Jacob Stuart Harrison Storytelling Thread - FSTDT Forums Ex-Pet Lolcow

[Feline Darkmage]

I'm genuinely surprised Jacob hasn't been halal'ed yet. Other lolcows have posted far less and made the cut.

This is basically his lolcow thread in all but actually being in lolcows and having a proper OP written by someone else though.

 

[MW 590]

I'm genuinely surprised Jacob hasn't been halal'ed yet. Other lolcows have posted far less and made the cut.

What does being halal’ed mean?

Considering that with exception to Eastern Europe most Europeans who profess Christianity don't actually practice it, would you not find more success taking over a portion of the Sunni Ummah and trying to bribe or install a mufti of your choice?

They're very nationalistic; and you've already got a core foundation of people in Britain who hate the House of Windsor, Democracy, rights for women, other religions, Israel and share many more of the same goals you do.

How dare you compare me with Muslims! How do I share the same goals? I wish to defend England and preserve English culture while many of them with to destroy it. Even when I was Catholic, I opposed how Islam treats women and homosexuals.

As for Israel, the Israel-Palestine conflict is a conflict between Jewish vs Muslim claims to the land especially Jerusalem. However, the Crusaders believed that the land was rightful Christian land. And they are right. Here is why.

1. Christianity started in Judea. A man called Yeshua claimed to be the messiah, gained followers, got crucified, and a new religion started.

2. Judea was part of the Roman Empire which converted to Christianity. The majority of the inhabitants became Christian(since the Jews were exiled for rebelling against the Romans) so the land was Christian before the Muslims conquered it in the 7th century.

Since I discovered more information on England, I rewrote the story about the parallel universe where the true heir is restored to England’s throne. I hope it is better than the previous version. I made my fiancée @pomme a stronger character. This story is a crossover between King Arthur, Star Wars, Super Mario, and Lord of the Rings.

https://jacob-harrison.fandom.com/w...lac_and_Jacob_Harrison_in_a_Parallel_Universe

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

What does being halal’ed mean?

There's a rule on Kiwi Farms that members do not make Lolcow threads about other members; unless they are declared "Halal" (that is, permissible).

It just means they're fair game to have a lolcow thread be submitted for them. If you check the lolcow section anyone that has حلال as their thread tag instead of Horrorcow, Careercow etc is a Kiwi who has been declared Halal.

How dare you compare me with Muslims! How do I share the same goals? I wish to defend England and preserve English culture while many of them with to destroy it. Even when I was Catholic, I opposed how Islam treats women and homosexuals.

Let's see.

-Catholics treat women like second class citizens. Admittedly not as bad as Muslims, but they're still baby makers who need to stay at home and be submissive to their father or husband.
-Muslims, specifically British Salafist Muslims, are openly hostile towards the British government and monarchy and look to abolish both in favor of their monarch of choice the Caliph.
-British Muslims of all political stripes are united in their desire for the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people. There is a reason here why their party of choice, the Labour party, is openly and rabidly anti-semetic. Like your desire to launch a crusade against it, they too wish to launch one of their own.
- Your desire to install a new monarch despite the will of the British people and your willingness to subvert and sabotage other democratic states shows you have no interest in preserving Democracy. British Imam's themselves are fairly open about using their high fertility rate to infiltrate institutions for the sole purpose of subverting them. Al Quada's most recent propaganda suggests they're so confident this has been a success they can't even be bothered to engage in any further operations and are just sitting back to "watch the show".

As for Israel, the Israel-Palestine conflict is a conflict between Jewish vs Muslim claims to the land especially Jerusalem. However, the Crusaders believed that the land was rightful Christian land. And they are right. Here is why.

1. Christianity started in Judea. A man called Yeshua claimed to be the messiah, gained followers, got crucified, and a new religion started.

2. Judea was part of the Roman Empire which converted to Christianity. The majority of the inhabitants became Christian(since the Jews were exiled for rebelling against the Romans) so the land was Christian before the Muslims conquered it in the 7th century.

Every time the west has tried to hold or subjugate the East from Persia onwards has been a disaster. Alexander, Baldwin; it matters not if they did it in the name of Jesus or the Hellenic Gods they all ultimately failed to hold it.

Israel is literally among the major leading reasons the west hasn't been attacked by the Arab states in any unified way as it historically had been when the Islamic world was more unified as it was under the Ottomans. They're all too busy screeching about Israel and launching half assed attacks on it to bother with the rest of the world like Europe.

