Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[JamFlowMan]

What's he gonna do when Sean gets his voice taken down?

Let me guess... Sean is fat?

Since it seems Nick has fallen to the level of ripping off the Dabbleverse my next best guess would be a Sean and Kurt puppet he argues with. Can't wait to hear the impressions.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

. And even if supertips were to win in court, it would lose through the platform & ToS rules in youtube which are more strict that the legal system.

YouTube is going to take a dim view of Melton's Supertips scheme. YouTube is definitely not going to bat for a competitor platform of it's own system. I'm surprised it's not a ToS violation.

Nick: "These NIL claims are not valid! YouTube needs to fight this in court for our use as it's parody!"
YouTube: "Your superchat system is now a ToS violation for trying to steal from us. Go stream elsewhere if you want to use it. GFY"

 

[AnOminous]

So this is interesting. Nick brought up the old Rev. Jerry Falwell vs Larry Flynt (Hustler) case (1987/8 in Melton's chat last night. Basically saying you cannot sue over Supertips a.i. voices because it's parody.
Of course Falwell lost his libel suit, but still won 150k in damages later.

The Supreme Court unanimously threw out the damages award. Falwell initially lost on libel but won on "intentional infliction of emotional distress." Basically, having lost the defamation claim, SCOTUS found you couldn't do an end-run around First Amendment protections by alleging some other tort like IIED.

Nick, in his descent into sovcit level retardation, thinks he can just invoke a word like "parody" despite the complete difference between that case and what he's doing. For one thing, so far, nobody is even claiming defamation or IIED or anything related. The issue is commercial exploitation of someone else's image or likeness without consent.

It's like comparing apples to oranges, or to put it some way Nick might understand, cocaine to ketamine.

 

[Vibralldo]

Let me guess... Sean is fat?

Hey!
He also likes sandwiches!

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Crossposting from Melton’s thread:

For reference, these are the shows currently known to use the Supertip service to fraudulently solicit non-anonymous donations under the guise of offering anonymous donations:

Bedabbler Network (Tookie)
Bubba The Love Sponge
BYB Podcast
Cardiff Electric
Catalano TV
Corndiff
Douglas Nelson (Mr Nailsin)
Ekul Pineapple
Little Lemmi
Nick Rekieta
Nobody Likes Onions
Obnoxious John
Pat Dixon
Perry Caravello Live
Pretty Antisocial Podcast
Schmuel Buckman
United States of Australia
Who Are These Podcasts

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Crossposting from Melton’s thread:

YouTube considers it a privacy vio. @Potentially Criminal

TOS Privacy vio::
Someone uses AI or other tools to alter or generate your voice or image without your permission:

• “Altered” or “synthetic” content is content that looks or sounds like you, but was significantly edited or generated by AI.
• Learn more about altered or synthetic content and what needs to be disclosed by creators.
• Examples of someone using AI or other tools to alter or generate your voice or image without permission include:
  • Altering content to replace the face of one person with another person’s
  • Simulating audio to make it sound like a person is saying something they have not said

 

[Not Really Here]

Streaming porn on the internet is not illegal.

I would think that depends on several points:
What is State law on production, and transmission of porn?
Is there some extreme kink specifically banned, beyond CSEM?
Has he been personally restricted by court order, or function of law?

 

[Melty Butter]

Crossposting from Aaron’s thread about Louisiana loser Wil Herren running D for his Senpai (clips included in linked post):

Wil is so insufferably stupid.

Interesting hacking (?) related comment from Wil about Nick (my bold).

"I've seen them. Uh, Nick has all the DMs. He took pictures of all the text messages, all the everything. Like, Nick is an attor-NEY. Like, all this stuff. He has everything. He saved everything. The conversation about the fluid, the conversation about being in a bathroom and, y'know, needing to have something [baseball bat] taken away from him. Like, everything. It was all documented. Everything's been... When Nick decides to pull the trigger it hits Aaron."

