2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Catch me up on something: I heard Pompeo is revealing something at a press conference tomorrow. If true, what is it?
Probably China related
Gonna cuck and say "MoST SeCuRE ElEcTiOn"
Not his purview. And the FEC chairman already said the election was filthy, although the media ignored him and took the word of one of his underlings instead.
 
1607477074223_They're learning.PNG


Can we have more republicans like Kevin McCarthy. Is that too much to ask for?
 
I'm going to be honest - I'm really skeptical about the whole "4D chess" thing. I'm more inclined to believe Trump's team was flailing about legally speaking, but other people unrelated to them were quietly watching from behind the scenes and working to get an actual workable case put forward. Texas isn't doing this for Trump - Texas is most likely doing this because they know a Biden administration is going to fuck them six ways from Sunday.

I think you are being a bit harsh on the Trump legal team. I think it was perfectly reasonable to seek remedy within the contested States. It really isn't Trumps fault that courts in Pennsylvania used the catch 22 ruling of too early/too late. You have to remember that each of these states have a hostile AG and a hostile SoS. That is how those states got their ridiculous rules for mail-in ballots always accompanied with an activist or cooperating courts.

I can easily imagine that Trump's team realised that it would take a state seeking relief from SCOTUS. Now I have no idea whether SCOTUS are going to favour the short term benefit of overlooking obvious fuckery and avoiding "troubles" over the long term benefit of having fairer elections, but either way Trumps team could never win their lawsuits.

Neither side is playing 4D chess. The democrats, big tech and likely the CCP have planned for two years at least to remove Trump from office through fraud (still don't think COVID was an accident or a freak occurrence). They used the 2018 midterms as a dry run and abused the fallout of COVID to pass rules in multiple states to allow this fraud to happen on a big enough scale to affect the outcome of the presidential election. However like a dog who has finally caught the car it's been chasing, I don't expect they will know what to do with it. I don't imagine their defense of the SCOTUS case will be any good and they will be relying on brow beating and intimidation alone. If they don't get the presidency I would imagine the elites might start to be culled. Zuckerberg is sufficiently and provably involved in this that he might as well flee the country if Trump wins.

Trump has been the backfoot because this level of fraud was unforeseeable. A lot of people including myself had predicted that the Democrats were going to cheat a bit, they always do, but I don't know of one person who said the Democrats are going to flagrantly stuff over a million ballots over 6 states in late night drop offs. That was not foreseen by anyone. In each of these states there has been hostile resistance to Trump seeking quick state granted relief, as shown in Michigan, Georgia et al. If the SoS and AG's weren't so obviously in on it, he could have got a quick remedy. This has been planned for quite a while and is hard to unravel without state cooperation.

With all that said the democrat strategy really isn't more sophisticated than sending as many men as needed to charge a machine gun. Its just a case of whether they have enough men to overwhelm it or not.

My guess is just that they expected Trump to concede.
 
"The one-line order was issued with no noted dissents."

LMFAO, the SCOTUS didn't even want to hear it, RIP every faggot who thought they were going to be the gamechanger.
It was already pointed out this was only for the PA specific case, and likely done to avoid redundancy in conjunction with Texas' newly filed case. Read the thread, dammit.
 
Sorry to be that faggot, but does anybody have a quick recap on whats going on? What happened with Texas?
Texas AG is under FBI investigation for abuse of political power (bribery), so he is sucking up to Trump for a pardon so he filed a frivolous lawsuit with no chance of winning.

If any of you think he will win, I am open to a wager
 
Docketing is little more then a clerical formality. It doesn’t mean they’re hearing it, just means they have it and it remains to be seen if they’ll take the case (which they probably will). It’s like saying little ronny the retard handed in his art assignment, it doesn't say anything if he actually painted what he was supposed to.

Not a huge fan with the Texas lolsuit IMO because Paxton is or has been indicted and is probably only doing it to secure a pardon from Trump. Looks like the giant fucking Hail Mary that I’ve been saying they’re going to pull.
 
Man we got it all: FBI investigations into the thread, slap fights between states in the supreme court, politicians being really fucking sarcastic and immature to each other on twitter, dumbass wagers, threats of rioting AND civil war - this is the best USA election ever!
 
