Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
These /pol/ and The_Donald types are so incredibly stupid (I guess I can give the benefit of the doubt to the old people who don't know shit about the internet and think it's just Facebook and the comment threads on their local news websites)...literally no ISP is going to want to support the type of content they create and share, literally no ISP is going to want their corporate brand to be associated with that. To be perfectly honest, corporations would rather be associated with SJW-type shit (do you see how marketable it's become, especially anything having to do with LGBT issues?) than /pol/ shit, so I hope they're happy when the Comcast internet package their mom has bought for them doesn't include access to T_D and /pol/ but includes access to Buzzfeed and Vox.
 
exceptional individuals, the internet is now a utility. It is basically a requirement for daily life. It is NOT a content provider solely. It provides bank transactions, grading, security, research, communication, business.

Try to find a job without the internet. Try to do research without it. Or communicate with your boss. Try to get a fast responses to problems. Try to buy something outside of your state or your country.

It is a necessary facet of modern life. In fact most people use the internet on their phone more than they use it for talking. You will find navigating life without it now difficult, if not impossible. It is a utility like power, water and phone. To say otherwise is being an incompetent exceptional individual.

The amount of faith they are putting in the FTC, FCC and the ISPs is fucking comical. Basically their solution is to constantly go to court and hope that the FTC wins and that the ISPs play nice. They are dumb as dogshit

you hit the nail on the head everything is online now a days.
but, your also forgetting applying to colleges .
Now public schools have to spend even more money on getting these online resources to teach the next generation.
Congrats piece of shit pie you fucked up your own children's future
 
exceptional individuals, the internet is now a utility. It is basically a requirement for daily life. It is NOT a content provider solely. It provides bank transactions, grading, security, research, communication, business.

Try to find a job without the internet. Try to do research without it. Or communicate with your boss. Try to get a fast responses to problems. Try to buy something outside of your state or your country.

It is a necessary facet of modern life. In fact most people use the internet on their phone more than they use it for talking. You will find navigating life without it now difficult, if not impossible. It is a utility like power, water and phone. To say otherwise is being an incompetent exceptional individual.

The amount of faith they are putting in the FTC, FCC and the ISPs is fucking comical. Basically their solution is to constantly go to court and hope that the FTC wins and that the ISPs play nice. They are dumb as dogshit
It's like they want America's economy to collapse and burn, and to never be able to find a job in their lives.

These guys are fucking idiots.
 
The question is, would you rather be fucked in the ass by Microsoft and Google (pro-NN), or AT&T and Verizon (anti-NN)?
I hate Google and Microsoft way more since they have screwed me over more than AT&T and Verizon has. I don't have much of a choice about using Windows and Google services are ubiquitous. I've never had an ISP try to censor me.
 
The question is, would you rather be fucked in the ass by Microsoft and Google (pro-NN), or AT&T and Verizon (anti-NN)?
It's not a one or the other question, it's one or both of them. Microsoft and Google will still be around fucking you in the ass, even if ISPs are doing it too.
 
I noticed that the nightly news was rather quiet about this. They basically just said 'uh that happened' then tried to pretend nothing was going on in the backdrop. Guess I got what I deserved for turning my television on.
 
Well here's the latest thing they're spamming everywhere today. Remember the stupid incels and their "ultimate blackpill" and how dumb that was? Here's a bunch more crazy incels with their "ultimate redpill". It's equally stupid.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7fq8uw/supreme_red_pill_comprehensive_breakdown_of_the/

The FCC bootlicking is incredible.

They should go out of their way to charge them for a "Red Pill Package" to access these sites, and they'd probably swoon in ecstasy and lick Comcast asshole just for using the phrase "red pill" and cough up another $50 a month.

These /pol/ and The_Donald types are so incredibly stupid (I guess I can give the benefit of the doubt to the old people who don't know shit about the internet and think it's just Facebook and the comment threads on their local news websites)...

