Canada is a failed state

I checked with the crime statistics on Canada's worst cities and they're slowly getting worse. Note how Drug Abuse, Burglaries and Vandalism is even worse in Prince Albert than the Capital of Venezuela according to those who live in Prince Albert. Half of Canada's Cities and Towns have really bad crime statistics while the other half are fairly decent (Like Mexico).
Prince Albert.png
Caracas.png
 
Are these people really that fucking retarded or what? Or is this their way of "coping"?
The average person you encounter is closer to a dog than a thinking, breathing, human. They believe what they're told and do what they're told and the men on the media say that all the browns have nothing to do with the current state of the world so they'll believe them.
 
I checked with the crime statistics on Canada's worst cities and they're slowly getting worse. Note how Drug Abuse, Burglaries and Vandalism is even worse in Prince Albert than the Capital of Venezuela according to those who live in Prince Albert. Half of Canada's Cities and Towns have really bad crime statistics while the other half are fairly decent (Like Mexico).
View attachment 5557776View attachment 5557777
Thank you gun control for the rising crime statistics. Btw which site do you find these stats? Some might claim these stats are edited and photoshopped to discredit Canada.
 

There is a major controversy brewing in Canada over a proposal in the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons that schools shift from emphasizing “medical expertise” in favor of teaching “anti-racism” and social justice values.

An organization of physicians called Do No Harm is opposing the recommendation of the interim report by the college’s Anti-Racism Expert Working Group.

The report states that the new emphasis should center around “values such as anti-oppression, anti-racism, and social justice, rather than medical expertise.”

By “de-centering medical expertise,” the anti-racism experts suggest courses focusing on “anti-racism,” “anti-oppression,” “social justice and equity,” “inclusive compassion,” and “decolonization.”
 
Canada has always suffered "brain drain" to the states. Anyone who wanted to make actual money or build a real life fled to the US the second they could. Now it's getting much much worse, not only natural Canadians are fleeing but the high level immigrants the Liberals are counting on to make society work are also fleeing to the US.

A few eastern euro nations and even Israel have major brain drain issues. But in reality, it's intentional. The ruling class is fully aware and the state wants you gone. Because if you are a high functioning, high performing individual you are a threat to the overall regime and a lot of peoples personal grifts because you are likely to be an effective political organizer and foe should you choose to be. Maybe you hold a key position too or otherwise know things that can expose mega corruption, etc.

Canada looks like the exact same thing. It's not by accident or something seemingly clueless and bumbling political leaders or media circle jerkers have been going on about for at least the last 50 years. Canadians just get huffy and hung up on the US salary difference and call it a day. The truth is far more pernicious.
 
This plus MAID does seem to indicate that Canada is actively trying to murder it's citizens.
It appears to be the case for me, speaking as one who was diagnosed with depression and generalized anxiety disorder. I mean, it's much easier and cheaper to convince the "problem" to disappear than to try to fix it. My understanding is that it can take months to see a mental health professional and provincial health services hope that the problem corrects itself. Canada is--bar none--one of the most evil countries on the planet. What makes us worse than Russia, China, and Iran is they don't make nearly as much of an effort to conceal their true intentions. The Great White North is the ultimate moral busybody that puts on a show of how upstanding we are with the left (Liberals and NDP) possessing messianic delusions of grandeur.

As C.S. Lewis once wrote,. "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." The left in Canada wants to control every aspect of life down to the food we eat because they believe that they are saving humanity from itself. Their chimp-out over the Freedom Convoy was more a temper tantrum over some truckers refusing to bend to their whim. Thus they act under the assumption that they have a divine to determine who lives or dies. Just push a "troublesome" part of the population into letting the state kill them and replace them with a cheaper, more exploitable model.
 
Bill S-210 passed despite liberal opposition. Basically, now webmasters need to have people show actual ID before being allowed to view porn. This is in response to kids as young as 11 becoming porn addicts thanks to parents just handing them tablets and calling it a day.
I presume then the liberal opposition are ok with movies like Cuties?
 
Bill S-210 passed despite liberal opposition. Basically, now webmasters need to have people show actual ID before being allowed to view porn. This is in response to kids as young as 11 becoming porn addicts thanks to parents just handing them tablets and calling it a day.
Also absolutely hilarious seeing pornsoaked predditors suddenly going "muh internet censorship!!!!" and "it should be the parents' decision!!!!"
 
Bill S-210 passed despite liberal opposition. Basically, now webmasters need to have people show actual ID before being allowed to view porn. This is in response to kids as young as 11 becoming porn addicts thanks to parents just handing them tablets and calling it a day.
I am on the side of gubbmint overreach, but also doesn't this sort of make sense in a way? Have to show I.D to buy cigs/booze but somehow this gets by despite genuinely being adult content. Why have the 18 or older button if it means nothing. I don't like the idea of having to put your information out there but it sort of has a point, albeit a crooked/overreaching one.
 
Bill S-210 passed despite liberal opposition. Basically, now webmasters need to have people show actual ID before being allowed to view porn. This is in response to kids as young as 11 becoming porn addicts thanks to parents just handing them tablets and calling it a day.

According this legal analysis I found, it may become a major issue for Kiwi Farms access in Canada.

