SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Here’s an update post with some final semi-off-topic thoughts about the Cyantreuse situation before I move on to the next thing.

So, for a while I’ve been seeing people accusing Cyantreuse of being a child predator, and I and some others have alluded to inappropriate behavior towards minors from him. However, I do not believe that it’s accurate to refer to Cyantreuse as a child predator or a pedophile, and I want to shed some light on why I believe this, because I understand that it may seem conflicting. Overwhelmingly, people who have accused Cyantreuse of abuse, harassment, intimidation, etc. have been adults. Cyan has had several relationships with people from the SCP community over the years, and there is nothing to indicate that he has met up with anyone below the age of 18, or that he has a pattern of targeting people much younger than he is. I’m aware of two things that Cyan has been accused of that may make people believe otherwise. The first is that he offered to meet up with a person who, although 17 at the time, would have been 18 when they got the chance, and there seems to have been multiple witnesses to this. The second is that there was at least one occasion in which he invited someone who was underage to an NSFW chatroom. Whether this was accidental or not, I don’t know. I want to clarify that, while to some people these may be damning, and they’re certainly not good, I believe that this is more of an issue of the SCP community’s hookup culture than it is an issue of Cyan being attracted to young teens, because this is the exact kind of behavior that the SCP NSFW scene encourages from people who would know otherwise. I have seen many, many people make some very stupid decisions while in that side of the fandom, and it's difficult to tell whether they would have been predisposed to such a thing had they not gotten involved with the SCP sex scene.

So, a few days ago I was messaged about some stuff that I had totally missed, and it came as quite a surprise to me. Lot of images, I didn't have a choice otherwise.

21.png
22.png
23.png
24.png
25.png
26.png
27.png

All of these are posts that he made about his dad in early 2018. I’ve censored out identifying information including names, cities, and dates because I honestly just feel bad for him. While I suppose this explains how someone was able to doxx his dad, I’m also feeling quite confused as to why he decided to post all of these (and still has them up). These are some VERY heavy accusations, and yet he apparently felt safe enough around his dad to quit his job and move to a new house with him later that year in November. Hell, recently he even made this post: https://archive.md/IuW6s

Honestly I’m just taking this as more proof that Cyan is able to dish out all sorts of accusations on social media, but can’t handle it when he’s confronted about his own bad behavior. And Cy? If you’re reading this, please fucking delete these.

Also, I was sent another Tumblr post in which he describes getting into an argument with one of his partners over a knife, and… poor guy. https://archive.md/DyBEf.

So, now that all of that is out of the way, my next megapost which I’ve been researching for a while is for Dr. Bright / TheDuckman, a longtime SCP Wiki admin and the biggest piece of shit on staff. Hoping to have it out within the next few days. I’m not sure it it’s inappropriate of me to ask publicly or not, but I don’t know where else would be visible enough to request this. If anyone has any relevant information (including personal testimonies), it would be a big help if you could send me a DM. I don’t like to use anything that I’ve been told privately without permission.
 
Hey, it’s been a while since I got to post something significant. Here’s another megapost I’ve been working on for quite some time about a character who really needs it more than anyone else: the SCP Wiki’s very own admin, Dr. Bright. He got made fun of earlier in this thread, but I feel like the original poster missed the point.

“Dr. Bright” / “AdminBright” / “TheDuckman” / “iamnotadamnedmonkey” / “TheArgentOne” / “talljacksoe” / Mitchell Louis Peters:

1.jpg
Wikidot: http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/adminbright
Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/user/theargentone
Tumblr: https://iamnotadamnedmonkey.tumblr.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/talljacksoe (https://archive.md/b8ys8)
Discord: TheArgentOne#3095
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capnduckman?refer=embed
Livejournal: https://darksunlight.livejournal.com/profile (https://archive.ph/Z3PcN) (https://archive.ph/ra1uP)
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/CaptainCDuckman/videos

This individual has a very long history with the SCP Wiki and there are a lot of names I could call him. For simplicity’s sake, and because I don’t want anyone confusing him with his author character, I will refer to him in this post as “Duckman.” Many detractors of the SCP community, especially ones who are still salty about the June 2018 drama, frequently claim that social justice or transgender characters are the worst thing to happen to the SCP community. This assertion is misguided. I want to offer a counterpoint: Duckman is the pervert who’s been a blight on the community since it began, and he is directly responsible for the reason that it’s become such a haven for predators. As of posting (January 2020) he is 38 years old, soon to be 39. Keep that in mind.

