Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
That's a good example. According to some people here, any of these people can be labelled pedophiles:
  • A man who literally fucks children.
  • A man who masturbates to drawings of children.
  • A man who dates a woman significantly younger than him who's still over the age of consent.
  • A man who likes short women with small breasts.
  • A man who masturbates to Japanese drawings of highschoolers.
This is just like how nazi can refer to the following:
  • A man who is a member of the German National Socialist Workers Party.
  • A man who wants his grandchildren to look like him.
  • A man who doesn't want to be killed by foreigners.
Notice also how a pedophile is assumed to be male. Most people here who spout "woodchipper" would become literal rape apologists the moment it was a woman's turn to be fed into it.
You're being obtuse. Twitter zoomers overusing the word doesn't mean that it hasn't taken on a specific, generally agreed on context in this thread. I would also like to note that two of the examples you provided (italicized) are functionally the same, one just having slight modifiers (in bold) bolted on to make it seem different, which goes to show that a consensus relating to this debate has indeed formed.
 
I would also like to note that two of the examples you provided (italicized) are functionally the same
1742021293447.png
 
That's a good example. According to some people here, any of these people can be labelled pedophiles:
  • A man who literally fucks children.
  • A man who masturbates to drawings of children.
  • A man who dates a woman significantly younger than him who's still over the age of consent.
  • A man who likes short women with small breasts.
  • A man who masturbates to Japanese drawings of highschoolers.
let me guess you're one of those people
 
I've watched as abortion went from "safe, legal, and rare" to became "whenever I want, for whatever reason, paid for by the taxpayer".
The very notion of murdering babies being okay just because it's safe (not for the baby), legal, and rare was insane right from its inception even if it stayed that way, so it's pretty different.

let me guess you're one of those people
Two of those people are fine.
 
Man, some of you guys certainly got braver when everyone else decided to do something else with their evenings, huh?
No, it's just easier to have a conversation when people calm the fuck down.
The very notion of murdering babies being okay just because it's safe (not for the baby), legal, and rare was insane right from its inception even if it stayed that way, so it's pretty different.
This is a whole different conversation for a whole different thread, though I should clarify that I am very much against abortion. My point is about mission creep in government and activist groups.
let me guess you're one of those people
If you wanna call someone a pedonigger, just fucking say it instead of arguing like a woman.
 
You just pulled those out of your ass.
If I had to guess I'd assume he's referring to how lolicons have tried to weaponize petite women to push lolicon, and how some retarded zoomers think a 2 year age gap between 20 year-olds constitutes as pedophilia.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
Pretty much every example I've seen of someone outing themselves as a nonce is either a troon or a WigNat.
My favorite was Higgs Bonbon/Pedonymous
1721255903761.png1721259179839.png

Reminds me of loli antis and how they always get caught with CP. Do we start calling drag defense the "android raptor effect"?
Uuuoooohhhh Dori, belly and chest, dirty merchant requires market correction!!! 😭💢
I'm saying sweeping generalizations for the sake of clickbait aren't the best thing to use when trying to prove a point. If it was something like a 10% rate you'd have a point, but unlike troons there's no evidence to suggest the entirety of Japan can't differentiate reality and fiction. Brave Fencer Musashi doesn't even have anything to do with loli (if I'm not mistaken), it's an action series. If anything I'd be more suspicious of the Made in Abyss fella and his blatant child endangerment fetish, but even then there's no actual dirt on him.

Even Tom highlights that "though, obviously, the entire genre cannot be blamed". Oust the nonces and criminals, be wary and alert, but don't generalize—because you're not pointed towards enemy lines at that point.
Click to expand...
Of course they don't. It's either clout chasing (and seething when they're rebuffed by every single CSA agency) or projection in an attempt to distract people from actual pedophiles (as in the Dr Pizza effect).
Spoiler: schizoposting
TAX:
https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1652500910457917441?s=19
View attachment 5101349
"Why won't young people vote conservative?"
Click to expand...
It's all the western branches, as the gentleman above me stated. Soyny of America and the Nintendo Treehouse are extremely pozzed. A funny little fact on the latter: one of the staff (a woman if I remember correctly, it's been a few years) pushing for censorship on one of the Fire Emblem(?) games was also lusting after little boys. Like, real ones.