Man we got it all: FBI investigations into the thread, slap fights between states in the supreme court, politicians being really fucking sarcastic and immature to each other on twitter, dumbass wagers, threats of rioting AND civil war - this is the best USA election ever!
We've also got a supporter of designated foreign terror organization Hizbullah @3119967d0c posting in the same thread as FBI agents.
 
The site is not run by the government so any moderation applied to your moronic postings does not violate the free speech protection from government censorship in the first part of the bill of rights.

I have enjoyed all your cope, all your seethe and now look forward to your insisting you're not as bad as the dead ender her turners.

Remember, crazy people have their privilege to drive taken from them, not that driving without a license ever stopped a moron from "traveling," but still something to keep in mind.
 
Some info-pills from TDW:

  1. No other state has joined the TX lawsuit. Alabama and Louisiana AGs have released statements appreciating or supporting the lawsuit, but no state has yet joined the lawsuit. This could change, but for now, none has
  2. SCOTUS has NOT accepted the TX case. The case has been docketed, just like the PA case had been docketed. SCOTUS has yet to decide if they will hear the case, while I do expect them to, they haven't done so yet.
  3. SCOTUS has not rejected the Mike Kelly PA lawsuit. Jenna Ellis says "The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert. @MikeKellyPA’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court." This means that the merits of the case have not been rejected, and the case not only is still active, but can also be merged with the TX case. It can also not be, and the TX case can be independent. No certainties here.
Sources:
Louisiana's AG's Statement (supporting but not joining the lawsuit): https://www.kplctv.com/2020/12/08/louisiana-ag-throws-support-behind-texas-election-lawsuit/
Alabama's AG's Statement (supporting the arguments of the TX lawsuit but not joining it): https://twitter.com/AGSteveMarshall/status/1336435391403057156
**Mike Kelly PA's docketed case: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
See how Mike Kelly's case is DOCKETED on December 3rd. Doesn't mean that it was heard. Again, I hope, and honestly, expect, that SCOTUS will hear the TX case, but doesn't mean that SCOTUS will.**

Update 1: From now on any new edits, I'll add as updates.
Arkansas AG says she will help TX case in any legal way she can. Hasn't joined the lawsuit yet either.
Source: https://twitter.com/AGRutledge/status/1336452654982160392

Update 2: Added a third point regarding the "rejection" of the Mike Kelly Case. Source: https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1336451735150350336

Update 3: Ted Cruz has made a statement with respect to Mike Kelly's lawsuit lamenting on SCOTUS: https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1336467262975467520
IANAL so I'm not sure how this coincides with Lawyer Jenna Ellis, but for the sake of transparency, I'm adding it here to have everything in one place.
Going through the comments as rapidly as I can and responding. Saw the AG-Elect from Indiana supporting the TX lawsuit (but he's AG-Elect, so no authority yet right?). IDK, for reference, link is: https://www.facebook.com/ToddRokitaIN/posts/10158842063228252
 
How Trump drains The Swamp: Just let them expose themselves.

Kemp, Duncan, and Sperger are finished.
Ducey is at 30% approval, he's gone. Eyes are also on the AZ House Speaker too.
The legislatures in MI, PA, AZ, GA, WI are on thin ice.
The typical usual RINOs like Romney or Collins are begging to be primaried.

As for the Democrats, fucking lol are they compromised. I call that entire the party the Three Gorges Sham. Total Global Swampage right there.
So what happens if trump wins and he can prove china was behind this shit show?

Will that mean declaration of war?

Cause its just cause for it. If theres enough proof
 
Does this imply anything? Feel free to correct me, don't want to get my hopes up too easily.

View attachment 1775324

"You retarded towelheads, doomers, and leafs can all go to Hell. But as for me, I shall go to Texas!"
-Davy Crockett


It means the CSA is rising from the Grave to save the union.


Who was it in PA that wrote the whiny brief to Alito about not taking the Kelly case? We all know Alito isn't happy with PA, so maybe rejecting Kelly while accepting the Texas case is his way of saying "neener-neener" to them.

