Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I like how Bob talks bad about the character and story in Plinkett reviews when you look at what he has done with his Overthinker characters and story. At least I am not felling embarrassed watching the skits during Plinkett reviews like I feel when Bob is dressed up as his characters.
The gimmick behind Mr. Plinkett is actually entertaining, to an extent. It's funny because Bob is the closest thing to a real Mr. Plinkett that I've ever seen.

Also, slightly :offtopic:, but why do so many reviewers insist on giving their reviews a story?
 
Like his fashion sense wasn't shit already.
View attachment 403387
Bob, that's you. Why else would you suggest things like your Carebears pitch based on "Paradise Lost" or the multiple references to Christianity in your ideas? You can try to blame American culture or whatever but you seem to have Christ on your mind a bunch, you fedora tipper.
 
I don’t watch RLM, but there longest review is the SWE1 review correct? At 70 minutes, in multiple parts?

Compare this to Bob’s BvS: DoJ “review” that’s a multi-part review that somehow reaches over 2-3 hours a part. For a (current and supposedly incomplete) total of over 8 hours.

Speaks a world of difference between Bob and RLM
To quote from that Shakespeare quote they had, “brevity is the soul of wit, you keep it nice and simple”. RLM’s Phantom Menace review is nice and simple and clear, where I can’t tell what the fuck Bob’s arguing in his 3-hour BvS review.
 
I would like to point out that RLM has a patreon, that is making $19K a month more than Moviebob's patreon.

Bob doesn't get the joke of the Plinkett reviews, that spending hours and hours dissecting movies you don't like and making 2+ hour long videos are the actions of a fucking lunatic. That's why Plinkett kills hookers, because that's the sort of thing a fucking psychopath who reviews The Phantom Menace or Batman V Superman in depth would do. Only a parody of an angry sperging nerd with no social skills, no friends, and no life would do that. In many ways Bob is like Plinkett, only he casually mentions genocide instead of casually mentioning serial murder.
 
Also, slightly :offtopic:, but why do so many reviewers insist on giving their reviews a story?

Because most of them, including Blob himself, are frustrated filmmakers sure that they'd make a masterpiece if they got behind the camera. In most cases, though, what they do when they do get there is a total embarrassment and shows why they are bitching about other people's movies and not making their own.

Only a parody of an angry sperging nerd with no social skills, no friends, and no life would do that.

The difference is RLM are aware of the irony of this and Bob is completely oblivious to what a ridiculous, oafish, autistic, clownish manbabby he truly is.
 
I don’t watch RLM, but there longest review is the SWE1 review correct? At 70 minutes, in multiple parts?

Compare this to Bob’s BvS: DoJ “review” that’s a multi-part review that somehow reaches over 2-3 hours a part. For a (current and supposedly incomplete) total of over 8 hours.

Speaks a world of difference between Bob and RLM
The longest RLM video is their Episode III video. But you've got me thinking...
After doing calculations, the RLM prequel series combined clocks in at 4:18:03. Bob's BvS series clocks in 4:10:25. Similar in length, but RLM at least has the excuse of talking about three different movies, and combined, the videos aren't longer than the Prequels' total length.
 
The longest RLM video is their Episode III video. But you've got me thinking...
After doing calculations, the RLM prequel series combined clocks in at 4:18:03. Bob's BvS video clocks in 4:10:25. Similar in length, but RLM at least has the excuse of talking about three different movies.
While also comparing and contrasting with the original three.
 
NewGods.JPG


BobMeme.jpg
 
Will she have all the characters of New Genesis be black while all the characters of Apokolips be white? Make a guess who would be picked to portray Big Barda.
Probably Gugu Mbatha-Raw (Who's not a bad actress, imo.) Maybe Oprah as Granny Goodness because heaven forbid Ava not shoehorn Oprah in there somewhere.
DC, you diabolical...
FlOP8yv.jpg
 
Maybe it will be good? Just a thought.

Her first interest was in journalism, a choice influenced by an internship with CBS News, where she was assigned to help cover the O.J. Simpson murder trial.[10] She became disillusioned with journalism however, and decided to move into public relations, working as a junior publicist at Fox, Savoy Pictures, and a few other PR agencies before opening her own public relations firm, The DuVernay Agency, also known as DVAPR, in 1999. Through DVAPR she provided marketing and PR services to the entertainment and lifestyle industry, working on campaigns for movies and television shows such as Lumumba, Spy Kids, Shrek 2, The Terminal, Collateral, and Dreamgirls.

Yeessshh. Might as well throw M. Night on this bitch.
 
To quote from that Shakespeare quote they had, “brevity is the soul of wit, you keep it nice and simple”. RLM’s Phantom Menace review is nice and simple and clear, where I can’t tell what the fuck Bob’s arguing in his 3-hour BvS review.
The Phantom Menace review directly quotes that William Shakespeare Shakesman maxim, which Plinkett explains means "Don't waste my time". The Plinkett reviews cram in informative commentary and criticism in between jokes. Bob just...spergs.
 
The gimmick behind Mr. Plinkett is actually entertaining, to an extent. It's funny because Bob is the closest thing to a real Mr. Plinkett that I've ever seen.

Also, slightly :offtopic:, but why do so many reviewers insist on giving their reviews a story?
Film reviewers wanting to pretend at being film makers to feel more legitimate is the simple answer. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhSJp34wOeo

It's also kinda why I'm of two minds about his Game Overthinker plotline bullshit. It's some of the worst video content I've ever seen put to silicon, no doubt, but at some point, he is trying, and I have to assume he's at least trying to learn.

But then, any artist that's any good doesn't actually build their reputation on their starter content when they're still learning. He literally even says the Game Overthinker content is something he intends to continue using.

:powerlevel: :autism: I'm reminded of the one time you would have ever seen me in an art museum, it was dedicated to some bronze statue artist I forget the name of but made a lot of shit about horses and cowboys, etc. It was a whole goddamn art gallery dedicated to this dude, but they had one tiny cabinet that they basically put out only out of obligation, because they found his earliest works that survived to this day. The whole point is that they were shitty, to give you the idea that everyone has to start somewhere, even the curator was saying this, and none of the little figures in that cabinet had any resemblance to the works he's know for. Then you have Bob "Himmler" Chipman as recently as this week coming along treating this atrocity that is his Game Overthinker skits as what he'll be remembered for, as though it's some kind of magnum opus. Holy shit Bob.

As far as RLM specifically, you might argue that since E2 and E3 were a combined character study on Vader, that the Mr. Plinkett plot could be some weird meta dunk thing, since they esentially also serve as character studies on Plinkett. That's largely a coincidence and combined with revisionist history though, since they were doing Plinkett reviews of the Star Trek TNG era films for a good...year?... before the Phantom Menace review ever surfaced.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flexo
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back