BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm starting to wonder if he'll be the next to troon out in a desperate attempt to get breadtube to pay attention to him as well as try to make the troons that attacked him on twitter feel sorry for him.
Don't think that Hunter will troon out (my bet is on Jimmy Snow, he's already having that long mess on his head and is an open pan-sexual). I would personally put Hunter is the same boat as Xan and Vaush: straight, cis TRA. Just as crazy, just as radical, would definitely fuck a troon, but they will themselves never troon out. At most, they will come out as non-binary. That is a big maybe since coming out as enby doesn't seem to generate that much attractions (look at Thought Slime and Peter Coffin).
 
Don't think that Hunter will troon out (my bet is on Jimmy Snow, he's already having that long mess on his head and is an open pan-sexual). I would personally put Hunter is the same boat as Xan and Vaush: straight, cis TRA. Just as crazy, just as radical, would definitely fuck a troon, but they will themselves never troon out. At most, they will come out as non-binary. That is a big maybe since coming out as enby doesn't seem to generate that much attractions (look at Thought Slime and Peter Coffin).
will You tier list that?
 
got more of Leon’s tweets
8FE0E808-3F24-42C0-8635-F08BC983C25A.jpeg
DE974276-A65A-421B-9D94-72AAB97C36D8.jpeg
A228FC28-3158-4F91-88E6-5FA135D3B7A0.jpeg
FC781B68-62D7-4DD9-B4A8-D0DA2AE55573.jpeg
AAB01BB5-9E7A-42D4-8234-E45AF41F9761.jpeg
E5C9A777-01F5-47AA-93EA-002433A7753F.jpeg
 
Yeah, that pic's fake. The Proud Boys membership is made up of various ethnic groups and their leader is a person of colour, so those neo-nazis (if they are actually neo-nazis or a group of wokesters posing as such) are definitely NOT the Proud Boys. Are the MSM and the rest of the wokies really that stupid that they think they can keep up this slanderous lie forever even after it's been definitely debunked?

More from Suris The Shill;
Reeeing about capitalism
Well this is a first. He has talked about Blaire before on Twitter, but this is the first time he's done a proper video on her. Also, did he just invalidate her trans identity? I know the wokies hate Blaire, but they would NEVER, under any circumstance, invalidate a tranny's gender identity. I'm surprised this hasn't gotten him cancelled on the spot.
Cow-crossover with the Kavernacle. Also, sure haven't heard this one before, right?
Picking on Quatering again

Also, decided to check-out his Twitter for the first time in ages, even taken to following him under an alt-account so I can keep an eye on him and look what I found;
1615842368720.jpeg

Yeah he's definitely going to troon soon. That last "whatever" part of his pronoun list wasn't there before.
More Twitter takes;
1615842459046.jpeg

1615842583427.jpeg

Sure it was
1615842626793.jpeg

1615842961621.png

I and a good number of people here would be inclined to agree with Mr. Chaos
1615844633406.jpeg

1615844684146.jpeg

Trolling the superstraights
1615844752652.png

1615844956172.jpeg

1615844985306.png

1615845078741.png

1615845537609.png

More reeeing about superstraights
1615849129919.jpeg

Retweet from Kavernacle (seriously, what kind of a name is that?)
1615845218157.jpeg

And him childishly responding to a critic

I'd make a joke about wanting to neuter this catboy, but then I realised he was already neutered, figuratively, a long time ago and is highly likely to neuter himself literally sometime soon.
And I thought his kind hated classic movies because of their outdated attitudes to da womyn & teh minorities.
 

Attachments

  • 1615842927866.png
    1615842927866.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:
Yeah, that pic's fake. The Proud Boys membership is made up of various ethnic groups and their leader is a person of colour, so those neo-nazis (if they are actually neo-nazis or a group of wokesters posing as such) are definitely NOT the Proud Boys. Are the MSM and the rest of the wokies really that stupid that they think they can keep up this slanderous lie forever even after it's been definitely debunked?

More from Suris The Shill;
Reeeing about capitalism
Well this is a first. He has talked about Blaire before on Twitter, but this is the first time he's done a proper video on her. Also, did he just invalidate her trans identity? I know the wokies hate Blaire, but they would NEVER, under any circumstance, invalidate a tranny's gender identity. I'm surprised this hasn't gotten him cancelled on the spot.
Cow-crossover with the Kavernacle. Also, sure haven't heard this one before, right?
Picking on Quatering again

Also, decided to check-out his Twitter for the first time in ages, even taken to following him under an alt-account so I can keep an eye on him and look what I found;
View attachment 1999785
Yeah he's definitely going to troon soon. That last "whatever" part of his pronoun list wasn't there before.
More Twitter takes;
View attachment 1999792
View attachment 1999808
Sure it was
View attachment 1999811
View attachment 1999828
I and a good number of people here would be inclined to agree with Mr. Chaos
View attachment 1999913
View attachment 1999919
Trolling the superstraights
View attachment 1999922
View attachment 1999937
View attachment 1999940
View attachment 1999949
View attachment 2000019
More reeeing about superstraights

View attachment 1999976
And him childishly responding to a critic

I'd make a joke about wanting to neuter this catboy, but then I realised he was already neutered, figuratively, a long time ago and is highly likely to neuter himself literally sometime soon.

