Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.2%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 68 10.1%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    670
He’s coping by claiming Monty not having money isn’t the reason the suit was dropped, but because he couldn’t back up his claims
That's Nick's go to cope. Basically just "I escaped consequences, so that proves I did nothing wrong."

He and his fans do the same thing when asked about 9 year old (8 at the time) being exposed to cocaine.

The gayest part is now Nick's going to use this to further defame Monty as a pedophile
Yeah I think this will end with Monty looking to get an HRO. Nick seems to be extremely retributive, and now there's much less holding him back from fucking with Monty.
 
How is that a cope and why is it "already?" It's literally the reason cited in the stipulated dismissal. Lay off the Galaxy Gas Nick.
Nick knows what he's doing

He's implying that Monty is a pedophile and that he knew he'd lose in discovery because proof would come out

Doesn't matter if it's a blatant lie, Nick's degenerate few remaining fans will believe it
 
View attachment 7635715View attachment 7635716
If you calculated the money Nick's spent on coke, strippers, and lawsuits vs the money he's earned on his own that he didn't get from from his grandparents I guarantee it'd be in the negative


Let's dissect this wet-brain sentence:

Don't get me wrong. It sucks. But I'm spending a lot less money than would have been required and never recovered because broke loser is broke.
My translation of Nick's Jamaican semen and cocaine addled frontal cortex rambling here is that according to Nick, not only would Monty have lost at trial, but the entire Jury would have stood up and applauded tumblr style and awarded Nick full attorney fees and massive damages despite not having any legal ability to do so. The only wrinkle in this road to absolution was that Monty couldn't afford to pay the massive amount that would have been awarded against him, thus Nick had to spend well over 500k (approximately 10k KNUs) and destroy his life by getting arrested for felony cocaine possession and child abuse to delay the trial until Monty's lawyers decided that Nick had had enough punishment and the case wasn't worth it anymore and dropped it instead. Certainly a galaxy (gas) brain strategy if I've ever seen one.
 
View attachment 7635229
The r/SteelToeBoringShow user u/Subject-Gas6491 further speculates that Aaron attempted a TRO against Karl Heberger of WhoAreThesePodcasts, only to be shut down.
To clarify, it appears they are speculating, instead of giving any confirmation.
I am having a hard time believing Aaron would try to take an RO out on Karl, but not Melton or Nick (until just recently). A TRO application would also have to be exceptionally badly written to fail right out of the gate like that.

Aaron's thing has always been that he seen these types of online feuds as a net benefit to him.


View attachment 7635708
Monty's claim was that Nick was defaming him as a pedophile

Is Nick claiming that Monty had no claim because he's a pedophile and evidence of that would be found in discovery?
Again, I would refer you to my post here from two days ago:

Despite the stipulation in the above screencapped document, what he's gonna go here is either claim:

1. "I would have gotten this dismissed."
2. "I would have proven Monty "sucks little boy cock.""
3. Some amalgamation of the two.
Looks like he's going with #2. Which is, of course, the more disgusting of the two.

The belief that Monty ran out of money isn't a cope, or just taking Monty at his word. It is supported by the evidence. Chief amongst that evidence is the fact Monty only got about $3,000 or so since the Nick lost his appeal (which triggered the Cokestream). Monty would have needed significantly more to get this across the finish line. See my post here. It's also the reason stated in the stipulated dismissal motion too.

Discovery = Money. Sometimes a LOT of money.

You don't have to be clairvoyant to have seen this coming. You just have to know that Nick is a bastard and he lies all the time. 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
Nick knows what he's doing

He's implying that Monty is a pedophile and that he knew he'd lose in discovery because proof would come out

Doesn't matter if it's a blatant lie, Nick's degenerate few remaining fans will believe it

Monty's lawsuit indirectly destroyed Nick's life, cost him a fuckton of money, and led to Nick becoming a pariah on YouTube besides a handful of trash who would murder him in the street if it meant slightly more views for a week.

