US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I don't think most Americans realize just how easy it is to create another potential Hitler. Most bureaucrats and politicians are incredibly power hungry.
That's the the powers are supposed to be antagonistic to one another. Everybody thinks Congress is supposed to cooperate with the President, and that the House and the Senate are supposed to play nice with one another. They're not. Everybody is meant to moderate and cap the other's powers. When people all start beating the same drum, that's when we get this shit.
 
View attachment 2531623

edit: oh shit the comments in the Poso tweet point out he has his hand around the red hat girls waist. STRANGER DANGER.
20210913_081530.jpg

Nothing to see here, move along.
 
Foreign support is the big problem imo, if these politicians can seem legitimate enough to start sending NATO Soldiers to the USA, you're going to be in a far worse position.

This is why it's important to prevent them from settling in any other nation, too.
thanks to globohomo there won't be another nation able to once the USA goes down. same for fleeing after fucking up the country - to where? south america? africa? russia? all the other first world countries in the west will be imploding one way or another as well, and it's not a good idea to migrate to an unstable country, let alone hope for their support.

in the past it was easy to just take the family jewels and run, since most conflicts of that kind were limited to certain nations or regions, but not so much these days.
this also means you'll never be really "out of reach", and it doesn't take much for someone to spice your food with some polonium (in minecraft) if there's enough personal or political incentive.
 
I don't think most Americans realize just how easy it is to create another potential Hitler. Most bureaucrats and politicians are incredibly power hungry.
Not just power hungry but absolutely assured of their own intelligence and morality. Fauci isn't sitting in his office plotting to oppress the masses, he sitting their thinking "don't these morons know this is what's best for them?".
 
I really recommend Chernow's Washington biography. I came away respecting him more by seeing some of his flaws. His biggest one was that he had a bad temper that he was always trying to keep in check, so he was very stern and strict with his staff. (He and Hamilton had a BIG fight at one point over (literally) Hamilton not coming down the stairs fast enough and didn't speak to each other for years.) He was also not the greatest tactical general, and his biggest accomplishment was holding a volunteer army together through charisma and inspiration, even if all they were doing was running around New York. That's the part that gets exaggerated most. What he did was amazing, but it's not like he was brilliant at military campaigns, and his presidency itself was mostly non-eventful save for the Whiskey Rebellion.

But he intentionally modeled himself after Cincinnatus, who has his hero throughout his life. The Founding Fathers in general all had loooong views of history and were more concerned about being remembered honorably than gaining temporary acclaim. That's what drove him to the decision to sacrifice so much for the country, resist attempts to give him grandiose titles and powers (there was a Masonic cult that wanted to make him king), and step down before anyone was ready to see him go. Cincinnatus, too, was a great military leader who fucked off before people got sick of him. Washington thought that was crucial for a budding country not to get too tied up in one person. He did all he could in life to downplay his own achievements, so the exaggerations are almost ... corrective because he never wanted to be the focus of attention (even though he was still a politician and was willing to play his rivals off each other at times). He understood the symbolism of being the first president and knew exactly how to play it, and that was his main task.
Moreover, his Presidency was arguably less successful than his military career, as it helped to sow the seeds for the first regional and partisan divide while struggling to maintain a neutral foreign policy during a global war.
 
Not just power hungry but absolutely assured of their own intelligence and morality. Fauci isn't sitting in his office plotting to oppress the masses, he sitting their thinking "don't these morons know this is what's best for them?".
Since we’ve been talking about the progressives too, this is a great microcosm of how they think as well. The progressive foot soldiers believe they are smarter and better than everybody else and we are all retards for not seeing that their gay space communism utopia is feasible. Of course, this hubris is also what makes them such great lolcows because they simultaneously have the I am Better Than You attitude while their lives are in shambles. But we should all build a society based on their ideas. :story:
 
So, it's basically all over for Joe Biden, yes? This doesn't seem like a salvageable situation for him, 27 governors just told him to shove it where the sun don't shine.

If I understand correctly, the military is in the hands of the states & not the president directly, correct? I remember one of the governors calling back soldiers from his state when Joe Biden decided that a concrete parking lot was adequate accommodation for sleeping quarters for the people keeping the rabble at arms length. Please correct me if I'm wrong, @Gehenna.
About that, it's twenty-four governors, all of them Republicans. Not a single Democratic governor has said they would fight the vaccine mandate. Kansas, Louisiana, and Kentucky all have Democratic governors and, predictably, none of them spoke out against the mandate. The reason why these three states are red in the picture below is because their Attorney General spoke out against it. If a state's Governor and Attorney General are Democratic, they are in favor of the vaccine mandate.

