SJW Art and Extremes

[PinstripeLuns]

Not SJW art, but hypocritical SJW artists in action.

Instagram artist @bl0_doodles posted this artwork:

And the outcry is insane.

You'll noticed usedsoil as the artist behind pieces such as these:

Yet a naughty word is just too far.

Furthermore, the artist has defended herself by saying that she's been so used to being called a retard that she was just reclaiming it. They won't even have that though.

Update: both the original post and the apology post have been taken down. No complaints yet.

 

[fishercat]

You say that as if Carne doesn't exist.

I said what I said.

 

[Chromeo]

Not SJW art, but hypocritical SJW artists in action.

Instagram artist @bl0_doodles posted this artwork:
View attachment 1771169

And the outcry is insane.

View attachment 1771208

You'll noticed usedsoil as the artist behind pieces such as these:
View attachment 1771176

Yet a naughty word is just too far.

Furthermore, the artist has defended herself by saying that she's been so used to being called a retard that she was just reclaiming it. They won't even have that though.
View attachment 1771197
View attachment 1771206
View attachment 1771207

Wow what a bunch of sensitive retards lmao

 

[Jolyne THICCujoh]

You say that as if Carne doesn't exist.

How dare you disrespect that modern day Adonis. That's like saying Ungalo, in all his perfection, looks like a crack baby. For shame.

 

[verygayFrogs]

I find it amusing how CN makes "Don't Be Racist" cringe cartoons when I know for a fact that the people making these cartoons actively ostracize their black, Asian, Latino, etc. coworkers in the office.

And this is why I prefer @Chromeo ’s take on it because it didn’t do that

I like the forum style, and idk, a chat site like Discord wouldn't be so bad

im trying to make the best of it, plus it’s nice for art stuff if we ever wanna migrate the redrawing threads there.

Back on topic, I found a bad DR artist and I want to redraw all of the fankids. You might know them from the SHSL Horror Novelist and Comedian fankids

Spoiler

 

[Helvetica Standard]

And this is why I prefer @Chromeo ’s take on it because it didn’t do that

im trying to make the best of it, plus it’s nice for art stuff if we ever wanna migrate the redrawing threads there.

Back on topic, I found a bad DR artist and I want to redraw all of the fankids. You might know them from the SHSL Horror Novelist and Comedian fankids

Spoiler

View attachment 1771674View attachment 1771675

View attachment 1771676
View attachment 1771680
View attachment 1771683View attachment 1771684View attachment 1771686View attachment 1771689View attachment 1771691View attachment 1771692View attachment 1771694View attachment 1771695View attachment 1771696View attachment 1771697
View attachment 1771677

That first one actually looks okay, since it almost looks like a Fairly OddParents character. The rest... not so much. What's up with these weird ship choices? Did half of them re-marry? Plus, I'm not even going to ask about the three-way children.

The thing that gets me most is that this individual is 20. I genuinely thought she had to be closer to 14.

 

[Sí.]

And this is why I prefer @Chromeo ’s take on it because it didn’t do that

im trying to make the best of it, plus it’s nice for art stuff if we ever wanna migrate the redrawing threads there.

Back on topic, I found a bad DR artist and I want to redraw all of the fankids. You might know them from the SHSL Horror Novelist and Comedian fankids

Spoiler

View attachment 1771674View attachment 1771675

View attachment 1771676
View attachment 1771680
View attachment 1771683View attachment 1771684View attachment 1771686View attachment 1771689View attachment 1771691View attachment 1771692View attachment 1771694View attachment 1771695View attachment 1771696View attachment 1771697
View attachment 1771677

That's not how reproduction works. That's not how any of this works

 

[Chromeo]

And this is why I prefer @Chromeo ’s take on it because it didn’t do that

You charmer.

Spoiler: my shitty doodle PSA for a refresher

CN's problem overall is it doesn't know its audience. Its audience, it could be safely assumed, is children in America (where kids are gonna be watching TV and see the PSA.) Children most likely haven't seen racism along the lines of "black and white people can't get married," and if they can accept two boys getting married in the same short, there's no reason they can't accept race-mixing. Pick a lane. Then they insult the white members of their audience for being ignorant, which makes people want to not listen because their feelings are hurt. While catharsis for the oppressed people is one thing, you can't mix that with your actual activism. Those spaces need to be kept separate or you'll alienate potential allies.

The issue in the second PSA is fundamentally the same; No clear audience, anger directed at the audience, and literally at the audience because Pearl ends the short by glaring/yelling at the camera!!

