Argue about a game called "webfishing"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
A charitable take would be that adults just want to talk about adult things (not strictly sex) without kids present
Yet they're having these discussions in the online multiplayer game where everyone is waking around as a children's talking animal character.

"Guys, we just want to have these adult conversations in public chatrooms without kids present!" he said as he logged into his Sesame Street MMO with the name "BBC_King69"
 
Yet they're having these discussions in the online multiplayer game where everyone is waking around as a children's talking animal character.

"Guys, we just want to have these adult conversations in public chatrooms without kids present!" he said as he logged into his Sesame Street MMO with the name "BBC_King69"
One of his arguments was "I don't want kids in my petplay chatroom because they're annoying" like yeah I'm sure
Normal adults don't want to deal with kids in games, they're fucking annoying.
Completely missing the point that normal adults aren't going on webfishing to put on their fetish gear and fire up the buttplug mod while drawing out 'girldog knot' messages. In the game where everybody looks like a child, and is very clearly made to be presented to/for children.
 
"I don't want kids in my petplay chatroom because they're annoying"
That's why it's a problem? The minors who are being exposed to furry erotic roleplay are annoying? As opposed to, y'know, it being disgusting to have those conversations in the presence of minors in the first place?

So, if the minor wasn't being "annoying," then they wouldn't have any issues with it.
 
That's why it's a problem? The minors who are being exposed to furry erotic roleplay are annoying? As opposed to, y'know, it being disgusting to have those conversations in the presence of minors in the first place?

So, if the minor wasn't being "annoying," then they wouldn't have any issues with it.
It's that same dumbass cope chomos online try to use; "ew kids are gross why would I ever want to get in bed with one (wink)"
 
If there's grooming going on in this game, can you report it to FBI?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Juaco
It's that same dumbass cope chomos online try to use; "ew kids are gross why would I ever want to get in bed with one (wink)"
It sounds like something Vito "CringleJingle" Gesualdi would say verbatim.

Also, fuck their insane cope that it's not the developer's fault for fostering these chatrooms where malicious sex pests have these conversations and the only separation between them and children is the child lying about their age. "What are they supposed to do? Moderate these chats? Uhm, but there are other unmoderated chats where children are ALSO victimized, so this one should be allowed to exist too!" Literal troon-brain bullshit. "Other people do vile shit so we should be allowed to do the same vile shit!"

They think they're being sly and clever. "This is the parent's fault, not the developer's fault!" The great thing about fault is that it's not a finite resource. The parents having failed doesn't get this developer off the hook.

If there's grooming going on in this game, can you report it to FBI?
There's always the NCMEC, although I wouldn't recommend reaching out unless there's a specific incident you're reporting as those places are constantly inundated with reports, tips, and leads.
 
If there's grooming going on in this game, can you report it to FBI?
Usually you'd report through the NCMEC when there's something actionable to go off of. The goal would be to pressure the developer to suspend his game from the store until it can be properly labeled as containing adult themes, or remove the fetish itemization. There's nobody specific to send the feds after, so the next best thing is to just review/report the game on Steam, really.
Wow adding me to you block list sure lasted...less than an hour. Impressive!

I stand by that statement. Children are not owed privacy by their parents. Parents should be monitoring what their kids do online at all times.
Sure, but this doesn't mean the developer doesn't have his own responsibilities to uphold as well. All of us as adults have a role to play. He could simply make his game adult-only; he doesn't. He could have his game pop a warning on steam that it contains mature, adult themes; he doesn't. He could remove the fetish play items from his game; he doesn't. He could hide the adult servers and make it harder to reveal them; he doesn't.

There is an impetus on every party to do their part, not just the parents. Writing it all off as all the fault of parents is a retarded take. He has complete creative control over what he chooses to allow in his game.

To be clear, if he wants his game to be full of degenerate sex play that's fine, but his game needs to be very clearly marketed as such and out of the hands of children. He thinks he's being sly in passing it off as a children's game, and while parents should do their research he also has a responsibility to inform consumers more clearly about what exactly it is that they're purchasing. There are countless porn games on Steam, with videos and images in their previews; all he needs to do is include his fetish gear and the 'girldog dick' images and that would vastly improve what he communicates his game is about. He has a role to play in informing parents what they're buying.
 
Last edited:
They think they're being sly and clever. "This is the parent's fault, not the developer's fault!" The great thing about fault is that it's not a finite resource. The parents having failed doesn't get this developer off the hook.
It is quite literally the parents fault for not monitoring and protecting their kids online. It is not the fault of the person providing the platform.

