- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
I'm just not sure how the court would draw a reasonable adverse inference beyond that which it can already draw from Russ's own many dumb statements- there's so little known about what this witness would talk about that it's almost as if he doesn't exist.
Would be fun if he had to actually produce this allegedly totally-real person. Probably only to find out that "well, the gist of it is that he's not one person, he's like three or four people that I combined together for simplicity, but I don't have their numbers anymore and I only knew them by nicknames and they're all in canada and refuse to contact me for fear of getting their cars immolated by mexican gangs working for kiwifarms"
That aside I doubt this will do anything useful. The court wants to get this show on the road with whatever russ can actually deliver (not much, as it turns out).
Would be fun if he had to actually produce this allegedly totally-real person. Probably only to find out that "well, the gist of it is that he's not one person, he's like three or four people that I combined together for simplicity, but I don't have their numbers anymore and I only knew them by nicknames and they're all in canada and refuse to contact me for fear of getting their cars immolated by mexican gangs working for kiwifarms"
That aside I doubt this will do anything useful. The court wants to get this show on the road with whatever russ can actually deliver (not much, as it turns out).