Given how fucked 2020 is, I would not be surprised if that turned out to be the case

Apparently the SCOTUS ruled 9-0 to reject Kelly's case. If that is true, then the explanation that it was rejected to avoid redundancy gains more credibility. I can't imagine Clarence Motherfucking Thomas not being interested.

Agreed, and it wasn't even a full rejection. The dismissal was of a specific injunction within the case

It's not a matter of not being interested. They're being threatened. If Trump is crowned by the SC, then it's on the heads of those individual justices. They "betrayed" the Republic, they're now "responsible" for what comes next.

Luckily, the perennial scapegoat that is the Southern states will take the blame. The MSM and the Woke Left hate the South with a burning passion and will have a field day with this lawsuit if it does go anywhere.

The ruling means there's little chance the SC will elect trump right?

If it weren't for the more all-encompassing and more well-defined Texas lawsuit being picked up on the docket officially, I'd say you are right. But at this point, I'm not even sure what the fuck is going on.


Laws governing recall in Georgia - Ballotpedia

Laws governing recall in Georgia - Ballotpedia (archive.vn)

It could happen earlier.

Is this the curing loophole Abrams was using and we've been talking about for weeks?

Can somebody explain to me why this should be worth caring about? This feels like some formality shit.

Did all these states go to Trump? If this leads to states flipping or all the funny stuff being thrown out so there'll be a clear winner, I won't complain.

Hey, a win is a win anyway you can get it.


Its a trick from Trump's old WWE days, you know the show. A long drawn out slobberknocker of a bout that drags, and just when Trump is on the ropes suddenly the Texas anthem plays and a Ranger rushes the ring with a folding chair.

The Texas Rattlesnake is at it again!

 
I think you are being a bit harsh on the Trump legal team. I think it was perfectly reasonable to seek remedy within the contested States. It really isn't Trumps fault that courts in Pennsylvania used the catch 22 ruling of too early/too late. You have to remember that each of these states have a hostile AG and a hostile SoS. That is how those states got their ridiculous rules for mail-in ballots always accompanied with an activist or cooperating courts.

I can easily imagine that Trump's team realised that it would take a state seeking relief from SCOTUS. Now I have no idea whether SCOTUS are going to favour the short term benefit of overlooking obvious fuckery and avoiding "troubles" over the long term benefit of having fairer elections, but either way Trumps team could never win their lawsuits.

Neither side is playing 4D chess. The democrats, big tech and likely the CCP have planned for two years at least to remove Trump from office through fraud (still don't think COVID was an accident or a freak occurrence). They used the 2018 midterms as a dry run and abused the fallout of COVID to pass rules in multiple states to allow this fraud to happen on a big enough scale to affect the outcome of the presidential election. However like a dog who has finally caught the car it's been chasing, I don't expect they will know what to do with it. I don't imagine their defense of the SCOTUS case will be any good and they will be relying on brow beating and intimidation alone. If they don't get the presidency I would imagine the elites might start to be culled. Zuckerberg is sufficiently and provably involved in this that he might as well flee the country if Trump wins.

Trump has been the backfoot because this level of fraud was unforeseeable. A lot of people including myself had predicted that the Democrats were going to cheat a bit, they always do, but I don't know of one person who said the Democrats are going to flagrantly stuff over a million ballots over 6 states in late night drop offs. That was not foreseen by anyone. In each of these states there has been hostile resistance to Trump seeking quick state granted relief, as shown in Michigan, Georgia et al. If the SoS and AG's weren't so obviously in on it, he could have got a quick remedy. This has been planned for quite a while and is hard to unravel without state cooperation.

With all that said the democrat strategy really isn't more sophisticated than sending as many men as needed to charge a machine gun. Its just a case of whether they have enough men to overwhelm it or not.

My guess is just that they expected Trump to concede.

Most be hard living in a world where you are this scared and delusional. Every thing is some one else fault and the God King can not fail in any way right, nono the Chinese are behind it, nono the Jews are behind it, nono the Lizard people are behind it.

It is sad. I have not said shit in these kind of threads in about a month now and still your people are going full tinfoil hat.
Dont worry this time we will win, it is different 4D chess man, and not the temper tantrum of a big stupid child.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back