 

[break these cuffs]

I would think that depends on several points:
What is State law on production, and transmission of porn?
Is there some extreme kink specifically banned, beyond CSEM?
Has he been personally restricted by court order, or function of law?

Hmmm, Nevada is especially prudish when it comes to sex and Melton did mention that it was going to be disgusting fetish porn and wasn't something he was doing for the sole purpose of getting stream snipers banned from popular streaming platforms.

 

[Fapcop]

Crossposting from Aaron’s thread about Louisiana loser Wil Herren running D for his Senpai (clips included in linked post):

Why is Nick so eager for everyone to know that he’s a cuck who lets other men copulate with his wife?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Wil is so insufferably stupid.

Interesting hacking (?) related comment from Wil about Nick (my bold).

"I've seen them. Uh, Nick has all the DMs. He took pictures of all the text messages, all the everything. Like, Nick is an attor-NEY. Like, all this stuff. He has everything. He saved everything. The conversation about the fluid, the conversation about being in a bathroom and, y'know, needing to have something [baseball bat] taken away from him. Like, everything. It was all documented. Everything's been... When Nick decides to pull the trigger it hits Aaron."

So Wil confirms that Nick is currently threatening Aaron with the release of private material?
This could just be about Qover text messages, not necessarily Hacking related.

But either way, talking about that is very dumb.

 

[Flora Fox]

Nick, in his descent into sovcit level retardation, thinks he can just invoke a word like "parody" despite the complete difference between that case and what he's doing.

More "magic words".

 

[Maraschino]

1. Kino Casino exclusively stream on Kick, their clips are posted to YouTube. You can't kill a non-existent YouTube stream.
2. Suing people for calling you a gay porn star because you decided to film yourself jerking off is really gay, so you definitely should sue them for it.
3. Internationally suing someone is more expensive than you think, not accounting for Smash likely being in a different state than Razor (who I think is in Arizona).
4. Nick is backing you up. Your case is already over, Razor. Enjoy prison, wanker.

 

[Not Really Here]

Hmmm, Nevada is especially prudish when it comes to sex and Melton did mention that it was going to be disgusting fetish porn and wasn't something he was doing for the sole purpose of getting stream snipers banned from popular streaming platforms.

Just sayin' it's a little more complex than 'Porn is speech!' And stuff like Obscenity, based on local community standards/morals/ethics, has been upheld repeatedly.

 

[AnOminous]

You're not wrong that it COULD happen. But it almost certainly won't happen in Nick's case because he will fuck up well before they ever look at his doctor or prescriber. A guy literally died from overdosing on telemedicine Adderall and it's still legal.

Just because something continues to be done doesn't mean it's legal, just that nobody has prioritized prosecuting it. A lot of these pill mills are on very thin ice at best.

Obviously there is none. The cuck in this situation, if there is one, is Melton. Melton made the decision to comply with the C&D order which clearly is aligned with Melton's own ToS for his superchat system. If Nick is legally correct about everything, then Melton should be taking his advice and ignoring the C&D.

Even MAPton knows Nick is an absolutely incompetent loser and his advice is worthless. Also he can't even give legal advice. It would be a crime. He is not authorized to practice law.

It's two fold. The probation officer might start to brush all snitching off as gay Internet drama where legitimate concerns could have been missed, or they might get extra pissy and look at Skelly with a magnifying glass. A probation officer in Spicer of all places (or the country) can't have that much work to do right?

The people who take these calls all day long may notice that a good chunk of their daily hassle involves this one particular sociopathic asshole who can't quit fucking up constantly to save his life.

Does Nick really believe the AI voice donations are a copyright issue?

It's hard to know with Balldo. Is he actually stupid enough to believe that? He might be. Or he might just be banking on the fact his audience now consists entirely of knuckle-dragging droolers who will believe whatever he says.

Even now he says there's no way anyone around him knew about what he was doing, even though it's clear they did.

