- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
The Blob is MovieBob as a mutant."X-Cutioner is basically an EFAP incel who lifts."
Last edited:
Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.
- Thread starter Positron
- Start date
-
Happy Easter!
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Nothing can move the Blob. Bob, on the other hand can be easily moved if the right protected class uhm ackshoolee's him. The Blob also gets his hands dirty and not demand that other people do the work for him as he hides behind his phone.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2023
does Sweeney get her tits out in that film of hers?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
The "video game philosopher" (can you imagine a more pointless job (hard mode: not "online film critic")) basically said "you're wrong" without elaborating. I dunno if there's a followup where he does, but it stands to reason that a game that's actually entertaining and challenging is not one in which it lectures you constantly about how straight white men are the cause of all of society's problems.I have no clue what this is about and do not have the mental reserves to dedicate time to something no one wants to even try to explain.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771612728349626640
Bob, meanwhile, grossly overestimates his own intelligence and underestimates his opponents'. Dunning-Kruger in full swing.
If you want to make a living creating games, you'll need to make ones that people want to buy, and most people are more interested in something that's fun over something that has a message, even if it's one they'd support. But hey, if you're just creating art for art's sake, then it shouldn't matter to you whether people do or don't pay you money for it, right? No one's stopping you from making whatever game you want to make, just don't complain when people don't actually want to purchase Tranny Dilation Simulator 2024.A troon at Kotaku doesn't know what the free market is.
https://twitter.com/carolynmichelle/status/1771666283626385696
This is clearly about Sweet Baby Inc and the troon, who hopefully will be shitting into a can for Only Fans pennies soon, ignores the fact that the head of SBI said at a conference that they go out of their way to insert themselves and change games into THEIR own image and encourages people listening to her to make problems at their company if nobody wants to hire them to come in and shit up the already being developed game.
Reducing all of existence to a zero-sum game is the realm of fedora-tipping atheists and autists. So it's really no surprise that Bob legitimately holds this belief. Nihilism is cringe.Bob uses a Rick and Morty quote to defend...or attack...something? I don't really know. I think he's trying to make himself sound tough because he accepts that his poor decisions hurt others.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771739043404890408
The thing is, people used to care about Star Wars. It was one of the biggest entertainment properties in history, a true cultural phenomenon that made billions of dollars in movie tickets, home video, and all manner of licensed merchandise. It took less than a decade for Disney to sink what should have been a golden goose, reducing it to little more than TV shows that look painfully low budget despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on them, directed by feminist hack frauds that don't know how to tell a story without lecturing the primary Star Wars audience on why they suck.Bob uses his big boy brain to defend Acolytes and explains that none of the shit that obsesses over daily matters to the world at large. He retweeted all three of his own tweets.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771847270742286750
The fact that people don't care about Star Wars IRL is proof positive that something's wrong, Bobby. Apathy is the true death of a franchise.
Adam Sandler is a businessman that knows exactly what he's doing: get a bunch of money for him and his friends to goof off and produce a movie that caters to the lowest common denominator, which is the reason he can get that pile of cash in the first place since the studio knows it'll sell. Just because his movies are generally hits doesn't mean they're not kinda shitty, it just means that general audiences prefer simple and stupid.A shitposting account on twitter makes a tweet mocking and praising Adam Sandler. Bob uses this opportunity to correct the record and badly promote his ADAM SANDLER - Really That Good video.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771880277582733571
Just a friendly reminder that Bob's most viewed video TO THIS DAY is his take down of Pixels from 8 years ago.
I dunno how true it is, but you might be able to lay the blame on the Academy for his return to making garbage comedies. After he got snubbed for a Best Actor nomination, he supposedly said "welp, guess you don't want me doing these anymore" and went back to his easy paychecks.
I count 18 pins on that map, and let's also assume one on each end because you'll want to charge up before leaving and when you arrive, so 20 in all. New York to LA is about 3000 miles, so this plan assumes a stop approximately every 150 miles. $300/20 = $15 per charge, so that doesn't sound too bad on paper.
However, ICE cars are generally rather fuel efficient these days, and 30 mpg is pretty common. Currently, the national average gas price is about $3.50, so if your car gets 35 mpg or better, it comes out to be $300. Even at 30 mpg, it's only $350, which isn't a huge difference over such a long trip.
Furthermore, EV chargers are not known for being fast, and that's assuming you can find one that's working. "Rapid" chargers still take an hour or two to recharge from empty, and you can't even do anything else while it's charging besides sit in a parking lot and wait. Meanwhile, an ICE car can pull into a gas station, refuel, and be back on the road in about five minutes, and you're making fewer stops because you can easily get a 400 mile range on a single tank, while most EVs top out at 250 at best. Good luck getting decent range if you're driving through extreme heat or cold.