There is nothing unique about this game's chat system and all the same criticism could be lobbied against IRC. The reason why this game is being targeted specifically and the dev is being held to a higher standard than other small games/platforms is because of people's hatred of LGBT people, the game's primary taught audience.

If a child got groomed on this site's chat it wouldn't be Null's fault either.
 
There is an impetus on every party to do their part, not just the parents. Writing it all off as all the fault of parents is a retarded take.
Your kids, your problem. Do not expect society to make up for your bad parenting.

If you're such a bad parent your kids are getting groomed online one has to wonder what other parental responsibilities you are failing at.
are you implying you've groomed children on this site's chat? It's an oddly specific example to give
When did you stop beating your wife?
 
Children are not owed privacy by their parents
Its not about being owed, its about 99% of parent's being unable to monitor at ALL times, so we hold standards for treatment of children. Fucking groomer

are you implying you've groomed children on this site's chat?
If he is, can we give this faggot a pink triangle already?
 
It is quite literally the parents fault for not monitoring and protecting their kids online. It is not the fault of the person providing the platform.
While you can argue that parents should do a better job in what media their children engage with, and you're right, the developer is not forthright in the type of content his game contains. If you want to talk about 'the average child' let's talk about 'the average adult'; the average Joe Blow isn't going to pore through dozens of reviews and obscure forums online to see what's up with this game. They're going to take a look at the images and videos on the store page. The creator of the game doesn't include any of his fetish gear or queerbait gear on the page, which could very much inform a parent's purchase. He is not being honest about the content his game contains. It doesn't even pop a warning about the game containing adult material when going to its store page. How is a parent supposed to be properly informed when he's not trying to make that information available?

It goes both ways; while parents have a responsibility to manage what their child engages with, these developers also have a responsibility to properly inform their customers' purchases.
 
the average Joe Blow isn't going to pore through dozens of reviews and obscure forums online to see what's up with this game.
If a parent doesn't read the label on cold medicine and overdoses/kills their kid we blame the parent for not doing their due diligence.
It doesn't even pop a warning about the game containing adult material when going to its store page.
Adult materials are debatable.
calm down
That's probably what your wife cried the last time you hit her.
 
If a parent doesn't read the label on cold medicine and overdoses/kills their kid we blame the parent for not doing their due diligence.
Webfishing's bottle does not warn that it contains "queerbait, fetish gear, and unmoderated chats with strangers". How would they know?
Adult materials are debatable.
From the developer's own mouth "you can have sex in this game now"; why is this not on the store page if he wanted to make a point of it? Why aren't parents told about this when purchasing the game?
 
If a child got groomed on this site's chat it wouldn't be Null's fault either.
I don't need your permission in order to know I'm correct on this point, but it would be the site moderation's fault if a child joins, identifies themselves as a child, and then becomes victimized. You're remarkably stupid and I don't care whether you understand this, but the Kiwi Farms is expressly for adults. Minors are banned on sight. Steps are taken. It's quite literally their duty.

Continuing to point out other places where vulnerable children are victimized does nothing to make Webfishing any less responsible for creating a game accessible for adults and minors, allowing them to talk to strangers (something promoted as an intended feature on the Steam page), and then putting sexuality-based cosmetics in the game while unmoderated chatrooms allow adults to victimize children.

If a parent doesn't read the label on cold medicine and overdoses/kills their kid we blame the parent for not doing their due diligence.
Webfishing doesn't have labels which would warn parents that their children will be exposed to sexualized conversations in this game. You either don't believe your own points, don't care if your points make any sense, or you're too stupid to function.

Also, putting "18+ teehee" in the conversation title doesn't matter when the same title has vile shit like "COME LICK PRECUM OUT OF MY CHASTITY CAGE!" in the same exact line of text displayed in-game.
 
Webfishing's bottle does not warn that it contains "queerbait, fetish gear, and unmoderated chats with strangers". How would they know?
It being a multiplayer game implies chat functionality, and collars being fetish gear is debatable when the characters are animals. You taking issue with even the mention of queer things is just your hatred showing, it's not inherently adult content to acknowledge queer people exist.
I don't need a wife to hit when I can just hit your mom instead, and DAMN THAT PUSSY NICE! :lossmanjack:
My mother is dead. I didn't know you were a necrophile too.
 
Back