Children aren't going to understand the phrase "systemic racism," and they're not going to really have a follow-up from this PSA because it's going to go right into the next cartoon. All they'll get from this is "Pearl's mad at me because of Thomas Edison," which fwiw I think people are starting to shift the credit to Nikola Tesla for a lot of shit Edison did anyway. So...ineffective! Not useful! Actively harmful!!

 

[Lil Miku]

You charmer.

Spoiler: my shitty doodle PSA for a refresher

View attachment 1772365
View attachment 1772366
View attachment 1772367
View attachment 1772369
View attachment 1772370
View attachment 1772371
View attachment 1772373
View attachment 1772374
View attachment 1772375
View attachment 1772376
View attachment 1772377
View attachment 1772379
View attachment 1772380
View attachment 1772382
View attachment 1772383
View attachment 1772384
View attachment 1772385
View attachment 1772387
View attachment 1772389
View attachment 1772392
View attachment 1772393
View attachment 1772396

CN's problem overall is it doesn't know its audience. Its audience, it could be safely assumed, is children in America (where kids are gonna be watching TV and see the PSA.) Children most likely haven't seen racism along the lines of "black and white people can't get married," and if they can accept two boys getting married in the same short, there's no reason they can't accept race-mixing. Pick a lane. Then they insult the white members of their audience for being ignorant, which makes people want to not listen because their feelings are hurt. While catharsis for the oppressed people is one thing, you can't mix that with your actual activism. Those spaces need to be kept separate or you'll alienate potential allies.

The issue in the second PSA is fundamentally the same; No clear audience, anger directed at the audience, and literally at the audience because Pearl ends the short by glaring/yelling at the camera!!
View attachment 1772410
Children aren't going to understand the phrase "systemic racism," and they're not going to really have a follow-up from this PSA because it's going to go right into the next cartoon. All they'll get from this is "Pearl's mad at me because of Thomas Edison," which fwiw I think people are starting to shift the credit to Nikola Tesla for a lot of shit Edison did anyway. So...ineffective! Not useful! Actively harmful!!

I love your drawings! You did a great job with them!

 

[One Man Bland]

A more recent example of this behavior.
View attachment 1768206
“Our culture” they say....Bet this person yells at every white person with dreadlocks and braids...Oh btw this stronk blak person likes turning anime characters black too.
View attachment 1768224
Oh and they’re on “”””Hiatus””” because this poor person is getting hate! F’s in chat everyone!
BTW anyone who has that “who can reply” feature on is a fat lipped bitch who can’t take the heat.
View attachment 1768226
View attachment 1768229
View attachment 1768230

This mostly baffles me because the double bun look is one of those hairstyles so common and universal to all hair types that you can find a variation of it in pretty much every culture - some places like China have had young girls sporting the double bun look for thousands of years. It’s like trying to say that a single culture can lay claim to a standard ponytail so therefore anyone who uses it is committing the ultimate sin of cultural appropriation.

 

[existencialdispointment]

Oh, that

This mostly baffles me because the double bun look is one of those hairstyles so common and universal to all hair types that you can find a variation of it in pretty much every culture - some places like China have had young girls sporting the double bun look for thousands of years. It’s like trying to say that a single culture can lay claim to a standard ponytail so therefore anyone who uses it is committing the ultimate sin of cultural appropriation.

you think that's bad, dreads are far worse.

edit: there's evidence of it being in Europe for a long time

 

[Rakdos92]

Some time ago, I stated I have seen exactly one good example of a racebent Princess Zelda. Well, I found it:

Would you look at that? An actually decent looking african princess, rather than the usual She-Troll art that painters insist is beautiful.

 

[verygayFrogs]

Some time ago, I stated I have seen exactly one good example of a racebent Princess Zelda. Well, I found it:

Would you look at that? An actually decent looking african princess, rather than the usual She-Troll art that painters insist is beautiful.

ngl if we had a game like that I'd play it.

 

[NoReturn]

Some time ago, I stated I have seen exactly one good example of a racebent Princess Zelda. Well, I found it:

Would you look at that? An actually decent looking african princess, rather than the usual She-Troll art that painters insist is beautiful.

She's gorgeous! You could even make an allusion to the real-life queens of Ghanan tribes around the late 900s.

 

[goma]

You charmer.

Spoiler: my shitty doodle PSA for a refresher

View attachment 1772365
View attachment 1772366
View attachment 1772367
View attachment 1772369
View attachment 1772370
View attachment 1772371
View attachment 1772373
View attachment 1772374
View attachment 1772375
View attachment 1772376
View attachment 1772377
View attachment 1772379
View attachment 1772380
View attachment 1772382
View attachment 1772383
View attachment 1772384
View attachment 1772385
View attachment 1772387
View attachment 1772389
View attachment 1772392
View attachment 1772393
View attachment 1772396

This was a much better message that's pertinent to real-life events and easier to understand. Good job both on the writing and drawing.

