StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Looking back, I still think this is one of my favorites:
View attachment 1621970
stjc.jpg
 
Somebody explain that one.
A lot of people, conservatives mostly,love to talk about Judeo-Christian values or culture despite many of those Jews keep saying stuff like "no we aren't you" to the Christians and others just attach themselves to Christian culture like when Ben Shapiro said that Notre Dame was a symbol of Judeo-Christian culture.
 
Somebody explain that one.
Judeo-Christian refers to the term Judeo-Christian values, which is the belief that the values and culture of the west evolved from common themes and moral teachings shared by Christianity and Judaism. Stonetoss is saying (visually) that such a concept is ridiculous because the two religions split in terms of core teachings since the inception of Christianity.

This isn't directly stated by the comic but adds to its point too: Modern Judaism shares very little with any form of Christianity in terms of source material. A lot of Christian's have the impression that the entire old testament is the entirety of the Jewish faith, but in actual fact the core of modern Jewish beliefs is the first 5 books of the old testament (Torah) plus the Talmud, which is a transcription of an Oral Torah and the teachings of a bunch of rabbis. Neither the oral torah or those teachings are in the christian bible at all, and much of the later (and possibly the former considering they were passed down orally for a long time) are newer than Christianity and were created by the Pharisees, the order that killed Jesus. From what I've heard, the teachings of the Talmud differ drastically from those of the new testament and to some extent the old as well.

Disclaimer that I'm not very well informed on Modern Judaism and my understanding of it is either very surface level (what I've said here basically), or from listening to nazi's talk about it (which I have left out, but includes things like Jewish supremacy and the belief that Jesus is in a vat of boiling cum or some shit in the Talmud).
 
That's starting to change, because of the University/Public School systems.

Basically, teach the upcoming generations that the Social Sciences are equal to the hard STEM fields, and they believe it. Then actual practicing biologists are willing to turn a big fat blind eye to glaring inconsistencies of "gender" theory, and give their willing stamp of "Science" approval to social horseshit.

source: am biologist
The left has already changed STEM to STEAM - including (A)rts. Because, you know, everything/everyone is equally valid.
Waiting for the next change adding (E)ducation, (W)riting, and (H)istory - invalidating their entire argument.
 
Somebody explain that one

There's considerable reason to believe jesus was greek, not jewish (but living in the land we now call israel).

"Judeo-Christian" is a very strange american term. Because the new testament makes clear that it's the jewish religious leadership that is responsible for the cricifixion of christ, more so than the romans.

Jewish religion was messianic at the time and waiting for the messiah that would offer salvation. Christians believe that was christ. Jews did not and nailed him to the cross for falsely claiming it. Christians consider this rejection of christ and god.

So when the most essential part is not only rejected in judaism, but they are the villain, it's really strange to put them in the same term, and first too. As if there were no difference between the two, or as if judaism is an older brother.

The term is usually used to further jewish interests among christian populations. Some of the more religious jews aren't fan of being lumped in with christians either.

And that's leaving out the later jewish religious scripture of jesus being boiled in piss in hell and all that.

The comic makes the point simply. Jews crucified jesus, christians consider him divine. The beliefs are irreconcillable. And it's a disingenuous oppertunisticly used term.


and possibly the former considering they were passed down orally for a long time
The romans were very surprised to discover that jews had managed to keep religious writings secret for hundreds of years.
 
.... I never mentioned the banks. Do you mean the guys Jesus whipped, sure but his issue was more of the fact that they were doing it in a temple and not that they were doing it.

Yes, and Jesus was right about that.

He's referring to the fact that the "Jews own the world by controlling the banks" argument arose mostly from the actions of the Medieval Catholic Church and its prohibition on Christians engaging in usury against other Christians, which resulted in Jews filling the role as a Medieval protobanking system that eventually gave rise to modern banking and capitalism

And arguably centuries of selection for these traits are why Ashkenazi Jews specifically are so much better at math and verbal acuity and score a standard deviation above Caucasians in IQ. It's an objective fact that that's true, but there isn't really a definitive explanation.
 
If it hadn't been for Christians using Jews for banking while pretending they were too good to do such things, if Muslims had done the same instead, they'd be living in a modern wired society while we'd be the primitive goatfuckers. The fact is a modern economy can't even exist without capital and capitalism and that means banking, interest, and all that other shit.

I don't really buy this, and it gets mentioned all the time. It seems awfully Jewish to say "we only got into banking because we were bullied into it by goys." Perhaps- and hear me out here - Jews just like banking cause it doesn't require much work and is a way to make a lot of money and influence very easily.
People thought usury was manipulative and shitty, but nobody forced Jews to get into it and stay doing it forever. It also seems extremely Jewish to say everyone looked down on usury but it's the most important thing for society so god bless these brave Jews for doing what those dumb goys didn't want to do. Coincidentally, we now literally cannot comprehend a society not built entirely on usury. Maybe there's a more detailed history or book or something, but the story just seems off and I see it everywhere.
 