In short, EVs suck for long trips. Any potential cost savings on recharging are negated by the long wait times.
A good writer would research the type of character they're trying to write and strive to make them authentic, they wouldn't need a diversity consultant to tell them how to. A bad writer...well, a bad writer would make Borderlands 3.Meritocracy is like sky daddies in that it doesn't exist. That's why we need SBI to insert themselves into everything to make things worse while getting paid for it.
https://twitter.com/ThatSamWinkler/status/1771702338643689778
Sam is the retard who wrote Borderlands 3, a game that imo is unplayable because horrific dialogue. He most certainly does not have his writing skill maxed out.
Bob proves once again how he remains out of touch with the modern zeitgeist.Bob tries to downplay gaming as something no one cares about.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771906001970532634
"I'm not trans"
- 99.9% of the planet
See how easy that is?
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
If Bob is anyone from the X-Men it’s Mojo.
BScCollateral
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
There is no justification for a "Diversity Consultant." There is a justification for having experts review your stuff.
I remember a documentary where members of the Quileute tribe commented on Twilight. "Why don't we ever see him carving a paddle?" and stuff like that. A writer would kill for that sort of feedback.
And yeah, some of those guys are frauds. I don't have an answer for that.
- Joined
- May 19, 2018
Thr stuff Mojo makes is popular.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
- Highlight
- #10,729
I know you all forgot because I forgot too. Today was Bob's triple feature of new content. I have zoomed in so so you can better see the thumbnails.
I will watch them and make note of what retardation is in them probably in a separate post. Until then, enjoy.
THE CRUSADES (1935) - This Movie Exists
GINGER (1971) - This Movie Exists
HAPPILY EVER AFTER (1993) - This Movie Exists #SnowWhite
I will watch them and make note of what retardation is in them probably in a separate post. Until then, enjoy.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
Same mistake that cost EMI and Polygram Records: never venture into the film and television industry if you’re a company that doesn’t make movies and tv shows.
I know this isn’t Bob released, but what we saw happened to both EMI and Polygram is what’s happening to Marvel right now. Making shitty and over budgeted films at the cost of making quality comic books is hurting them.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Cecil B DeMille's The Crusade.
Why should you watch it? I guess because Richard is a bit of a jerkass with a heart of gold and it doesn't show off Muslims as blood thirsty conquers and puts forth this idea that the Christian and Muslim God are the same being?
Why should you watch Bob's thing on it? You shouldn't because I just gave you his thoughts on it.
tl;dw/dr
Bob's video takes 8 minutes to get to the movie, takes 17 minutes to tell you exactly what happens in the movie, and takes 5 minutes to talk about the actors and random bullshit. There is nothing noteworthy about The Crusade. This is a book report with extra steps.
His opener where he kinda makes fun of what he's doing, him doing it on The Crusade, and joke begs for support. Plural pronouns are used in abundance.
"And welcome to Pilot day on This Movie Exists where we are dropping three episodes all at once, covering three very different types of movie with just a little bit of stylistic difference because we're testing to see how they perform and what kind of material people react more strongly to. Links to the other two episodes will be in the description and at the end card. Please watch all three when you can. Like, subscribe, and tell your friends. We need the feedback and we really need the money."
"So why cover these three movies or at least why this movie? Well before looking into the development of new online content what often stands out as solid advice is that one should stay away from divisiveness or controversy early on. Build your brand out first establish. The trust relationship with the audience before moving into areas that might be off putting or uncomfortable like discussing politics, religion, international relations, or anything that could be tied to currently controversial ongoing geopolitical events. Oh and also for movie specifically it's probably a good idea to keep things relatable to what's bound to be a mostly Gen-X and younger Millennial audience given YouTube and other platforms demographic data. At least at first. You want to stay within the temporal and cultural experiential zone of a hypothetical view of for whom Classics might now refer to movies made in the early 2000s and a really old movie might refer to say the original Star Wars or Hell the first Shrek so obviously what makes more sense than covering a black and white movie from 1935 about a religious war in Jerusalem"
If Bob really wanted to be edgy he'd be doing Come and See.
Bob shows off a few pop culture refences of DeMille, all of which are aping the "I'm ready for my close up Mr. DeMille" from Sunset Boulevard, a movie not made by DeMille, followed up with this him saying he's perfectly willing to let this year in the making series get thrown in the dumpster.