He’s probably going to whine on Tumblr about how much better he’s gotten over the years after I post this, so be clear: I think that the feminist persona, virtue signaling, and “queer identity” are false flags to distract from the fact that he’s a creep, and the fact that he has an existing polycule doesn’t mean shit. Long post warning, and be sure to open all the spoilers.

Like some of the other people brought up in this thread before, Duckman is knees-deep in the sex side of the SCP fandom, and has been for a long time. Last I checked, he was an admin of the IRC chat #Site12, the popular NSFW IRC chat for members of the SCP Wiki who want to fuck each other. Also the place where a bunch of predators are born. His author character Dr. Bright has a bit of a reputation for being a pervert in-universe, and it’s something that Duckman himself has been trying to distance himself from. Too bad that he spent years gunking up the wiki with weird sex shit. Here are some examples:

1. In 2010, Duckman wrote a short story titled “Doctor, Doctor, Doctor” , about a scenario in which his author character possesses the body of everyone in the world. It also included a segment in which he describes the breasts of a 13 year old girl, and was completely unnecessary to the story. It can still be found in the page’s edit history (deleted bits are highlighted in blue).

2.png


Many people took issue with the reference to pedophilia, but even 5 years later, Duckman was still defending his unfunny joke.

3.png


It was not until 2018 that he conceded and made edits to the story.

4.png


2. SCP-1004, titled “Factory Porn” is a pretty well known SCP by Duckman. I was originally going to summarize it, but I’ll let these screenshots speak for themselves.

5.png

6.png


While I find it possible that this could have been intended as an anti-porn SCP, knowing Duckman, that seems unlikely, and the second screenshot, coupled with the way he defended its inclusion in the discussion section, has me even less convinced.

3. Duckman’s author page contains a crossed out reference to a now deleted story called Things to do in Tel Aviv When You’re Dead, which was part of a larger series that several authors contributed to. Here’s a screenshot of a Tumblr post summarizing it, by someone who read it:

7.png


I want to clarify that there’s nothing wrong with writing sexual horror, or even sex/sexual content in general. My issue with Duckman’s NSFW writing is that I think it tends to be gratuitous, inappropriate, and in many cases outright creepy. In other words, I think he has a history of being an immature pervert, and my issue is with how openly he flaunts it.

--------

That said, Duckman’s writing isn’t the only example of him posting inappropriate sexual shit to the wiki. Here’s a screenshot of a Reddit post by someone who made a big list of predators in the SCP community, including a helpful public summary of some of Duckman’s behavior.

8.png


Normally I would censor out names from these sorts of posts, but because I agree that Eskobar is a credible source as a long-time writer, I believe that the testimonies of both these people are helpful. I don’t know if it’s the exact same instance that this person is talking about, but I do recall seeing a screenshot of an announcement on the SCP Wiki stating that applications would be closed because Duckman was teaching BDSM classes at a convention, or something like that. I wasn’t able to find it again, but it was totally unnecessary to declare it in an announcement, and a good example of how Duckman helped to make sex and BDSM a prominent subculture of the SCP community.

On another note, as you may see from this screenshot, it was brought up that Duckman has a history of being creepy towards young girls. He does. Despite his age, Duckman is infamous for specifically targeting young girls for sex. As in, ones who have just turned 18 or 19. Mind that he does this a lot, and it’s borderline predatory for someone as sexually experienced as he is. Several people have tried to bring attention to this before, but usually get shot down because it’s “not an issue” or “kinkshaming” or whatever. Also he’s into dd/lg lol.

Unfortunately, Duckman also has a bad habit of talking about sex shit when kids are around. The issue has been brought up on Tumblr before.

9.png

10.png


The above are from an SCP shitposting blog and an SCP discourse blog, respectively. Duckman has a bad habit of talking about his sex life in front of people who are a bit young to hear about that.

While Duckman usually keeps his weird behavior private, sometimes it leaks into public, like that time he asked his followers to send him nudes for his birthday.
“They are for my own personal smiling.” Uh huh. Someone in a position of authority asking for nudes from fans is just… weird.

