- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Most importantly, the people who want the revolution to happen aren't even workers.
There is no revolution without workers.
Without workers, the word for it is "tantrum."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most importantly, the people who want the revolution to happen aren't even workers.
I went to college with trust fund commies. As a result, I own an AR-15, a Mini 14 and a few compact handguns. Rednecks would never be part of a Marxist revolution because they still believe in the concept of property and self sufficiency.The Worker's Revolution that they want to happen in the United States would be good as they would be the first ones gunned down by rednecks who would be leading the Revolution (who do you think are the oppressed ones in the USA class-wise?).
Fully automated luxury communism is a thing
I thought that was a drug induced term that Elizabeth Waite made up in their(?) suicide note. Did it actually exist before then?
Personally, I don't care, because someone always is going to be exploited, even in communist "utopia" (and I'm using this word very lightly).
What does Anarcho-Communism even mean? I'm genuinely curious. I've always thought anarchy fights against the power and order, whereas communism strongly supports strict control by using fear and discouraging individuality.
Does that mean that being an Anarcho-Communist is one's desire to live in an oppressive society just to have a cause to fight for? Is this why they truly love communism so much? Because they don't think they're actually oppressed enough in the current state of the government and they're so mentally immature that they have a desire to rebel but no real reason to?
I don't understand any of this.![]()
There are people who take it seriously and put their faith in that one day it will become reality....that fully automated thing is a joke meme.
You're right, and that is the obvious criticism of anarcho-communism. It's having your cake and eating it. You abolish the state but smuggle it back in and call it a workers' council or something. It is kind of the reigning orthodoxy of anarchism nowadays, though.What does Anarcho-Communism even mean? I'm genuinely curious. I've always thought anarchy fights against the power and order, whereas communism strongly supports strict control by using fear and discouraging individuality.
The problem is that what you have to do to secure the last point kind of undermines the first two.The meaning of communist anarchism is this: the abolition of government, of coercive authority and all its agencies and joint ownership - which means free and equal participation in the general work and welfare.
We are not bees!I think humans as a species are just incompatible with large scale communism.
Meh
I think Communism or more specifically "to each according to need, from each according to ability" is mankind's future.
Like faaaaaaaaaaaaar future; as in Star Trek space opera future where scarcity just isn't a issue anymore. After everyone has as much as they want of anything hopefully we can get past the materialistic competition that drives us and move onto a more co-operative society based on personals drives and community goals.
So yah...like in 10,000 years at the rate our species is maturing.
Basically we need advanced space communism for communism to work. Posadism wins again!Star Trek managed to eliminate poverty with two inventions.
One was the invention of cheap, or even free, readily available energy.
The second was the matter replicator. People could just replicate everything they needed.
Once that is in place, it's more likely that could be reality.