"unless this series completely bombs or I get a much better, more time consuming job offer than anything else I currently have happening, so let's see what happens there, I imagine we'll speak more on him (sic. DeMille) in the future"
For the next 4 minutes Bob explains DeMille's style. DeMille is bombastic and theatric. Bob tells his audience, in his very roundabout and verbose way, what people have known for years and why things like Last of Us 2, tranny Ellen Page, and bull dyke Kristen Stewart are not liked: Sex sells. I actually lol'd when he gets to talking about the 10 Commandments and says at 6:45
"All the chicks have big naturals"
lmao
He uses a clip from Garth Marenghi's Darkplace because it is infinitely more funny than him to hammer his point home about how over the top things are in all these movies that aren't the subject of the video. "I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" said the man with actual talent. Bob also calls out the lack of diversity in 10 Commandments.
"...basically zero Egyptians in the cast or even Jews which is interesting"
Remember, this is supposed to be a 30 minute long video about The Crusades and we're almost a third way through the video and have yet to got to it. There is more talk of how things be racist 'n sheeeeeeeeeeeeeit way back then and how DeMille be racist 'n sheeeeeeeeeeeeeit and eight minutes and twenty seconds into his video we are finally on topic.
Bob notes that this over the top epic is not historically accurate, as if that needed to be said. In an attempt to show the hip, young youth how over the top this movie is he keeps showing clips from Futurama where Zoidberg's uncle tries to make a movie for modern audiences. That episode, titled That's Lobstertainment, aired the 25th of February, 2001. The clips he is using to mock old timey film making is 23 years old. Bob is ancient and out of touch
Bob gives an entire synopsis of the movie. It's just a play by play. It's pretty dry and boring for the most part. He explains what's happening in the movie and then shows you it. Occasionally he talks about racism or pre World War 2 politics but none of it's funny or interesting. There two notable interjection from him. First, after playing a 30 seconds of King Richard saying he'd rather be killing than banging and he fears not the devil and prays not to God, at 13:10 Bob lies and says he knows his audience.
"Ahem, since nobody can say I don't know my audience those of you who'd like to pause and message that one guy from your DnD group and let them know you just discovered their favorite movie that they haven't seen yet go ahead and do that right now"
This is so early in the movie that it's still establishing the main character, King Richard, and his motivations. I'd rather just watch the movie than sit through this slog. The second come in about 10-11 minutes later where he kinda praises the movie for being progressive for softly denouncing religion. Saladin and Richard are having some sort of pow wow at the end of the movie. The lady lead is hanging off of Richard and the following conversation happens
Berengaria, Princess of Navarre:
We've been blind. We were proud dearest when we took the cross in our pride, we fought to conquer Jerusalem. We tried to ride through blood to the Holy Place of God. And now... now we suffer.
Saladin, Sultan of Islam:
The Holy City of Allah.
Berengaria, Princess of Navarre:
What if we call him Allah or God? Shall men fight because they travel different roads to him?
Bob responds
"Yeah I know right? I remind you this movie is from 1935!"
And here's where Bob needs bullied and treated like the hack fraud he is. That is not the full quote from the lady lead. She has one more sentence to say and that is "There is only one God" and Bob completely omits that because it fucks with his narrative that religion is evil and for stupid people.
BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!
Following that Bob shows a scene of Richard breaking his sword over his leg and then tries to say that the shattered sword visual from Lord of the Rings is "borrowed" from this.
"And plus, you know, 70 years later Lord of the Rings is going to have to borrow this peatah with shattered sword visual from somewhere"
I have no idea what the peatah word is. The transcript only registers it as "p". It sound French and that's the closest phonetic spelling I could be bothered to make for it. These are the visuals he chooses to have during this segment.
Him removing dialogue to make his point is far worse and insidious and shitty than his LotR comparison but I had to mention it. This is how he ended his 17 minute synopsis of the movie.
"And that's the Crusades! Yeah from 1935, a movie that has really about as much to do with actual history as the Crusades themselves had to do with anybody's religious convictions which is to say not much but it sure was influential!"
Why should you watch The Crusades? What is noteworthy about it? Fucked if I know! The only interesting piece of info I gathered is that Alan Hale Sr was in the movie and that he invented the hand held fire extinguisher and the greaseless potato chip. Bob challenges me to look that up so I did. Wikipedia quotes 3 sources for those claims:
Popular Mechanics from 1935
A book that I cannot find.
and his obituary
There is no mention of Hale on wikipedia's entry for fire extinguisher.
This is impressive. Bob calls him THE inventor of greaseless potato chips and the hand fire extinguisher "No fucking really! Go look that up!" and using his own sources I can prove him wrong. He is so bad at what he does. At this point there is still 3 minutes left in the video. Does Bob ever explain why this movie exists or whatever the hell he's trying to do with this series? lmao kinda sorta. He literally repeats himself by redoing his closing statement from two and a half minutes earlier.
"And that's the Crusades yeah it's not the best thing anyone involved ever did but it's a lot of fun!"
He says a bit more about how awkward movies are from that time, praises the actors again, he really likes dude bro Richard and his dude broiness, and says that the message is that Allah and Jehovah are the same thing so fighting is dumb.
