Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

[LaughJoke2.0]

Why the fuck would you have the fattest bitch you could find be holding the sign "Feed the Hungry"? Seriously the little girl the wheelchair wasn't thin because of NASA it was because Big Mama wasn't sharing.

Edit: Meant Wasn't and put was.

 

[Koby_Fish]

06Feb#03

what an odd thing to say/retweet. Seems oddly specific.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Whenever Bob writes a Tweet longer than a single sentence, my eyes glaze over and I struggle to stay awake. He's a really, really shitty writer who prattles on too long, and his sentences are so clunky and awkward that you usually have to read them carefully to understand what the hell he's trying to say.

He can't just write "Mario jumped on the Goomba." He has to write shit like "As an aside, I'd like to point out the interesting fact that people don't realize that Mario is a very skilled, even great-to-perfect jumper and can. using only a modicum of effort, go high enough into the air that when dropping to the earth below, smash down with enough tectonic force that he is able to crush a combo until it's perfectly flat!"

 

[King Dead]

Also random moment I stumbled on:


The link:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8489097.stm

For being such a big-brained Thinker, Bob really sucks at pattern recognition. "Of the two major political parties, one generally supports or is neutral towards the issue I care about the most, and one is constantly working against it. Which one should I vote for? Ah, of course, the second one! I am smart."

I'm glad Artemis got delayed long enough to potentially have our first moon landing in over fifty years happen during Trump's term. Bob will seethe so hard if the Orange Man is presiding over such an accomplishment, even if it was Trump who got the ball rolling in the first place. He probably still thinks that if Queen Hillary had won back in 2016, we'd have a Mars base by now, despite her never having said anything about space exploration to my knowledge.

 

[Dasjas Watanid Tabas]

I'm genuinely baffled at how this guy didn't rage himself into a heart attack after Trump won for the second time, it would've been so like him. Did he decide to bravely resist Le Cheeto Benito by living through his second term or is he less MATI about Trump now that in 2016-20?

 

[A Very Big Fish]

Ah yes, the federal government, bastion of openness and transparency. Funny how, once again, you never had a problem with the feds covering up everything they did on a daily basis for pretty much your entire life, but now that people you don't like are in charge of tearing that shit down, you bitch and moan about it.

"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Shitting on MovieBob's Ideology, Episode 2: "Thinkers vs Believers"

This was really hard to write and is gonna be really long. I apologize in advance, but I just wanna bury this stupid ass talking point and never have to worry about it again.

There's a really dumb talking point MovieBob has been repeating for the past couple years. The gist of it is: "There are two types of people in this world, thinkers and believers!" This is what I'd like to call a "bumper sticker" statement. A quote meant to look cool on a social media timeline or on a sticker, but usually doesn't have much more depth than that.

There's nothing inherently wrong with "bumper sticker" statements if they're clever or insightful. The problem is this one isn't at all. It sounds like the kind of thing I'd write on Myspace or Negrounds when I was 14 and in my edgy phase. It's cynical and misanthropic, but also incredibly simple and doesn't really tell you anything insightful about the world or the people in it. It might as well be "The world has dumb people and smart people." It's the kind of thing you'd see written as a throwaway tweet, something that goes viral because it's "clever" and gets a few hundred RTs, and is then forgotten. Plenty of people write dumb shit and forget about it.

The problem is, Bob never forgot about it, and it never even went viral. He repeats it over and over, and when someone disagrees with the point, he'll argue them in the replies like it's an actual intellectual point that needs defended. He treats this as though it's a serious piece of philosophy. He seems to treat this canned, rehearsed phrase as the backbone of his entire worldview.t, like it's something you have to debate and take seriously

But actually trying to debate against "thinkers vs belivers" is that it's so obviously stupid on its face that there's really not much to say. It's an extremely basic False Dichotomy fallacy. The kind of thing a 5 year old could refute just by asking a few basic questions. It's actually really, really uninteresting to try to deconstruct. As such, I'm going to speedrun my refutation of this incredibly simplistic bumper sticker worldview. I apologize if this feels like a Kindergarten lecture because the information is so basic.

