US Cloudflare: "Terminating Service for 8Chan"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Terminating Service for 8Chan

Tweet
August 05, 2019 1:44AM


The mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio are horrific tragedies. In the case of the El Paso shooting, the suspected terrorist gunman appears to have been inspired by the forum website known as 8chan. Based on evidence we've seen, it appears that he posted a screed to the site immediately before beginning his terrifying attack on the El Paso Walmart killing 20 people.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident. Nearly the same thing happened on 8chan before the terror attack in Christchurch, New Zealand. The El Paso shooter specifically referenced the Christchurch incident and appears to have been inspired by the largely unmoderated discussions on 8chan which glorified the previous massacre. In a separate tragedy, the suspected killer in the Poway, California synagogue shooting also posted a hate-filled “open letter” on 8chan. 8chan has repeatedly proven itself to be a cesspool of hate.

8chan is among the more than 19 million Internet properties that use Cloudflare's service. We just sent notice that we are terminating 8chan as a customer effective at midnight tonight Pacific Time. The rationale is simple: they have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths. Even if 8chan may not have violated the letter of the law in refusing to moderate their hate-filled community, they have created an environment that revels in violating its spirit.

We do not take this decision lightly. Cloudflare is a network provider. In pursuit of our goal of helping build a better internet, we’ve considered it important to provide our security services broadly to make sure as many users as possible are secure, and thereby making cyberattacks less attractive — regardless of the content of those websites. Many of our customers run platforms of their own on top of our network. If our policies are more conservative than theirs it effectively undercuts their ability to run their services and set their own policies. We reluctantly tolerate content that we find reprehensible, but we draw the line at platforms that have demonstrated they directly inspire tragic events and are lawless by design. 8chan has crossed that line. It will therefore no longer be allowed to use our services.

What Will Happen Next

Unfortunately, we have seen this situation before and so we have a good sense of what will play out. Almost exactly two years ago we made the determination to kick another disgusting site off Cloudflare's network: the Daily Stormer. That caused a brief interruption in the site's operations but they quickly came back online using a Cloudflare competitor. That competitor at the time promoted as a feature the fact that they didn't respond to legal process. Today, the Daily Stormer is still available and still disgusting. They have bragged that they have more readers than ever. They are no longer Cloudflare's problem, but they remain the Internet's problem.

I have little doubt we'll see the same happen with 8chan. While removing 8chan from our network takes heat off of us, it does nothing to address why hateful sites fester online. It does nothing to address why mass shootings occur. It does nothing to address why portions of the population feel so disenchanted they turn to hate. In taking this action we've solved our own problem, but we haven't solved the Internet's.

In the two years since the Daily Stormer what we have done to try and solve the Internet’s deeper problem is engage with law enforcement and civil society organizations to try and find solutions. Among other things, that resulted in us cooperating around monitoring potential hate sites on our network and notifying law enforcement when there was content that contained an indication of potential violence. We will continue to work within the legal process to share information when we can to hopefully prevent horrific acts of violence. We believe this is our responsibility and, given Cloudflare's scale and reach, we are hopeful we will continue to make progress toward solving the deeper problem.

Rule of Law

We continue to feel incredibly uncomfortable about playing the role of content arbiter and do not plan to exercise it often. Some have wrongly speculated this is due to some conception of the United States' First Amendment. That is incorrect. First, we are a private company and not bound by the First Amendment. Second, the vast majority of our customers, and more than 50% of our revenue, comes from outside the United States where the First Amendment and similarly libertarian freedom of speech protections do not apply. The only relevance of the First Amendment in this case and others is that it allows us to choose who we do and do not do business with; it does not obligate us to do business with everyone.

Instead our concern has centered around another much more universal idea: the Rule of Law. The Rule of Law requires policies be transparent and consistent. While it has been articulated as a framework for how governments ensure their legitimacy, we have used it as a touchstone when we think about our own policies.

We have been successful because we have a very effective technological solution that provides security, performance, and reliability in an affordable and easy-to-use way. As a result of that, a huge portion of the Internet now sits behind our network. 10% of the top million, 17% of the top 100,000, and 19% of the top 10,000 Internet properties use us today. 10% of the Fortune 1,000 are paying Cloudflare customers.

