I think the most Trump is willing to deliver is an American-Bonapartist regime. Which, I mean . . . hell yeah, I'll take it!
Oh, no, it's fine to late Loomer. She's a creepy grifting bitch who has some profoundly retarded takes.
Nope. Trump signed those pardons on camera. The whole argument here is that Biden didn’t sign these pardons and his auto pen was used by someone in the administration.
Well, the prevalence of lane assist and this example from 2015 of a production car being remotely controlled by executing code on the fucking CD player sorta puts the lie to that.
it does seem like an awfully big movement to make when you don't have any backing for it, which is why i suspect there must be more going on behind the scenes. not to mention the fact that news media has been fairly quiet about it all things considered.
How about the fact that he lied to congress about his involvement with gain of function.
Sometimes I think the Mark of the Beast is not one thing, but any that fulfil its purpose.
I have a question, if a pardon is upheld does that mean that the person in the pardon can be questioned about the events and cannot refuse to answer? I thought someone said that if they refused to answer questions the pardon would be null?
He cannot. The sole power to determine whether a president was cognitively able to perform his duties is vested in the Vice President (and the President that is accused of having cognitive issues). The Congress, of course, has the sole authority to resolve any dispute on the matter. The 25th Amendment gives no power to Trump in this case (or even to the courts)
You can if the prosecution promises to not prosecute you based on your answers. Failing to answer then can subject you to contempt of court. See, broadly, the whole Cosby debacle. If you want an easy one place to read about all of it, Pennsylvania Supreme Court detailed it all here.
You cannot claim both camps. Either the President can overrule the pardons and there is 5th Amendment applications, or the President cannot overrule pardons and there is not 5th Amendment applications. Again, the Cosby case dealt with almost the exact issue. The executive promised to not charge Cosby for his testimony thereby stealing his 5th Amendment rights. Afterwards they charged him based on the facts revealed by his testimony. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed finding that executive was bound by its promise even when the executive thought it was not. There is no special concerns arising from the executive disputing your legal immunities.
The thing is, there's probably no way to prove that that isn't what happened. He can just say that it was done in his presence and at his direction, even if it wasn't
Lmao no you’re not.
I don't buy that Trump would argue this without having this hurdle cleared. The way Trump worded this largely seems to insinuate that it was Joe Biden himself saying he did not sign or know about these pardons. He's been on camera dozens of times saying he would never pardon Hunter but at the end of his term he turns around does it anyway? If that's the case and Joe Biden and Jill Biden both attest to not knowing anything about the pardons, then I'd say Trump has a leg to stand on.
Of course the pardons will stand. That's not why this is being done. It will give us a fair number of benefits though:
Joe Biden made a bot farm for the thread and is trying to shit it up.