1) The point Bob is trying to make is that the world is full of dumb people who believe what they're told, and rational people who think critically about the information they're given. Or in other words, "smart people" and "dumb people." This is a really simplistic view and doesn't tell us anything valuable about human psychology or our nature as sentient beings. Why do some people 'think' and why do others 'believe'? Can you convert from one or the other, or are you just born the way you are?

2) "Believing" and "Thinking" aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, you have to "think" something to believe it. Even when you know something for sure, you "believe" it. When you "believe" something, you "think" it's true. You could engage in endless pedantry about what is meant by "think" and "believe" in this context, but that's exactly what it is: pedantry. To make the worldview somewhat coherent, you have to stretch the meanings of the words far past their original intent into extremely narrow, specific interpretations that are useful only in the singular concept of this debate.

3) Attempting to Steelman the argument into "Critical thinkers" and "the blindly faithful" (which is already a stretch) it's still a vacuous and fallacious statement, because absolutely no one fits into just one of the categories. Even the wisest of great thinkers have their blind spots and personal biases, and even the most robotic, sheep-like people occasionally see through bullshit or have a profound thought. No one is immune to propaganda, which is why its so harmful. The easiest way to refute the worldview is to simply ask the person: "Are you immune to propaganda?" No matter the answer, the argument is debunked. Or even better! Ask "Are you a thinker or a believer?" and that will also completely destroy the argument.

4) Some of the greatest minds in history have been religious men who were also scientists, and there are many dumb people like flat earthers who outright refuse to "believe" anything without first-hand knowledge. You can be a religious "thinker" or a secular "believer." Being a "thinker" doesn't make you smart, and being a "believer" doesn't make you dumb. If you disagree with this, you are denying irrefutable evidence to the contrary and therefore a "foolish believer." If you agree with this and conceal that "thinkers and believers" are just two different ways of human psychology that are equally valid, then the distinction doesn't really matter, and making it doesn't actually tell us anything important.

5) What about people who neither think nor believer? What about people who just act impulsively without thinking at all, and don't ever commit to an idea and figure everything is subjective? These people definitely exist. People who are totally apathetic to higher thinking or abstract thought, and don't really have any strong beliefs. Where do they fit into this paradigm? Are they "believers" for not thinking, or "thinkers" for not believing? Can they be classified as neither? Both? If you can be both or neither, then the original statement is false.

6) You can argue all of the above. But the more you have to, the further we get away from the original statement, into concepts that are far more complex and nuanced than a single sentence can sum up. The original thesis statement becomes less and less relevant the deeper you dive into the conversation. Even the most cliche of bumper sticker phrases like "if a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound?" still stay relevant is precisely because they have something profound to say, even if you think you already have a satisfying answer. "Thinkers vs Believers" doesn't ask a profound question or present an interesting observation, it makes a very narrow blanket statement that either doesn't actually apply to most situations, or doesn't have anything important to say for others.

So, "Thinkers vs Believers" is just a bumper sticker, and a particularly shitty one at that. Hell, just by googling "False Dichotomy Fallacy" you can debunk it. Plenty of people have pointed this out to Bob on Twitter, and he never has a satisfying response. He'll offer up a few token defenses of it, but clam up once the discussion goes on for too long and act like the conversation doesn't matter or never happened. So, if even Bob can't defend this dumb idea, why does he keep bringing it up?

Because it validates his narcissism.

From what we've seen and heard of Bob, he seems to have some clear narcissistic, grandiose traits. He speaks of himself very highly, seems to view himself as smarter than everyone around him, and constantly shits on other people for not being as smart as him. But if you look at Bob's life, his accomplishments are incredibly average at best, and minimal at worst. There's nothing grandiose or luxurious about his life, and he doesn't have much to make him "superior" to other people. He's a midwit at best and an idiot at worst. So when your sense of superiority doesn't align with your reality, it causes confusion and anger.

But the "Thinkers vs Believers" false dichotomy gives Bob a chance to solve this problem. It allows him to split everyone into a binary categorization, a "subhuman" class and an "elite" class, and he gets to be in the elite. It's a psychological concept called "leveling." He gets to level half the population to be beneath him, so that his unearned sense of grandiosity is justified. It is a coping mechanism to protect his ego.

