Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Were there any other tweet chains around that time that did involve April that he might have conflated it with in the galaxy gas filled, Swiss-cheesed-by-booze trash heap that is his brain?

Yes, he clearly must have been referring to this earlier exchange previously discussed ITT, which was not "up-thread" as he incorrectly said but close enough in time that his swiss-cheese brain probably did just conflate the two separate threads:

Transcript.webp
[X] [A]

There having been no admission to "renege" on, it still remains to be seen whether he will bother to issue any hard denial of the public notes about the footage that never should have been called "transcripts" to begin with. Hopefully he will shoot himself in the foot with a denial next, as the denial's implied need to dispel any misconceptions created by those notes' pesky Kiwi lies would just hand Hardin's public interest argument even more ammo on a silver platter, assuming that he will still rightly file the civil declaratory action on that alternative ground this week and isn't putting all eggs in the intervention basket.
 
Last edited:
This clicks as a profound low to me. A man who once captivated the Internet as a superb legal entertainer, guiding ignorant viewers through the hottest legal circuses of the day, now reduced to regaling tittybaiting e-sluts with his boring stories about drug abuse.
Where Nicholas is heading there will always another low on the horizon.

Plenty of work for Hardin though. With a fat payday at the end if he wins. I would imagine this case is catnip for a lawyer whose practice was primarily about Freedon of Information. Between this and Monty's lawsuit I imagine Kandiyohi County is going to be seeing alot of Hardin the Hardship.
We can only hope this ends with Hardin legally kneeling on the windpipes of each and every one of these corrupts scumbags and being paid handsomely for the pleasure as he demonstrates what Chauvin did not do.

There's no way he doesnt piss hot next test unless all he is doing is nitrous.
Hard to say honestly, he has a prescription for adderall and probably also modafinil still which he can abuse undetected if he times it well between his piss tests so the tested levels remain within his prescription limits.

So is Nick throwing the paper on the ground like an angry toddler something that would have been in these tapes or not? I forgot about that or actually where that lore even originated now.
That would be on the body cam of the cop who pulled over Nick and that footage hasn't been seen yet. The footage that was viewed had cops discussing Nick throwing the warrant on the ground though.
Nicholas having his toddler tantrum should be on both bodycam and probably dashcam but, and this is a big but, if it was not used for his case/plea deal they could have deleted it after as little as 90 days.
  • Body cam data that are not active or inactive criminal investigative data must be retained for at least 90 days. (§ 13.825, subd. 3)
I oppose mutt's law in this case because Nick would like it too much

Nick should be cursed to eternal lights on missionary sex with morbidly obese women
Maybe we do need a carveout for putting men in female prisons after all, not for troons but specifically for insufferable faggots like Nicholas who would treat any stint in a male prison as an all-you-can-eat buffet.

apologies for the dumb question but if wentzell signed off on removing it as evidence then why would he be motivated to sign off on putting back in?
If he can be proven to have subverted the legal process by acting in conflict with his constitutional duties as a judge by hiding away the bodycam footage, or even allowing its destruction, he can face reprimands up to the point of suspension and removal.

If it can be proven that the lawyer who filed this request violated his duties and attempted to pull a fast one the judge and the legal system he could face anything from fines to a revocation of his license. There are systems in place to punish these behaviors but a lot of the time they are very hard to activate unless powerful enough people are willing to play ball.
 
This is something I often notice on the Internet - with Rekieta, with Ralph, with troons, in our Mass Debates "Debate a nonce" threads - all pathetic, weak failed men go after women and when confronted by another man they either escape or become timid and polite.
Prospects for Rekieta don't look good.
View attachment 7437090
The left path just is a scenic detour to the right.

k he should be continually monitored, because I think he will for sure fuck up again, and one day, there will be more content again. But for now, he'
His IQ is lowering like half a point every day with nitrous. The best is yet to come.
It's not Rackets, they're protecting Kayla.
Its the Rekieta name they're protecting. Not their drugged up son / grandson, its the family name. They don't want him sullying their prestige.
They're boomers so they don't understand he's still online sullying it further and broader. If they were smart and understood the internet they'd threaten to cut his money off if he didn't get off it.
 
You know, for being a twiggy, scrawny, blue, bitch-made cuck, Nick produces an incredible amount of salt. It's like one of those boss monsters from the Resident Evil series that go "fuck the conservation of mass" as they explode into a horrific evil blob that gets blown up with a rocket launcher by the hero character. Except Nick would explode into a cloud of salt and nitrous gas.
 
