Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
R/gc posts Null has created a lovely website for JY.

Much applause in commentary, including this comment:

Null doesn't care at all. He's already invited JY to sue him (as he regularly does with people threatening lawsuits). An angry TIM with a knife once waited outside his house and then knocked on his door as soon as his family got home in order to threaten him about the TIM's thread on the site, and his response was to post it in the thread and have everyone mock the guy. He has upset a lot of very unstable people with his site and through all kinds of intense harassment compaigns he has told every single one of them to get bent. The guy has never met a hill he didn't want to die on.

I am honestly extremely glad we have someone like this on our side here.
 
They probably aren't a tranny. They used this to get closer to women and be creepy as fuck... but that's why he hasn't cut his penis off he's not a tranny but a sick fuck who wants the pussy... which is not illegal he can do that but still be a sick fuck... but the tampons thing with the 12 year old not illegal still. But it's obvious he's doing this for sexual reasons. They don't try to look like a woman they aren't they don't want to be. Also they have a lot of neck fat. About my previous post about him wanting the pussy... that was a fucking joke... but don't deprive a nigga of the pussy. That's a joke guys.
 

BB42A54A-D6E9-416D-890A-124ABB519687.jpeg


Best part of that thread
 
The fuck did you say? The Tommy Robinson shit happened in vile Albion. Yaniv and this tribunal bullshit is in Canada. The only common factor is a certain fag country.

Anarcho Tyranny is caused by a ruling class who have some vague ideas about being progressive and who are censorious and cowardly and want to keep the chaos their policies create under wraps.

That applies to the UK and Canada. It's harder for it to happen in the US because of the US constitution. Still if Hillary had won and had nominated a couple of SCOTUS judges you'd see that constitution get reinterpreted in some very creative ways. And in the US the government doesn't need to censor - the left controlled social media companies will do it without the government telling them.

You can't just blame the UK establishment for it, even though they're complete bastards and it's tempting to do so. It's a much more widespread problem, as evidenced by the way Twitter, a US company, is covering up for Yaniv. Facebook gave Miranda Yardley a 30 day ban for this post

https://mirandayardley.com/en/thirty-day-facebook-ban-because-the-truth-is-hate-speech/

upload_2019-1-8_17-0-43.png


And you can bet when that 30 days are up they'll just find something else to ban her again for. Their problem with her is not one specific post, it's with all her beliefs.

The censorious left have taken over US social media companies, purged internal dissenters like James Damore and are now purging their userbase of people like Yardley.
 
Has anyone posted this yet?

http://archive.ph/R7okP

Twitter has escalated the censorship bigtime. They threatened legal action in the UK against someone tweeting about Yaniv.

Even after all the fuckery I can hardly believe it. Twitter threatened legal action against one of their own users for tweeting? Has that ever happened before?

It all seems insane to me - did someone actually run this past the Twitter legal team, or has some troon somewhere in the Twitter hierarchy completely lost it?
The article is paywalled, so I can't see the reference to Twitter threatening legal action, but is this just the same warning that Twitter has sent to people who allegedly violate Pakistan's blasphemy law?

In order to file one of those reports, someone who identifies themselves as an "authorized law enforcement representative" or "authorized government representative" would need to fill out this super-secure-looking form, identifying themselves, the user or tweet in question, and the law or statute they allege has been violated...
upload_2019-1-8_11-4-3.png
upload_2019-1-8_11-4-16.png
One would like to presume that Twitter will do its due diligence in following up and verifying the details that are entered in these reports, but based on the way Twitter handles users who've tweeted anything about JY, I'm not sure we can presume that.
 
Has anyone posted this yet?

http://archive.ph/R7okP

Twitter has escalated the censorship bigtime. They threatened legal action in the UK against someone tweeting about Yaniv.

Even after all the fuckery I can hardly believe it. Twitter threatened legal action against one of their own users for tweeting? Has that ever happened before?

It all seems insane to me - did someone actually run this past the Twitter legal team, or has some troon somewhere in the Twitter hierarchy completely lost it?

How can twitter threaten legal action for 'hateful conduct'? It's a condition of the terms of service, not a crime or tort. You can't take legal action over it. She clearly got the boilerplate 'you have been suspended until you delete your tweet' and is exaggerating it for attention.

upload_2019-1-9_4-30-29.png


Remember, the British lie. They are a filthy subhuman race of liars. Never take at face value anything a British citizen says because they are lying liars who will lie right to your face, and one day a real rain will come and wash their degenerate decaying excuse for a civilisation back into the sea where it belongs.
 
Remember, the British lie. They are a filthy subhuman race of liars. Never take at face value anything a British citizen says because they are lying liars who will lie right to your face, and one day a real rain will come and wash their degenerate decaying excuse for a civilisation back into the sea where it belongs.

The Aussies are still sore, I guess.
 
How can twitter threaten legal action for 'hateful conduct'? It's a condition of the terms of service, not a crime or tort. You can't take legal action over it.
Twitter has a "by the way, such-and-such country says your tweet violated this one of its laws" boilerplate message that they send out. It's been mainly heard about because the Pakistani government has flagged a bunch of tweets for blasphemy. I would assume that this is what they received... someone claiming to be an agent of the UK government filled out a form saying that such-and-such tweet violates such-and-such law, and Twitter passed the info along to the person who tweeted it.

Of course, if the tweet also violates Twitter's rules (or the way the Twitter employee enforcing the rules interprets them), they'll punish the user who tweeted it. Otherwise, it's more of a heads-up than anything else.
 
Yaniv is Jewish. I’m sure other Jews disapprove of his behavior but they aren’t afraid of using every legal avenue either. Lots of Silicon Valley businesses tiptoe around this issue and usually just roll over for them reflexively.
There is no real reason this has anything to do with Yaniv's Jewishness, and everything to do with apparent connections to Big Tech higher-ups.
 
Not to get too tinfoil hat or anything, but this is starting to look less like dumb techbros taking the path of least resistance and more like something more complicated and sinister is going on behind the scenes.

We don't have all the pieces but Morgane Oger is the Vice President of the NDP, the ruling party of the province. There is A LOT OF MONEY coming from high places to turn every progressive agenda into a trans agenda. The head of the Georgia ACLU raised questions about why they were being lobbied to only focus on trans issues to the exclusion of all else and she was pressured to resign. Here's the interview.

There is a SHIT TON of money coming from Big Pharma and the Caitlyn Jenners of the world. Here's one example, Jennifer Pritzker's foundation.
 
Twitter has a "by the way, such-and-such country says your tweet violated this one of its laws" boilerplate message that they send out. It's been mainly heard about because the Pakistani government has flagged a bunch of tweets for blasphemy. I would assume that this is what they received... someone claiming to be an agent of the UK government filled out a form saying that such-and-such tweet violates such-and-such law, and Twitter passed the info along to the person who tweeted it.

"Hateful conduct" isn't a law, even in the snaggletoothed dystopian hellscape of perfidious Albion.
 
"Hateful conduct" isn't a law, even in the snaggletoothed dystopian hellscape of perfidious Albion.
That probably depends on whether the law is being interpreted by a real court in the UK, or by the same Twitter employees who have been suspending and/or banning users who mention JY.
 
Back