Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
Useful_Mistake said:
This one only? Wasn't the last one dismissed?
Click to expand...
No, the Rebolo case is on hold until the appeals court makes a decision on the Polano case.

He's also suing Creetosis over the New Vegas stream, which he's already included in the Rebolo case. Wonder what the courts would think of that?

1720017964018.png

1720018009037.png


EDIT: My bad, he's suing over the same STAG episode, but he's suing over his Morrowind video this time.
 
After slogging through this complaint it seems that Stabby still does not understand that it's not the amount of the work used by the 2nd party that makes it fair use or not.

He goes on and on and on about how all these evil, nasty harassers and doxxer's use every single second of the work which of course can't be fair use by David's educated viewpoint. He just does not or will not accept that parties can use his work, as much of it as they want and still be covered by fair use.

I honestly think Stabby is just really really pissed that Creetosis and crew are making more money of his work then he is. That and the fact they are mocking him while doing to is what gets ole Stabby's dander really up. Not only are they making fun of him and his obviously masterwork video's but they are making hundreds of dollars off of it while doing so and Stabby only get pennies.

Stabby is also trying to say that Creetosis is responsible for "some random person" appearing in his chat and using the Acerthorn Channel icon which is of course copyrighted and so both You Tube who refused to take down the vidoe over that icon appearing and Creetosis are liable for...you guessed it


MAXIMUM STATUTORY DAMAGES OF $150,000 PER INSTANCE FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF...drum roll please...$900,000.

PLUS a nice neat kool $1,000,000 on top for Libel and hurt fee fee's.

And of course Stabby tosses in his old standby's of Defendant must scrub all instances of this work off the internet and fully restore the good opinion of me in the communities eyes or be placed in jail. And the court must find the Defendant guilty of delibert malice in these acts so he can't wealse out of paying me no matter what. He also wants the Defendant to be forced to appy to the Copyright board before he creates any works involved the Plantiff "like a restraining order from a ex-girlfirend" to prevent any further harrasment. Yah I bet you know at tonne about Restraining Orders doncha Stabby.

"In addition to that, I ask that he be ordered to publicly correct the statements he madeabout me in such a way that ensures that my reputation is fully restored. He should not be required simply to tell everyone that he was wrong, but to actually convince them, to the point where literally everyone on Earth, with no exceptions, has either never heard of this controversy in the first place, or their must subjectively believe that I am the blameless victim of harassment, doxxing, and defamation (and that Creetosis willingly and maliciously participated in same), and absolutely nothing else."



All in all this suit isn't a funny as the last few as Stabby is pretty much just copy/pasting his work now and phoning it in.

I give it 4 face stabbings out of 10. You do not pass go, you do not collect $1,900,000 dollars.

We seen better from Mr Stabby in the past, maybe it's time to look up another avenue of work David. Have you thought about tranistioning into a woman and suing the government for discrimination? I hear there's big bucks to be made that way.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: koos koets, Not a bee, Vecr and 5 others
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: koos koets, TurboNAS, Broken Cuddles and 1 other person
CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps said:
Defendant mentioned that Northern District of California wasn't the proper venue in his answer to the complaint.



Here is a screencap from ECF, and from email that Zander received.

View attachment 6151977
View attachment 6152084
Click to expand...
I'm still confused.

Why would the judge transfer the case to another district then just close it?

If the lolsuit is really dead then I'm happy for Zell, he got off scott free and handed a huge L to Stabby.

If the clase has been closed Zell needs to go on the offensive. As we've seen with both SidAlpha and Creetosis Stabby won't stop. It don't matter if he lost this case, he will just file another next week and then another one after that and another after that.

It don't cost him a dime and his time is worthless. Zell needs to submit a request to have Stabby labelled a vexatious litigant citing all the cases he files against the same people as cause because trust me, this shit ain't over b y a long shot. Stabby will appeal and appeal and then appeal that appeal. Then when he's exhausted that he'll just find another thing to come after you with.

It won't be over until either the justice system cuts Stabby off completely or Stabby dies and his cockroach friends eat him.

Zell take the time and do the vexatious litigant order cuz. Your future self will thank you.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Meat Target, Broken Cuddles, Lake Cresva Diver and 2 others
Sweeter and Savoury said:
I'm still confused.

Why would the judge transfer the case to another district then just close it?

