Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,448 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,593
Even if he does move there (he won't, he can't afford it or convince the court) - he'll last 10 mins before an experienced escort has emptied his wallet.
Only Russ' single minded quest for bobs and vagene would protect him from getting fleeced by every two-bit huckster and scam artist Vegas has to offer and then it would lead him right to a woman who would take him for everything he's worth.
 
Even if he does move there (he won't, he can't afford it or convince the court) - he'll last 10 mins before an experienced escort has emptied his wallet.

Prostitution isn't legal in Vegas so if he is dumb enough to try anything there he'll be dealing with old school criminals. If he pulls any shit he's getting his ass kicked at best.
 
He's not banned from Facebook.

View attachment 1603599

Not only did I listen to both sides, I read the transcript too.
Nope, actually at this point there is only one side of the story, Russell: you are guilty. There is no debate anymore. You are a guilty sex pest degenerate and you swore that you were as much in court in front of God and country. You're a criminal for life and everyone knows it.
 
As for Russ moving to Las Vegas, since it is bench probation and not having to report to a probation and parole officer, then technically, he might be able to.

We would have to see what the conditions of his probation are. For people convicted of a felony and seeing a probation officer. Most of the time you have to get the receiving state (Nevada in this case) to agree to let him transfer the case to a PO in Vegas. If he violates he could technically be extradited to Utah. And usually to move, you have to have a good reason to do it. Something like family in the area or guaranteed employment. Not having easier access to hookers.

Now, like I said, for this being a misdemeanor bench probation, not really sure if the court would stop that. Also, logistically, most states will not pay to extradite someone over a misdemeanor. It is just not worth the cost and effort to travel real far to arrest and transport someone back to jail over a misdemeanor.

All of this is just hypothetical. We all know that this is all just a pie in the sky idea, and Rusty will not move out to Las Vegas.
 
Last edited:
Only Russ' single minded quest for bobs and vagene would protect him from getting fleeced by every two-bit huckster and scam artist Vegas has to offer and then it would lead him right to a woman who would take him for everything he's worth.
And then watch him rage when there's no one he can complain to.
 
Longtime lurker and first time poster, so apologies if this is not formatted correctly. I was able to get ahold of the transcript for the second part. However, some parts were difficult to hear so if anyone has any corrections, please let me know! Hopefully, this at least gives the gist of what was said.

[a short amount was cut off/partially inaudible in the beginning, just the judge calling forward the participants of the Greer case and then stating that the Court had looked into the matter of the protective order and they agree with Mr. Summers that the court does have the authority to issue such an order]

Summers: Your Honor, at this point we’re asking that Mr. Greer not have any communication, no contact, with Ms. Albino. We’d also ask that Mr. Greer not go to any residence or any place of occupation. I’m not going to ask Ms. Albino to provide those to the court. The reason for that is I don’t want Mr. Greer to have access to those addresses. Those would be the two main terms of the sentencing protective order.

Judge: Thank you Council. Mr. Greer, the court orders then the following- sentencing is taking place at this time. Ms. Greer (yes he did say that)… or Mr. Greer, the court traditionally has put a lot of energy for support in joint resolutions. There’s a value in that, there’s a safety in that. I’m going to follow the joint recommendations being made here today. In one portion that’s, I suppose it’s fortunate for you, in a sense, that I don’t know all the particulars, the details, to the point that the attorneys and the parties involved in this case and I’m sure there’s emotions on many sides of the argument. This is a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail. I have concerns. I am going to follow the joint recommendations and I want you to follow [inaudible] this court order of probation, otherwise the court will not hesitate to post jail time. The court order goes as follows: 180 days in jail is ordered in this case and at this time, the court suspends 180 days of jail and imposes a fine of $680. Places you on probation for 18 months and the terms of probation are as follows: the order of the court is to have no further violations of the law. Minor traffic offenses the court with not hold against you, with a valid license. The court orders you to complete a mental health evaluation by a 3rd party in a state-approved agency and turn that evaluation into the court within 90 days. The court appoints to order a psychosexual evaluation, but stays that order at this time in compliance with the joint agreement. The court orders you provide a set of fingerprints to this court within 30 days. You can go to the court webpage, and there’s a link that you can make an appointment to get your fingerprints done, and those will be needed and required to be provided to this court within 30 days. As a condition of probation and by court order, this court issues a sentencing protective order. A violation of a sentencing protective order could bring upon a party that violates the court order of protection further charges by a prosecution agency. The court order will only be lifted by the court who issued the order. Regardless of what you may feel or want, the court order is in you (?), the defendant, have any direct or indirect contact and not harass through telephone, mail, email, text, or communicate in any way with the victim, which is Ms. Albino. You’re to stay away from and avoid (?) any premise Ms. Albino is present and, if so, must leave immediately. It’s hard to articulate where this could be but upon your understanding, or knowledge of known places, you must leave immediately or you will be in violation of a court order. Can you pay the $680 fine in full today or do you need monthly payments?