The_Donald banned @Null. 'Nuff said.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Marvin and Dysnomia
It's not a one or the other question, it's one or both of them. Microsoft and Google will still be around fucking you in the ass, even if ISPs are doing it too.
At least I don't have to pay extra for them not to sell my information, yet...
 
These /pol/ and The_Donald types are so incredibly stupid (I guess I can give the benefit of the doubt to the old people who don't know shit about the internet and think it's just Facebook and the comment threads on their local news websites)

Those types aren't maliciously stupid, it's more sad to watch. Don't laugh at them, because they aren't that subreddit's population.

Its population, the people you SHOULD be ripping on, are the hardcore, underaged - 17 year old keyboard rebels who think finding creative ways to shout nigger and worshiping Trump as some Tzeentchian mastermind beyond our mere mortal comprehension makes them a part of something greater rather than making them look like a batch of incredibly autistic shills.

They'd stop breathing if they thought it'd solidify Donald's superiority over the SJW menace.

tl;dr they became consumed in the very memes they created, and they're ready to eat each other alive the moment any one of them has that sudden flash of buyer's remorse for what they've committed themselves to.
 
The question is, would you rather be fucked in the ass by Microsoft and Google (pro-NN), or AT&T and Verizon (anti-NN)?
this is essentially the same as a philosophical question I see come up a lot

would you rather put your trust in someone planning to betray you, or someone who openly identifies as your enemy?
 
exceptional individuals, the internet is now a utility

lol piss off. it's only becoming one due to corporate interests; that's not me talking out of my ass.

DSL providers were all over the place in the early aughts until cable providers started crying to lawmakers to draft bills that gutted them. Cable providers that don't have any stake in telecomms are all pro-NN because it means they don't have to pay for a fucking dime's worth of infrastructure and they can comfortably assume the same role as a power company while also being sleezy salesmen - and they got there by exploiting how comparatively little lawmakers knew about the internet at the time, as well as their lack of foresight as to how big the internet was going to get.

I'm not saying repealing anything is going to undo all that damage, and I'm certainly not interested in getting roped into a long, drawn-out debate over the nitty-gritty of the approved NN repeal proposal. But from a broader perspective I think people need to be in favor of moving it away from being a utility. There are more than enough delivery mechanisms, but the ability for competition to form has been gutted with massive amounts of legislation and regulation.

These aren't companies tasked with providing the best quality of life they can for your community. They just want to know if you have kids so they can pitch you Cartoon Network.
 
Last edited:
Never4get
Pajit_salt.png
 
skrrtt (walkie talkie sound)

this is agent yellow yam scam broadcasting from the near-mythical fighting dojos of south korea. i am training with some very wise, very asian masters of the combat arts, powerful men who abstain from alcohol, modern music, pornography (classical paintings are okay to jerk off to, with moderation) and most essentially broadband/wi-fi internet connections. we have known of ajits conspiracies and intrigues for many years and have been preparing our mind body and solds for the our upcoming counter-offensive. unlike you who have become soft and stupid due to the halogens embedded in your computer monitors and emitted through your routers, we have retained the true power of humanity: brain cells and lactic acid firing at full forcewhich we will use to their fullest potential to restore net neutrality as a favor, a gift, to you!! when the time is right...

when net netutrality is restored, we only ask you 2 remember who it was that deigned to save you all...for we will one day return and make ourselves known and then we will have a favor to ask in return...are you willing to pay the price??

do not fear young internet addicts. we are watching and waiting.

yellow yam scam over
skrrtt (walkie talkie sound)
 
I know nothing about the law, so maybe somebody who DOES can tell me whether it’s possible to essentially filibuster this thing into oblivion? To basically use vexatious tactics to stall the process until a time where the people who support this can be gotten rid of and replaced with others who’ll likely have a second vote and strike it down?

I’m guessing that the answer is “no,” but it wouldn’t hurt to ask.
Quoting this post 'cause I never got an answer. I'd like to have one, even if I end up not liking what the answer is.
 
Back