Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Question:

Is the case against Baz officially dead now that the court has ruled the copyright and defamation claims can't go forward?

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

If there was ever a time to label someone a vexatious ligitant in every district of the USA, it would be now.

 

[Adr1anD]

Question:

Is the case against Baz officially dead now that the court has ruled the copyright and defamation claims can't go forward?

No gobbler case is officially dead until the wereturkey exhausts his appeels, certioraris and mandamuses.

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Question:

Is the case against Baz officially dead now that the court has ruled the copyright and defamation claims can't go forward?

Uncertain on the Stabbins front.

I do know that Baz is currently locked in legal matters over the closure of a YouTube channel based in Brazil. Apparently a court order is required to terminate a channel in Brazil, and YouTube didn't have one when they terminated his which might as well be the reason why his channel got undeleted.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

Acerthorn asks how he can report a Discord server mod (Creetosis) without the mod finding out.
https://old.reddit.com/r/discordapp...o_i_report_mods_server_admins_to_discord_for/ (a)

Step 1. Log out of your ACERTHORN reddit account.

Creetosis talked about being sued again. Warning! VTuber content.
Pain and Suffering, as voted for by YOU! (Fallout 4 stream) 1:50:00 - 2:09:00

Spoiler: Streamlined 8 minute local archive

Key points
1) Making fun of Acerthorn in a private Discord channel is not harassment.
2) Saying "Youtube acts on DMCA flagging regardless of merit" is not libel.
3) The lawsuit is stupid.
4) Acerthorn is pathetic.

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

Stabbins Financial Update:

In a surprising turn of events Acer has closed down his Patreon.
Video announcing that Patreon is no more. (a)
His reasoning is that his last patron has stopped subscribing to him.
Having two forms of subscriptions were confusing to him.
Only has YouTube Memberships at the moment, still priced at $0.99 / $1.

Mold has taken over, no more brain to support the concept of TWO ways to support one person. Everything must be singular.

 

[TurboNAS]

View attachment 6128167
.

In a surprising turn of events Acer has closed down his Patreon.

Interesting that he doesn’t mention a Patreon as a source of income on his IFP application. It wasn’t likely to have been too terribly much but Mr. Stebbins seems to be forgetful of his income sources when reporting to the court.

The most surprising part of his video is that he sincerely thanked the last person that was subbed to him. That was an unexpected and classy thing to do. Good job Stebbins. Drop the lawsuits and do more of that stuff in the future.

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

The most surprising part of his video is that he sincerely thanked the last person that was subbed to him. That was an unexpected and classy thing to do. Good job Stebbins. Drop the lawsuits and do more of that stuff in the future.

This is the ONLY video he has released that I felt compelled to watch through to the end. I am very surprised he is able to be sincere, at all. I thought it was going to be angry seething.

In a rare compliment, good job Acerthorn you have made a watchable video.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

In a rare compliment, good job Acerthorn you have made a watchable video.

Very unusual. Acerthorn is usually copyright strike abusing the watchable videos on him

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

New filings in Zellzander's case.

Since I act as his representative here on KF he does not want me to attract unwanted ire, but does suggest that someone entertaining like MongolianMongoose make a post about them. Screenshot attached with new docket filings.

 

[DavidS877]

New filings in Zellzander's case.

Since I act as his representative here on KF he does not want me to attract unwanted ire, but does suggest that someone entertaining like MongolianMongoose make a post about them. Screenshot attached with new docket filings.

View attachment 6183014

Here are the new filings.

Also, not sure if it was posted here, but it's now:
8:24-cv-01486 District Court, C.D. California

Recap: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68923062/david-a-stebbins-v-cmdr-imperialsalt/

Ok kids, knock it off:


Judge appears to know what's coming:


And finally, "Y'all just shut the hell up and talk to each other with an adult in the room."

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This seems weird to me. I'm not positive Northern District Judge would have authority over a case in Central District, unlike what the Magistrate suggests. This might be a big win for Zander, if the Magistrate's theory holds weight.