:thinking:
Edit: it was Alison Rapp.
View attachment 5112059
Click to expand...
I actually linked some studies to the contrary (that is, lolicon being an entirely separate phenomenon to pedophilia and even standard paraphilia) but got sperged out at in another thread. Exact same reaction as the Twitter freaks, just with a groyper vernacular.
With all due respect, shut the fuck up

you should know by now this isn't the place to be having this argument if it's even worth having at all, anywhere, because there's never any neutral ground or concessions from either side
There aren't.
>we need this 100,000-ish group of habitual introverts into extremely niche cartoon smut to explicitly support us
>the inflation and vore demographic is vital to the success of our campaign
Even when you take into account all the wokealizer gentrification, the topic of lolicon is barely relevant, there isn't a Kodomo no Jikan or Mitsudomoe dub—or even official sub as far as I'm aware.
I said shut up you stupid fucking gorilla nigger, holy shit. If you want to discuss loli so badly there's containment zones that aren't the farms. You are talking to a brick wall.
"when I like it it's petite, not loli"
It doesn't help that heaps of people (presumably those who have never drawn) seem to believe artists NEED living models/references to draw anything, even highly exaggerated characters, and thus that every loli character has a harmed child behind it

I wouldn't doubt that it's happened once or twice a la shadman, but outside of that it's the typical histrionics.
you keep making good points but wording them in the worst way possible
 
No, it's just easier to have a conversation when people calm the fuck down.
So, "when people calm the fuck down" basically equates to whenever someone is even remotely entertaining your proposition of "This is definitely enforcing wrongthink and is government overreach", right? Because so far, catching up on what I missed, you only seem amenable to discussion when people are willing to agree with you on that crucial point so you can twist the train of thought in the conversation away from the fact that this is solely in regards to depictions of minors.

And I will once again insist upon what I initially stated back in Loli/Shota Defenders thread that this bill doesn't realistically matter until we actually get a case at this current juncture of someone getting charged for looking at depictions of underaged persons in sexually explicit situations that doesn't meet any of the criteria specified in the documentation, and we get some legislation and precedence on the books on account of the bill being passed. Thus, yours and other's responses leaning into the fearmongering (and especially flinging shit at others for not joining you in your fearmongering) seems more hysterical than anything else.
 
  • A man who dates a woman significantly younger than him who's still over the age of consent.
  • A man who likes short women with small breasts.
Whoever calls anyone a nonce for these two things in specific is as much of a retard as your entire post.

Now, don't misunderstand me. I do believe there is a very fair argument that short women attract more nonces, especially if flat chested, and some of them purposefully date them due to their low self esteem, but the exceptions ain't the norm and we shouldn't let social media rot our brains into believing that.

As well, the whole "Significantly younger than him who's still over the age of consent" also depends. If you're thirty five going to date a teenager in high school just because they're 19 I am going to call you a stupid nigger with pedo tendencies. However if you're say 38 and dating a 25+ year old anyone who calls you a nonce is a stupid retarded virtual signaling faggot.
 
So, "when people calm the fuck down" basically equates to whenever someone is even remotely entertaining your proposition of "This is definitely enforcing wrongthink and is government overreach", right? Because so far, catching up on what I missed, you only seem amenable to discussion when people are willing to agree with you on that crucial point so you can twist the train of thought in the conversation away from the fact that this is solely in regards to depictions of minors.

And I will once again insist upon what I initially stated back in Loli/Shota Defenders thread that this bill doesn't realistically matter until we actually get a case at this current juncture of someone getting charged for looking at depictions of underaged persons in sexually explicit situations that doesn't meet any of the criteria specified in the documentation, and we get some legislation and precedence on the books on account of the bill being passed. Thus, yours and other's responses leaning into the fearmongering (and especially flinging shit at others for not joining you in your fearmongering) seems more hysterical than anything else.
First off, it helps if you don't use run on sentences. Second off, expressing caution over the possibility of prosecuting thoughtcrimes isn't "fearmongering". Third off, I'm amenable to discussion when people talk to me and not through me. Preferably without run on sentences. Lastly, I would be making the same points if this bill was about violent video games, heavy metal music, comic books, or horror movies.
 
If you wanna call someone a pedonigger, just fucking say it instead of arguing like a woman.
I am not sure about that guy, so I will not use that term, but you're definitely a pedophilic zoophile
Your pfp is just the furry/zoophile version of a lolicon/pedophile dogwhistle
1742027554838.png



1742026952129.png1742027323956.png


You're against this law because they're making the drawn/animated zoopedo porn you love so much illegal as well
Please stay away from children and animals
 
I am not sure about that guy, so I will not use that term, but you're definitely a pedophilic zoophile
Your pfp is just the furry/zoophile version of a lolicon/pedophile dogwhistle
View attachment 7094919



View attachment 7094906View attachment 7094912


You're against this law because they're making the drawn/animated zoopedo porn you love so much illegal as well
Please stay away from children and animals
It's a cute, cartoon animal.
Also, loving the "my source: Urban dictionary".
 
Back