"Eventually the message to all of them is the concept of religious War for different iterations of the same God being dumb"
The last thing he says in the review or whatever the hell this is proper is
"Well, uh, whatever else may be said of it, this movie exists.:
That's his sign off. That's the tagline for a series he's had a year in the making. He then asks people to like and share this and all the other videos that came out at the same exact time. Incredible.
Why should you watch it? I guess because Richard is a bit of a jerkass with a heart of gold and it doesn't show off Muslims as blood thirsty conquers and puts forth this idea that the Christian and Muslim God are the same being?
Why should you watch Bob's thing on it? You shouldn't because I just gave you his thoughts on it.
tl;dw/dr
Bob's video takes 8 minutes to get to the movie, takes 17 minutes to tell you exactly what happens in the movie, and takes 5 minutes to talk about the actors and random bullshit. There is nothing noteworthy about The Crusade. This is a book report with extra steps.
His opener where he kinda makes fun of what he's doing, him doing it on The Crusade, and joke begs for support. Plural pronouns are used in abundance.
"And welcome to Pilot day on This Movie Exists where we are dropping three episodes all at once, covering three very different types of movie with just a little bit of stylistic difference because we're testing to see how they perform and what kind of material people react more strongly to. Links to the other two episodes will be in the description and at the end card. Please watch all three when you can. Like, subscribe, and tell your friends. We need the feedback and we really need the money."
"So why cover these three movies or at least why this movie? Well before looking into the development of new online content what often stands out as solid advice is that one should stay away from divisiveness or controversy early on. Build your brand out first establish. The trust relationship with the audience before moving into areas that might be off putting or uncomfortable like discussing politics, religion, international relations, or anything that could be tied to currently controversial ongoing geopolitical events. Oh and also for movie specifically it's probably a good idea to keep things relatable to what's bound to be a mostly Gen-X and younger Millennial audience given YouTube and other platforms demographic data. At least at first. You want to stay within the temporal and cultural experiential zone of a hypothetical view of for whom Classics might now refer to movies made in the early 2000s and a really old movie might refer to say the original Star Wars or Hell the first Shrek so obviously what makes more sense than covering a black and white movie from 1935 about a religious war in Jerusalem"
If Bob really wanted to be edgy he'd be doing Come and See.
Bob shows off a few pop culture refences of DeMille, all of which are aping the "I'm ready for my close up Mr. DeMille" from Sunset Boulevard, a movie not made by DeMille, followed up with this him saying he's perfectly willing to let this year in the making series get thrown in the dumpster.
"unless this series completely bombs or I get a much better, more time consuming job offer than anything else I currently have happening, so let's see what happens there, I imagine we'll speak more on him (sic. DeMille) in the future"
For the next 4 minutes Bob explains DeMille's style. DeMille is bombastic and theatric. Bob tells his audience, in his very roundabout and verbose way, what people have known for years and why things like Last of Us 2, tranny Ellen Page, and bull dyke Kristen Stewart are not liked: Sex sells. I actually lol'd when he gets to talking about the 10 Commandments and says at 6:45
"All the chicks have big naturals"
lmao
He uses a clip from Garth Marenghi's Darkplace because it is infinitely more funny than him to hammer his point home about how over the top things are in all these movies that aren't the subject of the video. "I know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards" said the man with actual talent. Bob also calls out the lack of diversity in 10 Commandments.
"...basically zero Egyptians in the cast or even Jews which is interesting"
Remember, this is supposed to be a 30 minute long video about The Crusades and we're almost a third way through the video and have yet to got to it. There is more talk of how things be racist 'n sheeeeeeeeeeeeeit way back then and how DeMille be racist 'n sheeeeeeeeeeeeeit and eight minutes and twenty seconds into his video we are finally on topic.
Bob notes that this over the top epic is not historically accurate, as if that needed to be said. In an attempt to show the hip, young youth how over the top this movie is he keeps showing clips from Futurama where Zoidberg's uncle tries to make a movie for modern audiences. That episode, titled That's Lobstertainment, aired the 25th of February, 2001. The clips he is using to mock old timey film making is 23 years old. Bob is ancient and out of touch
Bob gives an entire synopsis of the movie. It's just a play by play. It's pretty dry and boring for the most part. He explains what's happening in the movie and then shows you it. Occasionally he talks about racism or pre World War 2 politics but none of it's funny or interesting. There two notable interjection from him. First, after playing a 30 seconds of King Richard saying he'd rather be killing than banging and he fears not the devil and prays not to God, at 13:10 Bob lies and says he knows his audience.
