- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
I really dislike the video. The asshole just goes and buys a bunch of assets and pre-made systems and goes "LOL GUYUZ LOOK I MADE CYBA$RPUNK IN ONE DAY". Nigger, you didn't make shit in one day.
Hard no. Buy Shadowrun if you want Cyberpunk. Fuck, buy New Vegas. $60 when you can buy two or even three more polished, enjoyable games isn't worth it. This game also isn't worth your time as people have been experiencing increased crashes with Patch 1.05. And people ARE hitting the 8 MB cap. This game has broken AI (I mean, if you can call it AI. Its barely functional), doesn't have the features games ten years ago did. This is patently NOT worth the money for it. I was going to be generous and recorded how much time from launch to bug that I couldn't purposefully replicate I encountered. 8 minutes. No alt-tabbing, just straight loading in and driving to a section. I did a hack and a guy is T-posed out and gliding around behind a dumpster, only going back to normal before I cap him in the face. 8 fucking minutes it can't play without something glitching out.
I'm glad you feel like you got your money's worth, but you're asking people to spend $60 on a game: Which can't run for more than 10 minutes without bugging out, is lacking features games from 10 years ago had and is competing with dozens of older titles who are feature complete and more stable. It is not acceptable for a publisher to do this and ask people to spend their money on.
I'm not trying to convince you, nigger. A "normie" opinion was asked for, so I gave one. I've read the entire thread, so I've read enough sperging about Shadowrun and New Vegas to last a lifetime. Frankly, however, those are very different types of games with very different experiences. What Cyberpunk offers - no matter how many problems, no matter how many bugs - is not out there, at present. There's nothing resembling an open-world cyberpunk vibe that is currently on the market. THAT'S why normies are willing to pay a premium.