Now, it’s important to remember that Duckman is still an SCP admin, which means he has a whole decade of corruption to address. Duckman has never had the best reputation as an admin. It’s a somewhat known fact that during the early days of the wiki, he would purposefully deny applications from nonbinary people, and was known to be the kind of guy who would hound women for nudes. Any old admin worth their salt will admit to this. In more recent years, however, I’d argue that he hasn’t become any less corrupt. Duckman is hanging onto a lot of nostalgia points from when he held down the fort for a couple of years. That was several years ago, and these days he doesn’t contribute much, mostly showing up to vote on a ban length and not contributing many of his own thoughts.

It shouldn’t be a surprise that Duckman, much like Cyantreuse, has the habit of playing the victim when called out on his bad behavior. When he got called out some time ago for editing pages without permission, he pulled the depression card, of all things, and got off scott free.

--------

Oooooh, but I think my favorite Duckman staff moment was when he bragged on Tumblr about doxxing a literal kid for trolling the wiki. Here’s a fun fact for you all: Wikidot gave the SCP Wiki special permission to view the IPs of people who visit their site. They’re also on good terms with their IRC host, and can get the email addresses of people who signed up to the chat service. They can doxx people, and they will not feel bad about it. https://archive.md/mSCL5

Wanna bet that this isn’t the only time they’ve done something like this? The reblogs are full of other staff members and other important community members cheering it on, including Clef, Fantem, Foggy, and TheHauntedReader. Hey other admins, perhaps you should consider that this is not something that looks good on the Tumblr page of one of your own people?

Now, like every other predator who pretends to be leftist and woke, what Duckman says on social media doesn’t always line up with how he really feels. Let’s look at some examples:

Duckman in recent years has become a pretty big advocate for LGBT people. I imagine that this is in part to make up for his past opinions, though he also self-identifies as “queer.” A quick look at his blog will prove this, but to give an example, here’s an infamous post he made during the 2018 Pride month drama: https://archive.md/Op6bY
Wow, pretty cool of Duckman to stand up for a minority. And as a brave queer man, what else is he to do but fetishize lesbians on Reddit?

11.png


I’m sure that a young butch lesbian would be overjoyed to find out that the person who commented “I’d like to hire you, for a number of positions” on her post is actually a 38 year old man.

A few months ago, when asked on his blog about how he felt about an incestuous ship of two of his SCP characters, he claimed disgust, because incest:
https://archive.md/YnWAi
https://archive.ph/x892e
Perhaps this is to cover up that he specifically requested SCP incest porn from an NSFW artist? Come on Duck, I don’t think your reputation will go any lower than it already has if you admit you’re into that.

Remember how we discussed that Duckman has a habit of going for girls much younger than he is? Makes it a bit funny that he reblogs posts encouraging young girls to be wary of much older men.
https://archive.md/LjueE
https://archive.md/nSQa8
I agree completely, why won’t you consider someone your own age?

I understand that on their own, these posts are quite minor. But together I believe that they paint a picture of someone who isn’t totally honest online about his real motivations, and I’ll let you all come to your own conclusions.

--------

On top of all this, Duckman has a habit of pissing off people in the SCP community on social media, usually because of how possessive he can be over the fandom.

Duckman got in a fight not too long ago over a Tumblr user who made a meme of his character. (Retold in edited format).

12.png


And what is the meme in question that provoked such a strong reaction?

13.png

As a result of the mini-drama, one person chose a clever URL for their SCP blog.

A user on this very forum also described his experience with Duckman earlier in this thread, while in an SCP-themed roleplay game over Livejournal.

Oh, I have a story about the guy who made Dr. Bright (I don't know his actual name so I'll just call him Bright).

Back around 2011-2012, someone on LiveJournal made a roleplay game based on the SCP Foundation. This wasn't anything for-profit, or claiming to be an official part of the SCP Foundation, it was an insignificant roleplay game made by a few fans. Bright found it, and asked if he could join as Dr. Bright. The creators, excited that someone who was involved in the actual wiki wanted to play in their game, said yes.

