- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Claimed legal name jessica simpson yet his flat is in the name of jessica jonathan yaniv. Is this legal or somehow a method of scamming credit/background checks etc?
Suing the Strata - Harassment by WGKitty on kiwifarms
- Thread starter Jaded Optimist
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
Wouldn't surprise me. He's as honest as a three-dollar bill.
Picklechu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
His legal name before Jessica Serenity Simpson was Jessica Jonathan Yaniv, IIRC, so it probably hasn't been updated on that yet.
Érui
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2020
Do they need to make him leave?
They could make his life so utterly unbearable by enforcing every rule he can’t wait to get out of there.
He is kicking off about understandable rules such as not having cameras pointing in public areas, can you imagine what petty little rules they have that they don’t enforce.
if Johnnyboy wants to play rough, I imagine the Strata can play rougher.
They could make his life so utterly unbearable by enforcing every rule he can’t wait to get out of there.
He is kicking off about understandable rules such as not having cameras pointing in public areas, can you imagine what petty little rules they have that they don’t enforce.
if Johnnyboy wants to play rough, I imagine the Strata can play rougher.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
Serenity.
What hipster goyim bullshit is that? Good Jewish girls should have middle names like Leah or perhaps Golda after a great-aunt. Why am I so shocked? Just fucking kek. Damn.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
Yeah, it's legal, since people's names do change sometimes for legitimate (i.e. non-evasive) reasons. A woman who owns real property on her own and then gets married, for instance -- her legal name changes but although her property is deeded to her original name, she still legally owns the property. In fact I don't think there's even a need (in legal terms) to ever change the name on the deed.
Having said that, it's definitely also used to scam for credit and foil background checks. It usually doesn't work -- it relies entirely on credit bureaus and background checking companies screwing up and not tracking the name change -- but occasionally it does.
In Yaniv's case, he did it to shed the permanently awful reputation associated with his real name. He changed it to "Jessica Simpson" specifically because that's also the name of a pop star, so searching for him by his new name won't lead to sites like this that document his shitty behavior, but rather the usual staple of vapid articles about pop culture. With "deadnaming" being such a verboten practice, there aren't many articles that mention both his real name and his vanity name, so he's mostly invisible on the search engines.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
I just find it strange that he's changed his name on his birth certificate, passport, and I'd imagine his driving licence etc yet something as important as owning property is skipped on by. I don't know the Canadian credit check system so just wondered if this was another way of him trying to scam/con the system in some way.
Thankfully many sites are now quoting both his name change alongside his old name eg "Jessica Yaniv (whose legal name is Jessica Simpson)" ... "Jessica Yaniv Simpson" even brings up his Twitter page in Google search (3rd in the results after "Wikipedia" and "TrustedNerd is a Pedophile (Jessica Yaniv) @OnCreeping"... even his own Instagram page is 5th in the search results
so he'll never completely disappear."trustednerd" is as toxic as jonathan yaniv, jessica yaniv, jessica simpson, jessica yaniv simpson... even trying to change his "business" name to JS Simpson Group didn't work out.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
It’s possibly a money thing? In some countries changing your name on things like driving licences is free, but changing your name on a land title costs several hundred dollars.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2021
I’ll buy you all the pillowcases & bars of soap you need
mother of god are you a saint?? How can you live this close to this thing & not be up on a charge
Change your wifi ID to KiwifarmsJust a bowl of kiwi fruits
me & you both
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
The insanity continues...
meowmix.org
Interestingly no telephone number provided on this one.
The days ended with "y".
Jessica Yaniv Simpson vs. Strata Update: New Application Filed | MeowMix
Jessica Yaniv Simpson has filed a follow-up application to his strata demanding all kinds of senseless shit.
meowmix.org
- An order for 5 access control fobs.
- An order that the strata provide video surveillance to the Langley RCMP.
- An order that the entryway phone volume be turned up.
- An order that Yaniv gets a list of everyone in the building.
- An order that Yaniv be allowed to have a camera facing outside.
- An order that his personal info (fob/tag audits) be provided.
Interestingly no telephone number provided on this one.
I think yaniv has somehow forgotten he's suing Langley RCMP for unprofessionalism yet trusts this inept organisation to take charge of videos. Logic lost on me I'm afraid.
The days ended with "y".
