Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
? Httrack? Wget? Both of these options seem fine for independent archival purposes, I've even archived some websites already using these.I want to remind the doomers that Ghost Archive exists, however who knows how long it'll last if they're actually trying to take down Archive Today.
We need an actually good way to download websites. Chromium browsers have this already, but are pretty flawed compared to the main 3 archive sites.
Denis is a cow in his own right but his service is useful.Same, but I've had better luck accessing over tor. Both clearnet addresses and onion. Figured the owner was having another temper tantrum over a given web service.
I am almost certain this is a CSAM case:Oh. That's what they're after: someone is using this to archive child pornography.
They aren't seeking information from archive.today. It is a subpoena to Tucows, who is their domain registrar. They want information on the owner of the domain (i.e. the owner of archive.today).reading the subpeonea, it looks like they just want someone's billing & customer info from archive is? am I misunderstanding?
What they're asking is also definitive in terms of profiling: real name, phone number and billing address (if they can even get any of these, if the archive.today guy uses monero then he most definitely uses VoIP, and if he's actually russian he probably has some bullshit fake ID lol). So they're looking to unmask the owner entirely due to CSAM concerns, which would in turn open the them up to get nuked by corporations proper but that's an aside.reading the subpeonea, it looks like they just want someone's billing & customer info from archive is? am I misunderstanding?
This aged well.Glad to see the FBI focusing on things that matter.
Only person ITT who can read. Not saying there will not be consequences if the owner is phonebooked (and subsequently un-personed), but nobody is seizing anything it's just a subpoena for information from Tucows.They aren't seeking information from archive.today. It is a subpoena to Tucows, who is their domain registrar. They want information on the owner of the domain (i.e. the owner of archive.today).
Damn that SA sounds basedI am almost certain this is a CSAM case:
- The supervisory special agent, SA Marisa Kim Cowdry, seems to only work on CSAM cases. She worked at NCMEC back in 2015, she wrote search warrants related to CSAM, and she even went as far as posing as a parent selling a fictional 11-year-old to nab a pedophile.
- The case number is 305A-HQ-1497320-I045_PG; FBI case numbers consist classification numbers, then the name of the field office, then a number unique to the field office. The classification code "305A" was notably used for Operation Torpedo, which targeted CSAM websites on the dark net. It was also in the case number against a Nebraska man who was convicted of CSAM offences.
We're not allowed to have nice things. That's what all of this is about. It's why gay race communism has already won the culture war thanks in no small part to the right letting the left win.What the fuck are they going to do with the owner's information? Imagine Null's upstream got a subpoena for the shit happening right now. What is the expected outcome besides revealing his personal address to the world? It's not like he wants to host child porn, and it seems to be the same with archive.is; nothing about it seems to point to them wanting him in court for CSAM, they want to get to him so he can magic up personal information about someone else that he has no connection to besides having used his site. A site that allows TOR connections to archive stuff and which takes donations in XMR. It's a naked attempt to open him up for liabilities.
Happy Diwali saar, i love Cashapp Paypal now.Oh. That's what they're after: someone is using this to archive child pornography.
Ahem, OFCOM of the UK is threatening 4-chan and the Farms.So the FBI is threatening a company in Canada?
I do not see that working out, they are slightly outside of their jurisdiction.
I forgot, they always try to get away with it first.Ahem, OFCOM of the UK is threatening 4-chan and the Farms.
Both are outside of the UK's jurisdiction but they seem determined to win.