Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
I'm sorry, did you just make a reasonable request?
Oh, nvm, I think he showed picture of the last lawsuit, and I misunderstood him. Well, anyway, depending on what he sues for, differing statues of limitation would apply. Most states have 1-3 years for defamation cases for example, if memory serves.
 
How is David even going to find "INITIATIVE KOO-KEY"? With all the monopoly money he has? Wereturkey can't even find the flies on his head, let alone someone calling him a fat faggot.
 
How is David even going to find "INITIATIVE KOO-KEY"? With all the monopoly money he has? Wereturkey can't even find the flies on his head, let alone someone calling him a fat faggot.
He might believe bringing this to court will make the cops back trace the Internet, idk
 
Zander case:
Screenshot 2024-08-09 232948.png
Court rules in Acerthorn's favor but Acerthorn objects that the court didn't rule in his favor hard enough
Court:
Screenshot 2024-08-09 233041.png
Acer:
Screenshot 2024-08-09 233054.png
 

Attachments

Court rules in Acerthorn's favor but Acerthorn objects that the court didn't rule in his favor hard enough
Quintessential Acerthorn with the immediate motion for reconsideration after any order that he doesn't like.

This latest sequence honestly made me laugh, because even though the Court basically agreed with Acerthorn and insisted on Jones filing the declaration, they completely ignored his request for money. I can only imagine his frustration as he scrawled the recon. motion.

Edit: But, the Court did note it was planning to rule on Acer's original liquidated damage motions (because Jones isn't cooperating fast enough or whatever) after Jones files the declaration, which further calls into question the wisdom of confronting the Court's present ruling with a "no, wrong, do it again" motion over this silly sub-plot.
 
Trust Acerthorn to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

Waiting a few weeks for his money is just too much to ask I guess. His high maintenance lifestyle requires those funds to continue!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles
Trust Acerthorn to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

Waiting a few weeks for his money is just too much to ask I guess. His high maintenance lifestyle requires those funds to continue!
Those raw dollar store hotdogs don't pay for themselves!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not a bee
How come the court system is unable to realize that this guy is filing SLAPP suit after SLAPP suit and don't just dismiss his lawfare suits. The courts must know that Acer doesn't hope to win, he hopes to sue people for free while they have to pay as a means of financially punishing them for daring to step on his massive ego.
 
How come the court system is unable to realize that this guy is filing SLAPP suit after SLAPP suit and don't just dismiss his lawfare suits. The courts must know that Acer doesn't hope to win, he hopes to sue people for free while they have to pay as a means of financially punishing them for daring to step on his massive ego.
The court system operates on the presumption that everyone using it is operating in good faith. Since it's near impossible to determine if someone is acting in good faith without them being terminally retarded and saying they're not, they have to treat all of the cases as though Stabby is operating in good faith. Thing like being declared a vexatious litigant is the court systems method of damage mitigation.
 
The court system operates on the presumption that everyone using it is operating in good faith. Since it's near impossible to determine if someone is acting in good faith without them being terminally retarded and saying they're not, they have to treat all of the cases as though Stabby is operating in good faith. Thing like being declared a vexatious litigant is the court systems method of damage mitigation.
It's just incomprehensibly retarded that after you get declared vexatious, which is seemingly VERY hard to do and Acer only managed it after several years, you can just pack it up and run the same exact scheme in another district. It's like whack-a-mole but the mole is a bald retard and the game is rigged.
 
It's just incomprehensibly retarded that after you get declared vexatious, which is seemingly VERY hard to do and Acer only managed it after several years, you can just pack it up and run the same exact scheme in another district. It's like whack-a-mole but the mole is a bald retard and the game is rigged.
I used to try to defend this, some rigamarole about the sancticty of the right to access to the courts, but at some point, once you hit Stabby level, they should just throw you in a retard asylum for the rest of your life so you can continue to fling your own shit at the wall forever until you die.
 
I used to try to defend this, some rigamarole about the sancticty of the right to access to the courts, but at some point, once you hit Stabby level, they should just throw you in a retard asylum for the rest of your life so you can continue to fling your own shit at the wall forever until you die.
I understand, the courts exist for the little guy to be able to hold institutions/people accountable. In Forma Pauperis is a good concept because you shouldn't be denied the ability to hold someone accountable due to poor finances.

But come on man, like you said at a certain point they should lose that ability. We should have the right not to be persecuted by a fat psychopath who can do this for free AND get paid in neetbux to do it.
 
Attachment #1 gov-uscourts-cacd-932665-88-0.pdf
Docket 88 of Stebbins v CmdrImperialSalt is filled with emails between Acerthorn and his copyright enforcer/slave, Jones.
My favorite part. Acerthorn whines about Kiwi Farms and compares this thread to a KKK meeting.
stebbinsvJones88_email.png
Jones is contractually obligated to respond to Acerthorn's harassing berating emails. SAD!
 
Docket 88 of Stebbins v CmdrImperialSalt is filled with emails between Acerthorn and his copyright enforcer/slave, Jones.
My favorite part. Acerthorn whines about Kiwi Farms and compares this thread to a KKK meeting.
View attachment 6303557
Jones is contractually obligated to respond to Acerthorn's harassing berating emails. SAD!
How to win friends and influence people.
 
Back