POLICE ISSUE A STATEMENT

Status
Not open for further replies.
If the language of victim and suspect really means that Barb is totally in the clear, my question is, did they determine that she is of diminished capacity, was it the line in the texts where Chris admit she said no or did she throw Chris under the bus to save her own ass?
(I think she's a little late on that last part)
 
Holy shit I leave the site for six fucking months and look at all this shit Chris has gotten himself into

Enjoy this quality upscale of Chris' mugshot courtesy of Topaz Gigapixel AI:
232227445_4389133991153151_8783147635644666627_n (1).jpg
 
So are we expecting Null to give information on the $750 that Chris stole from Barb since he manages Chris email?
Y'all act like the cops and detectives are inept and can't call Bank of America with a request to see funds transfered and what time. It'll take them 60min tops and 50 of it is the wait time to speak to a live person.

I can see Dear Feeder not giving the cops any info unless subpoenaed. I'm sure some A-log on these forums will send it to the cops or has already sent it to the cops. The sheer volume of data that these locals will get will be staggering to the point of overwhelming.

Chris will be a Felon by the end of the year.
Null said he contacted the police right after Chris bullshitted him about the money he took. I imagine he had to show some sort of proof, like the notification email and texts, when he did.
 
Who the fuck designed their website? :story:
View attachment 2404139
Unfortunately a lot of small, local websites are often terribly built via wysiwyg, or severely outdated from not having a legit designer on staff.

inspecting the site very quickly, it seems safe to blame a “Lt. Ian P Andriechack” for it


odd that he worked for that jail beginning in 2012. If he designed that in 2012, he should be arrested.

update: it appears to have been built using something called avanquest webeasy. Never heard of that. But yeah.
 
Last edited:
Ar this moment he's probably telling some poor fucking beat cop his life story, how he got held down and recorded in middleschool, how those DAMN DIRTY TROLLS ruined his life. Besides Barbara was totally asking for it with those skimpy nightgowns..
Nah he's telling them about how his husband Magi-chan is going to bust him out now that the merge is here and how everything is going to be sunshine and rainbows from here on out. I pity the guard who has to listen to his schizo ranting right now.
 
But the pronouns used in statutes has nothing to do with tranny shit, legislators literally just pick one fucking pronoun and use it for consistency. If you want to know who the statute applies to, you need to look at the definition of "person."


They also clarify this in the definition of gender.
Fair enough. Guess we'll just have to wait and see if the courts will bend a knee to tranny shit, or just tell him he is a man.
 
I wonder if he's been given a public defender yet.

Do we think Chris will have the wherewithal to plead the 5th and ask for a lawyer? Or will he forget what the investigator told him after five minutes and just keep talking?
surely, in both the federal and virginia legal system, there must be some form of protections in place for defendants that are suspected of being incompetent to stand trial, unable to reasonably navigate the legal system, or otherwise unfit for relevant legal processes to be "guided" through the legal system in some attempt to fairly represent them, right? i understand public defenders enough to get that its likely chris will be represented by one, but is that the only thing that will happen? can chris attempt to represent himself despite his obvious inability to do so?

considering the misgendering on his intake listing, could this possibly be precedence for scotus to consider a situation in which someone may lawfully be eligible file a (legally righteous and significant) grievance of discrimination against a legal institution (as hes legally changed his gender) while also being incapable and/or unable to navigate the legal system? lotta word salad there, but this raises interesting ethical questions.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Bent_Duck
I’ve seen people in here ask why the pronoun shit is so important. It’s because it skews statistics.

There a reason why trannies took down the list of tranny serial killers from Wikipedia, and in the UK, women’s violent crime rates have gone up 8x the amount since troonism, because trannies keep saying they’re women when they get arrested.

It’s also a way for them to cover their tracks.
 
It's not exactly uncommon. I doubt it sees much use other than issuing statements like this one.

Whether it's rape likely depends on a proper evaluation of Barb's mental state. Painful sex doesn't necessarily mean rape, especially for an 80 year old woman like Barb who's china probably doesn't lubricate properly. No, Barb's blank ass stares on camera are not actual proof of dementia or a similar condition. It could be completely consensual incestuous sex given they're history of inappropriate conduct. Barb's mental capacity and testimony, a proper confession from Chris (to police or in court), and evidence of rape will all be deciding factors. If Barb is too far gone to consent she's likely too far gone to give reliable testimony as well. All that is actually known is that Chris admitted through texts to an uninvolved third party (at the time, assuming that they weren't coercing Chris into relations with Barb), which isn't enough to convict Chris, it's really only grounds to investigate. This text confession likely won't hold up in court unless the the phone carrier or app staff is subpoena'd and hands over chat logs, and even then that's still not concrete proof.
All the DA needs is the belief that Bard has some cognitive decline. Just that she is not at 100%. They aren’t going to go into fine details regarding Barbs mental state. Because Chris is the dominant party and supposed caregiver. If Barb is showing any signs of decline whatsoever, (which Chris himself documents both in the text leaks and the audio call), then it doesn’t matter if she in fact asked for it. Chris had the legal and moral obligation to not do it. If a 12 year old initiates sexual activity with you, it still makes you a Rapist. That’s how it works.

A defense attorney may attempt to make the case of consensual sex. But that’s just going to utterly repulse a jury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back