Argue about a game called "webfishing"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Also, putting "18+ teehee" in the conversation title doesn't matter when the same title has vile shit like "COME LICK PRECUM OUT OF MY CHASTITY CAGE!" in the same exact line of text displayed in-game.
I agree that the game desperately needs to have a word filter implemented and/or generic, uncustomizeable lobby titles.
 
I agree that the game desperately needs to have a word filter implemented and/or generic, uncustomizeable lobby titles.
But why? When it's all the parent's fault, why should the developer implement anything? Oh right, because the developer does have a duty after all to prevent the victimization of children when putting adults and children, strangers to one another, in chatrooms together with no age verification beyond the honor system?

Your points collapse in upon themselves because you're arguing from a place of malevolence and deceit.
 
You taking issue with even the mention of queer things is just your hatred showing
I'm not hiding my hatred of LGBT shit; I hate LGBT shit. I don't know why you think this is some epic le own.

You haven't addressed Harm's or my own points about the game not properly warning parents about the contents of the game on its storefront. You keep saying "ehhhh that's debatable" and writing it off as "it's just animals".
 
Because frankly it makes the game look trashy and I don't want to see vulgar things. I don't think the dev needs to implement it, but I'd like if they did.
I'm not hiding my hatred of LGBT shit; I hate LGBT shit.
I'm glad you admitted that, now at least I can know I'm right about why you're so hard on this developer specifically.
 
I'm right about why you're so hard on this developer specifically.
Well, no, the game having queer hats isn't why I hate it. It's because the developer fosters unmoderated spaces where children can join, in a game containing fetish items regarding ageplay and petplay, without any such warnings on its storefront informing customers of what it contains. Queerbait games are a dime-a-dozen. I don't have the time of day or the energy to hate every single one just because it has fag flags. But when a game is as blatantly irresponsible as Webfishing I can't see how anybody would defend it, unless they were a groomer themselves, which I believe you to be.

I won't ever like a game like Webfishing, because I'm not a degenerate furry trying to jerk off to other fat men pretending to be underaged catboys. However, I could settle to tolerate the existence of a game like Webfishing if its developer would do his part in keeping it out of the hands of children. A proper storefront page about what the game contains and labeling it as an adults-only game would be all it would take. It's not a lot.
 
I am gay and a furry so the whole "uhm, sweetie, you just hate queers!" mindgame won't work on me. The people who hate this shit would absolutely hate the victimization of minors in exclusively heterosexual situations as well.

However, people are especially quick to lash out at the issues involving queers because many of these faggots specifically target children in order to condition them to assimilate into troonfag bullshit. They make fucking mottos out of it ("protect trans kids!") then play dumb with "who? me???" bullshit when you take issue with it. They use the whole "you're homophobes!" shit as a shield to deflect from what they're doing to push this on the youth.

They don't want to be seen as groomers? Then stop making children's stuffed animals the icon of being a tranny faggot! Holy shit, it's crazy how that works. It's like the moderators in F1NN5TER's Discord server who know full well they're surrounded by children and talking about these things around kids and they either don't see an issue, or more often, they get off on what they're doing to impact stranger's children. It's awesome to them that they push this shit like this, but if you point it out to their face they play the STUPIDEST little games to pretend it's all in your head. The only people they're fooling are literal children!
 
The people who hate this shit would absolutely hate the victimization of minors in exclusively heterosexual situations as well.
These are the same people who would comment "nice" under a story of an adult female teacher raping a minor boy.
I am gay and a furry so the whole "uhm, sweetie, you just hate queers!" mindgame won't work on me
Self hating gay, got it.
 
These are the same people who would comment "nice" under a story of an adult female teacher raping a minor boy.
You do realize you could find a dozen such A&N threads on such cases where that is not how people react? You're getting off topic.

Why shouldn't Webfishing's developer have to warn customers via its storefront page about the kind of content his game contains? Why should the parents have to play it themselves to see? Why are they not owed the respect of an informed purchase?
 
calling people "self hating" when they criticize their own community?
really not beating the "all queers are pedos" allegations with this one brother
"You're gay and you don't think other gay people should openly groom children? Uhm, you clearly just hate yourself!"

Yeah, that wasn't nearly the own they wanted it to be.
 
I'm not going to argue with a homophobe because you're arguing in bad faith @DickMain.
Yeah, but, like imagine for a second that I suck all the dick in the world, humor me for a moment.

Why shouldn't Webfishing's developer properly inform customers on the type of itemization his game contains? It's a very simple question. Would you not call it a 'bad-faith' purchase when you weren't told your game contains sexual themes?
 
Back