Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

You know, for someone with a Tumblr, you write in proper English. That's pretty rare, congratulations!
Also, uh, don't take strangers on the internet so seriously.

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

This is like arguing with a bunch of 14 year old skinheads who think they have the world figured.

 

[seagull]

Sugoi is also okay with comments like this, despite labelling me a hypocrite.

Sugoi calls me a hypocrite but is perfectly okay with people this this being staff members. lol.

Sugoi really rustled you good.

 

[Arkangel]

The consensus of the forum thus far seems to be:

We have no "general consensus". We're an extremely diverse forum both politically, religiously, and ideologically.

The trans community, as a whole, does not think like I do

They don't. Trans people have their own ways of thinking. There isn't some singular monolithic ideology for being trans.

as well as engaging in stalking, d0xing and other behaviours("just talking about them") that potentially put them at greater risk for suicide.

This is a discussion forum, but when the person being discussed comes here OF THEIR OWN VOLITION, all bets are off here.

We just established that suicide is a personal choice by it's own definition.

It is acceptable to deadname trans women, and nobody has a right to say otherwise or they're policing them.

Unless they get their name legally changed, there is no real reason for anyone to respect any arbitrarily chosen name that anyone, trans or otherwise, chooses to call themselves. And yes. Telling people what they can and can't do IS policing them (context can be good or bad).

It's also acceptable to attack a trans woman for her appearance, despite dysphoria being one of the most prominent aspects of being a trans woman.

Looks are subjective and make this statement irrelevant.

 

[Cuck Norris]

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

This is like arguing with a bunch of 14 year old skinheads who think they have the world figured.

So wait, you're saying Hitler did something wrong?

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

lol, going through all this effort to change your gender and all you manage to do is look like Sylvester Stallone's 93 year old mother

Sugoi is okay with transmisogynistic attacks on a trans woman's appearance, but holds that I am a hypocrite.

 

[Boundman]

if you think me telling you you're wrong is "lolcow"content you have pathetic standards tbh.

You disagree with little to no reasoning behind it. 'deadnaming' a trans person when documenting their past is perfectly fine, it's a historical document. The truth trumps all feelings, every time. To cover it up is to pretend it never exisisted, and there is a reason repression is considered unhealthy.

 

[sugoi-chan]

Sugoi calls me a hypocrite but is perfectly okay with people this this being staff members. lol.

Sugoi is also okay with comments like this, despite labelling me a hypocrite.

Sugoi-chan doesn't give two shits what other people think because sugoi-chan doesn't need the world to conform to their views. Sugoi-chan understands that this is a sometimes fractious community and doesn't insist on making sure that every user fits into a pre-approved mold of thinking. Sugoi-chan finds more humor in when self-important jackasses claim to speak on behalf of the oppressed and blighted and still says things like

I'm even okay with CWC lolcow stuff, as I've followed it for years, as long as there are boundaries. i think it's okay to have a bit of fun with the stuff people like CWC say, but this thread is filled with outright transphobia and ableism, which is not cool.

and then proceed to come into the community and make autistic demands.

If you're going to talk to me, tag me. It's easy. Just type @ and my name.

Mention Kiwi Farms on your facebook.

 

[Bassomatic]

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

This is like arguing with a bunch of 14 year old skinheads who think they have the world figured.

You claim to be turbo atusimo and eloquent, pick one bro.

 

[Zvantastika]

if you think me telling you you're wrong is "lolcow"content you have pathetic standards tbh.

Oh, so us telling you're wrong for defending a molester is "pathetic", but you telling us we're wrong for calling you out is "the right thing to do"?

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

And you keep boosting your "logic and rational" skills... well, no turning back now, go ahead keep on posting

 

[Cynical]

@ScarletJusticeWitch, please understand that I'm male, yet I have nothing against transsexuals, but I do have everything against anyone of any gender acting like an asshole.

In fact, whatever your gender is, acting like an asshole is a poor way to make friends and influence people, and I recommend you reconsider your attitude towards others if you wish to be regarded with civility and respect irrespective of your gender identity.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

Have you considered pursuing a career in comedy

 

[Gensdupays]

Sugoi sure made you mad, huh? How have you learned not to bite bait?

 

[Blueberry]

Sugoi is okay with transmisogynistic attacks on a trans woman's appearance, but holds that I am a hypocrite.

And you are ok with 30,000 charity fraud.

 

[Haesindang Park]

Dat 80s hairstyle. Didn't know that transvestites were a big thing in the 80s.

 

[Organic Fapcup]

Sugoi is okay with transmisogynistic attacks on a trans woman's appearance, but holds that I am a hypocrite.

The fact that you take cheap, dumb jokes at your expense on the internet seriously shows your level of maturity quite well. Nice rationality there, bru.

 

[Fallensaint]

It's sort of hilarious because I'm actually pretty eloquent and have a pretty good grip on logic and rational arguments.

This is like arguing with a bunch of 14 year old skinheads who think they have the world figured.

Really? Let's test that theory, I could go back and prove you wrong but how about from now?

First mistake : ad hominem fallacy.

 

[ScarletJusticeWitch]

We have no "general consensus". We're an extremely diverse forum both politically, religiously, and ideologically.



They don't. Trans people have their own ways of thinking. There isn't some singular monolithic ideology for being trans.



This is a discussion forum, but when the person being discussed comes here OF THEIR OWN VOLITION, all bets are off here.

We just established that suicide is a personal choice by it's own definition.



Unless they get their name legally changed, there is no real reason for anyone to respect any arbitrarily chosen name that anyone, trans or otherwise, chooses to call themselves. And yes. Telling people what they can and can't do IS policing them (context can be good or bad).


Looks are subjective and make this statement irrelevant.

If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. There is little true diversity here, you still have to succumb to a group mentality. I could never be a regular poster here. Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans. As someone so kindly put, normal people don't have deadnames. People deadname trans women specifically to attack them. You generally have to go to conscious effort to dig it up and use it. It's a ocnscious choice to be transphobic.

Really? Let's test that theory, I could go back and prove you wrong but how about from now?

First mistake : ad hominem fallacy.

Off the cuff remark, not an attempt to make a logical argument. It holds no bearing on the rest of my argument and should not be held as such.

Fallacy fallacy.

 

[autism420]

Autism is an advantage in some ways and disadvantage in others. Because of the way most societies are set up, it's an overall disadvantage, a disability. But it's much closer to simply being an alternate way for a brain to be wired to an actual full on dysfunction.

I don't really know 100% why there's a distinction, but there is. So I'm going with it.

A little late, but this proves that you don't actually know what autism is.

Have you ever even met a person who had full on autism and not a mild form? They cannot drive. They cannot have a real job. They cannot have a relationship.

And that's an advantage to you? To be stuck in your own little world your whole life? Never being able to experience the real world?

You're a actually a fucking piece of shit. You are human garbage.

And no I'm not just shitposting. You actually pissed me off.

 

[Rabbit Bones]

Or like, you could grow a thicker skin and stop being a little pussy about someone using your birth name.

 

[namazuros]

If this was true, then there wouldn't be a near universal rejection of everything I'm saying. There is little true diversity here, you still have to succumb to a group mentality. I could never be a regular poster here. Nobody remotely critical of the anti-SJW bottom line could be.

Deadnaming someone is intentionally going out of your way to be disrespectful and hurtful to someone on the basis of them being trans. As someone so kindly put, normal people don't have deadnames. People deadname trans women specifically to attack them. You generally have to go to conscious effort to dig it up and use it. It's a ocnscious choice to be transphobic.

People don't dislike you because you are trans. People dislike you because you are you.