If the lolsuit is really dead then I'm happy for Zell, he got off scott free and handed a huge L to Stabby.
Click to expand...
Because that's how transfers work. It's gone, done, fini in the Northen District. Shortly, if it hasn't already, it will magically appear in the Central district.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Last Ride, Broken Cuddles, Mind Goblins and 1 other person
davids877 said:
Because that's how transfers work. It's gone, done, fini in the Northen District. Shortly, if it hasn't already, it will magically appear in the Central district.
Click to expand...
Yah this is what I think too

They just terminated the case in one district, tomorrow the case will be re-filed in the new district sadly.
 
"Dear court, please transfer this case to a district where I haven't been found a vexatious litigant."
ERROR: DISTRICT NOT FOUND



Note: this is a legally protected opinion under the satire provisions of the 1st amendment. No warranties, express or implied, are given. Service may be made to the registered agent at The Internet, One Ersatz Way, San Francisco, CA 90332
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Vecr, Last Ride, Meat Target and 3 others
Stebbins v. Creetosis Docket 1 Complaint
He wants $750,000 for 5 counts of Copyright Infringement and wants Youtube to be held liable for half because they've lost safe harbor.
1) Morrowind Retrospective - Why Morrowind is Overrated
2) Dark Souls Retrospective -Dark Souls Sucks, and Here's Why
3) Elden Ring Sucks, and Here's Why
4) Maybe YOU'RE the ones ducking ME!
5) Acerthorn Channel Icon #6

He's literally suing for his icon being used in Creetosis' chat for by an imposter. Acerthorn believe Youtube has lost safe harbor by not removing that stream containing his icon.
StebbinsVCreetosis1.png

$1,000,000 for libel and IIED (intentional infliction of emotional distress)
He claims Creetosis' mean words stressed him out, weakening his immune system, causing him to contract pneumonia. Pay no attention to Acerthorn's mold filled room.
He claims medicaid (government funded insurance for disabled and low income) paid $1,000,000 for his treatment. He provides no evidence for this.
In 2023 Acerthorn asked a lawyer on Avvo if he would be entitled to costs his insurance paid. Avvo is anonymous but the date and district lines up exactly with when he sued SidAlpha for the same thing.
avvo.png
He knows he's not entitled to that $1,000,000 but is suing SidAlpha, Creetosis, and Baz each for the same amount.

Confusingly Acerthorn sets the condition that if he can't receive $750,000 in statutory damages he should receive $1,000,000 in actual damages for copyright infringement... for emotional distress.
156. In the event that I am unable to recover statutory damages for any or all of my claims of
copyright infringement, then I ask that the $1,000,000 in compensatory damages also be awarded
to me as actual damages for the claims of copyright infringement. 17 USC § 504(b) does not
limit actual damages only to purely economic lost revenues, so damages for emotional distress
are plainly allowed.
Click to expand...

Stebbins v. Creetosis Docket 7 Letter from Google
Google, a co-defendant in Stebbins v. Creetosis, claims Acerthorn failed to comply with his vexatious litigant order. Acerthorn must attach the 18 page order that declared him a vexatious litigant. He attached only the last page.
StebbinVCreetosis7.png

Stebbins v. Creetosis Docket 8 Response to Google
Acerthorn asks for proof he's required to attach the entire order. He says he didn't include all 18 pages because "Not having to print those first 17 pages helped me to save on stationary and shipping costs." :story:
He says he got away with this in his case against Baz so it shouldn't be an issue here.
StebbinVCreetosis8_1.pngStebbinVCreetosis8_2.png

Stebbins v. Creetosis Docket 10
The Court responds. Things are not looking good for Acerthorn.
CLERK'S NOTICE: The court was not aware of the vexatious-litigant order and withdraws its authorization of service. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Entered: 06/26/2024)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets, Coo Coo Bird, SpiceyHuman and 8 others
MongolianMongoose said:
Things are not looking good for Acerthorn.
Click to expand...
The government datawarehouses all types of inane shit but cant establish a database for vexatious litigants? Its crazy that someone could have multiple places declare him a vexatious litigant and he can just get away with filing more lawsuits by omitting the fact he is a vexatious litigant.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets, SpiceyHuman, Mankirk and 5 others
DiggieSmalls said:
The government datawarehouses all types of inane shit but cant establish a database for vexatious litigants? Its crazy that someone could have multiple places declare him a vexatious litigant and he can just get away with filing more lawsuits by omitting the fact he is a vexatious litigant.
Click to expand...
A vexlit declaration should be known by the government top-to-bottom, like a felony conviction. And any vexlit that continues forum-shopping or attempting to file frivolous suits should go to jail.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Mankirk, Vecr, REGENDarySumanai and 4 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: koos koets, Coo Coo Bird, Vecr and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back