Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, he got started after all.


Honestly I believe The Tick was a far better subversion of the Superhero genre, rather than the Freakazoid, but that's subjective. Anyways on point, it is no surprise he brings up Pepe and 4Chan as much like CWC, that is where his worst enemies lie. The funny slip in this review was his inclusion of Kyle's dad as the douchy, pretentious internet critic that was mostly reviewing junk food places giving it the facade of brilliance. I guess Bob's lack of self-reflection is stronger than ever.
 
Why does he speak so fast in all of his reviews? Like, its very clearly more quicker than the average cadence, and it's not because he's an edgier, quicker witted dude. With something like Zero Punctuation, I guess the dude might speed up his speech because the segment is called "Zero Punctuation", but it works for that segment and his stream of conscious review, small bite sized chunks of information interspersed with zany insults and jokes--but this is just a regular review. Maybe for Zero Punctuation it does provide a subconscious element of the dude being edgier, funnier and more quick witted, but that also has to do with his writing, when he makes a joke, you know, and he gives it space; plus he delivers it with some space, he slows down and actually provides some punctuation that kinda acts as like a laugh track. This is just a regular review, no jokes, so aping Zero Punctuation guy is stupid because youre doing it without knowing why and youre missing the second half; it doesnt need to be sped up and speeding it up or delivering it faster doesnt bring anything to the table. It's just out of place, it's almost got a little bit of a yakback, chipmunk esque quality to it.


Listening to him sperg has gotten me to review his review, so thanks. Two thumbs down you Ebert wannabe. Was Ebert the fat guy?
 
Last edited:
Dumpity Dump:

Consider that this is Bob's definition of a "solid" campaign we're talking about:
image.jpeg


Bob's so pumped about Nintendo Land he forgets how grammar works:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg


Hillary did nothing wrong!:
image.jpeg


Bob deflecting his bullshit being thrown back at him:
image.jpeg


Yeah, she still got fuck-all votes Bob, you sexist mansplainer:
image.jpeg


Bob's calling someone's opinions "unnecessary and uncool" :story::
image.jpeg
image.jpeg


"Rethink the 'tude". For a guy who hates the 90s, he sure talks like a talking animal mascot from a Genesis game:
image.jpeg


And Bob might actually have a biological clock worse than Chris's:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
we're gonna build a beautiful wall, brick by brick, and make the mushrooms pay for it!

View attachment 236510

Imagine the twitter rant he'd go on if someone sent that to him.

Also gotta love that he still hasn't dropped the arrogant smug attitude; that attitude is going to ruin his beloved Democrat party in 2018 unless they change the 'tude.
 
So he's unaware his precious Airship ride and Kirby land may have been cut?
 
Dumpity Dump:

Hillary did nothing wrong!:
View attachment 236500
That was really the only reason he likes Hillary. The progressive idea of the first female president no matter what.
Bob deflecting his bullshit being thrown back at him:
View attachment 236501
When I was in high school sociology class we were taught the difference between racism and race discrimination. I thought it was stupid as racism should be short for race discrimination but at least I respect that the teacher still told us that it is wrong to do either. People like Bob and other SJWs seem to think its OK to discriminate against whites because "its not racism".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Positron
Could someone help Me out here and please explain what the fuck Hillary ever did to earn such undying loyalty from Bob and his SJW friends?
 
Could someone help Me out here and please explain what the fuck Hillary ever did to earn such undying loyalty from Bob and his SJW friends?

A lot of the Obama love had nothing to do with his governance and more to do with the idea that the Democrats had at long last achieved the demographic shift they'd been anticipating since the whole "Demographics is destiny" notion that was first floated sometime when Bill was President. In a nutshell, increasing immigration and the expanding black and Hispanic communities, who vote Democrat in very large and overwhelming majorities respectively, led many Democrats to believe the traditional Republican voters -- white middle class, Christian, military -- simply didn't matter anymore, and there would likely never be a Republican President again -- certainly not a conservative Republican President (never mind that Trump in most respects isn't a conservative; he's an unashamed troglodyte and that's just as bad).