Link / Archive

1631522137121.png


The good news is that all three states with Democratic governors I mentioned are - for now - solid red states. That means next year in Kansas and 2023 for the other two, if you live in those states, you have an opportunity to vote them out.

Right, normally polls follow a pretty basic pattern. First you, through a mixture of phonecall and online means, obtain a sample of voters from a given area. You ask some basic identifying questions "Are you registered to vote, have you voted, are you likely to vote" etc. From there, you ask a series of increasingly more specific questions.

This is where the first bit of fuckery begins. The questions are generally -very- misleading, For example: "Do you approve of increased measures to ensure vaccination" (That is a verbatim example from CNN). Frankly, the fact that question -only- got a raw 64% yes response is amazing. It's so god damn broad and open that everyone is like "yes". But it's also priming the pump, we already agreed SOME increased measures are fine. So the next questions are very, very slowly more severe, and lead to additional positive answers.

Now comes the second fuckery. The next bit is to compile the data to see what kind of range of answers you got. The traditional value is to put them into Republican/Democrat/Independent groups. This is where oversampling comes in. Now, ove sampling is -not inherently bad-. What is normally done is you weigh your numbers based on national averages or regional averages, so they balance it out. To massively oversimplify, if you know there is a 50/50 split of Dems to Republicans, but you got 12 Democrats and 8 Republicans you'd weight the democrat responses down to 0.83 and weigh the republican responses up by 1.25 so they both are 'equal' to 10.

The democrats, and CNN, technically do this. But they -massively- overweight Democrats.

This leads to our final bit of fuckery, Time period. CNN in particular is now taking 'polls' over the span of months and compiling them into one to provide a more 'accurate' view. This is bullshit. People's views change over time, it's why we use graphs to indicate changes over time in the day to day. No poll is accurate out to more than a week which is why they are generally shorter. Polls are an indicator of the movement of opinion, not the opinion in and of itself. In isolation, any given poll can only tell you a snapshot -at the time- of an opinion. Having them spread that out over months is going to garble it with utterly useless info and be utterly meaningless.
This is a good post. The problems of the polling industry is difficult to understand unless you have been following it on conservative-leaning (more like moderate if we're being honest) media or worked on how to make accurate polling in the age of online like People's Pundit with Big Data Poll, Trafalgar, or Susquehanna have. Here are some of the claims the polling industry swore up and down would happen that did not,

- Thom Tillis would lose to Democratic Senator Kay Hagan. He won by 1.5 points.
- Hillary Clinton would win the election. Trump won and significantly outdid his polling in places like Ohio, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
- Predicted that Andrew Gillum would win Florida in 2018 and that Democrat Bill Nelson would keep his seat. Neither happened. Ron DeSantis is in the governor mansion while being an example of what a populist should do and Rick Scott flipped Nelson's seat red.
- Claimed that Democrats would expand their House majority. It in fact narrowed as not a single Republican incumbent running for re-election lost their seats whereas we had Democrats running that lost theirs.
- Every poll predicted Sara Gideon would beat Susan Collins for Senator in Maine, yet Collins won by a comfortable margin.
- Claimed that a Biden landslide was inevitable. Sure Biden "won", but he didn't get even an Obama-tier landslide and he only obtained the presidency by 40,000 votes.

A solid pollsters will have misses, but the key thing is that the misses will occur on both side and they are transparent about the method they use. The problem with the MSM polling industry is that they are just are corrupt as the mainstream media that employs them, and that's reflected on significant misses outside of the margin of error - occasionally even double-digit - that they keep having. Yet we were told that Biden had Obama-level approval rating when we're now witnessing the fastest collapse of an administration since Gerald Ford (who was dealing with Nixon's tainted hands). The fact that CNN had to change their polling methodology in response to backlash speaks volumes about how untrustworthy most pollsters are.

Manchin is angling to absolutely gut the pork in it, which will in turn just absolutely wreck the attempts to refinance the coffers. The man increasingly is angling for a governor position, and the revelation that Governors can have more power than the President may just have been the last bit of oomph he needed to go full 'fuck it'.