Monty won, Nick just kept pouring money into a hole until Monty couldn't afford to fully prosecute the lawsuit.

Nick's 'win' to be able to slander Monty is meaningless in a world where everyone no longer listens to what Nick has to say.
 
Nick's 'win' to be able to slander Monty is meaningless in a world where everyone no longer listens to what Nick has to say.
He ended up even worse in the hole. Vic's persecutors got their fees paid, thanks to the shitty, incompetent lawyer Nick fobbed off on him. Nick gets nothing.

Nobody believes Nick. Some people still believe Monica Liar and Jamie (who both got fired from their VA jobs in Panty & Stocking suck it whores).
 
My translation of Nick's Jamaican semen and cocaine addled frontal cortex rambling here is that according to Nick, not only would Monty have lost at trial, but the entire Jury would have stood up and applauded tumblr style and awarded Nick full attorney fees and massive damages despite not having any legal ability to do so.
And then Ayn Rand, Albert Einstein, Ronald Reagan, Hilter, and Ghandi clapped.
 
He ended up even worse in the hole

Nick's bankruptcy arc in a few years will be wild. He has no income that isnt oil money and he's shown time and again that he will spend outside his means and whatever the stipend he gets from the trust is.

Obviously the worst case was the moron blowing money on coke and a dumbass car and and shitty tattoos and retard art.

But do you think he will stop spending that money now that he doesn't have stream income? Of course not, he'd admitted he buys junk and hoards it.

What's Nick going to do when instead of giving him money to poorly raise his kids, mommy and daddy send cash to pay off the children's college tuition instead? Nick can't divert trust funds into his lifestyle if he doesn't get the money.

Unless Nick surprises us all and begins living frugally (and admittedly a very comfortable upper middle class lifestyle) he's cooked. He's going to start using again if not before probation is done then definitely after.
 
What is Nick doing on LOCALS, you may wonder...

1752357117238.webp

Chat messages:

1752357167381.webp

1752357199124.webp
1752357223924.webp
1752357248071.webp
1752357274144.webp
1752357315448.webp
1752357365039.webp
1752357389114.webp
1752357419510.webp
 
1752357726730.webp
Nick soberly admits to Monty pwning the fuck out of his finances and putting him in such a tailspin he got a five year probation and a ruined reputation due to his child abuse being exposed.
1752357884421.webp
Should've paid up and made a public apology then faggot.
It gladden my soul that Nick Rekieta knows in his heart of hearts, Monty deepdicked his wallet into submission, much like Aaron did with his loose asshole.
 
Nick soberly admits to Monty pwning the fuck out of his finances and putting him in such a tailspin he got a five year probation and a ruined reputation due to his child abuse being exposed.
But hey, he's the really awesome He-Man (meaning a man into men) who got to call some random dude a child molester? Wouldn't you pay $200K for that? What are you, poor?
 
We actually don't know if Monty had pro bono representation. A popular theory here was that Schneider was working at a deeply discounted rate, but that's just the usual thread speculation. Nick himself said that he thought Schneider was working on contingency, but Nick's opinion means even less than anyone here.

What we know is that, when it came to the appeal, Monty had to raise money to bring in a guy that specializes in appeals (meaning that very definately wasn't pro bono). He out-raised Nick... and then... beat Randazza with a much cheaper lawyer. Cue Cokestream.

It would actually be pretty funny if Monty's total outlay for this whole thing is pretty insignificant and, in return, he caused Nick to burn hundreds of thousands of dollars, and get so fucked up on coke on a livestream that the 5-0 noticed and included it in a search warrant application. It would still be a Nick W against Monty, I suppose, but a really pyrrhic one.

It also makes one wonder what would ever happen if Nick pissed off somebody with less baggage but more money.
Didn’t he have to sell one of his homes to pay for the lawsuit? Nick did not get away lightly with his criminal slander of Monotograph.
 
Back