Last edited:
I don't really buy this, and it gets mentioned all the time. It seems awfully Jewish to say "we only got into banking because we were bullied into it by goys." Perhaps- and hear me out here - Jews just like banking cause it doesn't require much work and is a way to make a lot of money and influence very easily.
People thought usury was manipulative and shitty, but nobody forced Jews to get into it and stay doing it forever. It also seems extremely Jewish to say everyone looked down on usury but it's the most important thing for society so god bless these brave Jews for doing what those dumb goys didn't want to do. Coincidentally, we now literally cannot comprehend a society not built entirely on usury. Maybe there's a more detailed history or book or something, but the story just seems off and I see it everywhere.
Damn, they truly are our greatest ally.
 
I like how 95% of posts in this thread aren't about the webcomic itself.
That's how you know stonetoss the only succesful political comic maker.

He makes a two panel, two word comic, and us autists want to discuss for pages whether banking is jew's gift to the world or how they use banking to rob us blind before we're born.
 
Last edited:
A lot of people, conservatives mostly,love to talk about Judeo-Christian values or culture despite many of those Jews keep saying stuff like "no we aren't you" to the Christians and others just attach themselves to Christian culture like when Ben Shapiro said that Notre Dame was a symbol of Judeo-Christian culture.
I probably thought about this way too much, but I can think of two instances where the Judeo-Christian term isn't full of shit:
1. If it's just randomly taking motifs from both religions indiscriminately like some shitty anime.
2. If it's specifically referring to the last one and a half century where people from both religions caused massive global changes in both culture and technology in the west.
 
Regardless of the roots of Judeo-Christianity, in practice it was a way for neocons to manipulate the working class untermenschen into believing their cause and Israel’s were the same, which is why you need to fight and die for Israel, goy! As a concept, it peaked during the Iraq War and is now increasingly rejected. Parroted by jokes like Ben Shapiro and kosher conservatism, which is an ideology that has waned since Iraq. Trump is a Likud shill but he diverges a lot from the likes of Bill Kristol, which him alone tells you all you need to know about Judeo-Christian values.
 
Trump is a Likud shill but he diverges a lot from the likes of Bill Kristol, which him alone tells you all you need to know about Judeo-Christian values.

Trump shills for Zionists partly because of just the practical fact it's better for us for them to be there as a lightning rod for Muslim hate, and partly because it appeals to his fundie base and their dreams of Armageddon. But he isn't a neocon, one of the few good things about him. If there's any single group that literally wants to establish ZOG it's those mothers, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Kristol, that whole bunch of Zionazis.
 
This is the only stonetoss comic I feel is a miss.
The guy on the cross is a jew. The god he claimed to be is the jewish god YHWH. The only white people in the whole story are Pilate, the man who sentences him, and Longinius, the man hammering the nail. Literally everyone else in the whole story is jewish.
I don't think it's disingenuous to describe christianity, a religion whose entire mythology is rooted in judaism, as a jewish sect. The only difference between a christian and a jew is who they think the messiah is. One thinks he already came, the other thinks he's still coming. They both think there's such a thing as a messiah, descending to the same earth from the same god to bring the same paradise. It's more of a minor theological dispute than a separate religion.
 
This is the only stonetoss comic I feel is a miss.
The guy on the cross is a jew. The god he claimed to be is the jewish god YHWH. The only white people in the whole story are Pilate, the man who sentences him, and Longinius, the man hammering the nail. Literally everyone else in the whole story is jewish.
I don't think it's disingenuous to describe christianity, a religion whose entire mythology is rooted in judaism, as a jewish sect. The only difference between a christian and a jew is who they think the messiah is. One thinks he already came, the other thinks he's still coming. They both think there's such a thing as a messiah, descending to the same earth from the same god to bring the same paradise. It's more of a minor theological dispute than a separate religion.
By that logic, there's no real difference between Christianity and Judaism and Islam. After all, they all worship the same God, they just disagree on who the final prophet is.
 
By that logic, there's no real difference between Christianity and Judaism and Islam. After all, they all worship the same God, they just disagree on who the final prophet is.
Yeah. I generally refer to the group as Abrahamism. I see very little difference between abrahamic sects as opposed to actually different religions like buddhism for example. Islam and Christianity share 99% of everything, they rest on the same foundation. Islam and Buddhism share nothing, they are built from totally distinct foundations.
 
Yeah. I generally refer to the group as Abrahamism. I see very little difference between abrahamic sects as opposed to actually different religions like buddhism for example. Islam and Christianity share 99% of everything, they rest on the same foundation. Islam and Buddhism share nothing, they are built from totally distinct foundations.
And that's where I disagree. Beyond the foundation, there are a lot of serious doctrinal differences among the religions, as they diverged significantly from those foundations.
 
Beyond the foundation, there are a lot of serious doctrinal differences among the religions,
Doctrinal differences about concepts that exist only within abrahism. If you disagree about who the messiah is, you are still both asking "Who is the messiah, and when is he coming?" That is a question which is exclusive and specific to judaism and its subsequent sectarian divisions. Buddhists don't ask who the messiah is. South American animists don't ask who the messiah is.
 
Back