Well, Meme is a palatable version of MGTOW, right?
There's nothing to indicate he's MGTOW. He claims to have a girlfriend currently, which kinda defeats the purpose of going your own way.
True, but my hunch? Drexell's issue with Nick revolves around Kayla. Drex and Kayla were very close (and, no, I do not believe he was boning her).
I believe Nick's public humiliation of Kayla was a bridge too far for Drex. She was (publicly, anyway) an "honorable woman". I can imagine that, deep down, Drex wished for the trad dad life Nick was pretending to lead. Instead of protecting his family and leaving the Internet (as Drex has largely done), Nick openly mocked his wife and trotted April out, proud of his sexual escapades.
I do think Drexel cares about Kayla, and I agree Drexel probably does want the trad life he shits on (but his belief system is that it's just not possible), but I don't think the way Kayla was being treated by Nick is the primary reason. I think Drexel cares way more about Nick's children in this scenario, and the way Nick was propping up April bothered him more since he knows Kayla, but he doesn't know who this 4/10 Minnesota slag is. 75/25 of his reasoning being Nick's children and Kayla.
Nick entered a swinging relationship to cuck himself and some random retard radio jockey to pursue some Minnesota sixhead to replace his "destroyed" wife, left his children starving and unwashed, and then one of his children (who is his "favorite") tests highly positive for the substance he's now pleading guilty to possessing,
with the caveat he's the only person who ever had access to the substance...but Nick has only ever claimed he was the only one negatively affected, because he's always the victim, never the victimizer.
I doubt Drexel agrees.
(Outside chance that Drex's daughter communicates with Nick's daughter, who is the same age. Drex may know details that only the kids know.)
And this is probably a major reason why Drexel believes Nick is full of shit.
Drexel was considered by Nick's parents to be their "black son", while he consider(ed) himself Nick's brother, and he was effectively considered an uncle by Nick's children. Nick has shown himself throughout the entire fiasco to be a liar. The chances that Nick's children have been giving Drexel information is almost 100%. And I bet the information he's been given by the children, and the story Nick has been telling don't match up at all. He has no reason to believe Nick, but I bet he's more willing to listen to children who he effectively treats as his own family.
They have
no reason to lie to him, but Nick has
every reason.
Drex has twisted codes of conduct, but they are standards nonetheless. (Fwiw, the two people whom I know who have been involved with BDSM have almost militant rules of conduct, privacy, and behavior.)
I'd rather deal with someone like Drexel than someone like Nick. Drexel seems like even though he probably has a code that is, in some ways, really fucking stupid, he actually has one, and has been fairly consistent, like his willingness to not suffer bullshit. Nick's idea of language is that it means whatever he wants it to mean to himself specifically, and his standards are whatever is most convenient to himself, and they will change on a dime, but you won't know and you aren't allowed to call it out, because "you're not entitled to that information." You can't have a conversation with someone who intentionally refuses to define words because he wants them to mean anything or nothing depending on what he wants to do. You can't have a conversation with a guy who denies things we know for a fact he's said because he was stupid enough to literally record himself say them ("I never said Jesus was just some guy"), unless you can literally prove it right at that second, in which case "Oh well I was right though". And if you're stupid enough to tell him about any vulnerability you have, he'll lash out at you and try to weaponize it, like a fucking woman would.
You can't trust Nick with personal information which is really funny and weird for a fucking attorney to be incapable of doing, and you can't expect anything he says at any given moment to be true unless you know specifically how to ask him a specific question (that he'll likely refuse to answer but pretend he did answer because he loves to be "technically not lying" when you know he's being misleading), because he intentionally hooks onto people (on average) not knowing how to ask very specific questions with specific words to avoid the other person being a fucking snake, when he's not literally snaking every single person who has ever tried defending him (which just so happens to happen after they decide they're done trying to defend him--the timing is just "coincidental", and his "loyalty" has nothing to do with how much someone is willing to defend him after the Cokestream /sneed).
Versus a dude who may have groomed a girl into BDSM and thinks women should be breeding vessels. Somehow "the women are breeding vessels" guy is less insufferable. I can, somehow, in some way, tolerate a questionable retard. I can't tolerate whatever the fuck soulless malicious homunculus Nick has warped himself into.