So fittingly enough, Bob neither "believes" in "Thinkers or Belivers" nor does he think it through. He just desperately wants it to be true so he can be better than other people. He wants something to proud of, and for him it's the very basic concept of thought. Because all he can do is "think" shit. He goes "But haha, you can't think!" No, moron. Even the dumbest people on earth think. There is nothing special about you.

 

[Samuel Fuller]

Yes, I really don't want Canadian ideas to be absorbed into the US more than they already have been. In fact, I'm hoping Trump will build a wall and make the Canadians pay for it. (My grandfather managed to escape from that awful place to... Freedom. Even so, his brain was full of Canadian ideas until the day he sadly died. My Mom used to say he would have voted for Kruschev if he was the Democratic candidate.)

Canada isn't a monolith, politically. Alberta is pretty much Republican and we are nearing a point where the majority of the people here want to separate due to being systemically disenfranchised while having the money form our resources stolen and our oil industry strangled by the federal government's policies.

If we joined the US, we would be a deep-red state.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Be sure to keep an eye on Blob's patreon, he probably wasn't fully funded by USAID like other streamer faggots but they might have thrown Diabeeto a few hundred bucks to say out loud their desires for extermination of inferiors.

 

[TowinKarz]

For being such a big-brained Thinker, Bob really sucks at pattern recognition. "Of the two major political parties, one generally supports or is neutral towards the issue I care about the most, and one is constantly working against it. Which one should I vote for? Ah, of course, the second one! I am smart."

I'm glad Artemis got delayed long enough to potentially have our first moon landing in over fifty years happen during Trump's term. Bob will seethe so hard if the Orange Man is presiding over such an accomplishment, even if it was Trump who got the ball rolling in the first place. He probably still thinks that if Queen Hillary had won back in 2016, we'd have a Mars base by now, despite her never having said anything about space exploration to my knowledge.

Meanwhile, Musk is proposing a Mars mission.... (whether or not he's being realistic aside) and you can bet that Bobby would rather the UN pass some kind of space treaty that Mars is off-limits to humanity than get even a teeny tiny bit excited/optimistic over that fact.

However? If some washed-up 80's celebrity was proposing the same thing? Or founding a "Mars Institute" in their twilight years as a dual tax break/attempt at a legacy? Instant erection from Bobby boy, most likely.

 

[Arthur Morgan]

06Feb#19

I don't know why they're complimenting him for this because he outright says in the FF video that he stole most of the ideas he presents from other people online. Also, Bob's idea was that they were time travellers, not that the movie was set in the 60s. It's been years since I watched the video and even I remember that.

I'm genuinely baffled at how this guy didn't rage himself into a heart attack after Trump won for the second time, it would've been so like him. Did he decide to bravely resist Le Cheeto Benito by living through his second term or is he less MATI about Trump now that in 2016-20?

Because his anger is mostly performative and more about convincing the Hollywood elite that he's one of them. Mostly by going overboard on his vitriol. If a moon mission happens before Trump leaves office, he'll secretly be happy.

Be sure to keep an eye on Blob's patreon, he probably wasn't fully funded by USAID like other streamer faggots but they might have thrown Diabeeto a few hundred bucks to say out loud their desires for extermination of inferiors.

They probably only funded people with actual audiences. Bob's so tiny (As a creator) that he doesn't get money from them for the same reason none of the gaming or film making companies ever tried to bribe him to give a positive review: No one thinks he matters.

 

[Mac Monster]

06Feb#15

I surmise that someone who created a game played by billions of children worldwide is fairly high in the echelon of Creative Elites? What have you made Bobby?

Anytime a libshit complains about muh pedos, you just know it's pure performative bullshit since they're more than willing to give pedos access to children if they wave the correct flag. Bob himself defended what was essentially child porn in a futile attempt to get laid, perfectly displaying how he doesn't give a fuck about children as long as he believes he'll get something in return.

 

[MikeyNohMore]

It just occured to me that Bob's disdain for the shooter and sports genres and the people who exclusively play them is super ironic because that's probably the most brown and least white section of gamers. Seriously, over half of the streamers and content creators for those types of games are black, Latino, or Asian.

