CHAZ/CHOP: Autonomous No Cop Zone and Commune Declared In Seattle - Render unto Warlord Raz what is owed to Warlord Raz

Wy4M said:
And he grew a plant from his abscess:
Click to expand...
27C0C360-EB1B-49AD-8693-90A43059AA3B.jpeg
Jesus fucking Christ.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rafal Gan Ganowicz, spiritofamermaid, CockPockets and 10 others
Lissamine Green said:
Oh good gravy it gets worse.


www.king5.com

Homicide investigation after woman's death at Seattle's Cal Anderson Park

A suspect was barricaded at the Capitol Hill park after a woman was found dead. Her death is being investigated as a homicide.
www.king5.com www.king5.com

View attachment 1604266

Makes that bloodless "we kind of found a woman who might have...*passed*" post from the BLM freak sound even more horrific knowing THAT is what they saw.
Click to expand...
Fuck this dude. Seriously. If BLM did kill him after he did this then they did good.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Badusedbenzos, Rafal Gan Ganowicz, spiritofamermaid and 9 others
DeadFish said:
When will insurance companies add the "insurance not payable due to local officals being democrats" clause?
Click to expand...
Garm said:
Soon. Or they will price it out of the "average" Americans price range.

Liberals decry oligarchy but then create policies that require huge corporations in order to afford the operating costs. Hmmm...
Click to expand...

Unlikely. Most major insurance companies work extensively with the government (read: primarily Democrats) as part of the lobbyist system. It's one of the ways they've managed most of the less scrupulous practices they pull off, they're buddied up with the politicians who make decisions about who has to buy what and where. You think it's an accident that Obamacare wound up being about forcing you to buy insurance? Sure that was probably Step One along the way towards something bigger, but in the meantime the individual mandate was gonna see a lot of cash in the companies' pockets as they cranked up their premiums on most of their customers and got even more premiums from all the healthy young people who they wouldn't be spending much money on that were now forced to buy from them.

So they'd never make it something so obvious as "You get higher rates for living in a Democrat-controlled city." Now, "We've assessed your area as high risk and due to recently passed legislation you're required by law to buy Potential Overenthusiastic Protester Insurance", that could happen.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, queue-anon, Garm and 2 others
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Full Race Replay, spiritofamermaid, A Cold Potato and 2 others
TurkishOreo said:
Why should they pay for shit that was caused by perfectly sueable officials.
Click to expand...

Because even if you go class action you're not going to be able to afford the level of lawyer that the officials can force the taxpayers to hire for them. And even if you win the settlement will get argued down and split up so much that you've effectively just wasted your time.
 
Jigglyjogglers said:
Because even if you go class action you're not going to be able to afford the level of lawyer that the officials can force the taxpayers to hire for them. And even if you win the settlement will get argued down and split up so much that you've effectively just wasted your time.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, that sounds like a "little people" problem. Why should I, as a gigantic insurance company, care?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Ped Xing said:
Hmmm, that sounds like a "little people" problem. Why should I, as a gigantic insurance company, care?
Click to expand...

A very good question, my horrifying blue friend! Because as a giant insurance company that has teamed up with the government to force people to buy POP insurance, you can use your high-paid lawyers to sue the officials!

Of course since you're a gigantic insurance company that works with the government (one of the few large enough and connected enough to navigate what will obviously be the Herculean task of becoming authorized to sell POP insurance), either the government will settle with you for some fraction of the cost of the damages (say, three quarters or half or less) and you'll then charge the deductible on top of that, leaving someone with maaaaybe enough money to just scrape by on rebuilding... or, your lawyers and the official's taxpayer-funded lawyers just drag things out for years until the problem goes away!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, spiritofamermaid, IAmNotAlpharius and 2 others
Jigglyjogglers said:
Unlikely. Most major insurance companies work extensively with the government (read: primarily Democrats) as part of the lobbyist system. It's one of the ways they've managed most of the less scrupulous practices they pull off, they're buddied up with the politicians who make decisions about who has to buy what and where. You think it's an accident that Obamacare wound up being about forcing you to buy insurance? Sure that was probably Step One along the way towards something bigger, but in the meantime the individual mandate was gonna see a lot of cash in the companies' pockets as they cranked up their premiums on most of their customers and got even more premiums from all the healthy young people who they wouldn't be spending much money on that were now forced to buy from them.

So they'd never make it something so obvious as "You get higher rates for living in a Democrat-controlled city." Now, "We've assessed your area as high risk and due to recently passed legislation you're required by law to buy Potential Overenthusiastic Protester Insurance", that could happen.
Click to expand...

I agree. I just figured everyone here would know that the increase in costs would have some Orwellian sounding name.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back