Yes, he clearly must have been referring to this earlier exchange previously discussed ITT, which was not "up-thread" as he incorrectly said but close enough in time that his swiss-cheese brain probably did just conflate the two separate threads:

View attachment 7437296
[X] [A]

There having been no admission to "renege" on, it still remains to be seen whether he will bother to issue any hard denial of the public notes about the footage that never should have been called "transcripts" to begin with. Hopefully he will shoot himself in the foot with a denial next, as the denial's implied need to dispel any misconceptions created by those notes' pesky Kiwi lies would just hand Hardin's public interest argument even more ammo on a silver platter, assuming that he will still rightly file the civil declaratory action on that alternative ground this week and isn't putting all eggs in the intervention basket.
Did he already have the transcript made, because he said it "looks accurate" as in it's been made and he's seen it

It definitely reads more like Nick admitted the bodycam was accurate, realized that was stupid, and is now trying to come up with an excuse to what he was actually talking about
 
The left path just is a scenic detour to the right.


His IQ is lowering like half a point every day with nitrous. The best is yet to come.

Its the Rekieta name they're protecting. Not their drugged up son / grandson, its the family name. They don't want him sullying their prestige.
They're boomers so they don't understand he's still online sullying it further and broader. If they were smart and understood the internet they'd threaten to cut his money off if he didn't get off it.
They don't give a shit about the Rekietas baring actually money changing hands. They may be rich but they're outsiders. Kayla and her family are insiders who are to be protected. Why do you think she got off scot-free?
 
View attachment 7437016
[ X / Archive ]

Nick reneges on his previous statement that the transcripts are accurate, giving the excuse that he was "referring to April's words, which is further up the tweet chain."

This seems to be a poor excuse, as he replied directly to someone asking for its accuracy. There is no mention of April in the tweet chain. This is a easily provable lie.

Has he now only just realised the apocalyptically bad optics of co-signing bodycam descriptions that include cocaine testing positive on pillows and old bottles of alcohol mixed with childrens' toys, and is only now seeking to retract?

Edit:
View attachment 7437166
This is the entire tweet chain. Nick made a tweet, "JamboJ" asks as to the accuracy of the video transcript and Nick makes a singular, direct reply. There is no mention of April.
Just because it worked once (for now) doesn't mean the Judge/DA/Sheriff can erase every stupid thing you do, Nick.
 
Last edited:
You know, for being a twiggy, scrawny, blue, bitch-made cuck, Nick produces an incredible amount of salt. It's like one of those boss monsters from the Resident Evil series that go "fuck the conservation of mass" as they explode into a horrific evil blob that gets blown up with a rocket launcher by the hero character. Except Nick would explode into a cloud of salt and nitrous gas.
... and 1 dorito
 
Did he already have the transcript made, because he said it "looks accurate" as in it's been made and he's seen it

Who can say with his wordgames about a promise he was never going to keep anyway, but one consistent interpretation could be that when the state produced the bodycam footage to the Barneswalker in discovery, they also produced transcripts that they would have already prepared as a matter of course, in which case what Nick was going to have "made" was a truncated portion of those transcripts limited in scope to April's statements to be responsive to what the tweeter was asking him. Either that or he actually never had transcripts from discovery and had a transcript of April's statements "made" ad hoc, which he later got back from someone (?) and considered accurate when he got it back, but he just hasn't it published yet. Or he's just full of shit and was never going to publish anything in the first place.
 
Meme Copium implies he's heard stories of Nick hitting his daughter(s)
I voted for Trump all three times (to give an idea of my basic politics) but one point on which I might be called a bit woke is corporal punishment for (white) kids, and I had been pleasantly surprised to hear Rekieta was against it even back when he was pretending to be Trad Dad, but it looks like that was another lie on his part.
 
Who can say with his wordgames about a promise he was never going to keep anyway, but one consistent interpretation could be that when the state produced the bodycam footage to the Barneswalker in discovery, they also produced transcripts that they would have already prepared as a matter of course, in which case what Nick was going to have "made" was a truncated portion of those transcripts limited in scope to April's statements to be responsive to what the tweeter was asking him. Either that or he actually never had transcripts from discovery and had a transcript of April's statements "made" ad hoc, which he later got back from someone (?) and considered accurate when he got it back, but he just hasn't it published yet. Or he's just full of shit and was never going to publish anything in the first place.
Nick's a lying liar that lies and has proven that whenever there's doubt the worst interpretation is true
 
Back