 

[Revelator]

It just occured to me that Bob's disdain for the shooter and sports genres and the people who exclusively play them is super ironic because that's probably the most brown and least white section of gamers. Seriously, over half of the streamers and content creators for those types of games are black, Latino, or Asian.

Any word on if he considers Yugioh players thinkers or believers? It's the blackest TCG by a mile.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

Any word on if he considers Yugioh players thinkers or believers? It's the blackest TCG by a mile.

The game about summoning the Egyptian gods to fight each other via trading card? Hard core believers, no doubt.

Pokemon in contrast is for thinkers, because you can catch Poke-Jesus in a small pokeball designed by godless heathens to turn wild creatures into dog fighting slaves.

 

[JayHarrison]

There's a really dumb talking point MovieBob has been repeating for the past couple years [...]: "There are two types of people in this world, thinkers and believers!" This is what I'd like to call a "bumper sticker" statement. A quote meant to look cool on a social media timeline or on a sticker, but usually doesn't have much more depth than that.

Accurate.

It's cynical and misanthropic...

Just like Moviebob.

but also incredibly simple and doesn't really tell you anything insightful about the world or the people in it.

Nor does Moviebob explain what the hell a "thinker" is supposed to be--outside of "Democrat voter who agrees with no less than 100% of Moviebob's political viewpointa".

Plenty of people write dumb shit and forget about it.

The problem is, Bob never forgot about it, and it never even went viral. He repeats it over and over...

Just like a video game NPC. It genuinely surprises me that, despite Moviebob constantly repeating the same shit over and over again, nobody's taken any of Moviebob's X-Twitter avatars and given them the same treatment as this image of Stephen Colbert:

​

1) The point Bob is trying to make is that the world is full of dumb people who believe what they're told, and rational people who think critically about the information they're given.

I often point to Moviebob's reaction toward which White House resident distributed the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. Moviebob happily took the vaccine under Biden, but wouldn't have taken the exact, same vaccine with the exact, same recipe under Donald Trump, even if administered by Hooters waitresses.

2) "Believing" and "Thinking" aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, you have to "think" something to believe it. Even when you know something for sure, you "believe" it. When you "believe" something, you "think" it's true.

Good point.

3) [...] Even the wisest of great thinkers have their blind spots and personal biases...

Of which I am guilty. I would rather bask in comfortable confirmation biases than suffer through undesirable facts. And, yes, the facts sometimes defeat my pre-existing biases (unfortunatley, I can't cite any personal experiences at this time).

...and even the most robotic, sheep-like people occasionally see through bullshit or have a profound thought.

Unless, of course, you're Moviebob.

No one is immune to propaganda, which is why its so harmful.

Again, I am guilty of buying into propaganda.

4) Some of the greatest minds in history have been religious men who were also scientists...

A Thinker™ like Moviebob should know this.

and there are many dumb people like flat earthers who outright refuse to "believe" anything without first-hand knowledge.

Going back to I wouldn't be surprised if Moviebob believed Fuckwit in Chief Biden's claims that taking a COVID-19 shot would have rendered Bob completley immune to the Coof. Bob ended up taking the shot, Bob eventually contracted the Coof, Bob called the experience with the Coof hellish, and I smiled in sadistic glee at Bob's misfortune. After all, bad people deserve to experience bad things, and Moviebob is one of the absolute worst.

Being a "thinker" doesn't make you smart, and being a "believer" doesn't make you dumb.

Correct.

So, "Thinkers vs Believers" is just a bumper sticker, and a particularly shitty one at that. Hell, just by googling "False Dichotomy Fallacy" you can debunk it. Plenty of people have pointed this out to Bob on Twitter, and he never has a satisfying response.

That's because Moviebob rebut any justified criticism without reverting to some asinine ad hominem attack, such as "you paid for X-Twitter", "anime avatar", and "you're not a person and your life doesn't matter".

if even Bob can't defend this dumb idea, why does he keep bringing it up?

Because it validates his narcissism.

E-X-actly.

...if you look at Bob's life, his accomplishments are incredibly average at best, and minimal at worst. [...] He's a midwit at best and an idiot at worst.

That's giving Moviebob the benefit of the doubt in both cases.

But the "Thinkers vs Believers" false dichotomy gives Bob a chance to [...] to split everyone into a binary categorization, a "subhuman" class and an "elite" class...

