Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would he care?
Because it is news in vidja gaymes and everyone else will care about the ever increasing monolith, though there's a chance Bob will be all for more giant corporations until enough people tell him to feel bad about it. Either way, he is aware.
1600699657746.png
 
Chris has committed two very common errors among Christians. The first is that you should not evaluate the Bible based on the sinful behaviors of fallible human beings, even people in the church. The temptation to pass judgement is very understandable; I succumb to this even now, but Chris should bear this in mind if he were still in the flock (which he is no longer). The second is that you cannot take the Bible a la carte, I agree with this but object to that. If you have doubts about whatever part of the Bible you should ask for pastoral assistance.
Chris has committed an even more basic error. The Bible "as we have it" absolutely was NOT compiled by "17th century white dudes", as though the KJV is "The Bible".

The selection of books was formed by centuries of church consensus, not any one individual or committee (which is why Catholic and Protestant canons differ slightly). Even then, that canon was extremely well established by the time the KJV came out.

And while he's entirely correct that a lot of translations in the KJV (and even translations today) are politically and theologically motivated, any retard can compare translations side by side and see where that's taken place. Even if you're not a Hebrew/Greek speaker, there are plenty of resources on the difficult and controversial translation choices. Not to mention that modern translations have FAR MORE manuscript evidence than older ones. Modern translations aren't revisions of the KJV, the vast majority of them are entirely new, using the best compiled manuscripts available (which, while not perfect, are generally reckoned to be pretty damn close). They're more accurate, not less.

Maybe Chis should've been held back a couple grades in Catholic school.
 
Jesus effing Christ. There's so much stupid here, it's a wonder Bobby can even manage to remember to breathe.

First off, that's not what the SCOTUS is supposed to be doing, fuckwad. Legislation from the bench has been an increasingly big problem in recent years, where a judge or group of judges decides to "reinterpret" some existing law and inject a whole new meaning into it that wasn't there to begin with. Despite many people in the country continuing to be opposed to gay marriage (even the liberal paradise of California striking down a measure to legalize it), the Supreme Court decided to just magic it into existence by claiming that it was enshrined in existing civil rights laws, forcing people to accept it even if they didn't want to.

The problem is that this goes against the entire concept of separation of powers. The legislative branch is supposed to create the laws that govern our nation, while the judicial interprets and the executive enforces. Each branch has checks and balances against the others; for example, if the legislature creates a law that would annul a First Amendment right, the judiciary can strike that down as unconstitutional. But if the judiciary not only gets to interpret laws, but also de facto create laws, we now have a bunch of unelected judges (often with lifetime appointments, no less) that get to decide how the country is run, instead of a legislature that has a slow but steady change of members over the years.

Bob and others like him only care about short-term gratification. They love shit like the gay marriage legalization only because it serves as a big dopamine hit; they owned those damn Bible-thumping conservatards and the Superior Future™ is nigh! They don't even begin to consider the ramifications of legislating from the bench. All that matters is that they feel good about it.

Second, way to go oversimplifying the American Revolution, you fucking moron. Claiming that it was only because "a bunch of assholes didn't want to pay extra for their breakfast drink" is about the dumbest take I could possibly imagine...actually, scratch that, I legitimately would never have thought of that before I just read it. Congrats, Bobby, your opinions are worse than even I could have come up with. You're beyond parody.

Third, do you even understand how much it would take to change something as fundamental as the head of our judiciary branch? It's enshrined in the fucking Constitution. The process of replacing the SCOTUS with some other leftist-approved system would involve going through the amendment process, which would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress to propose it and a three-fourths majority of state legislatures to ratify it. Last I checked, the Democrats are nowhere close to having control of enough of those to pass an amendment like that, and no way in hell would Republicans go along with it.

Unless, of course, you're referring to overthrowing the government entirely and setting up a new one. To that I say, good fucking luck. We've seen the extent of what Antifa can do over the past few months of rioting: they pussy out at the first sign of confrontation. If these are the shock troops that are supposed to deliver the leftist utopia by overthrowing Drumpfler, then quite frankly, I think we have nothing to worry about.

Finally, Bob has no room to shittalk another person's intelligence, especially not Trump's. Setting aside all the complete wrong I just covered, if you were anywhere near the genius you envision yourself being, you wouldn't have an almost 3000-page thread on Kiwifarms.

I can't even bother with the rest of those tweets. So much idiocy condensed into a few sentences, it's almost given me a headache.
Bob gets the basic idea that "governance is a lie agreed upon" - he just fails to understand that the rest of the sentence is "because it is a better alternative than endless war."

I know also he likes to think that in a war his side will win because "we're the good guys" never mind that history has proven 99% of the time - minorities lose wars. Because at the end of the day, it's not about who has the Force, but who has the bodies. (It's why we remember and imortalize those times the little guy won.)
 
So according to Bob, Al Qaeda launched an attack on the World Trade Center because they really liked Goldeneye?
I’m not sure what it was but it was because the government was making shooter games through Activision so that it can ingrain in peoples heads to shoot brown people and 9/11 was done with that in mind which boomed shooter games in the 2000’s to get dudebros to kill brown people

Of course I am not sure if this was spot on to Bob’s “Activision did 9/11” belief
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Koby_Fish
So according to Bob, Al Qaeda launched an attack on the World Trade Center because they really liked Goldeneye?
We had a lot of laughs when it was discovered that on Osama Bin Laden's computer were emulators of Mario games.

Anyway I'll find you the citation later today if nobody else has. (Should be on the OP.)
 
That was pretty much locked down by 325 and the First Council of Nicea.
First Council of Nicea had nothing to do with the selection of books in the canon. There were other matters of "canon" (that is, official doctrine) being decided, but not that. This is an old urban legend that refuses to die.
 
First Council of Nicea had nothing to do with the selection of books in the canon. There were other matters of "canon" (that is, official doctrine) being decided, but not that. This is an old urban legend that refuses to die.

Sorry, I was imprecise. The canon was pretty much settled by the time of the First Council of Nicea; we know this because the consensus canon was discussed and spelled out in the minutes.

This does not mean the First Council of Nicea settled the canon.
 
I’m not sure what it was but it was because the government was making shooter games through Activision so that it can ingrain in peoples heads to shoot brown people and 9/11 was done with that in mind which boomed shooter games in the 2000’s to get dudebros to kill brown people

Of course I am not sure if this was spot on to Bob’s “Activision did 9/11” belief
You've more or less got it. IIRC he was more in the "Bush let 9/11 happen" camp vs. "Bush did 9/11", but the underlying belief that any fad or happening in his pop culture entertainment, that Bob personally dislikes, is a government psyop is still there. That same belief drove his hilarious 2014 theory that Republicans did GamerGate to make gamers misogynist and vote against Hillary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back