Cloudflare is not a government. While we've been successful as a company, that does not give us the political legitimacy to make determinations on what content is good and bad. Nor should it. Questions around content are real societal issues that need politically legitimate solutions. We will continue to engage with lawmakers around the world as they set the boundaries of what is acceptable in their countries through due process of law. And we will comply with those boundaries when and where they are set.

Europe, for example, has taken a lead in this area. As we've seen governments there attempt to address hate and terror content online, there is recognition that different obligations should be placed on companies that organize and promote content — like Facebook and YouTube — rather than those that are mere conduits for that content. Conduits, like Cloudflare, are not visible to users and therefore cannot be transparent and consistent about their policies.
The unresolved question is how should the law deal with platforms that ignore or actively thwart the Rule of Law? That's closer to the situation we have seen with the Daily Stormer and 8chan. They are lawless platforms. In cases like these, where platforms have been designed to be lawless and unmoderated, and where the platforms have demonstrated their ability to cause real harm, the law may need additional remedies. We and other technology companies need to work with policy makers in order to help them understand the problem and define these remedies. And, in some cases, it may mean moving enforcement mechanisms further down the technical stack.

Our Obligation

Cloudflare's mission is to help build a better Internet. At some level firing 8chan as a customer is easy. They are uniquely lawless and that lawlessness has contributed to multiple horrific tragedies. Enough is enough.

What's hard is defining the policy that we can enforce transparently and consistently going forward. We, and other technology companies like us that enable the great parts of the Internet, have an obligation to help propose solutions to deal with the parts we're not proud of. That's our obligation and we're committed to it.

Unfortunately the action we take today won’t fix hate online. It will almost certainly not even remove 8chan from the Internet. But it is the right thing to do. Hate online is a real issue. Here are some organizations that have active work to help address it:
Our whole Cloudflare team’s thoughts are with the families grieving in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio this evening.
 
Not sure how a court would view the absolute truth as told by an avowed child pornographer.
He is going to get vanned soon. He seriously wants someone to kill him.
>I asked him about a forum called /doll/, which hosts provocative photos of barely clothed little girls.
>“If you want /doll/ shut down,” he countered, “you should instead focus on the studios who are producing this content. "
His words from 2014 put his pastebin quote from him in new light.
sketch-1571672139266.png
 
Last edited:
He is going to get vanned soon. He seriously wants someone to kill him.
>I asked him about a forum called /doll/, which hosts provocative photos of barely clothed little girls.
>“If you want /doll/ shut down,” he countered, “you should instead focus on the studios who are producing this content. "

The constant with this twisted homunculus is no matter what it is, it's someone else's fault, never his. "Do you want me to stop doing this thing? Go get that guy over there!"
 
Well Alibaba's official story on why they route through Department of Defense IPs is exactly what @Jump was saying:
alibaba1.png

(https://archive.li/1DpiV)

Is it tin-foily of me to still think that this is a little strange? Why link to a blog post explaining it? Why not just say "Yeah, we just used those IPs and didn't think much of it".
 
Well Alibaba's official story on why they route through Department of Defense IPs is exactly what @Jump was saying:
View attachment 979906
(https://archive.li/1DpiV)

Is it tin-foily of me to still think that this is a little strange? Why link to a blog post explaining it? Why not just say "Yeah, we just used those IPs and didn't think much of it".
It's better to add something for people who want to know more about it.
 
Well Alibaba's official story on why they route through Department of Defense IPs is exactly what @Jump was saying:
View attachment 979906
(https://archive.li/1DpiV)

Is it tin-foily of me to still think that this is a little strange? Why link to a blog post explaining it? Why not just say "Yeah, we just used those IPs and didn't think much of it".

I think Errata Security is legit.

 
It's better to add something for people who want to know more about it.
I think Errata Security is legit.
Okay, fair enough I guess. So it seems like it really was benign after all.

Meanwhile, Fredrick and his new friends are going after Tucows now to try and get rid of 8kun's hosting:
tucows.png

(https://archive.li/0HsCL)
 
Is it tin-foily of me to still think that this is a little strange? Why link to a blog post explaining it? Why not just say "Yeah, we just used those IPs and didn't think much of it".

I think they might just be embarrassed and want to emphasize "this isn't just some sleazy chinky scam shit we're doing!" Even though it kind of is.
 
What does IPv6 achieve that IPv4+population control could not (starting with disingenious child pornographers like Brennan)?

IIRC (I'm not an expert at this kind of thing), it can allow for routing inefficiencies, and lets you have a large pool of IP addresses that you can swap out regularly. I currently have seven.
 