"Ahem, since nobody can say I don't know my audience those of you who'd like to pause and message that one guy from your DnD group and let them know you just discovered their favorite movie that they haven't seen yet go ahead and do that right now"
This is so early in the movie that it's still establishing the main character, King Richard, and his motivations. I'd rather just watch the movie than sit through this slog. The second come in about 10-11 minutes later where he kinda praises the movie for being progressive for softly denouncing religion. Saladin and Richard are having some sort of pow wow at the end of the movie. The lady lead is hanging off of Richard and the following conversation happens
Berengaria, Princess of Navarre:
We've been blind. We were proud dearest when we took the cross in our pride, we fought to conquer Jerusalem. We tried to ride through blood to the Holy Place of God. And now... now we suffer.
Saladin, Sultan of Islam:
The Holy City of Allah.
Berengaria, Princess of Navarre:
What if we call him Allah or God? Shall men fight because they travel different roads to him?
Bob responds
"Yeah I know right? I remind you this movie is from 1935!"
And here's where Bob needs bullied and treated like the hack fraud he is. That is not the full quote from the lady lead. She has one more sentence to say and that is "There is only one God" and Bob completely omits that because it fucks with his narrative that religion is evil and for stupid people.
BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!
Following that Bob shows a scene of Richard breaking his sword over his leg and then tries to say that the shattered sword visual from Lord of the Rings is "borrowed" from this.
"And plus, you know, 70 years later Lord of the Rings is going to have to borrow this peatah with shattered sword visual from somewhere"
I have no idea what the peatah word is. The transcript only registers it as "p". It sound French and that's the closest phonetic spelling I could be bothered to make for it. These are the visuals he chooses to have during this segment.
Him removing dialogue to make his point is far worse and insidious and shitty than his LotR comparison but I had to mention it. This is how he ended his 17 minute synopsis of the movie.
"And that's the Crusades! Yeah from 1935, a movie that has really about as much to do with actual history as the Crusades themselves had to do with anybody's religious convictions which is to say not much but it sure was influential!"
Why should you watch The Crusades? What is noteworthy about it? Fucked if I know! The only interesting piece of info I gathered is that Alan Hale Sr was in the movie and that he invented the hand held fire extinguisher and the greaseless potato chip. Bob challenges me to look that up so I did. Wikipedia quotes 3 sources for those claims:
Popular Mechanics from 1935
A book that I cannot find.
and his obituary
There is no mention of Hale on wikipedia's entry for fire extinguisher.
This is impressive. Bob calls him THE inventor of greaseless potato chips and the hand fire extinguisher "No fucking really! Go look that up!" and using his own sources I can prove him wrong. He is so bad at what he does. At this point there is still 3 minutes left in the video. Does Bob ever explain why this movie exists or whatever the hell he's trying to do with this series? lmao kinda sorta. He literally repeats himself by redoing his closing statement from two and a half minutes earlier.
"And that's the Crusades yeah it's not the best thing anyone involved ever did but it's a lot of fun!"
He says a bit more about how awkward movies are from that time, praises the actors again, he really likes dude bro Richard and his dude broiness, and says that the message is that Allah and Jehovah are the same thing so fighting is dumb.
"Eventually the message to all of them is the concept of religious War for different iterations of the same God being dumb"
The last thing he says in the review or whatever the hell this is proper is
"Well, uh, whatever else may be said of it, this movie exists.:
That's his sign off. That's the tagline for a series he's had a year in the making. He then asks people to like and share this and all the other videos that came out at the same exact time. Incredible.
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
Ben Shapiro actually looks rather handsome with a beard. Moviebob, on the other hand, is visually ugly, beard or no beard.Benji Shapiro declares Star Wars is officially ruined. Bob makes fun of his beard.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771598860017598907
Remember, folks: Moviebob's vision of a superiyaa fyuuchaa is literally what would have happened if those damned Americans had never thrwarted the plans fo Bob's dear Hitler-senpai.Learn to code, mother fucker. Learn to code.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771609083834982754
The wise know they are not wise. Moviebob is not a wise who deserves to have that smug look taken off its face.
No, Bob. People hate electric vehicles because their batteies have to be charged every few hours.
(Tangent: This does potentially present an interesting situation. There are nineteen charging stops listed above between Los Angeles and New York, each stop taking two hours to fully recharge. On the negative side, that's about 1.5 extra days wasted on the road if you want to travel as fast as possible on land. On the positive side... well, for those more interested in the journey than the destination, the multiple recharge stops provide ample time for sightseeing.)
Moviebob: "I specifically DON'T 'voteshame on Twitter'..."https://twitter.com/ZeeZeeMooMoo/status/1771558313257226712 https://archive.ph/xaqfy
Bob tries to impress a dick snipper and admits that he knows how to make bombs.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771896264369537145 https://archive.ph/MxJmy
Moviebob, 2016.11.09: "If you voted Trump because you're 'disenfranchised,' you've only proved that you DESERVED to be so. You're a failed human."