It turns out he really didn't care about playing in the game, and his intentions for joining were to keep it from becoming "stupid" or straying too far from SCP canon. His entire presence in the game was one tantrum after another as he tried to play canon police and tell people that they were doing it wrong. In the end, he threw such a big fit that culminated in him telling people that Dr. Bright was going to kill their characters because they were stupid characters that would never be part of the actual SCP Foundation that the creators just said fuck it and closed the game. He went crying to another LiveJournal community about how the players in that community just don't care enough about SCP Foundation canon, to which the response was an overwhelming "why do you care?"

So, unsurprisingly, the guy with the Mary Sue immortal scientist character that breaks basically every rule on the SCP Wiki is a huge manbaby that can't handle people writing things he doesn't like on different websites.

As for my opinion about SCP as a whole, there are some good creepy creations there but the rules and guidelines for writing there are peak :autism: and so are a lot of the more prominent members. The fact that a lot of these exceptional individuals seem to think they're god's gift to horror writing too doesn't help.

I went looking through his Livejournal, and found some posts in which he talks about it.

14.png

15.png


And sometimes you can find other miscellaneous posts about the guy throughout the internet.

16.png


17.png


Seems like someone has some issues with getting along with the fandom. He’s gotten in some other fights, like the time he got into some drama with a person who kinned one of his characters and another time when he blocked someone for calling out Cyantreuse without involving him lol. I'll let you all find those on your own.

I couldn't find anything again while working on this, but I've also seen several people claim before that he was extremely discouraging to them as new SCP writers. Having seen some of the barebones critique he gives before, I honestly wouldn't be shocked. Duckman is definitely one of those people who takes an elitist approach to the community and throws around his weight as a popular author, to the loss of those around him.

So, in conclusion, what did we learn from this? Consent is sexy.
 
Last edited:
I remember reading that factory porn SCP back in the day. I didn't realize that creepy sex shit was literally the majority of Bright's work.

Jesus christ is there nobody on that wiki who isn't a sperg or predator?
You have to be autistic to run a wiki, and given they went woke, that means it was much more likely that many of the staff want to rape people or have raped people and use that movement to pretend they aren't subhumans worthy of elimination.

Also the doctor characters were shit for the most part since they could casually survive what MTF agents couldn't do for bs reasons.
 
You have to be autistic to run a wiki, and given they went woke, that means it was much more likely that many of the staff want to rape people or have raped people and use that movement to pretend they aren't subhumans worthy of elimination.

Also the doctor characters were shit for the most part since they could casually survive what MTF agents couldn't do for bs reasons.

Dr. Clef as a character was alright though. Emphasis on "alright"
 
I remember reading that factory porn SCP back in the day. I didn't realize that creepy sex shit was literally the majority of Bright's work.

Jesus christ is there nobody on that wiki who isn't a sperg or predator?

I forgot to bring it up in my post, but Duckman has power on the Site Criticism Team, Internet Outreach Team, Licensing Team, Rewrite Team, Disciplinary Committee, and the fucking Anti-Harassment Team. As in the same Anti-Harassment Team that deals with very sensitive information from SCP community members and has their own private wiki to log everything. How someone thought it was a good idea, I don't know.

also he just has way too much power in the first place
 
I almost died the first time I read this one: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2030
This is basically what I thought of after reading it for the first time. (The second half)

EDIT:

I was stupid enough to not archive the two above threads, so please forgive me, I’ll need to summarize them. I was under the belief that staff never erase threads.

Never assume anything on the internet is permanent no matter how long standing it is or how "level headed" the people running it seem to be. All it takes is one bad actor for historical revisionism to happen.
 
Last edited:
I've been re-reading some SCPs over the New Years holidays and for the most part haven't seen any additions to them, but then you read some random article and it starts off with "This SCP only affects males, however it will also affect transgender people who identify as male, any containment personnel should be female or identify as female", you look at the date of last edit and it was like October of this year whereas the main article is from like 2012 and you just sigh and roll your eyes.
 
I've been re-reading some SCPs over the New Years holidays and for the most part haven't seen any additions to them, but then you read some random article and it starts off with "This SCP only affects males, however it will also affect transgender people who identify as male, any containment personnel should be female or identify as female", you look at the date of last edit and it was like October of this year whereas the main article is from like 2012 and you just sigh and roll your eyes.
There's nothing wrong with an occasional gender-based SCP. You can look at the revision history, including reloading old versions iirc - was it actually introduced recently?

Honestly, the spookiest thing about this SCP idea is that, if it was edited this October, the edit is from ten months in the future.
 
