- Joined
- May 5, 2019
Author is unknown cause it and a few other SCPs were originally from /x/ in 2008this will most likely never happen, but imagine what would happen if the author of SCP 173 moved over to RPC
all hell would break loose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Author is unknown cause it and a few other SCPs were originally from /x/ in 2008this will most likely never happen, but imagine what would happen if the author of SCP 173 moved over to RPC
all hell would break loose
Oh, I have a story about the guy who made Dr. Bright (I don't know his actual name so I'll just call him Bright).
Back around 2011-2012, someone on LiveJournal made a roleplay game based on the SCP Foundation. This wasn't anything for-profit, or claiming to be an official part of the SCP Foundation, it was an insignificant roleplay game made by a few fans. Bright found it, and asked if he could join as Dr. Bright. The creators, excited that someone who was involved in the actual wiki wanted to play in their game, said yes.
It turns out he really didn't care about playing in the game, and his intentions for joining were to keep it from becoming "stupid" or straying too far from SCP canon. His entire presence in the game was one tantrum after another as he tried to play canon police and tell people that they were doing it wrong. In the end, he threw such a big fit that culminated in him telling people that Dr. Bright was going to kill their characters because they were stupid characters that would never be part of the actual SCP Foundation that the creators just said fuck it and closed the game. He went crying to another LiveJournal community about how the players in that community just don't care enough about SCP Foundation canon, to which the response was an overwhelming "why do you care?"
So, unsurprisingly, the guy with the Mary Sue immortal scientist character that breaks basically every rule on the SCP Wiki is a huge manbaby that can't handle people writing things he doesn't like on different websites.
As for my opinion about SCP as a whole, there are some good creepy creations there but the rules and guidelines for writing there are peak :autism: and so are a lot of the more prominent members. The fact that a lot of these exceptional individuals seem to think they're god's gift to horror writing too doesn't help.
You have to be autistic to run a wiki, and given they went woke, that means it was much more likely that many of the staff want to rape people or have raped people and use that movement to pretend they aren't subhumans worthy of elimination.I remember reading that factory porn SCP back in the day. I didn't realize that creepy sex shit was literally the majority of Bright's work.
Jesus christ is there nobody on that wiki who isn't a sperg or predator?
You have to be autistic to run a wiki, and given they went woke, that means it was much more likely that many of the staff want to rape people or have raped people and use that movement to pretend they aren't subhumans worthy of elimination.
Also the doctor characters were shit for the most part since they could casually survive what MTF agents couldn't do for bs reasons.
Clef was the worst, considering he was always used in the deletion stories.Dr. Clef as a character was alright though. Emphasis on "alright"
I remember reading that factory porn SCP back in the day. I didn't realize that creepy sex shit was literally the majority of Bright's work.
Jesus christ is there nobody on that wiki who isn't a sperg or predator?
This is basically what I thought of after reading it for the first time. (The second half)I almost died the first time I read this one: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2030
I was stupid enough to not archive the two above threads, so please forgive me, I’ll need to summarize them. I was under the belief that staff never erase threads.
There's nothing wrong with an occasional gender-based SCP. You can look at the revision history, including reloading old versions iirc - was it actually introduced recently?I've been re-reading some SCPs over the New Years holidays and for the most part haven't seen any additions to them, but then you read some random article and it starts off with "This SCP only affects males, however it will also affect transgender people who identify as male, any containment personnel should be female or identify as female", you look at the date of last edit and it was like October of this year whereas the main article is from like 2012 and you just sigh and roll your eyes.
There's nothing wrong with an occasional gender-based SCP. You can look at the revision history, including reloading old versions iirc - was it actually introduced recently?
Honestly, the spookiest thing about this SCP idea is that, if it was edited this October, the edit is from ten months in the future.
oh my god he's insane
View attachment 1087451
Anyone know when this email was sent and to whom? We need this info![]()
I was thinking of saying something about the creepy shit Cy has been saying on Tumblr, but I kinda want to talk about something that's been bothering me about how SCP staff cover up serious offenses in their immediate community.
A while back, a pedophile who frequented SCP IRC chats, including several NSFW and roleplay ones, got banned. He was caught doing a lot of creepy shit to younger girls in the SCP fandom, including minors. Now, to my knowledge, a lot of people know what he did, so he probably has no hope of making a return. But here's the issue: he never got an actual disciplinary thread, despite being a longtime member of the community and a writer. The only hint of him being banned is buried in the chat ban page where the reason given is so vague that it could mean a lot of different things. And I do somewhat understand why they do this: I imagine that they want to maintain their image and discourage people from reaching out to the victims. But for fuck's sake, would it kill you to say that a guy got banned for being a predator? Especially when none of his pages got deleted, and newbies regularly get 15-post-long threads for giving bad critique? What a great way to give legitimate child predators a means to cover up their actions.
Glad you asked. He went by Sax/SAXiao/Sad Xiao and was a mid-20s Canadian engineer who typed all his messages like he was writing edgy poetry or roleplaying like a facebook stalker. I’m pretty sure he wiped all his SCP-related accounts, thankfully, but his name is still attached to countless pages and posts.
2. SCP-1004, titled “Factory Porn” is a pretty well known SCP by Duckman. I was originally going to summarize it, but I’ll let these screenshots speak for themselves.
So, in conclusion, what did we learn from this? Consent is sexy.
This post might be a bit late, but I wanted to post some more info on this guy since I finally found enough old screenshots to justify it and they're hard to come by. It's been about a year since he got banned, and even though I don't think he's coming back, this is usually when the scum think they can start appealing their bans for good behavior.
View attachment 1090706
View attachment 1090707
View attachment 1090709
View attachment 1090710
(Sorry for heavy censorship in the next one - it's how I found it and I don't include the names of innocent people.)
View attachment 1090711
If someone has to literally wear slogans on their clothes that basically say "I'm not a rapist, honest" I'm really going to doubt their intentions.