To piggy back on
@soy_king , politics in every country runs on a thin and fine layer of corruption. You wash my back, I wash yours, we both get happy. This is nominally kept in check by requiring it to be done quietly, and the corruption remaining less costly than the benefit to the voter. This is the reality of the system, and functions quite well normally.
But the core rule of all this is that it must remain under the table, the system must be -perceived- as clean. Just ignoring court orders is too dirty.
Some lubricating corruption has been a staple of politics since people started living in villages to make the systems work. Nobody minds a little corruption when
the politicians and policies involved benefit the populace. When Senator Jones pulls a little dirty fast one to put some kind of project in town that employs a lot of townspeople and local firms, nobody really minds if he skims a little off the top as a bonus. After all all, the Mayor is getting clout, Charlie's Construction boys get a good gig for building it, Dave and Bill and Jimmy get to work there when its done, Paul's Diner and Tom's Pub all get more business, and so on - everybody is happy so Senator Jones can have a taste as a reward. Take a look at Huey P. Long's entire career, corrupt as could be but because he built bridges, and roads, and improved people's lives he was practically a political messiah.
When it breaks down, it breaks down because the corruption no longer benefits the people, either the politicians take too much, they point the benefits to non-local entities, or both. The openness of the corruption is secondary to where the benefits go and how much the politician benefits from the corruption. Once the internal perception goes from 'they are a corrupt bastard, but they're benefitting me' to 'this asshole is corrupt and hurting my kids' then public opinion and theoretically votes shift to dislodge the official.
The issue currently is that its not a senator or mayor here and there undergoing this level of distrust, but entire parties and administrations. On one paw, all politicians have become more selfish and corrupt as they have continued to get away with it, and arrogantly forgot that there is a fine balance to maintain. On the other, entire classes of politicians have converted to an ideology that isn't even about pretending to serve the people, but instead to destroy the nation and genocide its populace by corrupt and authoritarian means. In most people's minds, these two great sins end up a bit blended, and if there is a grand political backlash nobody is going to care about distinguishing the nuances of motivation behind the betrayal.
They'll just want to see the entire political system swing from a lamppost.
Oh no! The religious right wants me to raise my family in a moral and gospel centered way.
This is exactly the same as leftoids trying to corrupt and destroy your child, family, and country as soon as possible with the full weight of the government, media, and globohomo.

"So we want you to raise your child up to have moral virtue, and aspire to be a good citizen and good parent to their own children in time."

"Whats the trade-off for the benefits?"

"We're going to need to see them at Church on Sundays, believe in Jesus and avoid degeneracy."

"Alright, lets hear the counter-offer?"

"lEt uS CuT OfF YoUr dAuGhTeRs tItS!"

"Wait - "

"LeT Us cRoSsDrEsS YoUr sOn aNd mAkE ThEm sTrIp dAnCe fOr aDuLt mEn!"

"Don't you come near my kids!"

"Oh sWeAtY, wE WiLl cUm iN YoUr kIdS! tOdDlErS CaN CoNsEnT! iF YoU DiSaGrEe yOu'rE A rAcIsT NaZi hOmOpHoBe!"

"Would you like to hear about our Crusade options?"

"....yes, I would like that very much."