Or, respectively, "MAGA" and "blindly loyal Democrat voter".

...and he gets to be in the elite.

Despite having done nothing to earn it.

...Bob neither "believes" in "Thinkers or Belivers" nor does he think it through.

Correct.

He just desperately wants it to be true so he can be better than other people. He wants something to proud of, and for him it's the very basic concept of thought. Because all he can do is "think" shit.

And it truly is shit.

He goes "But haha, you can't think!" No, moron. Even the dumbest people on earth think. There is nothing special about you.

Just remember this whenever Moviebob claims to "think" and not "believe":

​

Feel free to disagree with me on this matter, but at least you know where I stand.

 

[Koby_Fish]

06Feb#04
All fascist dictators strive to make their governments small and powerless. In BS you learn something new everyday.

the logic, it's..... not there. How can it be a fascist dictatorship when government has LESS power? Does not compute. Natzee Germany had TIGHT control over EVERYTHING. They even had gun control. Doesn't this logic make all the antigun-(D)'s fascists?

06Feb#14
Tampon Tim likes to be with kids, and he wants Minnesota kids castrated.

wait wait wait WHY is he STILL governor? Like, STILL IN POWER Governor? In Canada if you run for another office, you MUST resign your current role FIRST. Then if you lose, there's no-take-backsies, you can't just go back to it, you gotta go do something else, and your role is filled by by-election. Which you can't run for, because you resigned.

06Feb#16

Thinkingbayonet: You don't want a coup or a civil war, you've probably never even shot at or killed anyone
Bobby, completely missing the point: But maybe we should just kill people. That would work, right?

06Feb#25

haha i been waiting for someone to pull that on Bob.

So whay, exactly, does Dave Chappelle suck ass, Bob? Is it because Chappelle doesn't cater to your every whim?

something something troonfobia.

Fat faggot internet tough guy Bob Chipman boasts that he'll personally go and murder every chud out there. If shit actually went down, he'd be cowering in his mom's basement hoping that nobody would find him.

nah he's just hoping all the Antifa types will go out there and do it for them like the fucking Weathermen/Weather Underground Bill Ayers types.

Nor does Moviebob explain what the hell a "thinker" is supposed to be--outside of "Democrat voter who agrees with no less than 100% of Moviebob's political viewpointa".

I'm guessing Bob thinks it's self-evident what a Thinker is - the opposite of a Believer . Not superstitious, doesn't unironically bow down to Invisible Sky Daddy In the Clouds that might have told someone to gas the Minorities in Minecraft or some such, does Science and gives us Robot Slaves to do manual labor so humans can do the Thinking (but NOT the Robots! NEVER the Robots! Unless it's Commander Data) and drags the Untermenschen kicking and screaming forward towards the Holy Soopeeryah Fyootchah. And would eliminate the Believers in a heartbeat in minecraft, so that things "work".

For being such a big-brained Thinker, Bob really sucks at pattern recognition. "Of the two major political parties, one generally supports or is neutral towards the issue I care about the most, and one is constantly working against it. Which one should I vote for? Ah, of course, the second one! I am smart."

But only One party can give him the big fake-tittied "tall girl" hot librarian troon he lusts after, and it sure ain't the (R). The (D) is for degeneracy after all. Fuck your moon rocket, Bob wants to suck troon cock!

There's a really dumb talking point MovieBob has been repeating for the past couple years. The gist of it is: "There are two types of people in this world, thinkers and believers!" This is what I'd like to call a "bumper sticker" statement. A quote meant to look cool on a social media timeline or on a sticker, but usually doesn't have much more depth than that.

Bob is of course, wrong. There are two types of people in this world, but they are not Thinkers vs Believers. They are Thinkers vs Feelers. Bob is a Feeler .

