US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I could be wrong here, but a case that has been dismissed with prejudice can still be appealed all the way to the SCOTUS if needed assuming the claimants have the money and lawyers necessary for said appeal, IIRC.
Theoretically, yes. However, I doubt this would be dismissed with prejudice outright because it creates a very clear constitutional question, namely a possible 10 A violation.
 
You can accurately predict the DNC's 10-year plans by looking at whatever they vehemently deny in the present. Remember their platitudes from 2011?

"Nobody wants to take your guns"
"If you like your plan, you may keep it"
"Your church won't be forced to marry homos or perform abortions on the altar"
"The NSA is not spying on you"
Here's another good one; "We only want to raise taxes on the billionaires and make them pay their fair share!"
 
1614938684080.png

A recent photo of migrants crossing the US-Mexican border.
 
Well, you got Roberts who’s a coin flip, the Obama appointees who try to legislate from the bench with a living Constitution, and Trump’s appointees haven’t lived up to the meme image MAGA has projected. And then you got the Democrats’ dream of court packing. I don’t think SCOTUS can stop this Bill. The Democrats will force it down everyone’s throats.
Roberts isn't a coinflip, if something is semi popular and progressive he will rule it as Constitutional.
 
I feel like I've made it perfectly clear that I'm actually a 450 pound neckbeard living in my parents basement, who is so mad with loneliness that I'll go after anything with a pulse.
See? This is a believable self-portrait-- meanwhile you got other users running around talking about their supposed womanliness but never even providing evidence
I wonder if Mitch ever three-holed Elaine.
I don't think it's that kind of marriage.

You know... a warm one.
 
Last edited:
Roberts isn't a coinflip, if something is semi popular and progressive he will rule it as Constitutional.
Is that why he ruled in favor of "the Muslim ban" or decided to get rid of the Civil Rights Act provisions that required Southern states to send their redistricting proposals to Congress for approval?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Is that why he ruled in favor of "the Muslim ban" or decided to get rid of the Civil Rights Act provisions that required Southern states to send their redistricting proposals to Congress for approval?
The thing that didn't ban Muslims and the thing that had almost no popular support?
What's the point you're trying to make?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Is that why he ruled in favor of "the Muslim ban" or decided to get rid of the Civil Rights Act provisions that required Southern states to send their redistricting proposals to Congress for approval?
And he’s cut ranks on near everything else of importance. Makes me wonder if that thing about the probable ruling on the ACA really did get leaked and they found blackmail to make him change it to the absurd reasoning it was upheld on. Did anyone thing that was dumb back then? I was liberal as all hell at the time and still thought that ruling made no sense.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
The thing that didn't ban Muslims and the thing that had almost no popular support?
What's the point you're trying to make?
You clearly didn't tune in to popular progressive outlets in 2015 and otherwise ignore decisions that run counter to your retarded assertions.

Roberts is a conservacuck who, while having a tendency to support the occasional socially left wing ruling, has for the most part remained fairly consistent in his judicial philosophy. Just because the right wing of the Supreme Court has increasingly skewed rightwards doesn't make him any less of an old fashioned conservative.

And he’s cut ranks on near everything else of importance. Makes me wonder if that thing about the probable ruling on the ACA really did get leaked and they found blackmail to make him change it to the absurd reasoning it was upheld on. Did anyone thing that was dumb back then? I was liberal as all hell at the time and still thought that ruling made no sense.
The ACA is a mixed bag decision that clearly stems from his obsession with trying to keep the Supreme Court apolitical, which creates absurd results of its own but I digress. I will always be thankful to him that he didn't adopt the government's main position in Sibelius that the Commerce Clause permits the Congress to force people to participate in a market, because he's demonstrated throughout his career to be a staunch proponent of rolling back the Commerce Clause, and for that alone I support him.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
View attachment 1970756
A recent photo of migrants crossing the US-Mexican border.

Democrats: The country needs to be locked down because of how dangerous COVID is. The economy must be destroyed to save lives! Stay away from each other!
Also Democrats: BRING IN ALL THE IMMIGRANTS! OPEN BORDERS FOREVER! LOCKING DOWN THE BORDERS IS RACIST!!!
 
Democrats: The country needs to be locked down because of how dangerous COVID is. The economy must be destroyed to save lives! Stay away from each other!
Also Democrats: BRING IN ALL THE IMMIGRANTS! OPEN BORDERS FOREVER! LOCKING DOWN THE BORDERS IS RACIST!!!
They've already let at least 15 immigrants with COVID run free, and have no idea where they are right now.
 
Progressives are going ballistic about a 15 dollar minimum wage not being included in the stimulus. As yet nobody seems to be asking what a 15 dollar minimum wage has to do with a stimulus bill.

View attachment 1970756
A recent photo of migrants crossing the US-Mexican border.
I guess they didn't bother to make any child-sized shirts. Why dress up a prop when it is already effective as-is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back