Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.9%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.5%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.7%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 136 38.7%
  • Total voters
    351
DiabeticSydePhil said:
He probably realized how fucking insane he came off yesterday loudly broadcasting child abuse allegations all on his own and now wants to lay low.
Click to expand...
I doubt that. He's more than happy to go up and make himself look bad in front of everyone. It has to somehow damage his ego for it to be secret.
unironicjudiaism said:
Does she get a nod to battered woman's syndrome? I mean she has 5 fucking kids she she have had the presence of mind to get them the fuck out but I'm a supreme white male and I refuse to check my privilege so I don't conceptually understand how BWS works or if it's bullshit
Click to expand...
No. Itd be one thing if she was collared and chained, but the door's wide open unless those abuse claims are an understatement.

BWS is just another roundabout way to explain why so many women have no conscious. The term itself does make any sense. Little boys are also abused, yet only abuse + bitch brain matter. These "people" were soulless to begin with, abuse just made it worse. If any of this wasnt the case it'd just be ptsd. BWS only exist to justify surrendering to being a victim, and letting the kids rot by choice with emotionally charged language.

Until further information Kayla is an object, who threw away any sense of free will for star trek and pills.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: BoomerPrime, Arkin O'Brien, Peanut Butter Trails and 16 others
Pentamidine said:
There was a case last year of this happening. Two kids were starved and taped to radiators or something. One of the kids escaped and when he went next door for help, he asked for food and water. I'm not saying Nick's kids were tied to radiators or anything, but I'm saying there's a huge difference between "I'm hungry" and "we don't eat at home, can I have some food"?
Click to expand...
That was the son of mommy blogger Ruby Franke, another “Christian” (Mormon) internet parent of means who was starving and abusing her children. She’s rotting in prison now. Similar to Nick, she also brought another woman into the family home that she was having an affair with (the husband was kicked out). This video is heartbreaking and the mother involved was disgustingly defiant and unrepentant when arrested.

 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: often puzzled, Richard Cheese, Slur Slurries and 24 others
Pentamidine said:
I've never in my life known anyone that's called CPS because a kid said they were hungry, and I've heard plenty of kids say they're hungry. What probably happened is the kids were asking for food because they weren't being fed at home, not just kids mildly complaining about being hungry in that moment.

There was a case last year of this happening. Two kids were starved and taped to radiators or something. One of the kids escaped and when he went next door for help, he asked for food and water. I'm not saying Nick's kids were tied to radiators or anything, but I'm saying there's a huge difference between "I'm hungry" and "we don't eat at home, can I have some food"?
Click to expand...
If the children were at school/church/extra-circular event etc, and they asked for food while looking neglected, the staff or teachers might just call in a wellness check, to remove themselves for liability issues (never mind the kids welfare).

Like they probably weren't malnourished, but it's very easy to believe their white-nigger, idiot, Roehl Dahl-tier-Twit, parents would bundle them out the door forgetting to give them breakfast or a packed lunch for the day.
 
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Peanut Butter Trails, Buster Bloodvessel, Clamater and 2 others
Pentamidine said:
I've never in my life known anyone that's called CPS because a kid said they were hungry, and I've heard plenty of kids say they're hungry. What probably happened is the kids were asking for food because they weren't being fed at home, not just kids mildly complaining about being hungry in that moment.

There was a case last year of this happening. Two kids were starved and taped to radiators or something. One of the kids escaped and when he went next door for help, he asked for food and water. I'm not saying Nick's kids were tied to radiators or anything, but I'm saying there's a huge difference between "I'm hungry" and "we don't eat at home, can I have some food"?
Click to expand...
I can imagine fainting/weakness during dance classes and the chiropractor seeing low body weight.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: often puzzled, Peanut Butter Trails, The Great Horned Moth and 7 others
Gabe chimes in. Screenshot_20250611_121800_X.webp
Screenshot_20250611_121727_X.webp20250611_121735.webp20250611_121731.webp
Did Nick just expose himself, giving us more information before Gabe?
 
  • Late
  • Like
Reactions: The Motorizer, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Averagest Redditor and 19 others
Sneed Force One said:
View attachment 7488052View attachment 7488034
https://archive.md/fm2jc

Ya'know Nick, if it wasn't seriously on the cards, you wouldn't be bothered by it.
Feel free to prove that was her actual intention, or just the natural conclusion of you being a fucking loser.
Click to expand...
And gee, Nick, which things were misleadingly edited? Was it when you talked about loving April or how great her nether regions are? Or when you talked about Kayla's body being destroyed? Or when you admitted sexing April while Kayla was out actually buying food for the kids? Or when still today you're following prostitutes and engaging with OF "creators," virtually looming over them while proclaiming you're going to be "great pals"?

Oh, no, wait, some of that was your own public written tweets (so nothing Elissa had anything to do with) and for the others, you did, in fact, say those things, with no mitigating "context" to weasel-word your way through it? Or were there other disloyal and critical things you've said that could open a wife's eyes (theoretically; not yours, apparently)? Or was it just the years'-long pattern of recorded lies, backstabbing, and financial mismanagement that, once revealed, apparently further destabilized your marriage?