Moviebob, 2016.11.17 (#1, #2, #3): "Some people have to do the grudging "lets make this work" thing with Red America, but others have to be angry and unwavering so that when the history of this is written, the victims and the bad deeds aren't forgotten. 4 years from now, person/town/state voting from Trump can be a "slip up;" but 20 years from now it NEEDS to be a generational shame."
Moviebob, 2016.12,16: "Stop. Treating. [Republicans]. Like. Intellectual. Equals. You. Can. Reason. With."
Moviebob, 2017.01.31 (#1, #2, #3): "If you voted for Trump because of "economic anxiety," what you said was that you were okay with people being harmed in order to protect whatever job/field/region was in your interest. [...] I'm "okay" with that going BAD for you. [...] more of my charitable donations this year should start going to tech schools with robotics programs."
Moviebob, 2017.02.08 (#1, #2): "Red State America does NOT actually vote on economics (they vote on race, Jesus and guns). [...] Stop treating these people like evolved, 21st century humans you can reason with. They aren't."
Moviebob, 2017.02.16: "I'm [...] okay with Trump/GOP supporters suffering under the policies they voted for."
Moviebob, 2017.02.16: "Trump is ABSOLUTELY an everyman. He really is a dumb, classless slob--just like his voters.."
Moviebob, 2017.03.01: "People who voted for Trump's policies deserve the experience of what they voted for."
Moviebob, 2017.05.26 (#1, #2): "'____ voted for Trump, now ____'ll be hurt under his policies.' Good. They didn't listen. No sympathy. They made their beds."
Moviebob, 2017.06.22: "Rid yourself of illusion images like this will change Trump-voters minds. Empathy= moral intelligence, and they are the dumbest people alive."
Moviebob, 2017.08.15: "I'll never forgive anyone who voted for Trump, and it'll take a LONG time to forgive anyone who 'just didn't vote for Hillary.'"
Moviebob, 2017.10.30: "Remember EVERYONE who said it was "elitist" to suggest Trump wasn't smart enough to be President, or that his voters being dumb mattered."
Moviebob, 2017.12.05: "...Trump and his voters [...] They're backwards regressives, getting off on the suffering of their betters."
Moviebob, 2018.01.17: "Stop. Treating. These. People. Like. PEOPLE. Trumpers are not redeemable and not worth redeeming [...] They're the justly-forgotten remnants of an inferior world (and inferior mindset) that the 21st Century people they HATE evolved beyond and escaped."
Moviebob, 2018,01.20: "...reporters for the New York Times should stop TREATING [Trump voters] as [people], as we're all sick of reading the same dumb interviews with hinterland halfwits."
Moviebob, 2018.01.03: "Modern conservatism isn't about policy, it's about hurting people they perceive as 'beneath' them." (Me: Pot/kettle statement.)
Moviebob, 2018.02.21: "I want every Trump voter to live the remainder of their lives in joyless, soul-crushing, can't-look-in-the-mirror shame when this is all over--to START with."
Moviebob, 2018.09.04: "The Right is [...] caring only about what "it's people" (obsolete white people and the parts of capitalism that can't compete fairly in a global market) think and not about optics or history."
Moviebob, 2019.02.25: "Trump voters who became such because 'times are TOUGH, man' have shown us who they are [...] I've judged them accordingly. They're not worth saving, or even lifting up. They ceded that."
Moviebob, 2019.05.21 (#1, #2): "Democrats need to swallow hard [...] identify 'Trump VOTERS' as the enemy to be beaten along with Trump and the GOP themselves."
Moviebob, 2019.05.29: "There's ALWAYS 'big chunks of voters' who feel their interests aren't being served. Trump's "big chunk" were ignorant xenophobic obsolescents [...]maybe those interests SHOULDN'T be served?"
Moviebob, 2018.07.15 (#1, #2): "...the abject failure of American democracy under the electoral college in that […] only ‘the people’ can fix this but not enough of ‘the people’ can be trusted to DO SO. If you [...] only count the votes of people [...] worth a damn, not only would Trump not be President—you could probably pass a resolution to load him and his 'voter base' onto the next black-hole probe."
Moviebob, 2019.04.28 (#1, #2): "...I got zero confusion for the WHY of struggling people being mad at "the system." I [...] don't labor under the delusion that bigotry, hatred and regression are an inherent, inevitable reaction. [...] Trump Voter's choice of expression invalidates them from my sympathies."
Moviebob, 2019.08.12: "No abortion ever 'killed' a 'baby' because abortion involves a 'fetus.' Different thing Sorta like how no one who ever punched a 'Trump voter' actually laid hands on a 'person.'"