 

[LavenderMenace]

This mostly baffles me because the double bun look is one of those hairstyles so common and universal to all hair types that you can find a variation of it in pretty much every culture - some places like China have had young girls sporting the double bun look for thousands of years. It’s like trying to say that a single culture can lay claim to a standard ponytail so therefore anyone who uses it is committing the ultimate sin of cultural appropriation.

You can honestly tell the age and intelligence some of these idiots just by not knowing that the rest of the world exists and it's not like America....

you think that's bad, dreads are far worse.

edit: there's evidence of it being in Europe for a long time

Apparently alot of white people wear dreads in the northwest? Some of them look cool af....

 

[Biology Book]

You charmer.

Spoiler: my shitty doodle PSA for a refresher

View attachment 1772365
View attachment 1772366
View attachment 1772367
View attachment 1772369
View attachment 1772370
View attachment 1772371
View attachment 1772373
View attachment 1772374
View attachment 1772375
View attachment 1772376
View attachment 1772377
View attachment 1772379
View attachment 1772380
View attachment 1772382
View attachment 1772383
View attachment 1772384
View attachment 1772385
View attachment 1772387
View attachment 1772389
View attachment 1772392
View attachment 1772393
View attachment 1772396

CN's problem overall is it doesn't know its audience. Its audience, it could be safely assumed, is children in America (where kids are gonna be watching TV and see the PSA.) Children most likely haven't seen racism along the lines of "black and white people can't get married," and if they can accept two boys getting married in the same short, there's no reason they can't accept race-mixing. Pick a lane. Then they insult the white members of their audience for being ignorant, which makes people want to not listen because their feelings are hurt. While catharsis for the oppressed people is one thing, you can't mix that with your actual activism. Those spaces need to be kept separate or you'll alienate potential allies.

The issue in the second PSA is fundamentally the same; No clear audience, anger directed at the audience, and literally at the audience because Pearl ends the short by glaring/yelling at the camera!!
View attachment 1772410
Children aren't going to understand the phrase "systemic racism," and they're not going to really have a follow-up from this PSA because it's going to go right into the next cartoon. All they'll get from this is "Pearl's mad at me because of Thomas Edison," which fwiw I think people are starting to shift the credit to Nikola Tesla for a lot of shit Edison did anyway. So...ineffective! Not useful! Actively harmful!!

Im gonna say..Thank you for explaining this <3
you are really informative and explain this really clear <3

 

[One Man Bland]

you think that's bad, dreads are far worse.

edit: there's evidence of it being in Europe for a long time

The dread thing I can partially understand from a pragmatic perspective since, from what I understan, European and Scandinavian "dreads" aren’t quite the same as black dreads (the European variety are more like unbraided twists rather than matting) and trying to make them more like black dreads is a really quick way to damage your hair (although I’ve seen unkempt dreads on black people too and they seem to get equally nasty) but frankly I feel like what people do with their hair - long term damage or not - is their business. And at this point I’ve seen so man blacktivists treat any elaborate styling techniques, regardless of origin, like it‘s appropriation against themselves specifically that I’m of the mind that anyone who cares that much about hair has too much time on their hands.

 

[NoReturn]

The dread thing I can partially understand from a pragmatic perspective since, from what I understan, European and Scandinavian "dreads" aren’t quite the same as black dreads (the European variety are more like unbraided twists rather than matting) and trying to make them more like black dreads is a really quick way to damage your hair (although I’ve seen unkempt dreads on black people too and they seem to get equally nasty) but frankly I feel like what people do with their hair - long term damage or not - is their business. And at this point I’ve seen so man blacktivists treat any elaborate styling techniques, regardless of origin, like it‘s appropriation against themselves specifically that I’m of the mind that anyone who cares that much about hair has too much time on their hands.

It's because European hair is different to African hair:

The flatness of African hair also means they're basically immune to lice because lice can't hold on to the strands because their stupid little lice-feet only work on circles, not ovals:

Spoiler: Electron microscope image of a louse

 

[verygayFrogs]

It's because European hair is different to African hair:
View attachment 1775525
The flatness of African hair also means they're basically immune to lice because lice can't hold on to the strands because their stupid little lice-feet only work on circles, not ovals:

Spoiler: Electron microscope image of a louse

View attachment 1775517

Why do those lice look like bosses from dark souls?