- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
The beauty is he probably has no idea what he filed at ECF #1. That was years ago and he doesn't keep records.I can imagine the possibility that Greer is just so retarded that he thought his finances allowed for IFP status. But it would be quite strange if his statements here don't match his disclosures in the IFP application. He had money he could use for discretionary purposes when he filed his action, so my question is what he told the court about that money in his IFP application. Did he just not mention it? Did he lie and say it was bound up or spent already? Maybe he did mention it but is so retarded that his language obfuscated the reality of his assets.
I'm sure the District of Utah will be right on it.