There's nothing wrong with an occasional gender-based SCP. You can look at the revision history, including reloading old versions iirc - was it actually introduced recently?

Honestly, the spookiest thing about this SCP idea is that, if it was edited this October, the edit is from ten months in the future.

Gender-based SCP's are fine, hiring mentally ill persons to your organization isn't.

The edits were October 2019, I'm still not used to the idea of it being 2020 yet.
 
I was thinking of saying something about the creepy shit Cy has been saying on Tumblr, but I kinda want to talk about something that's been bothering me about how SCP staff cover up serious offenses in their immediate community.

A while back, a pedophile who frequented SCP IRC chats, including several NSFW and roleplay ones, got banned. He was caught doing a lot of creepy shit to younger girls in the SCP fandom, including minors. Now, to my knowledge, a lot of people know what he did, so he probably has no hope of making a return. But here's the issue: he never got an actual disciplinary thread, despite being a longtime member of the community and a writer. The only hint of him being banned is buried in the chat ban page where the reason given is so vague that it could mean a lot of different things. And I do somewhat understand why they do this: I imagine that they want to maintain their image and discourage people from reaching out to the victims. But for fuck's sake, would it kill you to say that a guy got banned for being a predator? Especially when none of his pages got deleted, and newbies regularly get 15-post-long threads for giving bad critique? What a great way to give legitimate child predators a means to cover up their actions.
Glad you asked. He went by Sax/SAXiao/Sad Xiao and was a mid-20s Canadian engineer who typed all his messages like he was writing edgy poetry or roleplaying like a facebook stalker. I’m pretty sure he wiped all his SCP-related accounts, thankfully, but his name is still attached to countless pages and posts.

This post might be a bit late, but I wanted to post some more info on this guy since I finally found enough old screenshots to justify it and they're hard to come by. It's been about a year since he got banned, and even though I don't think he's coming back, this is usually when the scum think they can start appealing their bans for good behavior.

sax.png
sax 2.png

sax 3.png

sax 4.png


(Sorry for heavy censorship in the next one - it's how I found it and I don't include the names of innocent people.)

sax 5.png

His discord name is SAXiao#5333 and the only website I was able to find him on is an RP site where he's still quite active. https://forums.spacebattles.com/members/saxiao.367583/ (https://archive.ph/lJoo9)
According to a google sweep, info from his deleted wikidot account says he lives in Toronto, Canada.

I know that this thread goes into detail on a lot of people, and it may be disorienting at times, but please do your best to keep track of every one of them. Don't ever forget their names and details, that's how they find ways to return.
 
2. SCP-1004, titled “Factory Porn” is a pretty well known SCP by Duckman. I was originally going to summarize it, but I’ll let these screenshots speak for themselves.

And is literally an SCP made of porn that turns you into a child molester and/or troons you out. So it's basically tumblr.

So, in conclusion, what did we learn from this? Consent is sexy.

If someone has to literally wear slogans on their clothes that basically say "I'm not a rapist, honest" I'm really going to doubt their intentions.
 
This post might be a bit late, but I wanted to post some more info on this guy since I finally found enough old screenshots to justify it and they're hard to come by. It's been about a year since he got banned, and even though I don't think he's coming back, this is usually when the scum think they can start appealing their bans for good behavior.

View attachment 1090706
View attachment 1090707
View attachment 1090709
View attachment 1090710

(Sorry for heavy censorship in the next one - it's how I found it and I don't include the names of innocent people.)

View attachment 1090711

lmao what a fucking fagoid
 
If someone has to literally wear slogans on their clothes that basically say "I'm not a rapist, honest" I'm really going to doubt their intentions.

I actually hadn't thought of it that way, but you're totally right. It's for the same reason that I tend to be very wary of the types of male feminists who claim to hate all other men, and Duckman is definitely in that school of thought, only made worse by the fact that he is very much the exact type of creep he would normally claim to despise. I see three possibilities here:
1. He actually believes that men are inherently evil, and he's just a dumbass who's too blind to realize that he's not one of "the good ones."
2. He believes men are evil because he subconsciously knows that his behavior is gross, but rather than taking steps to improve himself, he projects his insecurity onto others.
3. He's just saying that to get laid.
None of them are ideal.
 
Back