The problem is, Bob never forgot about it, and it never even went viral. He repeats it over and over, and when someone disagrees with the point, he'll argue them in the replies like it's an actual intellectual point that needs defended. He treats this as though it's a serious piece of philosophy. He seems to treat this canned, rehearsed phrase as the backbone of his entire worldview.t, like it's something you have to debate and take seriously

This would explain why he takes dril/wint's tweet way too fucking seriously:

2) "Believing" and "Thinking" aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, you have to "think" something to believe it. Even when you know something for sure, you "believe" it. When you "believe" something, you "think" it's true. You could engage in endless pedantry about what is meant by "think" and "believe" in this context, but that's exactly what it is: pedantry. To make the worldview somewhat coherent, you have to stretch the meanings of the words far past their original intent into extremely narrow, specific interpretations that are useful only in the singular concept of this debate.

Bob is artificially reducing "Believer" to the context of someone who believes in one or more deities (usually God as described in Christianity/Judaism). Since it's obvious to Bob that god "doesn't exist", he finds belief harmful because belief apparently causes bigotry and mass killings (of the wrong people) and such.

and being a "believer" doesn't make you dumb.

Bob thinks believing in something that to his mind flies in the face of reality (ie Bob is absolutely, without a doubt POSITIVE there is no God, So Saith Bob, The Galaxy Smoothbrain), is bad and dumb, and causes people to make dumb decisions en masse that overwhelmingly harm the Actually-A-Persons.

5) What about people who neither think nor believer? What about people who just act impulsively without thinking at all, and don't ever commit to an idea and figure everything is subjective? These people definitely exist. People who are totally apathetic to higher thinking or abstract thought, and don't really have any strong beliefs. Where do they fit into this paradigm? Are they "believers" for not thinking, or "thinkers" for not believing? Can they be classified as neither? Both? If you can be both or neither, then the original statement is false.

as long as they don't believe in (any) God, Bob counts them as Thinkers .

So fittingly enough, Bob neither "believes" in "Thinkers or Belivers" nor does he think it through. He just desperately wants it to be true so he can be better than other people. He wants something to proud of, and for him it's the very basic concept of thought. Because all he can do is "think" shit. He goes "But haha, you can't think!" No, moron. Even the dumbest people on earth think. There is nothing special about you.

and he wants Someone to save the world by gassing the MAGA CHUDs in Minecraft, for surely that will bring forth the Holy Soopeeryah Fyootchah! No more MAGAnaiseghoulen to hinder progress by their wrongvotes! Problem with that is, you can't do that. Being a Believer is not genetic. Even if you cull all the Stupids and MAGA CHUDs, some are going to appear spontaneously from the population, thus making it an unending task. Even if Bob couldn't actually do it himself but relies on Revolutionary commie types to do so instead.

I don't know why they're complimenting him for this because he outright says in the FF video that he stole most of the ideas he presents from other people online. Also, Bob's idea was that they were time travellers, not that the movie was set in the 60s. It's been years since I watched the video and even I remember that.

Bob lying or misremembering to make himself look good - day ending in Y.

That's because Moviebob rebut any justified criticism without reverting to some asinine ad hominem attack, such as "you paid for X-Twitter", "anime avatar", and "you're not a person and your life doesn't matter".

you know when Bob resorts to any of those, plus 'Your Mom', he's lost the argument.

Despite having done nothing to earn it.

Bob's like a corrupted version of a Christian. Instead of believing in Jesus to get to Heaven and save his soul, Bob believes thinks that if he is a good boy earns good-boy points, says his prayers every night curses the MAGA CHUDs all day long while proclaiming Vote Blue No Matter Who, and he drinks Jack Daniels Pabst Blue Ribbon when he dies he will go to Tennessee he will get a Ghost in the Shell Standalone Complex Body complete with Mario-shka brain whereby to Bing Bing Wahoo forever. For he is The Kwisatz Tarderach, Lard of Lynn, Last of his Line, Sheikh Diabeeto, Ba'ab al-Movie, Masshole Mussolini, Pol Potbelly, Bobby the Smoothbrain Henan Chipman, Bob the Blue Curtain Builder Reader, the crayon-eating, paste-consooming exceptional High Acolyte of The Cult of Our Lady of Blue Curtains.

 

[Positron]

Anytime a libshit complains about muh pedos, you just know it's pure performative bullshit since they're more than willing to give pedos access to children if they wave the correct flag. B

07Feb#01


07Feb#02
Bobby might have quit Twitter, but he cannot quit Peter Coffin.


07Feb#03
Trump is going after "independent journalists" like Aaron Rupar.