FYI: https://nypost.com/2021/07/01/sen-joe-manchin-talks-switching-parties-to-join-gop/ The rumblings began around July that Manchin was possibly considering switching parties. He hasn't yet out of some lingering loyalty, but that loyalty is -frayed- to hell and back.
Fuck no. Manchin voted for Trump's impeachment when he had an opportunity to stand against his colleagues. He's a liberal that would be the definition of a RINO, backstabbing a possible Trump or DeSantis term just as hard as Romney or Collins does, if not more so. He should stay in the Democratic Party and pretend to be a moderate if he wants to pretend party label is not important to him. Sure he might be responsible for preventing the worst of Biden's laws coming to fruition, but that is only because he knows West Virginia would vote him out in landslide if he approved shit like H.R.1 (fortifying voter fraud on a nationwide scale) or H.R.8 (banning "assault weapons").

Come 2024, West Virginia should make the point of denying him a Senate or Governor position. We need more populist Republican Senators and few states have a better shot at a flip than West Virginia. If Manchin does run for governor in 2024, the voters should vote to keep Jim Justice or elect a new populist governor.
 
Last edited:
I guess I discussed this in another thread but will give a short summary here. I have observed three camps of thinking for 9/11.

First camp believes the muzzies pulled it all off on their own.

Second camp believes the muzzies did it with aid from the Jews, Mossad, CIA and the neocons in the Bush administration

Third camp believes that the planes were a red herring to distract people from the Jews, Israel and the Neocons in the Bush administration blowing up the towers.
Fourth camp thinks people within the government knew but that Bush himself wasn't personally aware by design.

I tend to think the terrorists did it themselves (because Occam's razor and terrorists are that crazy for 72 virgins) but that certain agencies and ideologues didn't want to let the crisis go to waste. Maybe some of them knew it was coming. That being said if they knew the planes were coming, what could they have done? Shoot it down? That'd still be taking civilian lives so they'd get shat on either way.
 
Fourth camp thinks people within the government knew but that Bush himself wasn't personally aware by design.

I tend to think the terrorists did it themselves (because Occam's razor and terrorists are that crazy for 72 virgins) but that certain agencies and ideologues didn't want to let the crisis go to waste. Maybe some of them knew it was coming. That being said if they knew the planes were coming, what could they have done? Shoot it down? That'd still be taking civilian lives so they'd get shat on either way.
Wasn't there a pretty plausible theory that they did indeed shoot one of the 9/11 planes down? Then claimed some absolutely autistically stupid event happened on the plane where a bunch of people rushed the cockpit and whoopsy doodle, plane fall down go boom? Something about how unbelievable the event was and how it got memory holed pretty fucking quick + no black box recordings.
 
Wasn't there a pretty plausible theory that they did indeed shoot one of the 9/11 planes down? Then claimed some absolutely autistically stupid event happened on the plane where a bunch of people rushed the cockpit and whoopsy doodle, plane fall down go boom? Something about how unbelievable the event was and how it got memory holed pretty fucking quick + no black box recordings.
they could have shot it down anytime if things got bad. The passengers just took care of the job for them.
 
Yeah why would anyone ever suspect the same people who absolutely, 100%, blatantly rigged the national election last year might rig a smaller, less protected election that would nonetheless set the national narrative about their party losing power and a red populist / MAGA wave coming over them and cost them a seat that's "safe?" Why would aaaaanyone ever suspect the people known for cheating might cheat?

View attachment 2532263

View attachment 2532265

It's a mystery to everyone.

Obviously this is just conspiracy theorycrafting, which is why they're calling it a false claim before the event has even occurred. And when he gets 99% of the vote with more votes than in Californian history, we'll just all pretend that's kosher -- or else the techbros that we outsourced our ability to communicate to will remove our first amendment rights again.
Just a reminder that the drawing is tomorrow.

Yippee⸮
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
I always avoid A&N on the 9/11 anniversaries but I noticed in the NFL pregame shows yesterday, they couldn't stop spinning the "remember how the nation united that day" narrative. I couldn't help but think "nigger, your president* is doing his best to make sure I lose my job for not taking the vaccine. Fuck unity, we're about to balkanize or have a civil war"
 
Airlines will need another bailout if that's actually enforced.
I have status on one of the airlines because I used to fly a lot for work. Have not been on a plane since this started. Instead, I drive to everything now and the mileage reimbursement ain’t half bad. Keep pushing though, Fauci, it’s fun to watch an old man fall on his face so much.
 
Maybe some of them knew it was coming. That being said if they knew the planes were coming, what could they have done? Shoot it down? That'd still be taking civilian lives so they'd get shat on either way.
They knew something was coming - intelligence reports indicated that a large terrorist attack was imminent - but they probably assumed it would be a repeat of the 93 bombing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back