This is even better. This suggests that the Magistrate does not think Zander waived his Rule 12 rights.

This is retarded, will go nowhere, and is waste of everyone's time. Still, a small price to pay for the other wins.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

View attachment 6183134
This seems weird to me. I'm not positive Northern District Judge would have authority over a case in Central District, unlike what the Magistrate suggests. This might be a big win for Zander, if the Magistrate's theory holds weight.
View attachment 6183158
This is even better. This suggests that the Magistrate does not think Zander waived his Rule 12 rights.

I know nothing about law, but I agree, this seems weird to me.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I wunder if Zell should accept a settlement offer?

I'm sure Stabby would take just about anything as he's dirt poor and more importantly really really really looking for that copyright win to boost up his chances with his other suits.

IMHO I would hope that Zell tells Stabby to stick it where the sun don't shine, which I guess is anywhere in Stabby's dank, filthy broom closet, just to prevent Stabby from using that ruling to browbeat other victims with.

But that's just me. You do whats best for you Zell.

 

[TurboNAS]

Hopefully the pro se clinic can give Zell good advice on how to proceed.

The original infringing content has been removed and a reaction/commentary video is in its place. Presumably there’s a decent fair use case there but that’s no guarantee. (Edit: wrong case)

What would a settlement look like? The content was valued at a dollar but Stebbins can argue that he lost revenue because this altered version was available elsewhere. From his IFP forms there seems to be an upper bound of $40 a month for total income from YouTube. I expect that’s primarily ad revenue vs subscriptions. It would be helpful to see his subscription stats for the last year. I suspect the real amount in controversy is a couple dollars.

Maybe a lawyer can recommend a reasonable settlement amount like $12 - a whole year of subscription! In return, a limited license for the content and settlement of the suit.

I’ve got a good feeling that both sides will reach a very reasonable amount and avoid further costly and time consuming litigation.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I’ve got a good feeling that both sides will reach a very reasonable amount and avoid further costly and time consuming litigation.

Your a very funny man my friend. Kudos

 

[AngryTreeRat]

This is even better. This suggests that the Magistrate does not think Zander waived his Rule 12 rights.

What does this actually mean in real terms to the case? From what I understand this refers to the requirement of responding within a timely manner and then lists a bunch of ways to ask the courts to dismiss the case based on certain defenses.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The original infringing content has been removed and a reaction/commentary video is in its place.

Neither of these are true. You are confusing this with a different recent case of Acerthorn's against a forum member.

I've got a good feeling that both sides will reach a very reasonable amount and avoid further costly and time consuming litigation.

Lol. Lmao even.

I wunder if Zell should accept a settlement offer?

Problem is, he's not going to get a settlement offer, he's going to get a capitulation demand. That is not worth accepting. There is also a problem in that I'm not sure what the settlement could achieve. As Zander contends, he has asked Null to delete his post, and Null refused. So, settlement can't help there. Zander also contends he is dirt poor. So, Acer can't really win there either.

What does this actually mean in real terms to the case?

This means that Acer was annoying enough to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Zander's chances just increased dramatically in my view.

 

[TurboNAS]

Neither of these are true. You are confusing this with a different recent case of Acerthorn's against a forum member.

Whoops. I’m going to need a “Who is Stebbins suing now?” Flowchart. I suppose the date on this lawsuit should have been a clue. It’s been going for a couple years.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Whoops. I’m going to need a “Who is Stebbins suing now?” Flowchart. I suppose the date on this lawsuit should have been a clue. It’s been going for a couple years.

Dear Stalker Child,

Your attemps to execute your felonious stalkings are very much inadequate, and has brought shame on all the stalker childs worldwide. Consider, Mr. Child, that the case you are thinking of is Stebbins v. Moon (2:24-cv-00140), which can be found here, and here.

Yours truly,

Stalker Child General Useful_Mistake.