I honestly don't know, from what I've personally seen almost everyone is fedup with our adventures involving killing sand people, seeing BILLIONS worth of equipment being given to our enemies while local infrastructure crumbles was a big eye opener for a lot of people. If the September slaughter were to occur I could see just as many people (if not more) blaming and calling for Biden's head as people calling for a return to the middle east.
Yeah, I think it would more likely push a purge and restructure of the military. We cannot mount a competent offensive with trust as low as it is, with the top officials proving the quality of their expertise with a defeat of this magnitude. It would be "we have to get back into fighting shape and resurrect a clear moral vision for America." If we get into a war now, with the people in charge still at the top, we would just have another 20-year defeat.
Where would we be without helpful fact checks from DNC shills?
View attachment 2509308
Edit: they later retracted this "fact check" and admitted Biden could be seen checking his watch several times. As if none of us have fucking eyes. Unfuckingbelievable, these people. Some of the clumsiest gaslighting ever.
They just move the goalposts around. Every Trump quote was anonymously sourced by people in his administration, whereas the people who saw Biden do what he did have put their names and faces out there. But suddenly we need video proof. If we have video proof, it's "manipulated media" because they cut a second out of the video.
@Terrifik:
Senate panel will probe Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling, 'shadow docket'
They did not "decide" the case via shadow docket. There is no one to issue an injunction against until a proper lawsuit is brought. Even the liberal dissents admitted this. That's it. When there is someone who can say they were harmed by the law, it will definitely be heard by SCOTUS. But a stay/injunction would just confuse people and not be binding precedent, so they are going to focus on clean cases that can actually sketch out whether the enforcement mechanism of the Texas law is allowed.
Really, only conservative judges should be on the Court. I say this because they all have actual legal philosophies that guide them, whereas the liberals are only about "living Constitutions" and preserving liberal policies. If we just appointed actual textualists, it would force the legislative and executive to follow the letter of the law and stop usurping powers they don't have. But that's just me.
This is why I can't truly hate Mitch McConnell. He's a snake and a turtle, but he had a long game for the courts and seized the opportunity that Obama left by leaving so many positions unfilled. Then Trump gave him the opportunity to get three new judges on SCOTUS. They are in an even better position now because they have a sizable back bench of reliable conservative judges on the lower levels that are ready to be promoted. It's smart strategy, and we need similar single-mindedness when it comes to cleaning out other departments. Long march through the institutions, baby.
So is Biden's new strategy just to call everything a success even when it clearly isn't?
Afghanistan exit? Rousing success. Over a gorillion air lifted.
The economy? Building back better! Pay no attention to slow job growth or how much ground beef costs.
Hey man, they saved us a whole 16 cents on hot dogs on the Fourth.