Both are (or were, RIP Bulla, whose death has complicated my uses of tenses and pronouns) abnormally horny, and not shy about it. Neither was a catch, nor endowed with the the kinds of qualities that women appreciate in abnormally horny men. Their libidos were matched by commensurate mental illness, social deficits and poverty.
While the world may be full of sex crazed retards, very few have been able to leave such a durable impression on social media. In generations past, Bull and Lucas would not have the means to become the legends they are today. Lucas, for example, would merely be a bit of Spokane lore, something whispered about by spooked Spokane teens at slumber parties.
Schizos and tards, Bulla and Lucas arrived at the same conclusion, through the different paths of religious bullshit and crackpot science: I am plenty good and entitled to the sex I want with the hottest babes.
Bulla believed that his friend God promised him a hot babe "to marry and fuck," while Lucas believes that biology, mathematics and the structure of reality itself entitle him to a fecund teen bae.
Bulla succeeded at sexual predation, while Lucas lacks the savvy to. In this respect, Bulla was better than Lucas. Further comparison does not favor Lucas. Consider:
1. Bulla was married, unlike Lucas.
2. Bulla had a daughter. Granted, she was a stepdaughter, and his rape victim, but he came closer to being paterfamilias than Lucas has, or will.
3. Bulla was less homeless than Lucas. Granted, this may have more do with their family circumstances than individual qualities and decisions, but Bulla wasn't a hobo.
4. Bulla wasn't a chickenshit coward.
5. While not particularly well endowed, Bulla's wiener is not as comically small as Lucas's.
6. MRSA