Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Having some facial traits in common is forgivable (because a lot of fat, bald dudes look alike), but... their beards. WHY DO THEY BOTH HAVE GINGER BEARDS. WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE GOD COPY-PASTED THEIR BEARDS ON.

Also, friendly reminder that Jamie's husband supposedly lurks this thread because Jamie is too much of a pussy to do it himself.

I suppose we should say hello to him then. Show them the farms can be friendly. Not too friendly now.

View attachment 989456
This sounds confusing af. Is this the norm? Happy I never went into law.

Lemoine is shotgunning terms. Basically "Anyone or anything that was involved with this case. Don't try and be smart to avoid handing stuff over because of pronouns or willful misconstruing of terms. Just because I didn't put the term Xir in there doesn't mean you hold on to it."
 
Last edited:
Found this nifty little Monica fan boy on Facebook
EIDxn6lWkAAPuvp.jpeg
EIDxoQ3WsAI3kzV.jpeg

Oh hi Ron
 
Man this whole thing is turning into a whole fucking mess.

Has Chupp even acknowledged any of his sperging? Because if not I'm gonna find this 100x funnier.
I don't think he has. I don't know if the judge has to directly respond to each and every motion, but he's simply ignored some motions after a motion to quash came through (Vic's subpoena for the TCPA hearing, Nick's deposition notice, etc).

Although, in this case, Lemwaaah actually responded to Ty's motion to quash, whereas he was all bluster for the other quashes.
 
Uh, hello, he's been an admin/mod for Monica's fan group for 3 years, he's clearly a BF Deal.
Yeah, so is that UnderdogBT sperg. Nobody cares about him, except for that picture when he had a helmet on.

All Slatosch has to do in a deposition is admit Ron committed TI and say "I dont recall" for the next 8 hours.
 
Last edited:
The Sandman case was reinstated. For all our Twitter delvers, did any of LawTwitter express opinions about that case? You know, see what their batting average is.

Also, it is a little late now, but you know that experiment where they genderswapped Trump and Hillary lines? (Hillary's lines came out of a man etc) What if Nick had done that? Found an attractive woman to explain why Vic had a case? Would LawTwitter be tripping over themselves?

Yeah, virtue signal harder. Thats so hot. Mmmmm, yeah. Monica will definitely fuck you if you virtue signal just a wee bit more.

Sometimes Monica just wants junk food instead of steak, if you catch my drift. (Ron being freeze dried cereal.)
 
Also, it is a little late now, but you know that experiment where they genderswapped Trump and Hillary lines? (Hillary's lines came out of a man etc) What if Nick had done that? Found an attractive woman to explain why Vic had a case? Would LawTwitter be tripping over themselves?
Just get @Svetlana. Makeupsplaining the interwebs
 
You may be saying that as a joke, but I would honestly love to see how she does make up for shows, most YouTube videos of makeup are Beauty stuff or just before and after for special effects. A more detailed look at SFX stuff would be cool.
"Helloooo guys, and welcome to Makeupsplaining the Interwebs! I am your host, Lisa of Hansell FX, a small makeup company in southern California. With me today is my good friend Vic Mignogna, who I will be turning into a Klingon, live."
 
"Helloooo guys, and welcome to Makeupsplaining the Interwebs! I am your host, Lisa of Hansell FX, a small makeup company in southern California. With me today is my good friend Vic Mignogna, who I will be turning into a Klingon, live."
No, no, no, if she gets Vic for a make-up he should be a green skinned girl.

Either that or a SFX prostetic ala Full Metal Alchemist.
 
The Sandman case was reinstated. For all our Twitter delvers, did any of LawTwitter express opinions about that case?

Who cares? Nick did a video on it though.


I'm somewhat underwhelmed by the development but it's still rather remarkable for a Rule 60 motion for a federal judge to reverse his own judgment to succeed even in part.
 
Back