07Feb#04


07Feb#05


07Feb#06


07Feb#07


07Feb#08


07Feb#09

That's sad. Racism simply mean you are not socially inhibited to call shit out, exactly the quality that a DOGE executive should have. The WSJ article is paywalled and WSJ blocked archive.ph. Same story from NPR.

07Feb#10

07Feb#11

Debate kids are insufferable, have a stronger Dunning-Kruger than the average nerds, and worse they are two-faced and without principles. Richard Dawkins couldn't stand them. I don't know Amanda Marcotte is on a "forensic team" (search "forensic" on her Wikipedia article - no hit); she is ever known only as a nutty journoroach for Salon.com.

---

07Feb#12
Severance packages are "dirty".


07Feb#13


07Feb#14


07Feb#15


07Feb#16
Rep. Brandon Gill points out how Ilhan Omar taught Somalian illegals how to evade ICE detection. "It is as un-American as you can possibly be. It is unbecoming for a congressperson".

But is Brandon Gill wrong?

07Feb#17

Why are the Democrats so racist?

07Feb#18


07Feb#19


07Feb#20


07Feb#21


07Feb#22
You can always count on the Democrats to respect women.

Retwat by Woman Respecter Bob.

07Feb#23

The topic at hand was Trump's EO banning men in women sports. So Stephen Smith is fighting for the "civil liberties" of men stealing medals and scholarships from women; Stephen Smith is fighting for the "civil liberties" of the likes of William "Lia" Thomas parading in front of women with his dong out. And no, if Cornel West had no chance, then what chance would this nigger has?

07Feb#24
Some one in the Manhattan Institute (sounds omnious; what does it do?) troons out.


07Feb#25
Will Stancil on tranny bullshit.


07Feb#26

If the forgotten men from Sisterbang County aren't safe, can anyone be safe?

---

07Feb#27

07Feb#28


07Feb#29
Bobby habitually reads the script he writes aloud.


07Feb#30
Bobby wishes Youtube were filled with something like The Game Overthinker videos, where fat fucks wearing trench coats having fencing matches with their katanas and light sabers.


07Feb#31

It is well known that Canada used to be the favorite tax-dodge haven for Hollywood. Unfortunately Texas has now been eating their lunch.

07Feb#32
Will Shanter criticizes someone taking credit for AI-generated content (which was exactly what the SAG-AFTRA people want). Suddenly he is in Bobby's good graces.


07Feb#33

Wuxia cinema is not Final Fantasy. There has never been a trend of "big swords". The late-period Shaw Brothers was better remembered for the blood geysers in films by director Chang Cheh.

07Feb#34

Imagine a Solid Snake the size of Bob Chicken. It will sell games.

07Feb#35
Another Nostradamus predicts the next Mario Movie will feature Yoshi (I haven't seen the first but even I know an egg cracked in the stinger)


07Feb#36

Can one order a Princess Peach escort through room service?

07Feb#37

He twitted an awful lot during said "housecleaning".

07Feb#38a
Burgers?


07Feb#39b
There is "safe horny" and then there is "ironic sexy". He thinks enjoying scantily clad women put out by ad-men means you're smart.

There is "titillation" and then there is "bad taste": the Miller Lite advert is firmly in the latter territory. To claim it is "ironic" or "to put a lampshade on it" does not change anything, and you're not fooling anyone saying you watch the ad for the "joke". Claiming "It is okay to enjoy the ad because it is a satire of sex-starved dude bros, see how the ladies are repulsed by them?" is exactly how Thinkers justified Cuties: "You know is a bad thing the girls behaved this way. As a Thinker yourself, an enjoyer of that movie, of course you watch Cuties for the consequences of intersectional oppression of sexism, racism, and Islam."

07Feb#40

 

[Koby_Fish]

07Feb#22
You can always count on the Democrats to respect women.

nah, that's not a hoe. The correct term is "rake".

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

The game about summoning the Egyptian gods to fight each other via trading card? Hard core believers, no doubt.

Pokemon in contrast is for thinkers, because you can catch Poke-Jesus in a small pokeball designed by godless heathens to turn wild creatures into dog fighting slaves.

Though that's only an avatar of a bigger being.