If that ever changed, a lot of other things would too IMO; and it would probably involve a constant far more expensive American military presence across South Eastern Europe.

While the Jews themselves likely gained the land that would be known as Israel via conquest, as the Romans did; if you truely do believe the oldest lineage grants greater authority they are the "rightful owners" of the land, not the Christians.

 

[MW 590]

Let's see.

-Catholics treat women like second class citizens. Admittedly not as bad as Muslims, but they're still baby makers who need to stay at home and be submissive to their father or husband.
-Muslims, specifically British Salafist Muslims, are openly hostile towards the British government and monarchy and look to abolish both in favor of their monarch of choice the Caliph.
-British Muslims of all political stripes are united in their desire for the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people. There is a reason here why their party of choice, the Labour party, is openly and rabidly anti-semetic. Like your desire to launch a crusade against it, they too wish to launch one of their own.
- Your desire to install a new monarch despite the will of the British people and your willingness to subvert and sabotage other democratic states shows you have no interest in preserving Democracy. British Imam's themselves are fairly open about using their high fertility rate to infiltrate institutions for the sole purpose of subverting them. Al Quada's most recent propaganda suggests they're so confident this has been a success they can't even be bothered to engage in any further operations and are just sitting back to "watch the show".

The difference is I am trying to restore how Britain used to be while they are trying to destroy Britain. And I am not rabbidly antisemitc like them. I wish for the English to subjugate the Israelis and Palestinians which will bring peace as well as liberate the Israeli and Palestinian christians who have been persecuted by both sides. Once Israel is conquered, the Israelis will probably not rebel because they will need the English for protection from the Muslims.

Every time the west has tried to hold or subjugate the East from Persia onwards has been a disaster. Alexander, Baldwin; it matters not if they did it in the name of Jesus or the Hellenic Gods they all ultimately failed to hold it.

The Roman Empire succeeded in ruling in the Middle East for centuries.

Israel is literally among the major leading reasons the west hasn't been attacked by the Arab states in any unified way as it historically had been when the Islamic world was more unified as it was under the Ottomans. They're all too busy screeching about Israel and launching half assed attacks on it to bother with the rest of the world like Europe.

If that ever changed, a lot of other things would too IMO; and it would probably involve a constant far more expensive American military presence across South Eastern Europe.

After the fall of the Ottomon Turks and the creation of new Arab states in their place, the Arab states have also been too busy fighting each other to bother with the rest of the world.

Also, I have an important question. What is your political affiliation? I've seen you criticize both Trump, Antifa, and the Labour party.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

The difference is I am trying to restore how Britain used to be while they are trying to destroy Britain. And I am not rabbidly antisemitc like them. I wish for the English to subjugate the Israelis and Palestinians which will bring peace as well as liberate the Israeli and Palestinian christians who have been persecuted by both sides. Once Israel is conquered, the Israelis will probably not rebel because they will need the English for protection from the Muslims.

The reason the middle east is such a disaster zone is ultimate because of British and French meddling and in the end the State of Israel could not have been were it not for Britain.

Do I think it would have been any better without them? I think it's impossible to say what could have been, but the way things are now I think English participation and leadership is probably amongst the worst input either side could recieve.

There's several reasons the American's lead the support to Israel and not the Europe that made the sharpest push for Zionism; and it's not purely financing.

The Roman Empire succeeded in ruling in the Middle East for centuries.

On and off, with lots of major infighting and losses against Persia and Palmyra. It was never a secure part of their territory in the same way that Northern Africa was until the Arab conquest.

After the fall of the Ottomon Turks and the creation of new Arab states in their place, the Arab states have also been too busy fighting each other to bother with the rest of the world.

It "tends" to be Sunni vs Shia led-states; and as it stands were they not all united in their hatred of Israel the Shia would have been conquered decades ago. The Shia are evil heretical apostates to the Sunni certainly, but they're not "as bad" as Jews.

Also, I have an important question. What is your political affiliation? I've seen you criticize both Trump, Antifa, and the Labour party.

Until about five years ago I would have described myself as centre-left. I've been a lifelong voter of social democratic parties like Labour and Socialdemokraterna depending on where I've lived in Europe.

However, the past few years have seen some major changes. Center-left parties in Europe have been overtaken by and large by a bizarre coalition of radical feminists and Islamists (which side is stronger depends on the territory) who promote far-left social policies I simply don't support to the extent I will sacrifice my opinions on welfare systems to try and prevent them being introduced (and also in Britain promoting budgets and economic plans that are simply not workable; we simply can't tax the rich into oblivion and sign off all third world debt like Comrade Corbyn would wish).

