- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
He did, which is why I got the .ORG versions.You'd think some IT expe
You'd think some hotshot IT expert would have already grabbed his own names on the top level domains.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He did, which is why I got the .ORG versions.You'd think some IT expe
You'd think some hotshot IT expert would have already grabbed his own names on the top level domains.
He did, which is why I got the .ORG versions.
The fuck did you say? The Tommy Robinson shit happened in vile Albion. Yaniv and this tribunal bullshit is in Canada. The only common factor is a certain fag country.Land of the free!
It's not for him. It's for the audience of the document.I know that you find it awkward to use pronouns that don't match the name, but you should change the pronouns on jessicayaniv.org, because why even give him that?
but that's why he hasn't cut his penis off he's not a tranny but a sick fuck who wants the pussy.
The fuck did you say? The Tommy Robinson shit happened in vile Albion. Yaniv and this tribunal bullshit is in Canada. The only common factor is a certain fag country.
The article is paywalled, so I can't see the reference to Twitter threatening legal action, but is this just the same warning that Twitter has sent to people who allegedly violate Pakistan's blasphemy law?Has anyone posted this yet?
http://archive.ph/R7okP
Twitter has escalated the censorship bigtime. They threatened legal action in the UK against someone tweeting about Yaniv.
Even after all the fuckery I can hardly believe it. Twitter threatened legal action against one of their own users for tweeting? Has that ever happened before?
It all seems insane to me - did someone actually run this past the Twitter legal team, or has some troon somewhere in the Twitter hierarchy completely lost it?
Has anyone posted this yet?
http://archive.ph/R7okP
Twitter has escalated the censorship bigtime. They threatened legal action in the UK against someone tweeting about Yaniv.
Even after all the fuckery I can hardly believe it. Twitter threatened legal action against one of their own users for tweeting? Has that ever happened before?
It all seems insane to me - did someone actually run this past the Twitter legal team, or has some troon somewhere in the Twitter hierarchy completely lost it?
Remember, the British lie. They are a filthy subhuman race of liars. Never take at face value anything a British citizen says because they are lying liars who will lie right to your face, and one day a real rain will come and wash their degenerate decaying excuse for a civilisation back into the sea where it belongs.
The Aussies are still sore, I guess.
Your country is shit and you're shit.
Twitter has a "by the way, such-and-such country says your tweet violated this one of its laws" boilerplate message that they send out. It's been mainly heard about because the Pakistani government has flagged a bunch of tweets for blasphemy. I would assume that this is what they received... someone claiming to be an agent of the UK government filled out a form saying that such-and-such tweet violates such-and-such law, and Twitter passed the info along to the person who tweeted it.How can twitter threaten legal action for 'hateful conduct'? It's a condition of the terms of service, not a crime or tort. You can't take legal action over it.
There is no real reason this has anything to do with Yaniv's Jewishness, and everything to do with apparent connections to Big Tech higher-ups.Yaniv is Jewish. I’m sure other Jews disapprove of his behavior but they aren’t afraid of using every legal avenue either. Lots of Silicon Valley businesses tiptoe around this issue and usually just roll over for them reflexively.
Not to get too tinfoil hat or anything, but this is starting to look less like dumb techbros taking the path of least resistance and more like something more complicated and sinister is going on behind the scenes.
Twitter has a "by the way, such-and-such country says your tweet violated this one of its laws" boilerplate message that they send out. It's been mainly heard about because the Pakistani government has flagged a bunch of tweets for blasphemy. I would assume that this is what they received... someone claiming to be an agent of the UK government filled out a form saying that such-and-such tweet violates such-and-such law, and Twitter passed the info along to the person who tweeted it.
That probably depends on whether the law is being interpreted by a real court in the UK, or by the same Twitter employees who have been suspending and/or banning users who mention JY."Hateful conduct" isn't a law, even in the snaggletoothed dystopian hellscape of perfidious Albion.