Gailey: Your honor, I would like to set up monthly payments on that and, as to… was the court willing to allow him credit for the cost of any out of pocket expenses for eval. and treatment?

J: Council, I don’t calculate those types of things, a lot of folks do upfront of staying $180 at the time to help offset some costs, but I’m not interested in my courts going and keeping track. So I’ll suspend $180, lowering the obligations to $500 fine [crosstalk] …nothing further regarding keeping tracks of actual costs.

G: Ok, great.

J: Now you can appeal, Mr. Greer, this court order. If you choose to appeal the order of the court, let it be known in writing to the court within 28 days.

G: Did… did you want to set up monthly payments, Your Honor? Like $50 a month or so?

J: Ok, then we’ll set up then a $50 per month, starting one month from today on 10/16, every month thereafter until paid in full. You can pay this online by going to the court’s webpage and pay it there or you can call the clerks of the court and pay over the phone.

G: Thank you Judge.

J: Mr. Greer and Council, is he in the Orem area?

G: He’s in my office right now.

J: He’ll report then to the [inaudible] station of the court before 5pm today, if possible. Is it possible, Council?

G: To…to sign the agreement?

J: So you can make sure he has a copy of the sentencing protective order.

G: Um, yeah, I guess because of the protective order, that makes sense Your Honor. Ok. [crosstalk] Yes… we’ll be able to make it today by…

J: …before 5pm then and that will be preparing the [inaudible].

G: Sounds good.

J: Is there any further business in the Greer matter?

G: No. [at this point, it looks like Russell tries to say something to the lawyer]

S: Not from the city, Your Honor.

J: Ms. Mena and Ms. Albino, thank you for your attendance here today.

Erika [overlapping]: Thank you, Your Honor.

J: ...business as you go forward.

Mena: Thank you, Your Honor.

Edit: Also, just a quick correction- the girl who he DM'ed right before this latest court date had lost her best friend, not her boyfriend (not that this makes it any better).

And, if by some chance, he is able to move to Vegas, I'm curious what part he will move to. There are a lot of Mormons in Vegas and the surrounding areas as well (like the suburbs of Henderson and Summerlin). The latter two areas are, for the most part, somewhat expensive and I'm not sure if he could afford to live there. Chances are, he might be stuck up in North Las Vegas or Downtown, both of which are not super great/safe areas.
 
Last edited:
I imagine Russ chimping every time he has to write a check for $50, or pay it online, or whatever. That's 50 instathots he can't venmo a dollar!

I note the "psychosexual evaluation" is stayed, in addition to the sentence being suspended. It sounds like an unpleasant enough procedure that this is probably to have a graduated set of responses to Russ being Russ and violating probation. So instead of just throwing him immediately in jail, if he triggers it, they'll invoke the "psychosexual evaluation" for whatever that is worth. Then if he refuses, or fucks up again, it's straight to jail. I'm not sure how they'll do that. I believe they can do anything from a day to the remaining probation time, to the actual full time, disregarding probation, depending on the circumstances.

So my guess is if he fucks up, their first step is the more intense psych option, followed by jail.
 
So he has an opportunity to appeal. I am of the opinion he will. Even without having a lawyer. The appeal will certainly (in his mind) give him the opportunity to tell his side and explain his plights and have his protective order rescinded. And everyone will clap
The court tends not to grant appeals when you plead guilty unless you can prove you were coerced into doing so. When you plead guilty, you're admitting guilt, so there's nothing to appeal. Appeals are if you think you didn't get a fair trial.
 
Last edited:
I'm referring to this, i doubt he would be granted anything, and only a fool would. Russell is that fool. Im not sure if the Judge was talking about the whole court order or just part of it

J: Now you can appeal, Mr. Greer, this court order. If you choose to appeal the order of the court, let it be known in writing to the court within 28 days.

The court tends not to grant appeals when you plead guilty unless you can prove you were coerced into doing so. When you plead guilty, you're admitting guilt, so there's nothing to appeal. Appeals are if you think you didn't get a fair trial.
 
The court tends not to grant appeals when you plead guilty unless you can prove you were coerced into doing so. When you plead guilty, you're admitting guilt, so there's nothing to appeal. Appeals are if you think you didn't get a fair trial.
He’d complain his lawyer coerced him and then try to represent himself, slurp through his trial and end up with a worse sentence than before
 
I think he's pretty much locked in on the "guilty" plea. If I'm not mistaken, the sentence itself could be appealed, but with the legal standard of "abuse of discretion." For the most part, the sentence he received was well within the sentencing guidelines, so it'd be pretty tough to appeal it. It probably could be argued that the sentencing protective order was an abuse of the court's discretion, but appealing that part specifically would be a really bad look.
 
Greer v. Swift update:

I just checked again and still no new fillings since Aug 19th, his Motion for Extension of Time and Motion for Alternative Service.

I have to assume that means both are denied and it's now just a matter of waiting on the court to file a dismissal for failure to serve. Good work, Russ.
 
Back