I really want to know what Nick thinks has been clipped in a way that could jeopardize his control marriage. I want to know what it was in general, what the clipped versions showed, what the unclipped segments were, what the original context was, how the clips misrepresented his words, and how the clips were aimed at getting Kayla to divorce him. Oh, and proof of intent.

Maybe he could use his new love, AI, to help lazy boy move past vague accusations and on to actual facts. "ChatGPT, scan all my streams to find me saying terrible things about my wife, and create a document itemizing each one with time/date references to embedded copies of both full streams and related clips. Analyze my speaking/ writing patterns to identify my lies and weasel-wording sophisticated communication patterns, then provide a translation proving that I never actually said the things I said."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: often puzzled, Arkin O'Brien, Permanent Resident Cope and 19 others
Sneed Force One said:
View attachment 7488052View attachment 7488034
https://archive.md/fm2jc

Ya'know Nick, if it wasn't seriously on the cards, you wouldn't be bothered by it.
Feel free to prove that was her actual intention, or just the natural conclusion of you being a fucking loser.
Click to expand...
Makes my blood boil that this piece of shit, for YEARS, would throw anything and everything others say under the biggest bus possible because *child abusing cokehead faggot voice* "UH-GAIN, WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE, CHYAT? THIS IS A LAWTUBE STREAM AND AS A LAWYER, I WANNA SEE EVIDENCE!"

Then this shitsucking scumfuck bastard will now turn around, without any goddam evidence at motherfucking all, and throw out "well, she tried to setup thermite explosives in my house to destroy my marriage and wipe my entire bloodline off the planet, SEAN! They say I beat invalids with baseball bats, SEAN!" UHM, sorry SWEATY, but I wanna see the evidence :smug:

Also, kill youself.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Windy Moors, Arkin O'Brien, Peanut Butter Trails and 21 others
So this puts the allegations against the nanny entirely into perspective. Somehow he got an inkling that she informed others about what she (allegedly) saw, so all of a sudden Nick remembers her being a lush on the job and giving his kids booze and energy drinks. Very convenient, that you bring that up, unannounced and unasked for right before this comes out.

And, as always with liars, the worst interpretation is to take them at their word and extrapolate from there.

So, Nick knew she was drinking on the job before she left and later on that she was stealing enough bottles of liquor that Nick, a stone-cold alcoholic with money to waste, in a cesspit of a house where stuff probably goes missing all the time, notices. To take him at his word, we also have to believe he was such a non-entity in his children's lives that he didn't notice any of the above alleged behaviour and after catching her drunk didn't even think to ask.

Conveniently after she makes allegations against him, he 'learns' of these things which would discredit her reliability and could be wielded as a threat. He also, again conveniently, makes it public without any prompting, right before these allegations potentially could be made known to the outside.

Even if you assume his allegations are 100% fact, the most reasonable assumption is still that he was a neglectful parent who did not know and did not care to find out about his children being mistreated, until the precise moment allegations against himself were made and, keeping up the streak, didn't see fit to warn anyone else about this potential risk to others children until, again, he was due to be put in the line of fire.

Utter scumbag. I hope his community service has him pick up dog turds with bags that are too thin in the Minnesota summer and drivers-by spit on his bald-spot.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Trianon, often puzzled, Arkin O'Brien and 26 others
Sloppa said:
If the children were at school/church/extra-circular event etc, and they asked for food while looking neglected, the staff or teachers might just call in a wellness check, to remove themselves for liability issues (never mind the kids welfare).

Like they probably weren't malnourished, but it's very easy to believe their white-nigger, idiot, Roehl Dahl-tier-Twit, parents would bundle them out the door forgetting to give them breakfast or a packed lunch for the day.
Click to expand...
(Almost) No one's going to go to CPS the first time an elementary-aged kid looks messy or says they're hungry, or even that there's "no food at my house" (not saying any kid said that, but it's the kind of things kids say all the time, when what they mean is, "I don't like anything in the cupboards/fridge."). The Rekietas had multiple reports made about their kids (and no, Nick, the nanny wasn't the only one mentioned in the report that included her; you were as well).

That is very unusual and suggests that multiple, uncoordinated people, in different contexts and spanning an extended period of time, observed enough about you and your children that appeared severely out of the normal tolerance to prompt them to raise the alarm formally. THAT IS NOT NORMAL.

And it's not due to jelly poors or people with a personal axe to grind. It's because you and your wife failed to take reasonable care of your family and home.

Perhaps less time and money on blow and fuckfests and plastic surgery and shiny tech you don't understand, and more on laundry and dusting and regular family meals and consistent, non-irritable engagement with your children would have been a better way to be a parent...and to avoid all of the various expressions of deep concern about the goings-on in your home.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: often puzzled, Blackhole, Peanut Butter Trails and 22 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back