Hillary not just losing but losing decisively in the Electoral College showed this idea was a pipe dream, at least for now. A lot of people just can't accept that. For Bob, the unpleasant surprise that all those rubes in Middle America still have a voice that matters has resulted in the insane vitriol we all enjoy on this site to this day.

Is what Bob's been spewing in reaction ever since what the kids call "tard cum?" I guess it's as good a name as any.
 
A lot of the Obama love had nothing to do with his governance and more to do with the idea that the Democrats had at long last achieved the demographic shift they'd been anticipating since the whole "Demographics is destiny" notion that was first floated sometime when Bill was President. In a nutshell, increasing immigration and the expanding black and Hispanic communities, who vote Democrat in very large and overwhelming majorities respectively, led many Democrats to believe the traditional Republican voters -- white middle class, Christian, military -- simply didn't matter anymore, and there would likely never be a Republican President again -- certainly not a conservative Republican President (never mind that Trump in most respects isn't a conservative; he's an unashamed troglodyte and that's just as bad).
Even then, Black and Hispanic families are still church-going, Conservative-minded people who are just as put off of SJW nonsense as we are, so "Demographics is destiny" has some unintended consequences.
 
A lot of the Obama love had nothing to do with his governance and more to do with the idea that the Democrats had at long last achieved the demographic shift they'd been anticipating since the whole "Demographics is destiny" notion that was first floated sometime when Bill was President. In a nutshell, increasing immigration and the expanding black and Hispanic communities, who vote Democrat in very large and overwhelming majorities respectively, led many Democrats to believe the traditional Republican voters -- white middle class, Christian, military -- simply didn't matter anymore, and there would likely never be a Republican President again -- certainly not a conservative Republican President (never mind that Trump in most respects isn't a conservative; he's an unashamed troglodyte and that's just as bad).

Hillary not just losing but losing decisively in the Electoral College showed this idea was a pipe dream, at least for now. A lot of people just can't accept that. For Bob, the unpleasant surprise that all those rubes in Middle America still have a voice that matters has resulted in the insane vitriol we all enjoy on this site to this day.

Is what Bob's been spewing in reaction ever since what the kids call "tard cum?" I guess it's as good a name as any.
Yeah I get the whole "Demographics is destiny" thing. But what I don't get is why Bob and co are so convinced Hillary was a good candidate who ran a good campaign. As a comparison how many Republicans could you go out and find today who think John McCain or Mitt Romney were good candidates who ran good campaigns? I mean if you ask me all Hillary has to her name are two mediocre senate terms, gotten by blatant carpetbagging to deep Blue New York and Bill's name, a godawful SOS tenure and two failed Presidential runs.
 
Yeah I get the whole "Demographics is destiny" thing. But what I don't get is why Bob and co are so convinced Hillary was a good candidate who ran a good campaign. As a comparison how many Republicans could you go out and find today who think John McCain or Mitt Romney were good candidates who ran good campaigns? I mean if you ask me all Hillary has to her name are two mediocre senate terms, gotten by blatant carpetbagging to deep Blue New York and Bill's name, a godawful SOS tenure and two failed Presidential runs.

Clinton was the most politically active, "feminist" first lady since Eleanor Roosevelt, which resulted in her being fawned over in non-conservative media outlets for the entirety of the 1990's. That same media machine pushed her into her Senate seat and has been beating the drums for her inevitable presidency ever since the Lewinsky scandal. Since both SJWs and Bob give the media an undue amount of control and influence over their lives and worldview, they have been hearing her deified as a champion for the oppressed for their entire lifetimes. When they're confronted with information disproving or doubting that narrative, they've already been spoonfed the mantra Hillary has been using to deflect criticism her entire career: it's all part of the "vast Republican conspiracy".

I would also point out that people like Bob are exactly the kind of wannabe politicos who don't pay attention to the day in, day out politics, so referencing someone's lack of accomplishments means very little when they're more invested in that politician's hot takes on whatever controversy du jour the media is focusing on. When Hillary finally draws her last breath and we can be assured, barring necromancy, she's done with politics, they'll become rabid fanboys of whichever "wealthy white women in politics" the media focuses on next, whether that be Warren, Gillibrand, or (shudder) Chelsea Clinton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back