And I thought his kind hated classic movies because of their outdated attitudes to da womyn & teh minorities.
In other words Leon posted fake news
 
More from Pseduo intellectual that is vox day’s clone
E1DFF4D1-8C9E-4E68-848C-E80335355C4B.jpeg
77EE1974-371D-4D48-83AE-E36C2D2C8D37.jpeg
B9629031-2180-4B10-B8D0-CA3BDD456BBB.jpeg
 
I cant even remember what his crime was but it's fascinating to see him thrash and cope because he didnt expect for there to be 0 comradery among comrades.
He was a grifter that posted low brow "wrecked feminist" videos and tried to hitch his wagon on the bread tube train only to realize he's just an idiot who isn't capable of arguing on either side of the political spectrum.
 
How many tweets does this guy make per day?
A lot sorry to say and it doesn’t help when he locked his Twitter a while back and he deleted tweets under said lock
He may be a former Channel Awesome fag but he isnt wrong about Star Trek TNG. The first and second season are terrible.
At least he is right in that category
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Arm Pit Cream
Hunter is a huge faggot


Hunter decided to be biblical scholar for a day and larp like he's ever read the bible or any scholarly material behind it. There is no legitimate priest or rabbi that will agree with Hunter's take on the Leviticus verse because the concept it's referring to is pederasty which is still a problem today. The farthest I've seen this argument stretched by a religious authority is some really liberal rabbis will say lesbianism is ok because specifically goes after homosexual men.



Anyways, Hunter did a video replying to Milo like he's actually being serious. You think as a "long time Milo stan" Hunter would know better, but he just wants to moralize.

 
Hunter decided to be biblical scholar for a day and larp like he's ever read the bible or any scholarly material behind it. There is no legitimate priest or rabbi that will agree with Hunter's take on the Leviticus verse because the concept it's referring to is pederasty which is still a problem today. The farthest I've seen this argument stretched by a religious authority is some really liberal rabbis will say lesbianism is ok because specifically goes after homosexual men.
View attachment 2002819
Even if you think you've disproven Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, there's more than one Bible verse that denounces homosexuality. In the New Testament at least, I don't know how they could've possibly been any more crystal-clear regarding gay shit.

Romans 1:27 said:
In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 said:
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Timothy 1:9-11 said:
We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.

Why is Leviticus always the one thrown out there when it comes to Christians and homosexuality? There are far better and less ambiguous verses to refer to on the matter.

I guess the main argument that progressive Christians have against this is that Jesus never said anything specific regarding homosexuality, as all of the above were said by Saint Paul, rather. But does this mean saying that one of the most important founders of Christianity was completely wrong about something is just like "whatever", now? I'm not even Christian, but it's fascinating watching these weird progressive denominations bend every which way to justify literally anything they believe supposedly being compatible with Christianity. Really, it just means cherry-picking out of the Bible what they agree with and what they don't agree with, which was also a common criticism made towards traditionalist Bible-thumpers in the past... funny. It's like Biblical horseshoe theory.
 
Last edited:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 said:
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
The issue with quoting I Corinthians (its I not 1, as in "1st" not "one") is the original term was malakoi and arsenokoitai, which St. Paul made up (or at least was one of the first to write it). The reason I bring this up is leftists will say that this refers to pedophilia and non-marital gay sex. Non-marital gay sex ignores that no where in the bible is this concept mentioned and later on in Paul's writing, he explicitly states of one-man and one-woman marriages, but leftist will try to take things out of context to the extreme whenever it can fit their worldview. As for the two Greek words, they are first seen here but are combined from the words found in Leviticus in the Septuagint, which St. Paul used for his writing (Septuagint is the Greek old testament that Christ and Paul references). As Paul is referencing these acts in Leviticus (laying with another of the same sex) its clear that he means all same sex is abhorrent and will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. This means that Hunter's argument on it only being ritual or for "those" people doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

I've attached a document from the Anglican church that can talk about this more, and if anyone is curious on a "biblical" stance on homosexuality, its well written. Although sola scriptura (through scripture alone) isn't a part of the history of Christianity and the Catholic Church (the True Apostolic Church with foundation and Apostolic Succession to Christ and St. Peter the first pope) has ruled against gay marriage. The above is only relevant with the sola scriptura foundation.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Hunter is a huge faggot
View attachment 2002820

Hunter decided to be biblical scholar for a day and larp like he's ever read the bible or any scholarly material behind it. There is no legitimate priest or rabbi that will agree with Hunter's take on the Leviticus verse because the concept it's referring to is pederasty which is still a problem today. The farthest I've seen this argument stretched by a religious authority is some really liberal rabbis will say lesbianism is ok because specifically goes after homosexual men.
View attachment 2002819


Anyways, Hunter did a video replying to Milo like he's actually being serious. You think as a "long time Milo stan" Hunter would know better, but he just wants to moralize.
View attachment 2002825
He was even Tim Pool’s podcast and didn’t even know about the hunter Biden scandal
 
Back