This is another where it's hard to know whether he believes his own lies. Not only did they know exactly what was going on, they literally turned him in to the cops.

Before I knew who any of these people were I had to turn off some panel I happened to run into about a minute in bc of his unbearable, nasty personality.

Maybe I'm numb to it but he's just a garden variety incel. Nowhere near Elliot Rodger territory. More like Eeyore. It's probably why he doesn't have an audience, because it really grates.

What Nick is doing with supertips has what appears to be a superchat by that person speaking in an AI generated voice as that person with no indication that it is parody.

What's worse and may tip the scale is that it isn't just some random parody, like those things where Conan O'Brien would put lips on a picture of someone and then "interview" them, where it clearly wasn't the person in question. It is not clear on sight that it isn't the person in question, the whole point of the AI simulation is to make it as realistic as possible.

However, it isn't just some part of another thing. It's an interactive service and the person using it has to pay for every use of it. So it is quite literally directly commercially exploiting that name, image and likeness on a per use basis.

This really would seem to put a stake through the heart of the "it's just a parody bro" defense.

 

[break these cuffs]

Just sayin' it's a little more complex than 'Porn is speech!' And stuff like Obscenity, based on local community standards/morals/ethics, has been upheld repeatedly.

The poster was pearl clutching about porn on the internet and posts very naïve and emotional takes all the time. My reply wasn't to a nuanced question of local zoning ordinances or Melton's sex offender registry status, it was to "Heavens to Betsy! Someone might see porn on the internet!"

 

[Melty Butter]

So Wil confirms that Nick is currently threatening Aaron with the release of private material?
This could just be about Qover text messages, not necessarily Hacking related.

But either way, talking about that is very dumb.

Ridiculously stupid.

I have no idea if @ItsAaronIgnoreMe has thought this through (he's not very strategic), but as far as I can tell, he has two options.

1. Issue a C & D, and get a TRO against Nick. Both would easily be granted considering what Nick has said about Aaron. Downside: he'll be widely mocked within his so-called sektor. Upside: it will better protect him if he really wants an legit radio job.

2. Let Nick release all the information and then retaliate in several ways, including contacting Nick's PO. Downside: The information might be legitimately damaging to Aaron's reputation/job prospects. Upside: More impact on Nick.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

However, it isn't just some part of another thing. It's an interactive service and the person using it has to pay for every use of it. So it is quite literally directly commercially exploiting that name, image and likeness on a per use basis.

Melton has been using his image and fake AI voice for months now without permission, I wonder if Aaron could file a complaint in Nevada for the illegal use and request the profits earned using his likeness and voice.

I would laugh my ass off if Nick running this gay feud and animated people into using pedo tips to alog Aaron would end up with a payday instead. (This is obviously unlikely, but it would be so funny)

1. Issue a C & D, and get a TRO against Nick.

If the fed investigation is real, then he should not do that. He can just sit and wait and watch them pile on.
If it is not, then I agree with you 100%.

 

[Vibralldo]

Wil is so insufferably stupid.

Interesting hacking (?) related comment from Wil about Nick (my bold).

"I've seen them. Uh, Nick has all the DMs. He took pictures of all the text messages, all the everything. Like, Nick is an attor-NEY. Like, all this stuff. He has everything. He saved everything. The conversation about the fluid, the conversation about being in a bathroom and, y'know, needing to have something [baseball bat] taken away from him. Like, everything. It was all documented. Everything's been... When Nick decides to pull the trigger it hits Aaron."

Nick really doesn't understand comedy. He has these long running jokes that are just boring.

Yes, we get it. You were gay with Aaron.

 

[JamFlowMan]

Nick really doesn't understand comedy. He has these long running jokes that are just boring.

Yes, we get it. You were gay with Aaron.

Nick seems to think people don't believe these things happened and once proof is shown Nick will be vindicated but the truth is people already believe him and just don't care.