Clayton Ray Huff / Dream / DreamOnPvP / DreamTraps / DreamAF / DreamXD / DeltaKnight / DreamSkilful / Clayman23 - Fat Minecraft Youtuber with fans that want to torture and rape him and are in denial that he's fat.

Is JacobTMK the Fatman?

  • Yes! It's a deadringer!

    Votes: 305 13.2%
  • No! That's Dream!

    Votes: 1,713 74.1%
  • It's neither of them!

    Votes: 295 12.8%

  • Total voters
    2,313
He didn't. He made a comparison about how when he says he 'loves' his fans, he means it the the same way as if he said that he loves kittens, or something along the lines of that. Now everyone and their mother is obfuscating it and saying he's calling his fans 'kittens'. Of course, feel free to correct me if I got it wrong.
You're right that he compared the "love" he feels for his fans to the type of love he has for kittens, but I think it was a calculated choice and he knew what kind of response it would evoke. He said he picked that example because he likes cats, but then why didn't he just compare his fans to cats instead? It's probably because kittens are not only irresistible, but the word itself can also have a naughty connotation (i.e. "sex kitten") and I'm sure he sensed it would trigger his hormonal retard fangirls into even more of a frenzy of thirst and devotion. I think he's (mostly) playing his fangirls/boys like a violin but doing it so he maintains a level of plausible deniability, the way someone like Pokimane does with her simps.

He could have used literally any comparison other than kittens and it wouldn't have had the same emotional effect.
 
Last edited:
I was off by one, I was correcting someone who said it was 20 runs, even if it was 20 that's way to small a sample size, and they didn't even run a control test to build a baseline. And for those saying the other streamers "median" runs were the control that's also false because that was also an incomplete data set.

to prove dream or anyone for that matter had anomalous runs have to run a test on a group of his runs that you "hypothesize" to not have been tampered with. That's you control. The you got to the data you "hypothesize" to be tampered with and run numbers through the EXACT same process as you control. that gives you your first Variable. we can call that V1.

Now you can compare V1 to the control and draw all kinds of conclusions because by definition they wont be the same set of numbers. so now with just 2 sets of numbers you STILL don't have enough information to draw any accurate conclusions. You then need to cultivate V2, V3, ect... until you have enough data setts to show a reliable trend AND be able to prove it under sever scrutiny.

THATS THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS FAGS, it is robust for a fucking reason.

So these niggers jannies on speedrun dot com just got one variable and then a polluted control and called it a day and all the semi intellectuals of the internet took one look at the complicated numbers on one side and the faggot ass mine crafter for kids on the other and just immediately went picked a side without using the amount of intelligence a rat would use to differentiate shit from food to inform their decision
You're dumb, very dumb.
It was 11 streams in total, and specifically 6 streams with abnormal drops.
Speedrunners do tons of runs and just restart if "the pace is too slow", are we supposed to include those too, 0 barters and 0 blaze kills, or whatever the fuck you're trying to grasp at?

You've outlined a procedure called "ANOVA", analysis of variance. Trust me, a test like that is not fucking needed because the 2 bunches are definitely different. The null hypothesis will be rejected. Comparing it to other runners will give the same result.

The test can't even be performed in good faith because the data is probably not normal, and definitely not heteroscedastic as it is. These are the two assumptions of the test, there's a third one, you're definitely not hetero.

If the system of numbers they designed is so robust and according to you his overall sample size is so small why did they not take ALL his streams?

how did they just know witch ones he was cheating in before they ran the numbers?

They went and looked at his run when he submitted it, went "hmm his trades seem lucky" then went and found 6 other streams and took the BEST RUNS FROM EACH OF THEM NOT ALL OF THEM

So now they have is world record run and 6 more runs that were personal bests of his for each night, add that together and that's 7 runs that were all personal bests. How do you look at that and go "yes an even sample of his runs were gathered"

Even if they are 100% correct and he cheated like a black man on an IQ test why not put his other streams through the system of equations to give contrast of how much his luck changed
A sample size of 24 hours worth or runs is small? You're a faggot. Many scientific tests, such as applying high voltage on faggots like you to cure homosexuality has a far far smaller sample size.

It's not "6 runs", it's "6 streams", and among those streams, some runs are successful, some are junk. I realised my mistake in calling these a run, because the word made it seem like these were just one game of 20 or so minutes, rather than one or two successful attempts out of 4 hours of streaming.
6 streams are here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1aYTDJ7r-c2OdIadBZTj7Zha5yMNUsM

I didn't realize the farms was as cancel hungry as twitter

what kind of kangaroo court argument is that? because some tranny on twitter accuses you anything suddenly you have to submit to some burden of proof just to not get canceled?

I don't care if clayton gets raped by a bear tomorrow, its the frenzy to blame and the guilty until proven innocent mentality I hate, it gives the dangerhairs way to much power
The mods in speedrun liked him about as much as the avg user in this thread and saw an opportunity to nail him to the wall

You guys seem happy to just stoke the hate boner but does anyone have a concrete reason why the mods would cherry pick a handful of his streams and not test them all?
You're so fucking smug.