In the last election, I participated in I voted for a center-right party. I find most of their manifesto abhorrent but they're the only ones that seemed in my eyes to have a viable plan for the country I was resident in (I have a fairly colorful family history and living situation that's left me with multiple nationalities and grants me the ability to vote in several countries inside and outside of the EU; though I haven't in all of them).

In the UK in the next general election I have honestly no idea who I will vote for. I support Brexit, meaning I would not vote for a party that promises to block it like Labour, the Scottish National Party or the Liberal Democrats. That said, I really don't like the look of this new Brexit Party. I share their main premise, but their policies are essentially either nonexistent or in the few cases they've given hints as to what they might be they're fairly extreme.

If Boris can deliver on a no-deal Brexit, I will vote Conservative. Otherwise I really have no idea. I suppose I would have to support Farrage and the Brexit Party, even though I think he is a complete and utter knob if he really is the only one trying to carry through the popular vote.

I find it hard to label my political stance Jacob these days since the meaning of labels of changed so drastically; when I first started voting being center-left meant you were for universal healthcare and social support programs; not that you wanted sex changes for twelve year olds and a choice of at least sixteen genders on your passport. I do hold very strong political views, but there is simply no individual or party that represents them in whole or even part in Europe anymore. Certainly not in the US either.

 

[MW 590]

The reason the middle east is such a disaster zone is ultimate because of British and French meddling and in the end the State of Israel could not have been were it not for Britain.

Do I think it would have been any better without them? I think it's impossible to say what could have been, but the way things are now I think English participation and leadership is probably amongst the worst input either side could recieve.

At that time, Britain was a constitutional monarchy and France was a Republic. Had the Jacobite heir been ruling Britain and France, things likely would have been different. He probably would have the old crusader mindset and believe Palestine to be rightful Christian land.

Until about five years ago I would have described myself as centre-left. I've been a lifelong voter of social democratic parties like Labour and Socialdemokraterna depending on where I've lived in Europe.

However, the past few years have seen some major changes. Center-left parties in Europe have been overtaken by and large by a bizarre coalition of radical feminists and Islamists (which side is stronger depends on the territory) who promote far-left social policies I simply don't support to the extent I will sacrifice my opinions on welfare systems to try and prevent them being introduced (and also in Britain promoting budgets and economic plans that are simply not workable; we simply can't tax the rich into oblivion and sign off all third world debt like Comrade Corbyn would wish).

In the last election, I participated in I voted for a center-right party. I find most of their manifesto abhorrent but they're the only ones that seemed in my eyes to have a viable plan for the country I was resident in (I have a fairly colorful family history and living situation that's left me with multiple nationalities and grants me the ability to vote in several countries inside and outside of the EU; though I haven't in all of them).

In the UK in the next general election I have honestly no idea who I will vote for. I support Brexit, meaning I would not vote for a party that promises to block it like Labour, the Scottish National Party or the Liberal Democrats. That said, I really don't like the look of this new Brexit Party. I share their main premise, but their policies are essentially either nonexistent or in the few cases they've given hints as to what they might be they're fairly extreme.

If Boris can deliver on a no-deal Brexit, I will vote Conservative. Otherwise I really have no idea. I suppose I would have to support Farrage and the Brexit Party, even though I think he is a complete and utter knob if he really is the only one trying to carry through the popular vote.

I find it hard to label my political stance Jacob these days since the meaning of labels of changed so drastically; when I first started voting being center-left meant you were for universal healthcare and social support programs; not that you wanted sex changes for twelve year olds and a choice of at least sixteen genders on your passport. I do hold very strong political views, but there is simply no individual or party that represents them in whole or even part in Europe anymore. Certainly not in the US either.

Why don’t you consider my ideas as a viable solution? With a traditional autocratic monarch in Britain, things would get done a lot faster and the radical leftists in the Labour party wouldn’t be in power.

Since I discovered more information on England, I rewrote the story about the parallel universe where the true heir is restored to England’s throne. I hope it is better than the previous version. I made my fiancée @pomme a stronger character. This story is a crossover between King Arthur, Star Wars, Super Mario, and Lord of the Rings.

https://jacob-harrison.fandom.com/w...lac_and_Jacob_Harrison_in_a_Parallel_Universe

So @Locomotive Derangement do you think that my revision is an improvement over my previous story?