Moviebob, 2019.08.27: "Let Trump's *voters* suffer Trump policies for a change. Every time I bring that up, I'm told I shouldn't because these people 'grow my food.' [...] They have my permission to eat some of it."
Moviebob, 2019.11.28 (#1, #2): "Trump voters made their decision with their eyes open. If his presidency has affected them negatively, I don't feel sympathy. [...] I bask in their misery."
Moviebob, 2019.12.05: "...there's different levels of both stupid and evil. Trump and Trump-voters are BOTH, but Trump himself [...] is less authentically stupid than derranged/damaged--while still being utterly evil. The voters? GENUINE stupid."
Moviebob, 2020.01.05: "...what bonds Trump Voters to Trump is the shared knowledge that they are utterly wretched, worthless excuses for humanity--the absolute moral and intellectual dregs of the species... and a desperate hatred for everyone even a little bit more worthwhile than them."
Moviebob, 2020.03.03 (#1, #2): "I save those 'We voted for Trump AND THE FARM STILL WENT UNDER!!!!!' sad-sack articles in a folder labled 'porn.' [...] it's equally funny if not moreso when it happens to bad rich people..."
Moviebob, 2020.03.14: "Should get #MAGAFlu to trend [...] because it's appropriate [...] also because maintaining social-distance from Trump Voters [...] is probably just good health advice in general--I mean, have you MET these people?"
Moviebob, 2020.03.21: "[COVID-19] is 100% on Trump and Trump voters. [...] The #MAGAVirus pandemic is on them, and they need to be held accountable."
Moviebob, 2020.10.29: "The Democrats (and the 'left') need to hang [...] the Trump admin's embrace of white nationalism around the entirety of not only conservatism but the GOP voter-base for generations--a catch-all for both overruling and overriding them."
Movebob, 2021.02.23: "For a long time I was saying 'Stop treating [Trump voters] like they're ______' -well, you can figure out the rest; but folks thought I was being ..'uncharitable.'"
Moviebob, 2021.03.25: "OH! I meant pleasant for ME, the guy who's been collecting newsclippings about Trump voters going broke, losing homes, failing in health, general misfortune, etc into adorable scrapbooks since 2016. I hope it's an absolute NIGHTMARE for them."
Moviebob, 2021.10.30 (#1, #2): "My empathy for The Stupid burned itself out between 2016 and 2020. It's gone now. [...] Not only do I not care what happens to the Trumpsuckers, I plan to delight in their suffering for as long as they or I remain alive. I haven't stopped smiling every time I see "sad" news items about Trump voters SHOCKED that they still "lost the house," and now I add it to the pile of laughs every time anti-vaxxers cough themselves into the ER."
Moviebob, 2022.05.23: "The Red States and the Mayo-Trash Republican Voters in them are parasites, sucking off tax subsidies from the America That Matters."
Moviebob, 2022.06.03: "I savor every bad thing that happens to any Republican or Trump supporter at this point, any level, [...] it's all beautiful."
And I doubt that's all of Moviebob's voteshaming of those who dared deny Führer Hillary her birthright tot he Oval Office (Moviebob's timeline has 318,000 posts), but those are among the most egregious. I've posted this once before, and I'll post it again because:
Moviebob is a Hitlerian sociopath.
"A GOOD narrative writer of ANY skin color can write a good character with another skin color, without needing 'consultants'": No lies detected. Good writing appeals across demographics, regardless of the writer's ethnicity.Meritocracy is like sky daddies in that it doesn't exist. That's why we need SBI to insert themselves into everything to make things worse while getting paid for it.
https://twitter.com/ThatSamWinkler/status/1771702338643689778
Sam is the retard who wrote Borderlands 3, a game that imo is unplayable because horrific dialogue. He most certainly does not have his writing skill maxed out.
blablabla
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
so this movie exist is the same shit that he already does, roger that. bob you retarded inbred hick. try reviewing ugetsu, tetsuo the iron man, anything from takeshii mike. fucking worthless slob
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
LOL you don't have a family. Your parents disowned you because you are a game dev, And needless to say you never knew the touch of either sex.
Learn to code, mother fucker. Learn to code
Since when has the Catholic church stops giving food to poor people? It is more often that said "poor people" refuse the food because they are too euphoric to pray before meal.Bob boasts about being an ex-fish eater while a troon uses an incredibly retarded strawman to attack Catholicism.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771853264138453033
BTW absolutely no one cares about Titty Sydney's politics.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
Oh shit, when did we decide to do that? The Pope never tells me anything, I swear.
I love that this dude has the logo from Sick, Sad, World from the show Daria. A show within the show, that would show up usually once an episode with a very bizarre and usually horrifically trashy headline of some story, that would then be interrupted as the show went on. What I'm saying is that they had more journalistic integrity than Kotaku.
but thankfully someone did archive the tweet before the jurno scum hid under their safety blankey.