I collated information in Dream's Harvard PhD in butchering statistics PDF and information on other runners are from the mod's spreadsheet found below in their report.
1609934279175.png


There's no good way to establish a link between gold used and pearls obtained with the data readily available. I'm NOT going to go through over 100 hours worth of streams to gather better data, unless Dream pays me.
1609934351657.png

Best I have are these. So I just made a new variable pearls per gold. This is shit because there's so many zeroes, but the same applies to other runners, so whatever.

First let's see Dream's own runs. Categorised into cheated and not cheated. Comparison procedure is Tukey.
1609934540521.png

Lol, cheating nigger.

1609935091071.png

Not a good test wit the available numbers.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values
Lot 2 Dream, Dream Cheat


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Lot 1 0.4047 0.40471 12.50 0.001
Error 37 1.1981 0.03238
Total 38 1.6028


Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.179946 25.25% 23.23% 17.86%
Tiny P-value, so the mean values (Ender Pearl barters per golden ingot) are statistically different.

Now, Dream's non-cheated runs VS other runners.
1609935375787.png

Geosquare's graph. Is Illumina lucky? Yeah. Weird? Not really.
1609935446123.png

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Lot 4 0.01558 0.003895 0.67 0.612
Error 104 0.60188 0.005787
Total 108 0.61746


Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.0760745 2.52% 0.00% 0.00%
P-value is big, so null hypothesis (no difference in mean) is not rejected.

Now, Dream's cheated runs VS genuine runs, including his own.
1609935741129.png

"But there's no definitive evidence because the comparison wasn't done the way I like it".

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Lot 5 0.6599 0.13198 9.45 0.000
Error 125 1.7456 0.01397
Total 130 2.4055


Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.118174 27.43% 24.53% 20.38%
P-value is non-existent like your T-cells. So null hypothesis is rejected, there's a statistically significant difference in means among the sample.

Maybe you can shut your cunt now and stop trying be a smug faggot.
 
You're dumb, very dumb.
It was 11 streams in total, and specifically 6 streams with abnormal drops.
Speedrunners do tons of runs and just restart if "the pace is too slow", are we supposed to include those too, 0 barters and 0 blaze kills, or whatever the fuck you're trying to grasp at?

You've outlined a procedure called "ANOVA", analysis of variance. Trust me, a test like that is not fucking needed because the 2 bunches are definitely different. The null hypothesis will be rejected. Comparing it to other runners will give the same result.

The test can't even be performed in good faith because the data is probably not normal, and definitely not heteroscedastic as it is. These are the two assumptions of the test, there's a third one, you're definitely not hetero.


A sample size of 24 hours worth or runs is small? You're a faggot. Many scientific tests, such as applying high voltage on faggots like you to cure homosexuality has a far far smaller sample size.

It's not "6 runs", it's "6 streams", and among those streams, some runs are successful, some are junk. I realised my mistake in calling these a run, because the word made it seem like these were just one game of 20 or so minutes, rather than one or two successful attempts out of 4 hours of streaming.
6 streams are here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1aYTDJ7r-c2OdIadBZTj7Zha5yMNUsM



You're so fucking smug.

I collated information in Dream's Harvard PhD in butchering statistics PDF and information on other runners are from the mod's spreadsheet found below in their report.
View attachment 1832425

There's no good way to establish a link between gold used and pearls obtained with the data readily available. I'm NOT going to go through over 100 hours worth of streams to gather better data, unless Dream pays me.
View attachment 1832426
Best I have are these. So I just made a new variable pearls per gold. This is shit because there's so many zeroes, but the same applies to other runners, so whatever.

First let's see Dream's own runs. Categorised into cheated and not cheated. Comparison procedure is Tukey.
View attachment 1832427
Lol, cheating nigger.

View attachment 1832435
Not a good test wit the available numbers.


Tiny P-value, so the mean values (Ender Pearl barters per golden ingot) are statistically different.

Now, Dream's non-cheated runs VS other runners.
View attachment 1832436
Geosquare's graph. Is Illumina lucky? Yeah. Weird? Not really.
View attachment 1832438

P-value is big, so null hypothesis (no difference in mean) is not rejected.

Now, Dream's cheated runs VS genuine runs, including his own.
View attachment 1832444
"But there's no definitive evidence because the comparison wasn't done the way I like it".


P-value is non-existent like your T-cells. So null hypothesis is rejected, there's a statistically significant difference in means among the sample.

Maybe you can shut your cunt now and stop trying be a smug faggot.
Great post, but I’m sure this still won’t be good enough for this (Dream’s)-ball gargling faggot
 
Christ alive I feel like my argument has been frakenstiend out of control.

That's because you are innumerate and don't have even a basic understanding of statistics.

Let's try explaining this in a way that uses as little math as possible.

