The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Derek Chauvin does get acquitted, will he be put into witness protection?
He's gonna be followed to the ends of the earth.
Got a good feeling he'll be acquitted, but riots are inevitable.
I don't care if his acquittal causes riots. It's high time someone stopped handling the Regressive Left with kid-gloves and told them "no" for once.

If Chauvin is convicted, they will learn, like a kid who can get candy just by throwing a tantrum, that they can get whatever they want by rioting.
 
He's gonna be followed to the ends of the earth.

I don't care if his acquittal causes riots. It's high time someone stopped handling the Regressive Left with kid-gloves and told them "no" for once.

If Chauvin is convicted, they will learn, like a kid who can get candy just by throwing a tantrim, that they can get whatever they want by rioting.
Another thing that I and other people here think might happen is that the trial will lead to a hung jury.
 
I imagine most people had no idea how potent Fentanyl is
It's incredibly fucking dangerous and there are other versions out there that are literally hundreds of times more potent per gram.
I frankly don't understand why Fent isn't being used for lethal injections.

tow the line
It's 'toe', as in to place your toes on a line, an old military drill technique.
 
CCW in California is either impossible to get or handed out like sparklers on the 4th of July, depending on what county you live in. This means that law-abiding Asians in Alameda County can't get one while people who are not law abiding are all strapped.
But they made it harder to get guns, where would these criminals be acquiring them? Wouldn't the background checks stop them from legally purchasing them at a gun store? :thinking:
 
But they made it harder to get guns, where would these criminals be acquiring them? Wouldn't the background checks stop them from legally purchasing them at a gun store? :thinking:
They literally blame it all on Arizona and Nevada. Because liberals are not capable of even comprehending the idea that they could be wrong. Nothing is ever their fault, nooo. Their policy failures are always the fault of damn dirty Republicans.

(Maybe I should dub this "Meat Target's 2nd Law").
 
I don't quite see how Derek walks away from this one, because rather than a case where a cop was stupid and "we" label it "murder", in this case he did try to actually commit murder and did so.

I do not see this case in the same light as other cases where we have had a stupid cop overreacting and then doing something stupid in the heat of the moment. Derek intended to kill Floyd and the evidence is strongly suggesting that premeditated intent was present.

Anyone who has looked at the evidence knows god damn well he did intend to kill him. And did so over many minutes with ample opportunity to reverse course. There is a marked difference I feel with this case.
 
They literally blame it all on Arizona and Nevada. Because liberals are not capable of even comprehending the idea that they could be wrong. Nothing is ever their fault, nooo. Their policy failures are always the fault of damn dirty Republicans.

(Maybe I should dub this "Meat Target's 2nd Law").
They do the same shit in Illinois as well, there it's the fault of literally every surrounding state that they're still awash in gun crime. Like Communism and Covidiocy Common Sense Gun Control® can never be wrong and its failures can only be fixed by forcing everyone else to adopt it even harder.
 
They do the same shit in Illinois as well, there it's the fault of literally every surrounding state that they're still awash in gun crime. Like Communism and Covidiocy Common Sense Gun Control® can never be wrong and its failures can only be fixed by forcing everyone else to adopt it even harder.
And when you show gun control activists and supporters that gun control doesn't work, they will outright deny it or claim it's "Right-wing propaganda".
 
If it was that easy why hasn't it happened in decades?
Here are a reasons:

Hillbilly Bob or Black Panther Kangz shooter:
Talks too much either online or in person. Anything approaching serious gets referred to the referred to the USSS and FBI. They got a nice visit from some federal agents about the mean words they have said and are covertly placed on a high intensity monitoring list. Anything that person owns or is connected to that person gets within 50 miles if the President alarm bells start going off at the FBI office or resident agency. Even the girlfriends car (license plates) is flagged.

Mr. AR-15 and NRA hat:
Probably has worked his entire life to fill three to four gun safes and has a semi-professional job. They may hate the President but they are smart enough to figure out that they will lose their upper middle class lifestyle and be reduced to being on 24/7 lockdown at ADX Florence.

Mr. Top Hat CEO:
Probably figures its cheap enough to form several PAC and run media campaigns. If that does not work he can always buy the Senate to ensure anything they opposes dies in committee.

Mr. Religion of Peace:
Can't get into the country. Too incompetent with screaming Allah Akbar and firing an AK from the hip too be successful. Idiot talks too much and even compatriots that are with hostile governments don't want the U.S. military on their doorstep.

Not saying that its impossible to kill a sitting President, just that it takes a significant amount of preparation and near total secrecy. A person on a rooftop will either be arrested and/or shot by agents already stationed there or killed by a counter sniper. The U.S. Secret Service have snipers that have surveyed the location and know all the good vantage points. Many of the decorations (flags, banners, etc.) are used to block views from buildings they cannot secure. With the height of the glass that the President has at an outside public speech it would need to be an almost 45 degree shot from four to five stories up.
 
If you need any more proof, how about Count Dankula contacting wikipedia asking if they can remove "far right" from his name, because he doesn't identify as that, and being told he's not a reliable source, but some no name Scottish rag is.
But be a child molester, and "identify" as a "woman" and you automatically are.

Hey, I identify as a dude with an Aston-Martin. So where is it? Give it to me you fucks.
 
Niggas keep saying two autopsies "concluded" homicide. Do they actually? Why hasn't that been brought up in court yet?
This was covered earlier in the thread.
Coroners must rule that deaths are either homicide, suicide, natural causes, or misadvanture.
As Floyd's fatal heart attack appeared to have been triggered by police intervention, it's listed as homicide.
If he'd OD'ed and died in the car before the cops got there, it would be misadvanture.
If he had a heart attack and died in the car before the cops got there, it would be natural causes.
A coroner's verdict of 'homicide' simply implies that human interaction was partially, indirectly, or wholly to blame for the death.
It's not synonymous with 'murder' as most retards on Reddit seem to think. It doesn't even apportion blame or responsibility.
It's just noting that absent of human interaction, the heart attack that killed Floyd may not have happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back