- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
I am shocked at how transparent they're being. The project moves and it's over. How childish is this behavior from them? This is Mean Girls Club tier nonsense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am shocked at how transparent they're being. The project moves and it's over. How childish is this behavior from them? This is Mean Girls Club tier nonsense.
It would be hilarious if the X12 developer moves to another platform and the projects sick of tranny shit start also moving, killing off freedesktopI am shocked at how transparent they're being. The project moves and it's over. How childish is this behavior from them? This is Mean Girls Club tier nonsense.
X12 would likely be backwards compatible with X11, assuming it doesn't faceplant out the door.You’re right. X11 is obsolete and Wayland still is missing critical functionality. What we need is a new standard everyone can get behind.
stickfigures.png
A pipe dream for sure but a nice one nonetheless.X12 would likely be backwards compatible with X11, assuming it doesn't faceplant out the door.
But imagine the salt if he just puts in all the changes he tried to put into X11 but was rejected and not only does it work and is stable, it does everything Wayland can do and some distros start adopting it.
I'm not sure, how much work would it actually be to implement HDR or whatever the really noteable features of Wayland into X11?A pipe dream for sure but a nice one nonetheless.
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.cache/mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/safebrowsing-updating/google4/goog-phish-proto-1.vlpset
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code].sqlite-wal
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code]/cache/caches.sqlite-wal
Wayland has big money behind it - not just Red Hat/IBM but also Valve, AMD, Intel, and Nvidia now. The speed at which Wayland development has accelerated recently is a pretty good indication that it'll probably outpace X11 within a year or two.In Linux news, an active X11 developer has decided to fork the project and is insinuating that the project has been allowed to languish primarily because of interference by Red Hat/IBM. It seems a little optimistic to me, but it would be really funny if he was right and a single developer managed to fix X11 and Wayland dies on the vine because they couldn't make it feature complete with nearly 2 decades of development.
Can you disable caching with that?Vivaldi was being merciless on disk I/O while every other process
What kind of sign?first sign of wearout
If you really don't want to visit bad websites, you can use DNS blocklists instead of Safe Browsing. Here's an example. As for caching, you likely can't. Youtube makes a lot of requests in the background and keeps shit stored as part of its telemetry.hey @GNU Abyss, @prollyanotherlurker, and @teriyakiburns
Found exactly what is going on, after I used fatrace in Terminal. That mysterious ~20 MB writing happened, and a bunch of this showed:
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.cache/mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/safebrowsing-updating/google4/goog-phish-proto-1.vlpset
So what is that and how do I stop it? BTW, that "safebrowsing-updating" folder does not show up in that file viewer of the OS somehow.
edit:
Oh yeah, also even with caching disabled, if I watch a YT vid, a bunch of this crap-o-rama shows up in the Terminal output of fatrace:
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code].sqlite-wal
and
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code]/cache/caches.sqlite-wal
edit again:
It looks like that mysterious ~20 MB of writes are a constantly updating blacklist of bad sites -- which would explain why the free space on the drive doesn't change and why it only happens when online, so disabling it may increase the risks of running into a malware site. That said, disabling that could be with going to about:config, looking up "safebrowsing", and setting the "download" related settings to false. But again -- and especially on Windows -- this could mean the increased risk of going to a bad website.
I still dunno how to stop the YT caching BS though.
Does pacman specifically mention these two conflicting? Try running it in verbose mode and see what else it has to say.can someone explain to me what the fuck gpgme and gpgmepp are. because I tried to run updates today and those two packages are conflicting but also gpgmepp depends on gpgme....
Does uBlock block malware sites as well?If you really don't want to visit bad websites, you can use DNS blocklists instead of Safe Browsing.
I guess the best solution with YT is to not use YT. At least I got the caching reduced to a few MB at most. Can not imagine how bad YT would be with browser caching enabled.As for caching, you likely can't.
Are you running this on windows? I mean, I assumed it was linux, but maybe you mentioned it a while back and I forgot or didn't notice. I mean, the /home/username is obviously linux/unix. So I really wouldn't worry much about if it is going to effect winows.hey @GNU Abyss, @prollyanotherlurker, and @teriyakiburns
Found exactly what is going on, after I used fatrace in Terminal. That mysterious ~20 MB writing happened, and a bunch of this showed:
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.cache/mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/safebrowsing-updating/google4/goog-phish-proto-1.vlpset
So what is that and how do I stop it? BTW, that "safebrowsing-updating" folder does not show up in that file viewer of the OS somehow.
edit:
Oh yeah, also even with caching disabled, if I watch a YT vid, a bunch of this crap-o-rama shows up in the Terminal output of fatrace:
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code].sqlite-wal
and
/home/[ToroidalBoat]/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/storage/private/[some code]/cache/caches.sqlite-wal
edit again:
It looks like that mysterious ~20 MB of writes are a constantly updating blacklist of bad sites -- which would explain why the free space on the drive doesn't change and why it only happens when online, so disabling it may increase the risks of running into a malware site. That said, disabling that could be with going to about:config, looking up "safebrowsing", and setting the "download" related settings to false. But again -- and especially on Windows -- this could mean the increased risk of going to a bad website.
I still dunno how to stop the YT caching BS though.
It would make more sense to call it X11R8 honestly. The underlying protocol changes for the big numbers and it hasn't changed in an Internet-eon.Is he calling it X12?
How do you disable safe browsing entirely?Anyway. I usually disable safe browsing anyway. Mostly out of my dislike , and distrust for google.
I think you can put entire DNS blocklists in ublock and it will work. Google telemetry and browser caching aside, you may be interested in using a DNS provider that is automatically managed to block malicious domains. For example, you could set your DNS up to be 9.9.9.9 (quad9) and chances are decent your computer would never interact with a known malicious domain.Does uBlock block malware sites as well?
It looks like that mysterious ~20 MB of writes are a constantly updating blacklist of bad sites -- which would explain why the free space on the drive doesn't change and why it only happens when online, so disabling it may increase the risks of running into a malware site. That said, disabling that could be with going to about:config, looking up "safebrowsing", and setting the "download" related settings to false. But again -- and especially on Windows -- this could mean the increased risk of going to a bad website.
Basic HDR support isn't hard. It's just reading monitor EDID and setting a linux drm api property value. The harder part is if you aren't playing a game/video in fullscreen and have to tonemap non-hdr content to the same range so it doesn't look weird. Since X11 has external compositors so that would have to be implemented in the compositors.I'm not sure, how much work would it actually be to implement HDR or whatever the really noteable features of Wayland into X11?
I dont know where this meme came from. When you run modern graphical applications X11 works pretty much exactly the same way as Wayland does, even using the same linux drm api and mesa gbm. It's not hard to add new functionality, Xorg code is actually pretty clean.Wayland has big money behind it - not just Red Hat/IBM but also Valve, AMD, Intel, and Nvidia now. The speed at which Wayland development has accelerated recently is a pretty good indication that it'll probably outpace X11 within a year or two.
Also I don't think it's really a conspiracy. The creators of the X11 protocol (who were the leads for xorg) have stated that, at the very least, X11 as a protocol is too fragmented and too rooted in 1980s assumptions about computing to really continue development. New functionality is difficult to implement due to the mountains of tech debt that have accrued over the last 30 or so years. Wayland is not a perfect successor, but it's better for 90% of users and ultimately development is always going to go where the users are.
In an ideal world, both X11 and Wayland would continue development but developers are expensive and you have to prioritize what you can get funding and support for.
Peak Code of Conduct commissar behavior.This is Mean Girls Club tier nonsense.