What are the odds of rolling a 20 on a 20-sided dice? 1 out of 20. Or 5%. So if a person picks up a dice and rolls a 20, there was a 5% chance they would do that. It was possible. Totally believable. Now, what if they roll two 20s in a row? The odds of that are smaller; it becomes 1 in 400 chance of that, or 0.25%. It could happen, and given enough rolls, it will happen eventually. But what if that person picks up their dice and rolls a 20 twenty times in a row? Well, you kick them out of your DnD group because they've got a weighted dice. It doesn't matter if they only rolled a twenty once in a previous session, or had perfectly normal rolls for the entire year of 2020, because the odds of those separate sessions don't change the odds of having rolled 20 twenty times in a row in last night's DnD session. You now know that person has a weighted dice, and even if they don't use it all the time, last night they were cheating and so they get the boot.

Does it make sense now?
 
Great post, but I’m sure this still won’t be good enough for this (Dream’s)-ball gargling faggot
From reading comments shown to me and glossing through some on various videos, Dream stans will not believe he cheated unless he outright admits to it. Some are pretending to be "the logical rational centrists" trying to say "maybe, maybe not" which is the worst.

The term "Huff" is blacklisted too.
1609952198219.png

1609952234095.png


Funny how his own clout chasing intro comment would have been blocked.

Nigger and faggot are blacklisted too, but we aren't. We love you dream! Free merch please! 8)
1609952546234.png
1609952646118.png
1609952695051.png
 
Last edited:
Don't let your kids use social media. Don't post pictures of your kids on social media. Don't allow others to post pictures of your kids on social media. Not fucking difficult.

Follow those rules and doxers will never see your fucking kids.
^^^^^^
Did you hear Dream rented a place and moved in with Sapnap? No one will be at home to receive the dildo lol what a waste
I have confirmation that Sap came down to 2710 English Ivy Ct and Clayton isn't renting shit through private sources

Has to be. Now that his fans know where his house is, they're gonna come and try to steal his hair or something. The people who follow him are insane.
They've already tried to show up and got cucked by the fact that the community is gated and all of his stans who bother coming to his house are morbidly obese fifteen year old girls who will impale themselves and die of exhaustion trying to climb a fence.

Gonna go out on a limb and say he's also probably a sex pervert and it'll come out he's been DMing explicitly with some of them. Because it's becoming a trend.
I wish I could say more but if you knew how fucking spot-on you were.

I wouldn't be surprised at all to learn if Clayton "Dreamy faggot" Huff was into some degenerate fetishes.
I'm resisting the urge to leak everything I've found and been told right now. Please just know that you're more correct then you likely originally thought in posting this comment

I'm glad we know Dream's home address and what it looks like.
The fact that absolute loser Clayton Ray Huff can buy an $825k house at 21 by making garbage Minecraft challenge videos hurts me on so many levels.
 
I wish I could say more but if you knew how fucking spot-on you were.


I'm resisting the urge to leak everything I've found and been told right now. Please just know that you're more correct then you likely originally thought in posting this comment
Sounds like this is going to be juicy. Could you remind us again why you’re unable to leak right now, and/or what you’re waiting for?
 
From reading comments shown to me and glossing through some on various videos, Dream stans will not believe he cheated unless he outright admits to it. Some are pretending to be "the logical rational centrists" trying to say "maybe, maybe not" which is the worst.
Can’t really blame them. He is their idol after all. If @TeamRooted is being honest with their implication of sex pest shit though, then these kids are going to feel quite the agony with sticking with him. I do really hope that he gets something on him from this - at least being branded as a cheater - because of how obvious it is with the data.
 
"uh yeah i'm happy to tell le ebin doxing kiddies that dream has a terabyte of cheese pizza or whatever the fuck but uhhhhhh i don't want it public lol"

faggot ops. leak it or don't quit sniffing your own farts for W O W finding the 10,000th dox on this website. you're so cool i'll suck your cock if you release it????
 
The people providing us with the information don't want it to be public, we're trying to convince them to publicly go on record and confirm the information.
Is there a threat of litigation from these people if you potentially said "fuck it" and released everything? Or is this something you guys need corroboration with to let people know it's real/you need someone to co-sign with it for a signal boost?

If it's a signal boost you need just go to Keem, I'm 90% sure he'd eat the entire thing up for clicks anyway.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc
Is there a threat of litigation from these people if you potentially said "fuck it" and released everything? Or is this something you guys need corroboration with to let people know it's real/you need someone to co-sign with it for a signal boost?

If it's a signal boost you need just go to Keem, I'm 90% sure he'd eat the entire thing up for clicks anyway.
Litigation through claims of slander is a real possibility. We've tried to get in contact with Keemstar multiple times over the past few months but to no-avail.
 
Litigation through claims of slander is a real possibility. We've tried to get in contact with Keemstar multiple times over the past few months but to no-avail.
That's tough, considering how many shekels Keem would've gotten from milking it like he is doing to Carson right now.

If all really is lost on the drama-tube front, feel free to dump it here. Null is pretty adamant on letting the type of stuff you guys usually drop stay on here even with BS litigation.

Is the content the usual "sent noodz to minorz" fare (extra points if it's more than two) or is it much more degnerate than that (actual grooming, fetish rp, etc.)?
 
Back