Bill S-210 goes well beyond personal choices to limit underage access to sexually explicit material on Canadian sites. Instead, it envisions government-enforced global website liability for failure to block underage access, backed by website blocking and mandated age verification systems that are likely to include face recognition technologies. The government establishes this regulatory framework and is likely to task the CRTC with providing the necessary administration. While there are surely good intentions with the bill, the risks and potential harms it poses are significant.

The basic framework of Bill S-210 is that it creates an offence for any organization making available sexually explicit material to anyone under the age of 18 for commercial purposes. The penalty for doing so is $250,000 for the first offence and up to $500,000 for any subsequent offences. Organizations (broadly defined under the Criminal Code) can rely on three potential defences:

  • The organization instituted a “prescribed age-verification method” to limit access. It would be up to the government to determine what methods qualify with due regard for reliability and privacy. There is a major global business of vendors that sell these technologies and who are vocal proponents of this kind of legislation.
  • The organization can make the case that there is “legitimate purpose related to science, medicine, education or the arts.”
  • The organization took steps required to limit access after having received a notification from the enforcement agency (likely the CRTC).

The enforcement of the bill is left to the designated regulatory agency, which can issue notifications of violations to websites and services. Those notices can include the steps the agency wants followed to bring the site into compliance. This literally means the government via its regulatory agency will dictate to sites how they must interact with users to ensure no underage access. If the site fails to act as instructed within 20 days, the regulator can apply for a court order mandating that Canadian ISPs block the site from their subscribers. The regulator would be required to identify which ISPs are subject to the blocking order.

The website blocking provisions are focused on limiting user access and can therefore be applied to websites anywhere in the world with Canadian ISPs required to ensure that the sites are rendered inaccessible. And what about the risk of overblocking? The bill not only envisions the possibility of blocking lawful content or limiting access to those over 18, it expressly permits it. Section 9(5) states that if the court determines that an order is needed, it may have the effect of preventing access to “material other than sexually explicit material made available by the organization” or limiting access to anyone, not just young people. This raises the prospect of full censorship of lawful content under court order based on notices from a government agency.

If that isn’t bad enough, there are two additional serious concerns. First, the bill is not limited to pornography sites. Rather, it applies to any site or service that makes sexually explicit materials available. This would presumably include search engines, social media sites such as Twitter, or chat forums such as Reddit, where access to explicit material is not hard to find.

Second, consider the way sites are supposed to comply with the law, by establishing age verification systems. This effectively means that sites will require their users to register with commercial age verification systems in order to run a search or access some tweets. And the age verification systems raise real privacy concerns, including mandated face recognition as part of the verification process.

Granted, this is extrapolation & speculation on the lawyer's part, but seems hard to believe this legislation & associated infrastructure won't be a slippery slope. Seems likely this will be used outside of porn restriction.

This looks like backdoor Digital ID (and by extension CBDC) implementation using justification palatable to Conservative-leaning people otherwise opposed to the concept of Digital ID/CBDC. Especially nefarious given what has lead to this, the seemingly deliberate lack of internal policing/moderation and other scandals at MindGeek, Roblox, Discord,, social media in general, etc. A push to make the problem so bad as to bring about legislation like this as the purported solution?

And I can't envision Null under any circumstance implementing mandatory age-verification services, let alone facial recognition. Not that those commercial age-verification providers would want to be associated with Kiwi Farms anyway.

Best of luck to Canuck Kiwis if this passes.
 
Granted, this is extrapolation & speculation on the lawyer's part, but seems hard to believe this legislation & associated infrastructure won't be a slippery slope. Seems likely this will be used outside of porn restriction.

Seems to be the only objective. Kiwifarms and anyone who may say anything naughty about regime elements, the LPC, Conservatives or CCP and just may have a picture of a tit or clothed tit under a bra, or a drawing of one will have to be registered with the politburo and it's users AI face databased for later. Canada is the money laundering home for Manwin FFS it's a bit late to get concerned about pornography but the timing is a bit suspect with Canada poised to enter a period of vast and possibly even apolitical levels of unrest.


This looks like backdoor Digital ID (and by extension CBDC) implementation using justification palatable to Conservative-leaning people otherwise opposed to the concept of Digital ID/CBDC. Especially nefarious given what has lead to this, the seemingly deliberate lack of internal policing/moderation and other scandals at MindGeek, Roblox, Discord,, social media in general, etc. A push to make the problem so bad as to bring about legislation like this as the purported solution?

I don't think it's shizo at all and both parties and normies will support it. Just tie in your vax status, your CRA account #, banking institution and BTC addresses so the government can keep track of what exchanges you use whenever you post a message and you are basically China. Just without any of the economic opportunities or benefits of China. But totalitarian in spades. You know, for the children.
 
Cons of annexing Canada:
* it's Canada
* probably have some kind of low-key river war between the Quebecois and the Cajuns down in swamp country at the mouth of the Mississippi river over the language
* more Native tribes to deal with
* constant bickering about the metric system

Pros of annexing Canada:
* some of the leafs are actually allright
* nice place to go during summer if you're from the South (Victoria, B.C. was lovely when I went there in August some years ago)
* poutine

... I'm a fat fuck, so that last one is especially tempting.
Canada is still a part of the Commonwealth and I think it's quite easy to interpret their continued existence as a violation of the Monroe Doctrine.
But the thing is, I don't really want to absorb their population, so I'm more in favor of glassing Canada, than annexing it.
 
Back