You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jason Thor Hall / PirateSoftware / Maldavius Figtree / DarkSphere Creations / Maldavius / Thorwich / Witness X / @PotatoSec - Incompetent Furry Programmer, Blizzard Nepo Baby, Lies about almost every thing in his life, Industry Shill, Carried by his father, Hate boner against Ross Scott of Accursed Farms, False Flagger
FTL also comes to mind. Really that game had mediocre graphics, servicable mechanics, and admittidely decent enough music, but it was really well liked for having some serious charm, and the devs having enough charecter to give substantial updates LONG after it had already sold a ton.
I think thats what it really is, all those examples, as shit coding and stuff as they were, they really tried, and had some good visions even if the coding ability was subpar. They also had passionate devs unlike jason
I really think the time is ticking on a major sperg out. With how much he worries about his image, and how so many are piling on, I wouldn't be surprised if a feedback loop hits. He tries acting cool, but hes thin skinned obviously
I think hes trying to entirely avoid the label of a drama farming shit stirrer. Hes non confrontational, and I think if others go to bat FOR him it doesn't matter. the only issue was jason being the biggest coverage at first. I don't think he NEEDS to do much. Muta and penguin covered it, if pewdiepie covered it too, it would be a wrap and ross wouldn't have to do shit.
I would argue that Ross's approach has been incredibly mature. It's really easy to get into the pig pen and the fact it took him 10 months to even dip his toe in not wanting to take away from the initiative shows a lot of restraint. I wouldn't call would he's doing right now 'soft spoken', just firm and direct without turning it into dramaslop. Thor and the greater internet have done well (us included lol) to do that.
The solutions are
puzzle 1: left/blue box
puzzle 2: white/middle box
puzzle 3: white/middle box
Puzzle 1 explanation:
obviously, the blue box can't be both true because the second statement is obviously false. likewise, the white and black boxes can't be both false since the second statement(for white) and the first statement are obviously true respectively. Therefore, we can deduce the blue box is false, ruling out the white box being the one with gems. Presuming both white and black statements being true, then the gems are obviously in the blue/left box.
MALD CHOSE WHITE LMFAO THE DUMBASS
Puzzle 2 explanation:
The white box states that the gems are not in the blue box, nor are the gems in the black box. This means that this box cannot be the box that contains 2 false statements(since 1 of the statements has to be true because only 1 box contains gems). Because we know the white box cannot be all false, we know can deduce that one of either blue box or black box contains the all false statement, meaning that blue box is atleast all false, since both include the same statement of "the blue box is all true". This means the gems are not in the blue box, leaving black and white. Black states that the gems are in a box with a false statement, which if true, means the gems are in the black box, but that would make white also contain a false statement, and since 1 box has to contain all true statements, the answer is the white/middle box
MALD CHOSE BLUE LMFAO
Puzzle 3 explanation:
This one is actually really hard compared to the first 2, and I think I forgot to include that the 3rd box that is neither all true nor all false can contain a true & false statement, so it's a mistake on my part if you guys got this one wrong.
The black box states that the both itself and the white box are all true, but that would create a paradox, so black is all false. To work out which one between blue and white is true, then we must remember that 1 box can be both true and false, while the remaining box must be all true, and the all true box would therefore not have the gems. Since we have deduced that the black box statement that the white box is all true is a false statement, we can assume the blue box is the all true, leaving the gems in white/middle box.
Puzzle 1: The right box has to be true since all boxes contain words, no gems there. The left box is false since the word longest is not the longest word, which means the box which doesnt have the longest word has the gems, since the condition of the middle box "The shortest word has the gems" is fuliflled on both middle and left. Answer is left
Puzzle 2: The right box says that the false statetment has the gems and that the left box is all true, while the left box says it has the gems which contradicts the right box as that would make it a true statement and have the gems. If the right box is neither fully true or false, it could be that the blue box statetments are true, while the gems are in a box with true statetments, that would make the left box the full true box and the middle the fully false box. The left has the gems.