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- An order that video surveillance from May 1&2 2021 be supplied to Langley RCMP immediately
I dunno how it works in leafland, but in the USA when the police want some video surveillance footage, and they have a colorable legal reason to have it, they just go to court themselves and they get a warrant for it.
I dunno how it works in leafland, but in the USA when the police want some video surveillance footage, and they have a colorable legal reason to have it, they just go to court themselves and they get a warrant for it.
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2014
What makes Yaniv think that he's entitled to a list of all other residents at the Strata?
Edit: aside from his obviously massive sense of entitlement
Edit: aside from his obviously massive sense of entitlement
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2021
ComeGetSome
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
What happened those days that has fatty so concerned?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
I’m guessing that’s the window during which he claims his car was vandalised.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Because yaniv.
List of tenants, free to photograph everyone entering/leaving the strata, intercom volume heightened = he can put names to faces and know their whereabouts/interactions.
Boy genius has the perfect plan if only the pesky strata would cooperate.
I would hope that someone somewhere asks yaniv why he wants/needs information on his fellow tenants. I feel it's WGkitty/Langley Resident/Twitter related but I would like to hear his lying reasons on a legal document.
I can only imagine the public doxing, threats, physical abuse and harassment yaniv would wreak.
Smacks of his ToL request for employee details.
Last edited:
ComeGetSome
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
Some interesting and relevant documents/legislation:
...so fatty has no inherent right, under PIPA (BC's privacy legislation) to personal information. On page 14 of the same doc, it's noted that fatty can request some information:
Section 35 of the Strata Properties Act (SPA) states (in part):
So at best, fatty could get a list of names, unit numbers, and addresses. However - there's still this bit from the previous doc (page 14):
I don't know if that can provide cover for the strata in this case, but it will be interesting to read any legal decision on this case.
From the first doc (page 13):It is important to note that PIPA does not give an individual the right to request
and receive someone else’s personal information unless that other individual
provides written authorization for that access. In addition, PIPA does not provide
a right of general access to the strata corporation’s records.
...so fatty has no inherent right, under PIPA (BC's privacy legislation) to personal information. On page 14 of the same doc, it's noted that fatty can request some information:
A strata corporation must comply with a request for records under s. 35 of SPA within
two weeks of receipt of the request, unless the request is for the strata corporation
bylaws or rules, in which case it has only one week to comply.
Section 35 of the Strata Properties Act (SPA) states (in part):
35 (1) The strata corporation must prepare all of the following records:
(a) minutes of annual and special general meetings and council meetings, including the results of any votes;
(b) a list of council members;
(c) a list of
(i) owners, with their strata lot addresses, mailing addresses if different, strata lot numbers as shown on the strata plan, parking stall and storage locker numbers, if any, and unit entitlements,
(ii) names and addresses of mortgagees who have filed a Mortgagee's Request for Notification under section 60,
(iii) names of tenants, and
(iv) assignments of voting or other rights by landlords to tenants under sections 147 and 148;
So at best, fatty could get a list of names, unit numbers, and addresses. However - there's still this bit from the previous doc (page 14):
Under SPA, an owner or tenant is not entitled to receive any information relating to
a lawsuit in which they are a party with an interest contrary to the strata corporation’s.
In that case, the strata corporation is authorized, pursuant to s. 169(1)(b) of SPA, not to
provide that owner or tenant with information or documents relating to the lawsuit,
including any legal opinions kept by the strata corporation under s. 35(2)(h) of SPA.
I don't know if that can provide cover for the strata in this case, but it will be interesting to read any legal decision on this case.
NathanielBowditch
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2019
It is really unlikely a small claims court could compel the strata to do anything. For most things in small claims court CANNOT compel action, only set restitution., plus there is a special tribunal set up for these disputes which is NOT small claims court, so this will most likely be dismissed. It is completely filed in the wrong venue.
Unfortunately, he's probably going to get between 1000-9000 from each party on the town of langley lawsuit, as the Judge did not disimss the case and it is cheaper to settle for less than 10G than go to trial, pay experts, witnesses, court appearances for motions/hearings etc so it is more cost effective for the municipality/agency.
ETA the reason he added more parties is because he knows this.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
Disagree. Why would they pay out this retard who doesn’t even have a case? They will make an example of him.