He is going to get vanned soon. He seriously wants someone to kill him.
>I asked him about a forum called /doll/, which hosts provocative photos of barely clothed little girls.
>“If you want /doll/ shut down,” he countered, “you should instead focus on the studios who are producing this content. "
His words from 2014 put his pastebin quote from him in new light.
View attachment 979588
Is there any concrete proof that he was a pedo? This article was written in late 2014 when the cripple considered himself a free speech absolutist. Throughout his tenure as admin of 8chan he repeatedly said that he found the pedophile boards gross but allowed them to stay because of his commitment to free speech.

I do have this old screenshot of the cripple defending those boards and calling pedos a "disadvantaged minority", that could definitely be interpreted as him being sympathetic to them.
hw defends pedophile boards.jpg
 
He is going to get vanned soon. He seriously wants someone to kill him.
>I asked him about a forum called /doll/, which hosts provocative photos of barely clothed little girls.
>“If you want /doll/ shut down,” he countered, “you should instead focus on the studios who are producing this content. "
His words from 2014 put his pastebin quote from him in new light.
View attachment 979588
Hotwheels: "Hands off my pictures of near-naked eight year olds"
Also Hotwheels: "Political discussion without government supervision is dangerous"
 
Hotwheels: "Hands off my pictures of near-naked eight year olds"
Also Hotwheels: "Political discussion without government supervision is dangerous"

That's what you call going full SJW.

Really, you little goblin? HuffPost?

Somehow, that's even more noxious than writing for The Daily Stormer.
 
That's what you call going full SJW.

Then what's this called?
fullsjw1.png

(https://archive.li/N11M4)

fullsjw2.png

(https://archive.li/1Ptwo)

Also, whatever the fuck this is:
whatevenisthis.jpg

(taken from this guy's Twitter post, archived)
 
A1F7CB38-A7F0-4631-AFC2-89E5E3FBC2AF.png

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/230038230/#q230039969
Josh did an ama on 4gag about Fredrick and 8chan
Here are some interesting quotes from it
On hotwheels
>I'm Josh, I worked with Fredrick on 8ch a few years ago in the Philippines before he was removed entirely by Jim.
>When he initially started talking to the press about this sort of stuff I kind-of understood his motivation. That is: separate himself from the history of 8ch to avoid potential legal repercussions, and allow him to live out his life in seclusion with cryptocurrency wealth. Now, I don't know what the fuck he's doing.
>Fredrick is passionately furious at Jim and his company and is intimately invested in its destructed.

On infinity never
>Next probably would have succeeded with more time but I set an arbitrary amount of time to complete it and didn't have much savings to go off of when the crowdfunding ended. Jim refused to help because of the open source license. In January, tensions were really high and it just snapped at a certain point
On 8chan's software
>8ch's underlying software in its current state is broken and I don't even know what Ron is doing to it.
>There's no point writing anything in any language unless it's federated. Make a federated imageboard. Just not in JavaScript.

On QBoomers and 8chan's new audience
>Jim has made the (correct) determination that the #QAnon boomers are docile, easily pleased source of profit and political leverage. He will begin pandering to them. The previous residents of 8ch are now obsolete in the business scheme of the site.
On 8chan's troubles and Jim
>I don't entirely understand it either. I think he thought I'd be more sympathetic towards him because I also have reasons to hate and distrust Jim (and I absolutely do hate and distrust Jim), but Jim's struggles mirror the KF's and he is more equipped to build things and combat policies than I am. It would be completely moronic and self-destructive to actively root against him.
Josh posted proof in the thread Post:'230039969'
 
On 8chan's software
>8ch's underlying software in its current state is broken and I don't even know what Ron is doing to it.
>There's no point writing anything in any language unless it's federated. Make a federated imageboard. Just not in JavaScript.
Now watch as they take exception to Joshua 'Null' Moon's pointers about how they should be writing their imageboard software, and their code crashes with a classic NullPointerException. Ba-dum-tish!
(Yeah yeah, I know, wrong Java. Let me have this, I've been wanting to make that joke for ages.)

Meanwhile, Fredrick and the gang keep playing whack-a-mole with the 8kun Alibaba IPs. It's been like almost a straight week of this now, right? Sad.
more8kunIPs.png

(https://archive.li/eXe46)
 
Back