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

At that time, Britain was a constitutional monarchy and France was a Republic. Had the Jacobite heir been ruling Britain and France, things likely would have been different. He probably would have the old crusader mindset and believe Palestine to be rightful Christian land.

Wouldn't have made a lot of difference, he'd have lost it too.

The sad but true thing is that as much as people harp on about religion Palestine/Israel is worthless for much else outside of tourism. The Jewish people do have a special investment in that barren patch of desert that makes them want to keep it that other states and peoples simply do not. Popes did not stop crusading because they had a sudden change of heart and became pacifists; they stopped crusading because they didn't have the manpower or enough people who actually cared about a sandpit halfway across the world. The crusader kingdoms learned the hard way that their land was pretty worthless; and the few things in its favor such as the East retaining some the wealth of Greek learning that the west had lost have since become irrelevant as the west became more technologically advanced.

The Muslims aren't fighting Israel because Palestine is worth anything, it's an honor thing that's unique to them. For non-Muslims it's just not worth the hassle or fighting over anymore. Outside of making the Islamic world turn in on itself of course, that's invaluable but doesn't require direct participation.

Why don’t you consider my ideas as a viable solution? With a traditional autocratic monarch in Britain, things would get done a lot faster and the radical leftists in the Labour party wouldn’t be in power.

It's not democratic and it has no feasible hope of success.

 

[MW 590]

Wouldn't have made a lot of difference, he'd have lost it too.

The sad but true thing is that as much as people harp on about religion Palestine/Israel is worthless for much else outside of tourism. The Jewish people do have a special investment in that barren patch of desert that makes them want to keep it that other states and peoples simply do not. Popes did not stop crusading because they had a sudden change of heart and became pacifists; they stopped crusading because they didn't have the manpower or enough people who actually cared about a sandpit halfway across the world. The crusader kingdoms learned the hard way that their land was pretty worthless; and the few things in its favor such as the East retaining some the wealth of Greek learning that the west had lost have since become irrelevant as the west became more technologically advanced.

The Muslims aren't fighting Israel because Palestine is worth anything, it's an honor thing that's unique to them. For non-Muslims it's just not worth the hassle or fighting over anymore. Outside of making the Islamic world turn in on itself of course, that's invaluable but doesn't require direct participation.

What has preserved the state of Israel, is the fact that it has nuclear weapons that it is ambiguous about. Likewise, when the English take over Israel, the nuclear weapons can be used to deter the Arab states from attacking.

You might wonder how my society is going to be able to take over nuclear armed countries such as Israel, and the answer to that is by infiltrating them from the inside and having secret agents elected to political office.

It's not democratic and it has no feasible hope of success.

We have been over this before. Statistically it will happen as long as long as I have a growing number of descendants raised to help my cause and recruit their friends into the society. And if you had to choose, would you prefer an autocratic monarchy with good national security and economic prosperity, or a democracy with a high rate in crime, terrorism, and economic depression?

I am really angry today! I noticed that I have been restricted from starting new threads again! This is probably because of my thread about the word nigger. All I was doing was trying to figure out if the users who say nigger are racist or not because I couldn't tell. I am glad that they are not racist. I was just making sure.

Next, I asked my fiancee a simple question. https://kiwifarms.net/members/pomme.31076/#profile-post-205157 And she didn't answer or edit her profile to make her age known! I have to put her on trial AGAIN and you guys must contact her and help me force her into answering my question.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

I am really angry today! I noticed that I have been restricted from starting new threads again! This is probably because of my thread about the word nigger. All I was doing was trying to figure out if the users who say nigger are racist or not because I couldn't tell. I am glad that they are not racist. I was just making sure.

Next, I asked my fiancee a simple question. https://kiwifarms.net/members/pomme.31076/#profile-post-205157 And she didn't answer or edit her profile to make her age known! I have to put her on trial AGAIN and you guys must contact her and help me force her into answering my question.

1. If you needed to ask that question, you're a stupid motherfucker.
2. I hate to break it to you, but Pomme was trolling you, you moron.
3. We don't have to do shit for you. What're you gonna do, cry and stop posting your plagaristic sub-Wattpad-tier fanfic?

 

[MW 590]

1. If you needed to ask that question, you're a stupid motherfucker.
2. I hate to break it to you, but Pomme was trolling you, you moron.
3. We don't have to do shit for you. What're you gonna do, cry and stop posting your plagaristic sub-Wattpad-tier fanfic?