Puzzle 3: Im assuming that both the statetments on the black box are not true, which means the top statetment of the white box is true while the bottom one is not. The left box has all true statetments, this way all conditions are met and the gems are in the middle box
2/3 you just missed that the middle box can't be fully false because then it means 2 boxes have gems. Dw, if you haven't played, this part isn't obvious. Mald getting this wrong is much worse since he's in like 70 hours deep at this point and still assumes that box can be full false.
Puzzle 1. Box A is untruthful because Shortest is a longer word than Longest. Box C is truthful because all three boxes have words on them, therefore the gems can only be in box A, because the gems can neither be in box B (gems are not in the box with the longest word) nor box C (gems are not in this box)
I'm too busy to do the other two but I invite anyone else to try
P1
Black - There are words on the box with the gem -> All have words on them -> True
White - "Shortest word is "A" -> True
Blue - "Longest" is the longest word -> "shortest" is longer -> False
Blue -> Has to have both statements false -> Shortest" is longest word -> no gems in white
If gems are in Black then neither Black nor White has 2 true statements. (Black -> no gems in black) (White -> gems have to be in a box with "a")
---------------------------------------------
Gems in Blue
P2
Black -> contradicts itself with blue -> One statement has to be false -> either Blue or White are all True
If blue all true -> White has to be all false -> therefore gems have to be in two boxes -> contradiction
So white has to be all true
-----------------------------------------------------
Gems in white
P3
White -> "Exactly two statements with "TRUE" are false" have to be true (All boxes point to it as true)
Black -> Both statements have to be false (Blue 1 is true, White 1 is true)
White -> Second statement is false
--------------------------------------------------------
Gems in white
Honestly those are quite harder than I would expected. I ain't even sure if I did them right.
1: It is in the second box (white). Third one is false because "shortest" is longer than "longest" and it is not in the first because it does not contain "a"
2: It is in the blue box. The white box is full liar, blue box tells the whole truth, black box tells one lie (the gems are in a box with a false statement) and one truth (the gems are in the blue box). This one I had to go over twice LOL, it got me because I forgot the black box can lie.
3: Fuck, I keep switching between white and blue as they boil down to the same thing in the end, I am trying to find the difference and always forget the justification the moment I make up my mind. Black is definitely the full liar, but I just cannot decide who has the whole truth (and thus does not have the gems). An easy copout would be to say that both are true and the gems are in the black box, which is not prevented by either - but I don't feel like this resolves the "paradox" I feel here.
oh sorry zeftax, for puzzle 1, the first box does contain an "A". I'm sure you would've got this correct if it was clearly than a twitch clip since your logic is sound, unlike Mald. And yeah, my third puzzle was not clearly defined so you get a pass on that too.
So, with all the data we have, we can conclude the average Kiwi is better at puzzles on their first attempt than a certain 3 time defcon winner after attempting over 50 of them.
God I am so happy blue prince has such a large selection of logic puzzles randomised where Mald can't just prep beforehand by googling, so his ass can get exposed here just like everywhere else.
Also, damn I did not expect charlie to escalate further. I don't have that much hopium left for SKG, but atleast Mald is looking like an ass out of all this
But in this case it's selling. His video covered everything that was needed about Jason, he didn't need to get into the weeds, just how he lied about the petition, and then refused to budge, even acting like a cunt when he didn't get his way. The fucker has already escalated it himself, and he looks like even more of an ass because he just continues to get more unreasonable, and his lies are getting real obvious. He gave three distinct excuses for the VOD deletion and then still refuses to back down.
I'm glad the tide is finally turning around on this midwit piece of shit. I can't stand his existence, his smug fucking shittery, his AIDS Skrillex look and his fake fucking faggot voice. I have a normie programmer friend that keeps posting this cocksucker and of course he has to be a contrarian retard when I try to explain this piece of shit to him. Maybe now that everyone's shitting on him the normie niggercattle will see through and accept the truth
Especially with the DARVO stuff that Mald is pulling. Louis fucking LOVES talking about that shit. I think Louis is still dealing with the fallout from that retard pedophile, but I really hope he gets around to addressing Mald soon.
There's something that reminds me of another lolcow, Cyraxx, the way mald brings up the "SKG Community" as if there's some kind of community mirroring his own that follow Ross as a creator dedicated to trolling HIM and not just a collection of people rallied to the cause which happens to include the accursedfarms following. Cyraxx does the same thing talking about the "Troll Community".
