Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Useful_Mistake]

 

[Bruno Powroznik]

View attachment 6282839

Stabby wants to milk another $10,000 from his cow

This nigger will never stop. WHY THE FUCK DID YOU SIGN THIS ZANDER, WHYYYYYYYY

 

[MongolianMongoose]

View attachment 6282839

Acerthorn says Jones owes him $10,000 for failing to declare net worth by August 5th.


But if you read docket 78's settlement agreement it actually says

If it is determined that Defendant’s net worth exceeds $6,000 excluding his car, Defendant will be liable under a liquidated damages provision where Defendant will be pay Plaintiff $10,000, payable over 2 years at a rate to be agreed to by the parties.

Since it wasn't determined that defendant's net worth exceeds $6,000 I don't understand why he would owe $10,000.

 

[ADN_VIII]

Acerthorn says Jones owes him $10,000 for failing to declare net worth by August 5th.
View attachment 6282923
View attachment 6282922
But if you read docket 78's settlement agreement it actually says

Since it wasn't determined that defendant's net worth exceeds $6,000 I don't understand why he would owe $10,000.

Acerthorn wants to be paid immediately, duh.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Vote for me this presidential cycle. The system has been corrupted beyond repair. This timeline has become terminal. My campaign promises to enact Eternal Recurrence until the human subconscious learns, over many cycles of the Recurrence, to reject the choices that lead us to this point.

We have either killed any God that may have been merciful to us, or outgrown their power; evidenced by this 'misery golem' has been given any kind of power to inflict his illness on others with the blessing of the system, thus it falls to us to fix this.

Also Sprach Zarathustra.

Yeah, I went there.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Hmm sounds like Stabby isn't too happy with the deal he made. He now wants far more then a measly 1200 bucks.

He's now after 10K because Jones hasn't immediately run out and done everything Stabby demanded. I guess that that settlement doesn't look so hot now does it Stabby? 1200 bucks is peanuts compared to a 100k payday.

The fact Jones doesn't even have 100 bucks to his name isn't Stabby's concern.

 

[Reticulan Joe]

Hmm sounds like Stabby isn't too happy with the deal he made. He now wants far more then a measly 1200 bucks.

He's now after 10K because Jones hasn't immediately run out and done everything Stabby demanded. I guess that that settlement doesn't look so hot now does it Stabby? 1200 bucks is peanuts compared to a 100k payday.

The fact Jones doesn't even have 100 bucks to his name isn't Stabby's concern.

WHY CAN'T I GET ANY BLOOD FROM THIS STONE!?!? I KEEP STABBING IT IN THE FACE!

 

[bile demon]

My wish is that Jones isn't special and in future Stebbins v. Moon filings we get the large font, bold and underlined yelling too. It's only fair.

Yep, it's lawsuit time.

 

[TurboNAS]

Since it wasn't determined that defendant's net worth exceeds $6,000 I don't understand why he would owe $10,000.

From the settlement agreement:
Defendant will execute a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that, excluding his single vehicle, he does not have assets worth more than $5,000 as of August 5, 2024.
 Defendant must make all reasonable efforts to cooperate with Plaintiff in confirming his net worth over the next 6 months (to be calculated from July 25, 2024).

Looks like he didn’t submit a declaration by August 5th.

If you read with a twisty sort of mind you could submit your declaration now and say “per the agreement as of August 5th I do not have assets exceeding X.” Then state that your declaration was to specify that by that date you didn’t meet the threshold, not that it was a command to produce the document by that date.

Then prepare for a tidal wave of objections and all caps shouting that you broke the AGREEMENT and must be punished forevermore.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Defendant will execute a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that, excluding his single vehicle, he does not have assets worth more than $5,000 as of August 5, 2024.

He did submit evidence to Acerthorn by that date, though, so that's a dead avenue

 

[anliteralidiot]

View attachment 6283244
View attachment 6283245View attachment 6283258View attachment 6283257
Yep, it's lawsuit time.

You forgot the brown mold!

 

[Redline of Sanity]

From the settlement agreement:
Defendant will execute a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that, excluding his single vehicle, he does not have assets worth more than $5,000 as of August 5, 2024.

Am I misreading this? I take that to ask for a declaration that "on August 5th, 2024, my net worth is no greater than $5000."

Like, "as of August 5, 2024" is the snapshot from which his net worth calculation starts, not the due date for his sworn declaration.

Open to correction if I'm misunderstanding. I guess it wouldn't surprise me with the settlement being as nutty as it already is. But if it were the due date I would have said something like, "will make the declaration no later than August 5, 2024."

 

[TurboNAS]

I don’t know if this document is in the thread yet but Jarrod did indeed point out that he was reading the August 5th date as a reference to his net worth and not a hard filing date.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.932665/gov.uscourts.cacd.932665.85.0.pdf

Stebbins now offers a new settlement, bring him the head (dox) of InitiativeKookie and all will be forgiven (Exhibit A). Man this gets stranger and stranger.

 

[Redline of Sanity]

I don’t know if this document is in the thread yet but Jarrod did indeed point out that he was reading the August 5th date as a reference to his net worth and not a hard filing date.

Ah, beat me to it.

It's no legal masterpiece, but honestly I think it gets the job done. I agree with his reading of the August 5 date, and he also points out that while he's trying to comply with the settlement, he has to keep pausing to respond to David's incessant motions. Can't say for certain in this arena, but I have to imagine in a pro se stupidity contest, the Court is probably likely to cut some slack to at least a decent showing of good faith. Or perhaps put another way, they'll be less likely to find in favor of the party who, less than one week after a settlement, is again flooding the docket with font-happy motions.

The InitiativeKookie bounty offer is kinda wild. I don't even know what to say about that.

I also got a kick out of the Court yeeting this thing right to the magistrate.

 

[AnOminous]

He did submit evidence to Acerthorn by that date, though, so that's a dead avenue

He kind of deserves this just for making a deal with the Devil a retarded wereturkey.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I don’t know if this document is in the thread yet

It wasn't.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Does Stabby even understand that InitiativeKookie is not a single person but a troll group?

Like I know Stabby thinks InitiativeKookie is his 2nd biggest enemy (after SidAlpha) but they haven't fucked with him in over 2 years as Acerthorn is pretty lame and gay and the milk he gives is dry and crusty and probably infected with mold.

I know Stabby can't "people" very well but surely someone has explained this to him by now right?



right?

 

[ADN_VIII]

Does Stabby even understand that InitiativeKookie is not a single person but a troll group?

Like I know Stabby thinks InitiativeKookie is his 2nd biggest enemy (after SidAlpha) but they haven't fucked with him in over 2 years as Acerthorn is pretty lame and gay and the milk he gives is dry and crusty and probably infected with mold.

I know Stabby can't "people" very well but surely someone has explained this to him by now right?



right?

Armchair psychology ahead: Acerthorn doesn't work like that. The details noted in his cases revolving the university of arkansas indicate to me that he perceives people who fuck with him in the way Kookie did as being singular malicious individuals as opposed to a collective operating with a shared goal. I would argue that it's not dissimilar to how Clyde Cash was for Chris back in the day; there was a singular troll that originally used the Clyde Cash handle but there were others with the same goal (fucking with Chris) that also used the name independently of the original and Chris regarded this as being one person instead of a collective.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

Acerthorn wants to sue InitiativeKookie again three years later? Isn't there a statute of limitations?
If he's trying track down InitiativeKookie again that means he sued the wrong person last time.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Isn't there a statute of limitations?

If you showed  what he is suing over, maybe we could answer your question.