If that is so, then I will be really heartbroken and angry as she is the woman I had the most romantic love towards in my life. The problem is I don't want to ruin a once in a lifetime opportunity because I am shy and awkward around women in real life. So @pomme, answer this question. Is our relationship real or were you trolling me this whole time?

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

This is the shittiest Love Island season ever.

Also as bad as Corbyn and token woke bla- I mean Abbot are they're still markedly better than you.

 

[MW 590]

This is the shittiest Love Island season ever.

Also as bad as Corbyn and token woke bla- I mean Abbot are they're still markedly better than you.

If you think that this drama is shitty, how about you help get pomme to answer my question about our relationship. If she was trolling me, then she is a very sadistic one and even if you thought it was funny, the joke has gone on long enough.

 

[betterbullocks]

The biggest injustice is that this fucker gets to ride a TR6 and I don't

 

[MW 590]

I am really angry today as well because I don’t understand an abbreviation being used on this site and nobody is answering my questions about it.

In the Top Secret Inner Circle on a thread about Corbin Dallas Multipass, Pomme said this.

He posrated me when no one else would

Sword Fighter Super replied saying this.

Sounds like @Jacob Harrison give you all the pos you could handle.

I repeatedly asked what pos means but people reacted to my post with dumb as if it is something obvious I’m supposed to know. So can someone please explain to me what pos means in this context?

 

[NOT Sword Fighter Super]

I am really angry today as well because I don’t understand an abbreviation being used on this site and nobody is answering my questions about it.

In the Top Secret Inner Circle on a thread about Corbin Dallas Multipass, Pomme said this.

Sword Fighter Super replied saying this.

I repeatedly asked what pos means but people reacted to my post with dumb as if it is something obvious I’m supposed to know. So can someone please explain to me what pos means in this context?

Positive ratings.

It was tongue in cheek, though.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

Positive ratings.

It was tongue in cheek, though.

I was about to link to pozzing damn you!

 

[NOT Sword Fighter Super]

I was about to link to pozzing damn you!

It's like the 3rd or 4th time he tagged me on this question today, lol.

 

[MW 590]

Positive ratings.

It was tongue in cheek, though.

Now I feel ashamed of myself for not understanding something that obvious. How could I perform so well in my hard science classes, and not understand a simple abbreviation? Now I know why Pomme hasn’t been answering my questions, she regrets proposing to me because she realized how unworthy I am. I am therefore leaving this site in shame.

Now I feel ashamed of myself for not understanding something that obvious. How could I perform so well in my hard science classes, and not understand a simple abbreviation? Now I know why Pomme hasn’t been answering my questions, she regrets proposing to me because she realized how unworthy I am. I am therefore leaving this site in shame.

Before I leave, I will again post this link to the recent story I wrote about a parallel universe. My parallel self was more successful in his relationship with Pomme in that universe than I am since Pomme in this universe broke up with me.

Since I discovered more information on England, I rewrote the story about the parallel universe where the true heir is restored to England’s throne. I hope it is better than the previous version. I made my fiancée @pomme a stronger character. This story is a crossover between King Arthur, Star Wars, Super Mario, and Lord of the Rings.

https://jacob-harrison.fandom.com/w...lac_and_Jacob_Harrison_in_a_Parallel_Universe

 

[Info Neutral Agency]

I am really angry today! I noticed that I have been restricted from starting new threads again! This is probably because of my thread about the word nigger. All I was doing was trying to figure out if the users who say nigger are racist or not because I couldn't tell. I am glad that they are not racist. I was just making sure.

Next, I asked my fiancee a simple question. https://kiwifarms.net/members/pomme.31076/#profile-post-205157 And she didn't answer or edit her profile to make her age known! I have to put her on trial AGAIN and you guys must contact her and help me force her into answering my question.

What the fuck is wrong with the word nigger? Nigger is just another word in the dictionary of the modern world. Just because your trying to have deep thoughts about "nigger racist or joke" has the most simple answer ever. Everyone is going to say it in their lifetime. No matter how much they use nigger in a racial context or as a joke about Sargon's failing career as a British politician, nobody is not butthurt about the word. Well except New Englanders, NPCs, and Zoomers. So here is my answer, nigger in my context is referring to someone as stupid or moronic in an edgy style. Or in simple terms, it's all in a relative matter you fucking Yankee Nigger. Offended yet?

 

[AprilRains]

Son, you are a hoot and a holler.