It's literally explained on their GitHub that numbers for any videos after the API was pulled are made up. My own videos have been off by 300% in some cases. Automaton noticed the same thing across multiple channels, including an instance with 20 times the dislikes. You can see users evaluating the extension on YouTube with mixed results. Sometimes it's very accurate across a large number of videos, but this is extremely dependent on things like channel size and niche.
RYD users are not always representative of Youtube users. I know gamergate retards and dramafags have loved using RYD dislikes as an easy win, but they're just not reliable.
Charlie and Mutahar talk about topics because they post within hours of eachother on the same shit. Still it seems this time its warranted. Fuck this brat.
Found this on /v/, it's dead on. Sorry if this one was already posted in this thread, I'm really regretting not really spending time in this thread back when I first saw it. This is dead on for how I felt this guy told his stories back when I first had the displeasure of seeing one of his videos pop up about a year ago.
It's literally explained on their GitHub that numbers for any videos after the API was pulled are made up. My own videos have been off by 300% in some cases. Automaton noticed the same thing across multiple channels, including an instance with 20 times the dislikes. You can see users evaluating the extension on YouTube with mixed results. Sometimes it's very accurate across a large number of videos, but this is extremely dependent on things like channel size and niche.
RYD users are not always representative of Youtube users. I know gamergate retards and dramafags have loved using RYD dislikes as an easy win, but they're just not reliable.
It's literally explained on their GitHub that numbers for any videos after the API was pulled are made up. My own videos have been off by 300% in some cases. Automaton noticed the same thing across multiple channels, including an instance with 20 times the dislikes. You can see users evaluating the extension on YouTube with mixed results. Sometimes it's very accurate across a large number of videos, but this is extremely dependent on things like channel size and niche.
RYD users are not always representative of Youtube users. I know gamergate retards and dramafags have loved using RYD dislikes as an easy win, but they're just not reliable.
Even if it's way far off for something like his recent uploads, I'd say it's still pretty indicative just based on the comments shitting and dunking on him for his smearing of Ross.
As much as Jason deserves all of this; I honestly feel he had a minimal impact on the StopKillingGames petition.
Sad fact of the matter is that Ross was obviously not prepared to be leading the charge of this movement (Even admitting so himself), and he hasn't done much to get the petition out there to the wider public, especially to gamers in the EU who don't speak a lick of English.
While it's great that the biggest talking heads online are finally talking about it and encouraging their fans to sign it, it's honestly too little, too late.
It would require them to get at least 14,000 signatures daily between now and July 31st. That is going to be a monumental task.
For what it's worth, they cleared about 50,000 yesterday and something similar the day before (currently at 4000 4 hours into today), and some bigger voices are getting in on this now than were before, so I think there's a not-inconsequential chance of it happening.
I want him to get pissy because he has to spend 10 minutes(Or 2 hours, if you've seen his code) to do something that Ross was responsible for helping mandate.
As much as Jason deserves all of this; I honestly feel he had a minimal impact on the StopKillingGames petition.
Sad fact of the matter is that Ross was obviously not prepared to be leading the charge of this movement (Even admitting so himself), and he hasn't done much to get the petition out there to the wider public, especially to gamers in the EU who don't speak a lick of English.
While it's great that the biggest talking heads online are finally talking about it and encouraging their fans to sign it, it's honestly too little, too late.
It would require them to get at least 14,000 signatures daily between now and July 31st. That is going to be a monumental task.
I would slightly disagree. I would say that both things can be true, that being Jason hurt the initiative in a substantial way and that Ross was not prepared to be leading the SKG thing. He even says so multiple times himself. I remember hearing about SKG not from Ross even though I'm subbed but because Jason made his videos and a small amount of drama youtubers I keep up with called him a giant retard. I would argue for the pure fact that you have brainlet drones repeating what Jason said verbatim before the rest of the internet got clued in that he hurt it substantially. Again, Ross said this himself backing it up with the data that right when Jason dropped his shit, signatures dried the fuck up.
While I don't think Jason is the SOLE reason, and that we can blame general apathy and doomer mindsets, I still will bitterly point my finger at the faggot who stuck a clay gnome up his ass.