"Are fish using our oceans as their own private toilet? A Sick, Sad World exclusive, right after this."
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
"Wind generators: Do they represent the future of electrcity or a grave threat to the existence of migratory birds? We'll explore that today on Sick, Sad World!"
Mr Processor
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2022
Bob doesn't care about gaming, therefore no one else can possibly care about it. Bob does care about troons, therefore everyone else must care about them. Bob's view of the world and his place in it is so easy to understand.Bob tries to downplay gaming as something no one cares about.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1771906001970532634
"I'm not trans"
- 99.9% of the planet
See how easy that is?
I don't agree with this hyperbolic headline, incidentally, but even though I'm not really into multiplayer games unless they are couch multiplayer (I get impatient waiting in lobbies for a game to open. Sadly, none of my real life friends are really gamers. I blame it on being old.). I am aware that Helldivers 2 is a big success, however.
Helldivers 2 may not have saved gaming but it has saved... democracy!
What are the odds that Bob picked The Crusades as one of his "This Movies Exist" because he wanted to rag on religion. In fact, looking at these I can pretty much figure out how he picked them:
Happily Ever After: Probably as simple as wanting to make the fake Nerdrotic screen and see if he could lure in the CHUDs (or maybe people who want to mock the CHUDs). Maybe he plans to say it was woke and ahead of his time. Given the other review I watched said it was poor quality and dumb, that would be an interesting take.
Ginger: Not just because it's pornography, it's pornography with lesbian sex scenes (which to Bob makes it an art house film). I don't even think it's because it also has a black man tell a white woman that she has to have sex with him in order to get the drugs she's after (and therefore this movie is woke!). Of course, I've only seen the trailer.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
So this made me take a swig of whiskey and do what I have avoided for ages and dive into this vid to see what the fuck this might have been. I went in thinking he might be using patois wrong, but he would really need to be fucking up the pronunciation. Not impossible, but I am leaning towards that not being the case, since even for Bob it would make no sense.
Bob's tweets used to be filled to the brim with retarded jargon and you could usually omit it and follow context clues to what he means anyway. I think it's funny that he and Coffin had this same problem and both eventually eased up on it after people kept telling them their writing was incomprehensible.
And while subjecting myself to this horror, I revisit what I said before. Bob's writing is cumbersome, it is a burden to slog through. His rapid fire shtick makes it seem clever in video, but that is because he moves on to the next thing before you can think to much about what he actually said. I imagine that is why he finds his tweets so clever. Read them in rapid succession without analysis you might think this guy knows what he is talking about just by volume.
He really is not taking youtube seriously after all his hot air. He recognizes his channel is ailing and that the algorithm is vaguely to blame since he can't just shit out whatever he wants and have it perform the way it used to. That being said, he seems to think all he has to do is just crank out a few more vids maybe launch a new series and he will be able to climb back up without any problem. All the while waiting to be scooped up and turned into the next James Gunn.
Youtube has changed vastly since Robert started. The algorithm he blames for his poor performance has gone under several changes, some were huge and destroyed channels better than his. Creators have had to adapt and there are some interesting success stories out there. Bob is just doing business as usual and just hoping it will work.
Finally something that really needs to be said just looking at his vid, he has huge as watermarks that show up often throughout his video. The movie bob production shit and his patreon. They are really fucking annoying to look at and if I just found his vids out of the blue that would be enough for me to never watch his vids again. (I am guessing this is so he can clip them later for tik tok.) Then add on to it even if I got past all that the fact he dropped three separate videos in one day would turn me off since I don't wanna subscribe to someone who will clog up my suggestion or notifications.
Also thanks @Ralph Barnhardt for keeping the fire going for us weirdos still interested in bob. And @Positron I hope your internet situation gets resolved soon, but I also hope you are enjoying a little break from you sisyphean task of keeping tabs on bobbert. I appreciate the work both of you do.
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2020
His awful eating habits has severely foreshortened his lifespan.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
- Highlight
- #10,740
I had a suspicion, so I skimmed the video -- I had a nice night out and I am not ruining it by subjecting myself to any more of Bob than necessary -- and confirmed that suspicion.
He's saying Pieta.
As in this Pieta:
That is, one of Michelangelo's most famous masterpieces; that is, a statue of a woman bearing a broken sword is the same as Mary cradling the crucified Christ.
Is this a valid interpretation of either the scene in The Crusades or the scene in Fellowship of the Ring? I suppose it's possible. I think it's more likely Bob is referencing a piece of classical artwork to make himself seem more clever than he is. Personally, I don't think it's evocative of the Pieta unless we're looking an actual human figure, not something that's merely symbolic of a martyr.